NL-12-2271, Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 14

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML12355A036)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 14
ML12355A036
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A036 (44)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2- IZý' Co0J Equip. Class 1? zi Equipment Description ,c-c-Lk ---v _w,-Location:

Bldg. r-vy Floor El. Z20' Room, Area (Z%53 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

4A',.Z-V oSA f NCZ..6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yi NEI UE] N/All Y' NDI UEI N/AD]Y*NE] UEI N/AD[Y* NDI UD- N/ADl Y( NE3 UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C3>PAGE 50 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- t1.\ý-V-Eý;-o0 ( Equip. Class'2 Equipment Description N C r- "'j Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YkNEI UI- N/AONEI U- N/AO NON U- N/AC Y14 NO U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NF UCl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: .4 -,'-1-1 )-')Ntles DO,-jC;-;'C

-vj 6~k(-~41--/~4Ib~

i-1 Date: c s- -2_'a< C-4 >PAGE 51 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSI N 1.now PAGE 52 of 433

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOV PAGE 53 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -J3D2-ft-o002 Equip. Class" Equipment Description

'4FA D L)r.V'Ve'.-

Location:

Bldg. Avg F Floor El. 2'J-- J Room, Area to Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recormmended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bcnt, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yl/N40 UD] N/AD Y[2/N-I U- N/AD-Y ND] UDI N/AD YI/NE UED N/AD Y$/N0 UD-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Clases of Equipment.

PAGE 54 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment 1D No. 2-_3o2___'__

_-_ Equip. Class"_Equipment Description 4/F/7-/ff

& 1 0^,..,VeW Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets ee from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[B/NE' U' N/ACI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,. UQJ N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YID/N 4/O UC N/AC Y0NCN UC Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Conimen ts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated.

by:, Date: --2zZ4: PAGE 55 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO y a t a -, PAGE 56 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status-D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2-13e?- V oo/ Equip. Class'2 z /Equipment Description C. h,-j&i, .fý-mj e T e Av,) /Location:

Bldg. C.6T,'J.f FloorEl. Z2.c; Room, Area , Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record theresults ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y['NEC of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y-' NO UF-C N/A[]Yf NE Ur- N/AC f" ýz C'ý'4k /V 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yb NEJ UO N/ACD YENEI UC N/AC--Ye1 NEI UC CEnter the equipment class namc from Appendix B: Classes of Equipmcnt.

<C-3 >PAGE 57 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 'oo/ Equip. Class"'Equipment Description a L..-r E -

Z Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

MO Qve, .Af ý pea- .--e 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YF OUO NIAUJ YO NOI UEJ NA Yl9/NO 110 N/AEJ YO/O U Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and fibund no other seismic conditions that could Y /No U1-'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

_7$e A -k ,,ý Cvpre-'k -Sl / F/-,.c, 4-re-.. 7i.-y 4 p o-C ,- a°, ck .7ý4 ,° 4:-,'. ct-."e. t , vpsT ', rý L Evaluated by: A*CC-C=~I:~tI~i Date: PAGE 58 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS100NO-U 74 PAGE 59 of 433 O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOVO PAGE 60 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 61 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. .2"4 7-?S(rS Equip., Class" 2 -Equipment Description SG6 ISd(. Steno,'t AA.Location:

Bldg. 1"X__ Floor El. I101O" Room, Area P- 130 Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended) (l"G, t ( J ,t C&'t01 4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other commrents.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3, Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration yefification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

J01-1" 'ý > , I(I-C'-YV NEI UD N/AE3 YW NO UyE N/AO Y[ NEI UD N/AD1 Y N U N/AD YNEI Urn lEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >, PAGE 62 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2- 007 -56,ý Equip. Class'" Equipment Description -qrB rsl{ s, In,;a tzb.{.... tS(TnSfrtA04jjf Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YýNE' U-' N/A[l Y4 NF' UF N/AQ Yý NO UD N/Ai"'X N- UD-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Hlave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

YNM UF Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.Date: -"- 7 -,<C-4 PAGE 63 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0)PAGE 64 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000-j -PAGE 65 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(C N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z oOý Q5H7 CrEquip. Class" 2 2o Equipment Description

_/1V,4C A/W6:l-Location:

Bldg: 4 Floor El. ZZO Room, Area szs-"2ýManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the resultq of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yg NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

2.l o8.Z7A go/,. /z. o 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y; NE UE N/AE Y; NEI UE N/AE YE NE UO NAA Yg NE. UE NIAE Yg NEIUE0 t1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B. Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 66 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-_/5 -0 6 5-Le' quip. Class'2 2,2 Equipment Description

/l-vAe pj,,4 L,.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YXNO UEI N/A0 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YD NI] UrI N/AI]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. -Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM NEI UE] NIAI]YXNnI UI]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NI--] UI]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

,')Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ,V 4't,"0 i5-41,V" /,.' Date: /-Z .0..-< C-4 >-PAGE 67 of 433 9 TTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOINPO a PAGE 68 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 69 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:, N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. --7 Equip. Class" 1 ,1 10 A'- 1I4 44D0:-f4'Equipment Description , f'-- C.O 1-.- acc.', -. .Location:

Bldg. Floor El. Room, Area FZ 1 t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

A~ AxI. -Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragxe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concretenear the anchors?S. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Notce This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ýNE] VE] N/AE]11 NE] UE- N/AE-ND NE] UE N/AE YE NE] UE N/An YXNE]UE U Enter th.e equiprment class name ftom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 ýPAGE 70 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-t-31 1-"7- 00 Equip. Class 1 2 1 24x tyPi.d EquipmentDescription , -O-'~)L (oL,-- U Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

NO UO N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y)' NC UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

(9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NEI ti N/AC Y?ýNO tiC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV NEI Ut adversely affect the safety fimctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SZ-~'5~\-

37--05-~ *:k L-J-~ ~~AC~5 '~Date; ~ ~i~~Evaluated by fj, we fr 6 zlý ý12-<C-4 >PAGE 71 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 U U I., a A PAGE 72 of 433 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.08 282012 PAGE 73 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID NO. Z- 224,A7"W/-

01*quip. Class" /a Equipment Description CO ,WU, A At' 4E&F lem, r'/r Location:

BIdg.e,9rT1POL FloorEL. Z~OO' Room, Area 44,61,_ _Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) e147., %, 4,R , Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3, Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is-more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

p,70iAJ&6 2 /1-V, z 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNCE uC N/AC YN NCI TC N/AC3 Y,% NCI UC N/AC Y4 NEI UTI N/AC Y/W NEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 74 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.2-/5?-,7'OfrO Equip. Class 1/8 Equipment Description C9 ,A R-C, R./W J'Fx x /-w/r Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NDI UD N/AD]Y NEID UD N/AD Y4 NED UD N/ACI YX'ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 0 A),V Evaluated by: /1 V() V/ CDae if ~7 ~< C-4 >-PAGE 75 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 NJ\I PAGE 76 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO ,I PAGE 77 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 4U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. A- /T .'CVO3 7-0O 3-O 0 0 OEquip. Class 1 2 9 -FAV.Equipment Description (i.'1. -\JA'r--' -O,,et T" CAILe- ,v, 1"' _ k --4v'- FA-Location:

Bldg. Tv,,We L- FloorEl. Z. I-). Room,Area P1P!,,,v-rj'"v,1'L LELA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI N)Q of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YEI No UEi N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NX UE] N/AE-oxidation?

I-4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE]I N u- N/AE]%-' C (Z X! .5t3 3 E53 G ' 1o/ A A %. ý D IA %,. ._f ý o l n L a Aoc " 'A 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NEI UE N/(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Nr-E UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1\12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 78 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID Equip. Class'2 Equipment Description t-:X )14, vJ Fi A , Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX NEI UF- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NO U[O N/AC and masonry blockwalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

/-9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXNCI UC N/A-Yý NEI UC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NCI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y, Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

< C-4 >PAGE 79 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*O PAGE 80 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOONO PAGE 81 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 82 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/51 ,47" O00. Equip. Class-2 A41R /- L[_,? -%, /0 Equipment Description 6LC-C 5X0',vt /i4(/ A1dC ,....... E--Location:

Bldg.. 4L Floor El. 1/, -Room, Area ?, OZ Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) e44P5y'el/

/WR &Z-L-'? 49' CAfNY Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yp No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than.mild surface oxidatiorn?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

,4 XZD00 4V eezqý 41-R 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YZ' NE UE] N/A[3 Y5 NE] U0 N/AC YQý NE] UEC N/AE]NX NEI U0 N/AE]YA NEI UE'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendi x B: Cltsses of Equipment.

<C-3>PAGE 83 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -/0-cA 0-a-Equip.

Clas0a 21 A000'4 b~/,VP e_Equipment Description e¢-C 5Wqlq 4AP IM-C * , Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI Ut N/AQ XNEI UO N/AD YX NEI UF N/AD YXNEI UD Other .Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary) f&otQý;Evaluated by: 4vdA\-ý MkI4LW waIdkwn Date: g2~..q.0'5o U<C-4 >)PAGE 84 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO 9.PAGE 85 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 9.PAGE 86 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 87 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOONO 08 29201 2 PAGE 88 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 89 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 0 U 5., Ct)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.
  • /5--A)7-t/7O uip. Cass 1 2) -Equipment Description P$Pý ( PCwJ -aA-io: (Room Firtr*A-Tom AAJO xH*k(4tr-GkAt Location:

Bldg. Floor El. I.'-fo' " Room, Area I? /Z-t'i Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

A lertc.A-I , 9ir td I f--l" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yd NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?LI- -tLkQ C(5)WdW 0& O3SOV * £5 'Z(r-- ~C)-r4N Yt NOl UI] N/AD Y4 NEI UE N/AD XY NDI U-1 N/A[-Y19 NEI UD N/ADl ylý NI UQ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Oro-,j,& : ZY.o'-Wrt-Z-7,*-6; ,-6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )PAGE 90 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2 -'°-c Equip. Class 1 2 I0 ti Equipment Description " -, f-,'-Co.J (Zc1oA l-o ) -L -C -Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yp NO UO N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Nil ULi N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y'M NO UF N/A" C"C,,../-'lo'

.',,..f, as T 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y) ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND UD" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/Cormments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) (cvcý-.t'c W O' i4E z f'~c-~ ~ t1.VA Z) -ý 0 VAr>'.ý&~

A .~-t1- L%. TL -~o-c~1 ,~7 Iicjjf-.ý z-) D..., z'L Evaluated by:.ýý-ef -4)1'1ý ý/--Wot /'-(-Date: Ot_ 4- 6 o/0-V/ZO/PAGE 91 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 92 of 433

  • ' ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02 VERSIO 9 N0 PAGE 93 of 433
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2271,_Vogtle,_Unit_2,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._1.0,_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Part_3_of_14&oldid=908768"