NL-12-168, Indian Point Energy Center - Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 2 of 4

Indian Point Energy Center - Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 2 of 4

ML12353A467
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	11/20/2012
From:	Farah M Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-168 IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0
Download: ML12353A467 (197)

Text

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-133 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[R NI I UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. MS-PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description 32 ABFP STEAM SUPPLY Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y] NI:]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y] Nil Ui N/AEl The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near tile anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Y[ NEl U[: N/A[ l YE NE-- U-- N/AD1 I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-134 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ ND- U[i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. MS-PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description 32 ABFP STEAM SUPPLY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I N -1 UI N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The base plate configuration and anchor bolt spacing are different from Dwg 9321-F-60825 The anchor bolt spacing is greater than that shown on the design drawing and is therfore conservative.

The vertical post is a square tube rather than a channel as shown on Dwg 9321-F-60825.

This is conservative since the tube has greater section modulus than the channel.CR IP3-2012-3394 has been written to correct the documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI uDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The discrepancies as described in item 5 above are conservative and therefore the support is adequate.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NDI UD N/AD-YZ NDI uDl N/ADl YN NDI uD- N/ADl Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-135 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NE I Ui--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. MS-PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description 32 ABFP STEAM SUPPLY 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[: UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[:] UFi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The minimum edge distance of one anchor is about 4" which is potentially less than the acceptable minimum.However, the base plate supports a spring can, which will only exert gravity loading on the base plate.Therefore, there will be no tension due to bending or uplift and there will be no shear loading. Therefore, the reduction in edge distance is not a seismic concern. CR-IP3-2012-03394 has been issued to resolve the configuration record.

References:

932 1-L-60825 Pipe Support Details 9321-F-21253-13 Auxiliary Feed Pump Building, Turbine Supply and Exhaust Piping Plans and Sections AWC-014 Date: 10/16/2012 Evaluated by: Stethen Yuan 10/16/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-136 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NR U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-034 Equipment ID No. MS-PCV-1310A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description 32 ABFP STEAM SUPPLY Photographs Photographs Note: MS-PCV-1310A Note: Anchor bolt has about 4" edge distance.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-137 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P3 Status: YN ND UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. MS-PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description 32 ABFP STEAM SUPPLY Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 32-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora-ge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is tile item one YZ ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YIZ Nil U[i N/ADl The anchorage is free of bent, broken and missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YM ND UDJ N/AD-oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NDl UDl N/AD anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-138 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YIZ ND UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. MS-PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description 32 ABFP STEAM SUPPLY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI-- NN u-I N/ALi (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The support has a horizontal tube at the base whereas the design drawing 9321-L-60825, Sheet 26 shows the vertical steel continuing to the base plate.The vertical post is not concentric with the base plate as detailed on the design drawing 9321-L-60825, Sheet 26.The post is a tube steel section whereas the design drawing 9321-L-60825, Sheet 26, shows a channel CR-IP3-2012-03394 has been written to investigate these differences.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEll NN ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No see answer to #5 above.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

YN ND UID N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NDI UD3 N/AD]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent tubes are not restrained.

By engineering judgement this is not considered a seismic risk for this equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI UDl N/AD]Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-139 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ N[-D U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. MS-PCV-1310B Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description 32 ABFP STEAM SUPPLY 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NF'1 Uil of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] NEIl uI'I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawing 9321-L-60825 sht. 26, Hanger no. MS-H-1027-20-V AWC-013 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/16/2012 Date: 10/16/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-140 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-- UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-035 Equipment ID No. MS-PCV-1310B Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description 32 ABFP STEAM SUPPLY Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Support arrangement Note: Equipment tag Note: Support arrangement EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-141 of 409 ATTACHME Sheet 1 c ENT 9.6 f4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP3 Status: YM ND U[II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. CH-MOV-441 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 31 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV Location:

Bldg. PP Floor El. 41-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ N E]Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE ND UD N/AD YE NO uD N/AD-YE ND U[-- N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-142 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NDI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl--036 Equipment ID No. CH-MOV-441 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 31 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NDi UD- N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI UDI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ ND: UD- N/ADl Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI UDl N/ADJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDJ uD- N/AD-Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-143 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ Ni D UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. CH-MOV-441 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description 31 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI uI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-L-60139,Sht 39, 40, R1, PAB/PIPE TRENCH AREA CHEMICAL & VOLUME CONTROL PIPE SUPPORT DETAILS 9321-F-26773-33, COMPOSITE PIPING IN TRENCHES SHEET NO 2.SEWS 31 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV AWC-038 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/24/12 10/24/12 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-144 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-036 Equipment ID No. CH-MOV-441 Equipment Description 31 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV IP3 Status: YE N-- U-Equip. Class 1 8 Photographs Note: STEEL SUPPORT FRAME Note: ANOTHER VIEW OF CH-MOV-441 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-145 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P3 Status: YE ND- UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. CH-MOV-442 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 32 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV Location:

Bldg. PP Floor El. 41-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NDI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YN Nil UD-- N/A[: Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.YN NDI uDl N/ADl Y[ NEI u-- N/ADl Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-146 of 409 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: YZ N--I UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. CH-MOV-442 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 32 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEil UD- N/AD--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ ND UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND-- UD- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE ND UD N/AD'Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI uD--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-147 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P3 Status: Y[ NI D UD-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. CH-MOV-442 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 32 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEil UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Dwg 9321-L-60139,Sht 39, 40, R1, PAB/PIPE TRENCH AREA CHEMICAL & VOLUME CONTROL PIPE SUPPORT DETAILS 9321-F-26773-33, COMPOSITE PIPING IN TRENCHES SHEET NO 2.SEWS 32 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VL V AWC-038 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/24/2012 K k~/Paul Date: 10/24/2012 Paul Huebsch EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-148 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YZ NI I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-037 Equipment ID No. CH-MOV-442 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description 32 RCP SEAL INJ CTMT ISO VLV Photographs I Note: CH-MOV-442 Note: STEEL SUPPORT FRAME EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-149 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Photographs I I Note: Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-150 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NR UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. CH-SOV-110A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CH-FCV-110A SOLENOID VALVE Location:

Bldg. PA Floor El. 80-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-- N[Z No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name froom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NO UE1 N/AD Y[ NO UDi N/A--YE NEI UD N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-151 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ ND I UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. CH-SOV-110A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description CH-FCV-110A SOLENOID VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NDI UEI- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since the anchorage is attached to steel.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI uil potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE] ND-I UL7 N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDi UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDi UD- N/AD-Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDl uD'of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-152 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NFD UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. CH-SOV-110A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description CH-FCV-110A SOLENOID VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] Nil Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SEWS Sheet Boric Acid Flow Ctrl 9321-F-25863-35 Primary Auxiliary Building, Composie Piping Arrangement at El 73'-0", Sheet No. 3 9321-F-70413-11 Primary Auxiliary Building Instrument Arrangement Sheet No. 2 Instrumentation AWC-026 Cf- A V, I EVdlUd alU Illl Date: 10/22/12 Y 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-153 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NFI1 U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-039 Equipment ID No. CH-SOV-110A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description CH-FCV-110A SOLENOID VALVE Photographs I I Note: CH-FCV-110A SOLENOID VALVE Note: Name tag EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-154 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE N-- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. CT-LCV-1158-1 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description COND STORAGE TANK TO CONDENSERS CT-LCV-1158-1 SOLENOID Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18"'6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No. the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YO NZ YO NO LIO N/AH Not applicable as valve is a in-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YOl NEI UL] N/AN Not applicable as valve is a in-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YO] NEI uOE N/AZ Not applicable as valve is a in-line valve.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YO] NE] u- N/A[Not applicable as valve is a in-line valve.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-155 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP3 Status: Y[ ND- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. CT-LCV-1158-1 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description COND STORAGE TANK TO CONDENSERS CT-LCV-1158-1 SOLENOID 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y] NDI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI urI N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UDl N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UD-! N/AD-Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Y[ NO UiD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-156 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 3 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM'P3 Status: YN N-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. CT-LCV-1158-1 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description COND STORAGE TANK TO CONDENSERS CT-LCV-1158-1 SOLENOID Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings:

9321-F-20183, Rev 61, Flow diagram condensate

& boiler feed pump suction.AWC-012 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/12/12 Date: 10/12/2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-157 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YEZ N[-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-040 Equipment ID No. CT-LCV-1158-1 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description COND STORAGE TANK TO CONDENSERS CT-LCV-1158-1 SOLENOID Photographs Note: CT-LCV-1 158-1 Note: EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-158 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YZ ND- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 SUPPLY Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 73-8" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is not a part of the anchor configuration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YDi NE Y[Z ND: ULIE- N/AD--YE NEI uD-- N/AD--There is evidence of minor surface corrosion only.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YO NE UI N/ADE At the point of attachment of the support frame to the concrete, the concrete is free of visible cracks.Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-159 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NW] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1230 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 SUPPLY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[j NWi ULi N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NWl ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ NDl ULi N/ADl Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UWl N/ADJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NWl UW- N/A[W Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDl UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-160 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NI I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1230 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 SUPPLY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ Nil UL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-32963-19 Conduit Layout, Auxillary Boiler Feed Pump Area -Sh 2 9321-F-70093-19 Instrument Air Supply, Sheet 2, Instrumentation and Restraint and Support Design IP3V-0041-0001 R2, Main Steam Stop Valve Panel Board w/Controls and 9" Air Cylinder Dashpot and Accumulator Mounting AWC-017 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/17/2012 Paul Huebsch Date: 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-161 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YIZ NI D UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-041 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 SUPPLY Photographs r I Note: Equipment tag Note: Cage surrounding valve Note: VIeW U/ support fdrFme Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-162 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE NR UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1233 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 SUPPLY Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 73-8" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora-ge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD NE This is not a part of the anchor configuration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YN NEI U[J N/AD1 YN ND UD- N/ADl There is evidence of minor surface corrosion only.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?At the point of attachment of the support frame to the concrete, the concrete is free of visible cracks.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE ND U0 N/AD1 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-163 ofO40 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 SEISMIC WALKODOWN CHECKLIST FORM Status: YN ND- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1233 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 SUPPLY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NDI U[L N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NI U[i-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NDI UDi N/ADJ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND UD- N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIE NDT UD-I N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDJ uID of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-164 of 409 ATTACHIMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1133 Status: Y[ NIII UF-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1233 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 SUPPLY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[l U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-32963-19 Conduit Layout, Auxiliary Boiler Feed Pump Area -Sh 2 9321-F-70093-19 Instrument Air Supply, Sheet 2, Instrumentation and Restraint and Support Design IP3V-0041-0001 R2, Main Steam Stop Valve Panel Board wiControls and 9"Air Cylinder Dashpot and Accumulator Mounting AWC-017 PX/nlilntari h/s S£t~nh en Yuan Date: 10/17/2012ýAýf ýDate: 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-165 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-042 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1233 E Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 SUPPLY Status: YEZ NR-] U--quip. Class 1 8 Photographs I I I Note: Name tag.ea Note: View of valve in cage I EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-166 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ ND] UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1230 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 EXHAUST SOLENOID Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 73'-8" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is not a part of the anchor configuration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YEI N[E YEZ ND UD- N/ADI Y[ ND I U- N/ADl There is evidence of minor surface corrosion only.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NJ uDJ N/AR At the point of attachment of the support frame to the concrete, the concrete is free of visible cracks.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-167 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NiDI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 EXHAUST SOLENOID 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEl NDI ULJ N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDJ urI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NDl UD- N/AD-Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI Ui- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UD- N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yr ND: uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-168 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE ND1 UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 EXHAUST SOLENOID Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U--i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-32963-19 Conduit Layout, Auxiliary Boiler Feed Pump Area -Sh 2 9321-F-70093-19 Instrument Air Supply, Sheet 2, Instrumentation and Restraint and Support Design IP3V-0041-O001 R2, Main Steam Stop Valve Panel Board wiControls and 9"Air Cylinder Dashpot and Accumulator Mounting AWC-017)ýVýEvaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/17/2012 Date: 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-169 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NF-R U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-043 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1230 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 EXHAUST SOLENOID Photographs Note: Name tag Note: View of support frame Note: Cage surrounding valve Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No, IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-170 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 1 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP3 Status: YZ ND I UD-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-044 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1233 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 EXHAUST SOLENOID Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 73'-8" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is not a part of the anchor configuration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

There is evidence of minor surface corrosion only.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?At the point of attachment of the support frame to the concrete, the concrete is free of visible cracks.Y] ND U-iD N/AD-YE NDI UD1 N/AD YE NEI UD- N/AD Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-171 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ ND I UD]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-044 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1233 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 EXHAUST SOLENOID 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NDI UD] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI ULI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE NDJ U[I: N/AD Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND- UDEl N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDl uD-- N/ADJ Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-172 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NIj UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-044 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1233 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 EXHAUST SOLENOID Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEIl UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-32963-19 Conduit Layout, Auxillaty Boiler Feed Pump Area -Sh 2 9321-F-70093-19 Instrument Air Supply, Sheet 2, Instrumentation and Restraint and Support Design IP3V-0041-O001 R2, Main Steam Stop Valve Panel Board w/Controls and 9"Air Cylinder Dashpot and Accumulator Mounting AWC-017)q Date: 10/17/2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-173 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ ND-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-044 Equipment ID No. MS-SOV-1233 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description SG#31 MAIN STM ISOLATION VALVE 31 EXHAUST SOLENOID Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Cage surrounding valve Note: View of support frame I Note: View of valve in cage EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-174 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P3 Status: YE N[-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. PAB SUPPLYFAN Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description PRIMARY Location:

Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchor bolts of the fan and motor are severely corroded.

It is more than mild surface oxidation.

CR IP3-2012-03624 has been written to remedy this condition.

There is a considerable amount of water on the floor indicating possible leakage from piping in the area. No obvious points of leakage were noted. LB-20 evaluation is generated to analyze the corroded anchor bolts.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NEI YE ND UDl N/A[-YDI NO UD N/AD1 YO NDI UID N/AD-Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-175 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P3 Status: Y[ Nn U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. PAB SUPPLYFAN Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description PRIMARY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NO U-- N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchor bolt layout is different from SEWS PAB SUPPORT FAN.The motor has only two support points on one end and connects to the fan base frame at other end. The SEWS shows four anchor points and treats the motor as an independent object in its calculation.

The SEWS calculation does not match as-built situation in the field. CR IP3-2012-03624 has been written to remedy this condition.

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with calculation IP3-CALC-PABHV-02202.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E ND LUI]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YN NDI UID- N/ADJ YEE NDI UD3 N/AD1 YM NDI UD N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-176 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P3 Status: Y[ NEil UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. PAB SUPPLYFAN Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description PRIMARY 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI- U--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N-- U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Expansion joint at fan outlet is degraded and partially missing. Needs to be fixed.CR IP3-2012-03625 has been written to remedy this condition.

There are three latches on the access door to the plenum and the bottom latch swings freely and does not secure the door panel. CR-IP3-2012-03655 has been written to remedy this condition.

Reference:

SEWS PAB SUPPLY FAN IP3V-439-0168 9321-F-70583 RI 1, PAB INSTRUMENT ARRANGEMENT SHT. NO. 5 9321-F-30843-34, CONDUIT LAYOUT PAB EL. 41'9321-F-40403-7, PAB HEATING AND VENTILATION SECTIONS -SHTNO.3 AWC-035 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/24/2012 Paul Huebsch Date: 10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-177 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YE ND-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. PABSUPPLYFAN Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description PRIMARY Photographs I I Note: Sign outside the room.Note: Support corrosion at near side.Note: Support near motor.Note: Expansion joint at fan ot and partially missing.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-178 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: YN Nr-] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-045 Equipment ID No. PAB SUPPLYFAN Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description PRIMARY Note: Support at far side of the fan.Note: Close up. The anchor bolts to the concrete floor are severelly corroted.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-179 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NEI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-046 Equipment ID No. VC PURGE/PAB EXH 31 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description 31 PAB EXHUAST FAN (31 PABEF)Location:

Bldg. FB Floor El. 72'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Observed two bolts nuts in the southeast comer of the fan that between one or two threads that are not engaged. SWES judged this to be acceptable since the rest of the bolts have sufficient engagment.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yi- NO YIO NEI UrI N/ADJ YO Nil ui- N/AD--Y0 NEI UL-] N/AL]Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-180 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: ND-- Ui-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-046 Equipment ID No. VC PURGEJPAB EXH 31 Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description 31 PAB EXHUAST FAN (31 PABEF)5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NEI UD- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEl U--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YlN NE] UE-] N/AD]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UDJ N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDl U[D] N/AD--Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[Z NDI uDýof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-181 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NiIl UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-046 Equipment ID No. VC PURGE/PAB EXH 31 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description 31 PAB EXHUAST FAN (31 PABEF)Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-25133-14, FAN ROOM & PIPING TRENCH GENERAL ARRANGEMENT SECTIONS 9321-F-40883-2, DRAIN PRIMARY AUXILIARY BUILDING EXHAUST CONTAINMENT BUILDING PURGE & CONTAINMENT BUILDING PRESSURE RELIEF FIL TER SYSTEM PLAN & SECTION 9321-F-40823-5, FAN HOUSE PRIMARY AUXILIARY BUILDING EXHAUST & CONTAINMENT BUILDING PURGE FILTER SYSTEM PLAN 9321-F-40833-4, FAN HOUSE PRIMARYAUXILIARY BUILDING EXHAUST & CONTAINMENT BUILDING PURGE FILTER SYSTEM SECTION & DETAIL 9321-F-40333-15, FAN HOUSE PRIMARY AUXILIARY BUILDING FUEL STORAGE BUILDING &CONTAINMENT BUILDING EXHAUST PURGE & DILUTION FANS PLANS 9321-F-40853-7, FAN HOUSE PRIMARY AUXILIARY BUILDING EXHAUST & CONTAINMENT BUILDING PURGE & CONTAINMENT BUILDING PRESSURE RELIEF FILTER SYSTEM DIAGRAMS IP3V-439-1524-1 SEWS for 31 PABEF AWC-039_Date: 10/24/12 Evaluated by: Maqgie Farah KaiLo /c 10/2412 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-182 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 1P3 Status: YE Nr-- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-046 Equipment ID No. VC PURGE/PAB EXH 31 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description 31 PAB EXHUAST FAN (31 PABEF)Photographs Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-183 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ Ni I UiD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-047 Equipment ID No. 34 ELEC TUNL EXH FAN Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EL TNL EXHAUST FAN 34 (UPPER)Location:

Bldg. ET Floor El. 46'-0" Room, Area FAN ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name fi'om EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NO U[- N/AD-Y[ ND Ur- N/AL]YE NO uDl N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-184 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE ND- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-047 Equipment ID No. 34 ELEC TUNL EXH FAN Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description EL TNL EXHAUST FAN 34 (UPPER)5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE ND- urI N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS for O034ETEF.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI uD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Y0 NDI uD N/AD Y[ NDI UD N/AD Y[D NDI uD N/AD YE NO U-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-185 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NDi U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-047 Equipment ID No. 34 ELEC TUNL EXH FAN Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EL TNL EXHAUST FAN 34 (UPPER)Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SEWS for 0034ETEF SEWS for 003 1ETEF 9321-F-40543-3, ELECTRICAL TUNNEL MCB & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING VENTILATION SCHEMATIC PLAN & SECTIONS 9321-F-40553-6, ELECTRICAL TUNNEL VENTILATION EQUIPMENT ROOM ELEVATION 65'-0" PLAN & SECTIONS IP3V-439-0022, Rev. 1 AWC-040 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: -10/24/12 KaiLo /10/24/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-186 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NnIl UnL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-047 Equipment ID No. 34 ELEC TUNL EXH FAN Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description EL TNL EXHAUST FAN 34 (UPPER)Photographs Note: 34 El Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-187 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P3 Status: Y[ Ni I Ui--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. F-313 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description WALL FAN-313-AB Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 32'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NEl Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No concrete anchors. The assembly is welded to a steel frame.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Not applicable since the fan housing is welded to a frame by 8-3/8"'bolts and the frame is welded to embed.Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YIE NDi UD- N/A--YE ND UD- N/A--YEi NDI uDI N/AN EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-188 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P3 Status: YIE NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. F-313 Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description WALL FAN-313-AB

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NDi UL- N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with the documentation per drawings IP3V-208-12.6-0007 and 9321-F-40433.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NDi uD--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

Y[ NDl UDl N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD- N/ADJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI uD- N/AD-]Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[E NDl uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-189 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NI I UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. F-313 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description WALL FAN-313-AB Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nil U-I1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-40433-5, MISCELLANEOUS PLTAREAS & BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM PLAN SECTION & DETAIL IP3V-208-12.6-0007, Rev. 2 SEWS for AFPB EXH FAN/DAMPER AWC-013 C~d~ A , #-U -r-valuate Date: 10/16/2012

.7 9;, /fL~~~Paul Huebsch Date: 10/16/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-190 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YZ NF-D Ui-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-048 Equipment ID No. F-313 Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description WALL FAN-313-AB Photographs I Note: Equipment tag Note: Fan at wall EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-191 of 409 ATRACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P3 Status: YZ Nr- UD]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-048 Equipment ID No. F-313 Equipment Description WALL FAN-313-AB Equip. Class 1 9 Note: Light fixture at fan EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-192 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YZ Ni-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-054 Equipment ID No. CCRA.C. UNIT 31 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 31 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, A/C EQUIPMENT ROOM Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ N[l Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NEI ULI N/Ar]YN N-I U-- N/A-YZ NO U-I N/A[l EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-193 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NF UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-054 Equipment ID No. CCRA.C. UNIT 31 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 31 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NrI U-- N/Ar-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS for Control Room A/C Unit 31. See list of eferences under comments.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDi UEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

SQUG analyzed the supports for lateral loading due to seismic shear loading and found the support acceptable.

Therefore, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There is a masonry block wall immediately adjacent to the item and there are equipment supports attached to the wall. If the wall were to fail laterally, it would impact the item. The wall was analyzed as part of IEB 80-11 (wall 53B,calculation 6604.210-1-CB-OO1-Q) and found to be satisfactory.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YE NEI UDl N/A[-]Y[ NDI Uil N/AD-YZ NDI uDI N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-194 of409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YN Ni I U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-054 Equipment ID No. CCR A.C. UNIT 31 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 31 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[: ULi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI- ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SEWS for Control Room A/C Unit 31 Calculation 6604.210-1-CB-001-Q 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING 9321-F-20152, Rev. 1, CONTROL BUILDING EL 15'-O"ADDITION OF TCV-1310,1311,1312

& 1313 TO A.C.UNITS

1. 31&32 PLANS & SECTIONS AWC-003 Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Maqie Farah _Date: 10/09/2012 Date: 10/09/2012 Date: 10/09/2012 Kai Lo /c 6 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-195 of 409 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YN Nr- UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-054 Equipment ID No. CCR A.C. UNIT 31 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 31 Photographs Note: Equipment Tag EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-196 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[Z ND- UD-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-055 Equipment ID No. CCRA.C. UNIT 32 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 32 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, A/C EQUIPMENT ROOM Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NEI Y[ NEI U-] N/A--YIZ NEI UEi N/A--YIN NDI U-I N/AD-Yes, anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-197 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NI-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-055 Equipment ID No. CCRA.C. UNIT 32 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 32 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ ND UI- N/AEI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS for Control Room A/C Unit 32 and 31. See list of references under comments.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND uD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

SQUG analyzed the supports for lateral seismic loading and found the support acceptable.

Therefore, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YE NO UD N/AD Y[ ND:] UD1 N/AD YN ND UD N/AD YN ND-] UD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-198 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NFII UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-055 Equipment ID No. CCRA.C. UNIT 32 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 32 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[E Nl uil-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SEWS for Control Room A/C Unit 32 and 31 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING 9321-F-20152, Rev. 1, CONTROL BUILDING EL 15'-O"ADDITION OF TCV-1310,1311,1312

& 1313 TO A.C.UNITS

1. 31&32 PLANS & SECTIONS AWC-003 Evaluated by: MKai~ Fo Lq-Kai Lo ~ I Date: 10/0912012 Date: 10/09/2012 Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-199 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NLI- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-055 Equipment ID No. CCRA.C. UNIT 32 Equip. Class 1 11 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 32 Photographs Note: EQUIPMENT TAG Note: CONTROL ROOM A/C UNIT 32 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-200 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: NF- ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-056 Equipment ID No. 31 IA COMPRESSOR Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 31 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, SWITCHGEAR ROOM Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NW of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?* Signifies that the nut is not fully SN engaged, approximately one thread of disengagement Nut was not visible.Motor 5/8" diameter anchor bolt edge distance violation was addressed by the SQUG evaluation and found to be acceptable.

CR-IP3-2012-03156 determined that the lack of engagement did not reduce the anchor capacity.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NEI ui-- N/A-J YE NW uW- N/ADJ Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-201 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NDT UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-056 Equipment ID No. 31 IA COMPRESSOR Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 31 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ ND:] U-I N/AD--anchors?There is some concrete spall (approximately 6" below the top of concrete) at the south west comer of the compressor pedestal.

There is no cracking of the concrete.

The spall is not considered detrimental to the function of the support.Grout at the motor was chipped for installation of the missile shield.There is no impact on the structural strength of the support.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NDI UD- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is consistent with 9321-F-19543-10.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM NDI uD- N/AD1 Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NI uD N/AD]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDl UD1 N/AD1 Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-202 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YIE NEI U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-056 Equipment ID No. 31 IA COMPRESSOR Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 31 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE Nil UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Missile shield adjacent to the compressor and motor is well anchored and does not have a seismic interaction consideration.

References:

9321-F-19543-10, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN AT EL. 15'-O" 9321-F-10623-5, CONTROL BUILDING REINFORCE DETAILS SLAB AT ELEVATION 15'-0" & 33X-0" 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING IP3V-92-63-0006, Rev. 1 SEWS for INSTAIR COMP 31 AWC-002 Evaluated by: CXA QLJ Date: 10/09/2012 Date: 10/09/2012 Ma.. ie Farah Jqiý-Kai Lo /c 6 Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-203 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI- UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-056 Equipment ID No. 31 IA COMPRESSOR Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 31 Photographs Note: Instrument Air Compressor

1. 31 Tag Note: Instrument Air Compressor

1. 31 Full View EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-204 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ ND UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. 32 IA COMPRESSOR Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 32 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, SWITCHGEAR ROOM Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE Nil Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?* Signfies bolt on motor with lack of full nut engagement, approximately one thread of N disengagment.

One bolt in the compressor anchor bolt group was not visible.Motor 5/8" diameter anchor bolt edge distance violation was addressed by the SQUG evaluation and determined to be acceptable.

CR-IP3-2012-03156 was issued to address the lack of full nut engagement.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NDI UiD N/ADl YIZ NDI uD1 N/A-]Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0. Page C-205 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NI I ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. 32 IA COMPRESSOR Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 32 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEil U[i] N/AMl anchors?Grout at the motor was chipped for installation of the missile shield.There is no impact on the structural strength of the support.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NDI ULI N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing 9321-F-19543-10.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND] UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YED NDI UD N/AN 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI UDl N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDi uDj N/ADl Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-206 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ ND-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. 32 IA COMPRESSOR Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 32 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEil UI--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil U[I: adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-19543-10, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN AT EL. 15"-0" 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING 9321-F-30513-48, ELECTRICAL NODES FOR EQUIPMENT IN CONTROL BUILDING 9321-F-10623-5, CONTROL BUILDING REINFORCE DETAILS SLAB AT ELEVATION 15'-0" & 33-0" IP3V-92-63-0006, Rev. 1 AWC-002 Evaluated by: Date: 10/09/2012 Maqigie Farah Kai Lo Date: 10/09/2012 6_ Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-207 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-057 Equipment ID No. 32 IA COMPRESSOR Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR

1. 32 Photographs Note: Back View of Instrument Air Compressor

1. 32 Note: Front View of Instrument Air Compressor

1. 32 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-208 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE ND i u-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-058 Equipment ID No. EDG-32-COMP Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description 32 EDG AIR COMP Location:

Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, 32 DIESEL GENERATOR Area ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NEJ YN NI U-] N/ADl YE NEl UrI N/AEl YZ NEI UiD N/ADl The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-209 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YN ND- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-058 Equipment ID No. EDG-32-COMP Ec Equipment Description 32 EDGAIR COMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with 9321-F-10543.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Iuip. Class 1 12 Y[ NDI uDl N/AD YE NDI uF-1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YZ ND'- UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO ND UDl N/AD--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Observed overhead grating that is well supported.

Therefore, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NDI UDl N/AD Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO ND uD-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-210 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YN N[-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-058 Equipment ID No. EDG-32-COMP Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description 32 EDG AIR COMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-10543-10, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN AT EL. 15'-0" 9321-F-22513-9, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT ELEVATIONS 9321-F-22583-19, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING FUEL OIL & JACKET WATER PIPING SH I Calc. No. IP3-CALC-EDG-03579, Rev. 0 SEWS for EDG-32-COMP AWC-020 Evaluated by: Maqqie Farah Date: 10/19/12-Aýq-Steohen Yuan 10/19/12 Steohen Yuan EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-211 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y0 NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-058 Equipment ID No. EDG-32-COMP Equip. Class 1 12 Equipment Description 32 EDG AIR COMP Photographs Note: 32 EDG air compressor Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-212 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YZ ND I U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-059 Equipment ID No. 31MGS-COUP Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 31 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (31 MG SET)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.Reference Drawing 9321-F-10553.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The generator base plate has 3 bolt holes on each side, each with a shim. The center hole does not have an anchor bolt but there is no corresponding hole in the support frame. It is to be determined whether this anchor configuration is adequate.

LB-02 was performed to assess this variation of the anchorage.

This evaluation validates that the existing bolt configuration is adequate.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YEZ NDl Y[ NI LiD N/A[:]YN NiD U-] N/ADl Anchors are free of corrosion and mild surface oxidation 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of'Equipment.

YE NI uDl N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-213 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ ND UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-059 Equipment ID No. 31MGS-COUP Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 31 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (31 MG SET)5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YU ND UD N/AOj (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The support frame is bolted to the floor with 6-3/44"anchors which is consistant with Drawing 9321-F-10553.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y] NDI UFI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

It does not apply because there is no soft target on this equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The block wall for Battery Room 32 is adjacent to the equipment.

This wall was evaluated as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis and found to be adequate for seismic loading (Reference Calculation 6620.210-1-CB-001-L, wall 52B). There is no seismic concern.Fluorescent bulbs are not secured in the fixtures but are judged not to be a seismic consideration for this rigid equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[ll ND U-] N/A[YN ND UDl N/AD-Yr ND uID N/ADl Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-214 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ ND U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-059 Equipment ID No. 31MGS-COUP Equip. Class' 13 Equipment Description 31 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (31 MG SET)Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[i URi-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-10553-11, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERA TOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN AT EL. 33-0" 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING A WC-007 Evaluated jqw;ýý-Maaaie Farah Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Kai Lo /C( 6 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-215 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-059 Equipment ID No. 31MGS-COUP Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 31 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (31 MG SET)Photographs Note: 31 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (31 MG SET)Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-216 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NI I UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-060 Equipment ID No. 32MGS-COUP Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 32 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (32 MG SET)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y!Z NO The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The generator base plate has 3 bolts holes on each side (no shims are visible).

The center hole does not have an anchor bolt but there is no corresponding hole in the support frame. It is to be determined whether this anchor configuration is adequate.

LB-02 was performed to assess this variation of the anchorage.

This evaluation validates that the existing bolt configuration is adequate.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y[ NEI u- N/A-YN N[ UiM N/AD The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-217 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NDý UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-060 Equipment ID No. 32MGS-COUP Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 32 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (32 MG SET)4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDI UDj N/A[-anchors?Observed a shrinkage crack in the concrete floor passes through the grout beneath the base plate and is within 3" of one anchor bolt.Drawing 9321-F-10533 shows the L-bolts with an embedment depth of 12 inches. The concrete cover is 2 inches and the crack is not likely to be deeper than the 2 inches of cover. Since the crack is shallow and the bolt has 12 inches of embedment, the crack will not impact the failure cone of the anchor. The crack is considered to have no impact on the anchor capacity.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NDI UD- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The support frame is bolted to the floor with 6-31" anchors which is consistant with Drawing 9321-F-10553.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NDI u[D potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

It does not apply because there are no soft target on this equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tile, lighting and masonry block wall are not likely to collapse.I YD- NDI ul N/AE YN ND] uD-- N/AD--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-218 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NDI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-060 Equipment ID No. 32MGS-COUP Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 32 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (32 MG SET)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI urI N/ADJ Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND Uli of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEJ NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

We have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-10553-11, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERA TOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN A T EL. 33'-0" 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING AWC-007 Evaluated by: M.... Far.. .. ..Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Kia Lo Ztf- 'C EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-219 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NEI UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-060 Equipment ID No. 32MGS-COUP Equip. Class 1 13 Equipment Description 32 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (32 MG SET)Photographs Note: 32 ROD CONTROL MOTOR GENERATOR SET (32 MG SET)Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-220 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YDI NDI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-061 Equipment ID No. 311B Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description SINGLE PHASE 118VAC INSTRUMENT BUS 31 CHANNEL II Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 53'-O" Room, Area CONTROL ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The panel is flush mounted with the wall and anchorage cannot be visually inspected since the anchorage is behind a panel cover. The panel cover is secured to a wall plate with 3 bolts on each side (see attached photo). Panel to be powered down and opened for inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE] N[E YEI- NDI UN N/AF-]YD- ND I UN N/AL]See #2 above.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE] NO UA N/AD See #2 above.I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes ofrEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0. Page C-221 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YEI NE] UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-061 Equipment ID No. 311B Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description SINGLE PHASE 118VAC INSTRUMENT BUS 31 CHANNEL II 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NEI UE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEI NEil uE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Uncertain based on responses above.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ N[l u[-l N/ALEj Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEil UEl N/AL]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Observed two ceiling tiles at the south corner of the room directly above FDR-20-CB door. The east ends of the tiles are slightly mislaid. The tiles seemed to be well secured by screws along one edge and will not dislodge during a seismic event. This is judged to be acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEI N[l U[-I N/A[Not applicable since there are no attached lines.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEil ULi1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No, IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-222 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Yi-- NEI UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-061 Equipment ID No. 311B Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description SINGLE PHASE 118VAC INSTRUMENT BUS 31 CHANNEL II Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UD--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

We have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Panel door was opened and panel internals were examined.

Inspection of the panel anchorage will require the panel cover to be disassembled which is only allowed during an outage.

References:

9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING 9321-F-31423, Rev. 25, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING SECTIONS AWC-015 Date: 10/16/2012 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Kai Lo /c 6 '10/1612012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-223 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YDI NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-061 Equipment ID No. 311B Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description SINGLE PHASE 118VAC INSTRUMENT BUS 31 CHANNEL II Photographs Note: Instrument bus 31 Note: Mislaid tiles above the control room door.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-224 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YO- ND UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 32DP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 32 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 53'-0" Room, Area CONTROL ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE ND The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The panel is flush mounted with the wall and anchorage cannot be visually inspected.

The panel cover is secured to a wall plate with 3 bolts on each side (see attached photo). Panel to be opened and intemaly inspected when panel is powered down.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yr-i ND U[ N/A[YE-I ND UN N/A-" See #2 above.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YEO NO UIZ N/AD See #2 above.I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-225 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YFD NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 32DP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 32 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NDl UE N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing IP3V-384-0004, Rev. I shows 4 bolt holes on the inside of the panel. SEWS for 125 VDC Distribution panel 32 evaluates the anchorage based on four 3/8" diameter bolts. However, the panel is flush mounted with the wall and anchorage cannot be visually inspected since the anchorage is behind the panel cover.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YD NDI UN potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See #2 & 5 above.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NDl uDl N/ADl Nearby equipment and structures are properly restrained.

Soft targets are free from impact by near-by equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y N ND uD A NAD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All ceiling tiles are tied together and well secured.Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YDI NDI uDl N/A[Not aplicable as lines are internal to wall that panel is mounted to so they will move together.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-226 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[I NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 32DP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 32 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[-] u-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJZ NEI UFL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

We have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Panel door was opened and panel internals were examined.

Inspection of the panel anchorage will require the panel cover to be disassembled which is only allowed during an outage.

References:

SEWS for 125 VDC Distribution Pn1 32 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING A WC-015 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/16/2012 Kai Lo /IC 6 10/162012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-227 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y-- NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-062 Equipment ID No. 32DP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Descrption 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 32 Photographs Note: 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 32 Note: 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 32 INTERNALS EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-228 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y-I NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-063 Equipment ID No. 32PP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC POWER PANEL 32 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of thischecklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE Ni The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The panel is mounted to the wall and the anchorage cannot be visually inspected since the anchorage is behind a panel cover. The panel cover is secured with 3 bolts on each side. Unassembling the panel cover may cause the plant to trip. Panel to be opened when panel is powered down.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO N- UNZ N/A-YO-- NEI UN N/A-See #2 above.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YO NO UE N/A-See #2 above.I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-229 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YD] N[] U[Z Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-063 Equipment ID No. 32PP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC POWER PANEL 32 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-I NDl UN N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See #2 details.Anchorage details are provided in SEWS for 125 VDC Power Panel#32 and 31.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YDi NDl UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See #2 for details.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI uDl N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block wall at Battery Room 31 which is near the equipment was evaluated as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis (Calculation 6620.210-1-CB-O01-L, wall 52B) and found to be seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI uDl N/AD'Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations the equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-230 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y-- NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-063 Equipment ID No. 32PP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC POWER PANEL 32 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Uf--I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The panel is flush mounted to the wall and the anchorage cannot be visually inspected since the anchorage is behind a panel cover plate. The panel cover is secured with 3 bolts on each side.Removable of the panel cover plate may cause the plant to trip unless panel is powered down.The door on the panel cover plate was opened and faces of the breaker/switches were examined.Panel cover needs to be removed for proper anchorage and intemal examination.

References:

SEWS for 125 VDC Power Panel #32 and 31 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50,, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING AWC-007 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Kai Lo1c Date: 10/17/2012 Date: 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-231 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y-I NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-063 Equipment ID No. 32PP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC POWER PANEL 32 Photographs Note: SEE ATTACHED PHOTO EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-232 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YEI No UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-064 Equipment ID No. 31PP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC POWER PANEL 31 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NEL The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The panel is mounted to the wall and the anchorage cannot be visually inspected since the anchorage is behind a panel cover. The panel cover is secured with 3 bolts on each side. Unassembling the panel cover may cause the plant to trip. Panel is to be opened when panel is powered down.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YD- NEI UE N/ADl YO NDI UN N/ADl See #2 above.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YDI N[-] UN N/A[--See #2 above.I Enter the equipment class name f'om EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-233 of 409 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[D NDI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-064 Equipment ID No. 31PP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC POWER PANEL 31 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI- NEil UN N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See #2 details.Anchorage details are provided in SEWS for 125 VDC Power Panel#31.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YDI NDI U[potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See #2 for details.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NDI uDl N/AD1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD1 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry block wall for Battery Room 32 is adjacent to the equipment.

This wall was evaluated as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis and found to be seismically qualified (Calculation 6620.210-1-CB-001-L, wall 52B)9. Do attached lines have adequate fle)dbility to avoid damage? YE ND: UDl N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-234 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y-I NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-064 Equipment ID No. 31PP Equip. Class 1 14 Equipment Description 125VDC POWER PANEL 31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

We have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The panel is flush mounted to the wall and the anchorage cannot be visually inspected since the anchorage is behind a panel cover plate. The panel cover is secured with 3 bolts on each side.Removable of the panel cover may cause the plant to trip unless panel is powered down.The door on the panel cover plate was opened and faces of the breaker/switches were examined.Panel cover needs to be removed for proper anchorage and intemal examination.

References:

SEWS for 125 VDC Power Panel #31 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING AWC-007 Evaluated by: Maaqie Farah Date: 10/17/2012 Kai Lo / '10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-235 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y-- NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-064 Equipment ID No. 31PP Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description 125VDC POWER PANEL 31 Photographs Note: NO PHOTOS ATTACHED Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-236 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NI I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. BATT31 Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area BATTERYROOM 31 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NO The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NO UOI N/AD Y[Z ND U-i N/A[Y[ ND UD N/A--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-237 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NiD U7-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No, BATT31 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NDi UL- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE ND-] uDl N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The Battery Room has masonry block walls which were evaluated as part of the IEB 890-11 analysis and found to be seismically qualified (Calculation 6620.210-1-CB-001-K, L and M, walls 52A, 52B and 52C).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI uD- N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-238 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NI I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. BATT31 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[:] UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SEWS for Battery Bank 31 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING 9321-F-38119, Rev. 2, BATTER Y ARRANGEMENT BATTERY ROOMS 31 & 32 A WC-004 Evaluated Maaaie Farah Maooie Farah ýE CLI ýDate: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Kai Lo Ic-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-239 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. BATT31 Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Photographs Note: NO PHOTOS ATTACHED Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-240 of 409 AT-rACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ Nr D U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. BATT32 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-O" Room, Area BA7TERY ROOM 32 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YIU NEI The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Found some bolts on support frames in the vicinity of batteries 58 and 57 and 1 and 2 which have less than full nut engagement.

Based on the noted engagement condition, it is judged that the condition is acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NEI UiD N/ADl Y[ NO UiD N/Ar-YZ NEI UDl N/AD1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-241 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: ND-- U[-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. BATT32 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NDI UD- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NDI uD- N/ADJ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[0 NDI UD1 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The Battery Room has masonry block walls which were evaluated as part of the IEB 890-11 analysis and found to be seismically qualified (Calculation 6620.210-1-CB-001-L, M and N, walls 52B, 52C and 52D).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE ND UD1 N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yo ND: UDJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-242 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YIZ No Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. BATT32 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE) U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SEWS for Battery Bank 32 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING 9321-F-38119, Rev. 2, BA TTERY ARRANGEMENT BATTERY ROOMS 31 & 32 AWC-005 Evaluated by: M~nv a,,o Kai Lo /-6 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-243 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-7 UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl -066 Equipment ID No. BATT32 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Photographs Note: BA TT 32 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-244 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Yr ND-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-067 Equipment ID No. BATT33 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Location:

Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, 31 DIESEL Area GENERATOR ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Compartment doors were opened; however, only 26 bolts were visible since the rest of the anchor bolts are behind the batteries with minimum clearance for inspection/visibility.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The visible anchors are free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxication.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y-J N 0 Y[ ND-- uLJ N/AD--YE NDJ U[-D N/ADJ Y[Z NDI UDJ N/AD1 The visible anchors are free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-245 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE ND I UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-067 Equipment ID No. BATT33 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE]- NDI UD N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[E NO UEi N/AD1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI U-- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDi UD--] N/AD-Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ ND uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-246 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NR UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-067 Equipment ID No. BATT33 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet doors were opened and internals were examined and found acceptable.

References:

9321-F-32733-9, BATTERY NO 33 ARRANGEMENT

& DETAIL 9321 -F-30523-50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING SEWS for Battery Bank 33 AWC-019 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/19/12 Kai Lo /10/1912 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-247 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NI I U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-067 Equipment ID No. BATT33 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Photographs Note: no photos attached.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-248 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: NEI ULII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. BATT34 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area BATTERY ROOM 34 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YS NEJ The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YZ NEI uW7 N/A-'YED NEI uW- N/AE]Y2 NEI uW1 N/AWýThe anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-249 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NW1 U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. BATT34 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NWI UW- NIAll (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS and calculation IP3-CALC-UNSPEL-01136, Rev. 0.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NWI UW-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ N[W] U-- N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NW UW- N/AWl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The battery room has masonry block walls on 4 sides. The walls were evaluated as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis and found to be satisfactory.

Reference calculation 6604-153.2-VENT-04.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NW UW1 N/AW3 Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NWI uW-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-250 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. BATT34 Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[Z N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

We have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

IP3V-156-0006, 60 CELL EA-11 BATTERYASSEMBLY SEWS for Battery Bank 34 IP3-CALC-UNSPEL-01136, Rev. 0 AWC-006 Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Maggie Farah Kai Lo c6 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-251 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. BATT34 Equip. Class 1 15 Equipment Description BATTERY Photographs Note: Equipment Tag Note: View of BATTERY 34 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-252 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YZ ND U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 31 Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description BATTERY Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the Rem one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NDI Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS and drawing IP3V-0156-O001.

Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE; NO ULI N/A--YE NDI uID N/ADl YN NEI uD- N/AD-YE NO UDl N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-253 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NEI UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. BATTCHGR 31 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[L-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

A Unistrut spans over the cabinet with approximately one inch of clearance (see attached photo). Based on the way the Unistrut is loaded, it is judged that the seismically induced vertical deflection will not cause a seismic interaction between the Unistrut and the cabinet.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry block wall for Battery Room 31 is adjacent to the equipment.

This wall was evaluated as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis and found to be seismically qualified (Calculation 6620.210-1-CB-001-L, wall 52B).Fluorescent bulbs in overhead lighting fixtures are not restrained.

This variance is addressed in CR-IP3-2012-03123.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UDn N/AD-YLI NO UEI N/A[]YM NEI UL- N/ADl YEI NO ULI No, based on #8 above.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-254 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ ND-- UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 31 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI u-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet doors need to opened to permit evaluation of intemal components.

Cabinet doors were opened and intemal components were examined and were judged to be adequate.

10/17/12

References:

9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING IP3V-0156-0001 SEWS for Battety Charger 31 AWC-007 Evaluated Maggie Farah Kai Lo /c Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/12 Date: 10/10/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-255 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YO ND UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. BATTCHGR 31 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY Photographs Note: BATT CHRG 31 Note: Unistrut spans over the cabinet with approximately one inch of clearance EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-256 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE NRi U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATTCHGR 32 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation..

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The floor is chipped out in the immediate vicinity of one anchor bolt, apparently for the installation of a grounding wire. The depth of the concrete removal is approximately one inch and extends to the anchor bolt so that the side of the bolt is visible below the base plate. CR-IP3-2012-03284 is written to address this issue. LB-04 evaluation per EC-DC-168 was generatred and the existing configuration is acceptable.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NO UD1 N/AD1 Y[ NO UD- N/AD-Y[D NDI UID N/AD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-257 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-- ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 32 Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NEI UOI N/AL](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation.

See list of references under the comments section.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEil UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

Y[ NE] UL] N/Ar-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NO-- Ui N/Al]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

A Unistrut is in contact with the top of the cabinet and was evaluated by SQUG and judged to be acceptable.

The masonry block wall for Battery Room 32 is adjacent to the equipment.

This wall was evaluated as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis and found to be seismically qualified (Calculation 6620.210-1-CB-001-L, wall 52B)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UL] N/AL]Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-258 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ ND-- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATTCHGR 32 Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ N[-E] UII of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R NEI UiD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet doors must be opened to allow evaluation of internal components.

Cabinet doors were opened and internal componenets were examined and were found adequate on 10/17/12.

References:

SEWS for Battery Charger 32 SEWS for Battery Charger 31 IP3V-0156-0001, Rev. 4, INSTRUMENT PANEL ONLINE 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING AWC-007 Evaluated Maqgie Farah Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 KaiLo /C.*(1~EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-259 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NM UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-070 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 32 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER Photographs Note: BATTCHRG32 Note: Unistrut is in contact with the top of the cabinet EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-260 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P3 Status: YE] NE I U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 33 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, SWITCHGEAR ROOM Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ N[: The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE ND IuD N/A Y[ NDL UD N/AD Y[ NDI UEJ N/AD--The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-261 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P3 Status: YDI NDI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 33 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YrI NO Ul-I N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG analysis shows bolt pattern at 18"x 30.5" and field measurement is 16 Y2" x 29". The load factor from SQUG is equal to 2.18. Based on the as-found bolt dimensions, it is estimated that the variation will not affect the acceptability of the anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI UDI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There is approximately 3" clearance to a telephone acoustic shelter.The telephone structure appears to be solidly anchored to the floor and was accepted in the SQUG analysis as being rigid and not subject to interaction effects. Although the anchorage method could not be determined by a visual examination it was confirmed that the assembly is rigid and is not expected to deflect sufficiently during a seismic event to result in interaction with the cabinet.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The fluorescent fixture above the cabinet is well anchored to its supporting structure.

However, there is no restraint for the fluorescent bulb in the fixture. In a seismic event it could loosen and fall. CR-IP3-2012-03123 was issued to address the lack of restraint of the bulbs.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YO NDI UDl N/AD]YDI NF UD1 N/AD YEA N[D uDl N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-262 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: Y-I NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATTCHGR 33 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI u-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YOi NEI uN adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked extemaly for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

However cabinet needs to be opened to perform a review of the integrity of the contents.

Cabinet cannot be opened to examine interals until plant outage.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-30523, Rev. 50 SEWS for Battery Charger 33 A WC-002 Evaluated Maoqie Farah Kai Lo Ic-Date: 10/09/2012 Date: 10/09/2012 Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-263 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YEI NEI U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 33 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY Photographs Note: Acoustic telephone shi battery charger.,cent to EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-264 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. BATTCHGR 33 Equipment Description BATTERY Status: YD- NO UE Equip. Class' 16 Note: Base plate of acoustic telephone shelter EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-265 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[Ii NE] U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. BATTCHGR 34 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NEl The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name fiom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YZ NO ULIE N/AD-YN NDI uDl N/ADl YN NEI UD- N/A"-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-266 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: Y-i NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 34 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ Ni UD- N/AEiJ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS for Battery Charger 34.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI U--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Obeserved a Unistrut frame with two Unistnrt columns on both sides of the cabinet with approximately 1 " of clearance (see attached photo).LB-03 evaluation was performed for the seismic interaction and the 1" clearance is adequate for the combined seismic displacement of the Battery Charger and the Unistrut frame.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YE NEI uIl N/AD YE ND U[I N/A'-YE NEI UD1 N/ADJ Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YE NEI UD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-267 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YO NO UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. BATTCHGR 34 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet must be opened to examine interal components.

Cabinet cannot be opened to examine internal components until plant outage. 10/17/12

References:

9321-F-30523, Rev. 50 SEWS for Battery Charger 34 Evaluated Date: 10/11/12 Maggie Farah 10/11/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-268 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YI- NR U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 34 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER Photographs Note: Battery charger 34 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-269 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3-Status: YD] ND] UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 31 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 31 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEE ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YN ND UD- N/ADJ The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.YEZ ND uD]U N/AD-YIE ND UDl N/AD1'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-270 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3-Status: YE NDI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 31 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 31 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NDI ULi N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS for STA77C INV 31.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Masonry block wall at adjacent Battery Room 34 is remote from the equipment and was evaluated as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis and found to be seismically qualified.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs in overhead lighting are not secured to the light fixture. This has been addressed by CR-IP3-2012-03123.

Masonry block wall at Battery Room 31 which is near the equipment was evaluated as part of the IEB 80-11 analysis (Calculation 6620.210-1-CB-001-L, wall 52B) and found to be seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YE NDI uDl N/AD-YDI NE uD- N/ADl Y[ NDI uDl N/AD1 Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-271 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3-Status: YE] NE] UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 31 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI- Nil UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cabinet doors need to be opened to evaluate internal components.

Cabinet doors cannot be opened until cabinet is powered down.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-65013, Rev. 1 9321-F-30523., Rev. 50 SEWS for 25 KVA Static Inverter #32 AWC-007 Evaluated by: Maaaie Farah Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Macoie Farah jqw;ýý_Kai Lo /C.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-272 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3-Status: YE] NE] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-073 Equipment ID No. 31 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 31 Photographs Note: STATIC INVERTER 31 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-273 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y-I N[-] U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 32 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 32 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[Z NDl The anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE N-- UD- N/AD--YE NDI UD] N/AD-YE ND-- UDJ N/AD--The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name fiom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-274 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YDI NDI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 32 INVERTER EF Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 32 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS for STATIC INV 32.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

quip. Class 1 16 YE NDI UiD N/ADl YOZ NEI uDl Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YO NDl uDl N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YDJ NO UD N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Flourescent bulbs in overhead lighting are not secured to the light fixture. This is addressed in CR-IP3-2012-03123.

The masonry block wall at Battery Room 32 adjacent to the equipment was evaluated in the IEB 80-11 analysis (Calculation 6620.2 10-1-CB-001-K, wall 52B) and found to be adequate.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI UD1 N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND:] UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-275 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YEI NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 32 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 32 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NEIl U[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cabinet needs to opened to permit examination of intemal components.

Cabinet cannot be opened to examine internal components until plant outage.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SEWS for 25 KVA Static Inverter #32 9321-F-50523, Rev. 50 9321-F-65013 AWC-007 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Kai Lo 1c, Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-276 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 1P3 Status: YLI N-- U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. 32 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 32 Photographs Note: 32 INVERTER Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-277 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y-I ND U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 33 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 33 Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NEI Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ N-I UD N/AD YN NDI UD N/AD YE NDI UEI N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-278 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YDI NDI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 33 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 33 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEi Ur-I N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with SEWS for STATIC INV 33.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDl U--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YN N[D uDl N/AD YE NED uDl N/AD Y[I ND:] UD N/AD1 YE NEI uD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-279 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y-I NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 33 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 33 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y-I N[il UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Intemals of cabinet could not be examined at the current time as cabinet cannot be opened when cabinet is powered. Panel door cannot be opened to examine intemals until plant outage.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

SEWS for 25 KVA Static Inverter #33 9321-F-30523, Rev. 50 AWC-007 Evaluated by: Date: 10/11/12... ac- e .. .....10/11/12 Mamie Farah ýE EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-280 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE] NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. 33 INVERTER Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description STATIC INVERTER 33 Photographs Note: STATIC INVERTER 33 Note: no photo attached EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-281 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 1P3 Status: Y[ Nn- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. DG-31 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 31 Location:

Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-O" Room, 31 DIESEL GENERATOR Area ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with 9321-F-10533-4.

YZ NEI YN NEI UD N/AD1 YIZ NDI UD-] N/ADl YE ND-- UD1 N/ADl YE NDI U-- N/AD Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-282 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 1P3 Status: Y[E NW-- UW--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. DG-31 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 31 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NEI U--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Observed an angle iron that is attached to a unistrut which supports the P1-1561 (31 DIG Crankcase Pressure indicator) tubing that is resting on DF-23-1 P1-1375 (Root Valve Isolation) tubing (see attached photos).SWES noted that there is minimal to no clearance between the angle iron and the tubing. CR-IP3-2012-3361 was written to further investigate this condition.

LB-06 evaluates this condition.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Observed Jacket Water piping in contact with Lube Oil Oultet piping at the south end of the Diesel (see attached photos). Both piping configuration were noted to be rigid; however, this is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03361 and LBE will be performed to further evaluate the interaction of the two pipes.YWI NE u-- N/A--YN NWI U-- N/A--YN NWI ul N/AZl YWI NE uil LB-06 evaluates this condition.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-283 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 IP3 Status: YIZ Ni U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. DG-31 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[: UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Observed a tight crack passing through a bolt for a fire protection support (see attached photo). This is evaluated in LB-08 and was found acceptable.

Observed conduit supports under the grating on east side of the cell, only one of the two anchor bolts were visible since the other anchor bolt is behind the conduits.

Based on nearby conduit supports similar to this support with two visible bolts, it is judged that the anchor bolt is behind the conduits.

References:

9321-F-10533-4, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING FOUNDATION PLAN & DETAILS 9321-F-1 0553-11, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN AT EL. 33'-0" 9321-F-22503-7, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANS 9321 -F-22513-9, DIESEL GENERA TOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT ELEVATIONS AWC-019 LB-06 LB-08 Date: 10/23/12 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Kai Lo 1(f- 10/23/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-284 of 409 ATFACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 IP3 Status: YE NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. DG-31 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 31 Photographs Note: Angle iron resting on tubing Note: Tubing under angle iron EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-285 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 1P3 Status: YE NM UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. DG-31 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 31 Note: Jacket Water piping in contact with Lube Oil Oultet piping Note: Jacket Water piping in contact with Lube Oil Oultet piping EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-286 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 IP3 Status: YE N[-- UF--Equip. Class 1 17 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. DG-31 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 31 Note: crack passing through a bolt for a fire protection support Note: Conduit support under the grating with anchor behind the conduits.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-287 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NiD U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. DG-32 Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 32 Location:

Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, 32 DIESEL Area GENERATOR ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NEI YE NEI UD N/AD-YE NEI UlD N/Ar-YE NEI uL- N/AD1 Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-288 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ ND-- UDJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. DG-32 Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 32 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI NDl UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing 9321-F-10533-4.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YN ND uD- N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND UD N/AD:]Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI uD--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-289 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NI I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. DG-32 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 32 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-10533-4, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING FOUNDATION PLAN & DETAILS 9321-F-10553-11, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERA TOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN A TEL. 33'-0" 9321-F-22503-7, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANS 9321-F-22513-9, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT ELEVATIONS SEWS for Diesel Gen No. 32, 31, 33 AWC-020 Evaluated by: Maggciie Farah Date: 10/19/2012 Kai Lo /c 6 ' Date: 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-290 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. DG-32 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 32 Photographs Note: DG-32 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-291 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE NiD UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. DG-33 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 33 Location:

Bldg. DG Floor El. 15"-0" Room, 33 DIESEL Area GENERATOR ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE ND UD N/AD YN ND UD N/AD Y] ND UE-D N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-292 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 2 of 4 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP3 Status: YZ ND-- U-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. DG-33 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 33 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NDi UEi N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation.

See list of references under comments section.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NDI UDl N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ N[-D UD- N/AD1 Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-293 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE] NnI- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. DG-33 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 33 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nil ur-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-22503-7, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANS 9321-F-22513-9, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT ELEVATIONS 9321-F-10533-4, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING FOUNDATION PLAN & DETAILS 9321-F-10553-11, CONTROL & DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING CONCRETE PLAN AT EL. 33'-0" SEWS for Diesel Gen No. 33 and 31 AWC-021 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/19/12 culýSteohen Yuan 10/19/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-294 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NE-] UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. DG-33 Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN NO. 33 Photographs Note: Diesel Gen No. 33 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-295 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: Yr NI I ur-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. RACK#9 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description MAIN STM PRESS TRANSMITTER RACK Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YED NEI u- N/A[I The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN ND UD N/Al oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NO u-- N/A[i]anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-296 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: ND UL-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. RACK#9 Equip. Class 1 18 Equipment Description MAIN STM PRESS TRANSMITTER RACK 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NE U-I N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 9321-F-70033-16 indicates that the bolt diameter for the rack is 5/8". SEWS for RACK9 evaluated the anchorage using Y" diameter bolts. Calculation IP3-CALC-STR-00990, Rev. 2 evaluated the anchorage using Y2" diameter bolts. Field measurement determined that the bolts are Y 2" diameter.

Both documents indicate that the Y2" anchors are acceptable; therefore, the anchorage is free from adverse seismic conditions.

This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03200.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE ND UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YE NDI uD] N/AD-Y[ NDI uD- N/AD-YE NDI uDl N/AD1 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-297 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YIZ NR UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. RACK#9 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description MAIN STM PRESS TRANSMITTER RACK 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEil ULi-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

I 983M0727 9321-F-70313, Rev. 16, AUXILIARY BOILER FEED PUMP ROOM INSTRUMENT PIPING SH I INSTRUMENTATION 9321-F-70533, Rev. 24, AUXILIARY BOILER FEED PUMP ROOM INSTRUMENT PIPING SH 2 INSTRUMENTATION 9321-F-70033-16, TRANSMITTER RACK PIPING ARRANGEMENT SH 2 INSTRUMENTATION SEWS for Instrument Rack AWC-012 Evaluated by: Kai Lo /Ca Date: 10/15/2012

____ 10/15/2012 Maggie Farah EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-298 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NI I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. RACK#9 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description MAIN STM PRESS TRANSMITTER RACK Photographs Note: Rack#9 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-299 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NF- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class 1 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Location:

Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is an in-line instrument.

Anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Y-- N 0 YED NEJ UE1 N/AM Not applicable since it is an in-line item.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thanmild surface oxidation?

YEI NEI UEI N/AZ Not applicable since it is an in-line item.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YEI NEI LJI NIAN Not applicable since it is an in-line item.Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-300 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NI I UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class 1 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI- NEIl UI-- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEIl UFi-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO N[ll U-I N/AEl Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEil UI- N/AEI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonty block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ Nll UL-] N/AII Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEIl UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-301 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ ND-- Ul-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class 1 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI" U[-l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-25883-24 Primary Auxiliary Building Composite Piping Arrangement at El 73'-0", Sheet No. I 9321-F-25153-22 Primary Auxiliary Building General Arrangement, Plans at El 55'-0" and 73'-0" 9321-F-70413-11 Primary Auxiliary Building Instrument Arrangement, Sheet No. 2, Instrumentation AWC-034ýAý%-Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/23/2012 Date: 10/23/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-302 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NDi UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class 1 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Photographs Note: NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT TE-130 Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-303 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: YIE ND I U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. AFWP32-LOC-PNL Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE-I NO The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NO UID N/AD YE NO LD N/AD YO NO ULI N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-304 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YEZ ND I uD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. AFWP32-LOC-PNL Ec Equipment Description AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

luip. Class 1 20 Y[D NDl UEI- N/A[YE NEI U-1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YE NEI UDl N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UI' N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UDl N/ADl Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-305 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[Z NDI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. AFWP32-LOC-PNL Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y-I NO U-Ii adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Observed P1-1445 tubing inside a cantilevered P 1000 Unistrut channel that is attached to the back of AFWP32-LOC-PNL, the P1000 unistrut has an unsupported length of approximately 69" (see photo.) This documented in CR-IP3-2012-03246.

LB-01 evaluates this condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

AWC-012 Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Date: 10/12/2012 Date: 10/12/2012 Maooie Farah EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-306 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. AFWP32-LOC-PNL Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION Photographs Note: AUX BOILER FEED PMP CONTROL STATION EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-307 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP3 Status: YE] NEI- UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL Location:

Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE-- NEZ The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Direct anchorage is to a Unistrut frame. This anchorage is inside of the cabinet and the doors cannot be opened except during an outage. It was not possible to evaluate the anchorage.

The anchorage of the support frame to the concrete is free of bent, broken or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

DPirect anchorage is to a Unistrut frame. This anchorage is inside of the cabinet and the doors cannot be opened except during an outage. It was not possible to evaluate the anchorage.

The anchorage of the frame to the concrete is free corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage of the frame to the concrete is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE-- NEI UZ N/A"-YD NEI UN N/AD YE NO UFD N/A[-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-308 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P3 Status: Y-I NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI- N[-] UI- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE]- NEil UN potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Direct anchorage is to a Unistrut frame. This anchorage is inside of the cabinet and the doors cannot be opened except during an outage. It was not possible to evaluate the anchorage.

The anchorage of the frame to the concrete is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Fluorescent bulbs above the panel need to be restrained.

This is not considered to be an impact condition for this panel.CR-IP3-2012-03481 has been written to address this condition.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block wall near the panel needs to be evaluated.

Calculation 6604.210-1-CB-001-F, G, H has evaluated the wall and found it to be seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.YE NDI UD1 N/AD3 YE NDI UD1 N/AD1 Y[ NDI uF- N/AEl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-309 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: Y-I NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN Nil U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Block wall was evaluated per the IEB 80-11 bulletin as noted in #8 above.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEIl u-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-F-70403-17 Prmary Auxiliary Building Instrument Arrangement Sh No. 1, Instrumentation and Restraint and Support Design AWC-029 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/22/2012 Date: 10/2212012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-310 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YD- Nr-] UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL Photographs Note: Equipment Tag EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-311 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 Sheet 5 of 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PL6 Equipment Descdlotion CHARGING PUMPS SPEED CONTROL PANEL SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM IP3 Status: YD- NE] UZ Equip. Class 1 20 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-312 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE NW- UW--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. P11 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description 31 EDG PNEU CONTROL PANEL Location:

Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, 31 DIESEL GENERATOR Area ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Observed four anchor bolts one at each comer of the panel. Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE-I NO YE Nil U[-D N/A--YEZ NO UD N/AD YM N[D] UD N/AD I Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-313 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NF] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. P11 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 31 EDG PNEU CONTROL PANEL 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YrI NEI Ur- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.YE NEI UD1 N/AD-YZ NDI U-' N/AD1 YE NDi UD- N/AD-YO ND UDl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-314 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Yo N[D UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. PI1 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 31 EDG PNEU CONTROL PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Panel door was opened. Anchorage and internals were examined and found acceptable.

References:

9321-F-22503-7, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN 9321-F-22513-9, DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT EL EVA TION AWC-019 Evaluated by: Maqqie Farah Date: 10/23/12 Kai Lo 10/23/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-315 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NI I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. PI1 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description 31 EDG PNEU CONTROL PANEL Photographs Note: 31 EDG PNEU Control Panel Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. I P-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-316 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. HJ9 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description 33/34 ETEF LOCAL CTRL STATION Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[- NO The anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.I Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NO U[I N/A--YO NEI ULi N/A-1 YO ND UEl N/AD EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-317 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NDI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. HJ9 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description 33/34 ETEF LOCAL CTRL STATION 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO NEI UL-- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEZ NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

YO NEI U-I N/A[D 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ ND UEI N/AL]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEE ND U[:- N/ADl Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NO UD--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-318 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NF1 ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. HJ9 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description 33/34 ETEF LOCAL CTRL STATION Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet door needs to opened for internals inspection.

Cabinet door was opened and internals were examined and found acceptable.

10/17/12.

Reference:

9321-F-33833, Rev. 12, ELECTRICAL NODES FOR EQUIPMENT IN CONTROL BUILDING SECTION "A-A" & "B-B" AWC-007~j2 Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Date: 10/10/2012 Date: 10/10/2012 Mannip. F~mh Mannie Farah Kai Lo Date: 10/10/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-319 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 1P3 Status: YZ NRI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. HJ9 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description 33/34 ETEF LOCAL CTRL STATION Photographs Note: EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-320 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKODOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-- UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. HA7 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, SWITCHGEAR ROOM Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD NZ No, the anchorage configuration verification is not required.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes, the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes, the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes, the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YOZ ND U-D N/A--Y[ NDI UDl N/A[-D Y[R NO UD N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-321 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. HA7 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEil UD N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ ND:1 u-- N/ADl Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UDJ N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI uDl N/ADJ Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ ND-- UD: of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-322 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE Ni 1 UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. HA7 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEJ U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet was opened and no adverse conditions were observed.

Reference:

9321-F-30523, Rev. 50, EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT CONTROL BUILDING AWC-002 Evaluated by: PaulHuebsch Date: 10/09/2012 Maggie Farah Date: 10/09/2012 Kai Lo / Date: 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-323 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NF- UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. HA7 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION Photographs Note: EQUIPMENT TAG Note: FRONT VIEW OF COMPRESSOR 32 CONTROL STATION EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-324 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ ND I Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. ADV Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31 Location:

Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoracie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, check the anchorage.

The panel anchors to column H8-19.5.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchors at the bottom of the panel exhibit minor corrosion which is judged to be acceptable

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is not attached to concrete.Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YN NO Y[D NOI ULI N/AFD YN NO UD1 N/AD-YDI ND UD1 N/A[D EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-325 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE ND L UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. ADV Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NEI Ul N/AL[I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UW1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM NWi U-- N/AD-Soft targets are free of impact by nearby equipment and structures.

Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent bulbs need to be restrained.

Not considered a threat to this panel.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEE NEI UW1 N/AD1 Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI uil of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?The equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-326 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE Nn UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. ADV Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO Nil UiJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

9321-H-70076, Rev. 1, ATMOSPHERIC STEAM DUMP CONTROL PANEL 9321-F-70313, Rev. 16, AUXILIARY BOILER FEED PUMP ROOM INSTRUMENT PIPING SH 1 INSTRUMENTATION 9321-H-67394, Rev. 1, ATMOSPHERIC STEAM DUMP CONTROL PANEL INSTRUMENT ARRANGEMENT AWC-014)ýVýE....,I.zf

-,.,. ... tn V,,o EVdlUdatU Date: 10/16/2012 y Date: 10/16/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-327 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[O NI D UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. ADV Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31 Photographs Note: EQUIPMENT TAG Note: ATM STEAM DUMP PANEL #31 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-328 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE NDI UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. ACATCC1 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description CC SURGE TANK #31 Location:

Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NDl Yes, check the anchors 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YZ NO UE-I N/AD--Y[ ND I UD-] N/ADl The anchorage is free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.Enter the equipment class name fiom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YE NDI uDl N/ADl EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page C-329 of 409 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N[D Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. ACATCCI Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CC SURGE TANK#31 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NEil U0 N/AL](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, the anchorage configuration is consistent with plant documentation.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE] NEil u[l N/A[I Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UD] N/AL]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI uD- N/AD-Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI uD]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.EN-DC-168 REV 0