ML12349A077
| ML12349A077 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 11/16/2012 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| Download: ML12349A077 (4) | |
Text
1 Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From:
dorts@firstenergycorp.com Sent:
Friday, November 16, 2012 4:29 PM To:
Howard, Kent Cc:
CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel; custerc@firstenergycorp.com
Subject:
RE: Davis-Besse ACRS Subcommittee Question Response -- Performance Improvement International Report Kent..... The letter is signed and I placed the Performance Improvement International Report in the mail this afternoon, with a CD that contains the report in an overnight UPS mailer to you.
Sorry for the delay... we only received the PII Report on Wednesday from the vendor.
Please let us know if there is anything else you need.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Steve Dort DBNPS License Renewal From: "Howard, Kent" <Kent.Howard@nrc.gov>
To: "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>
Cc: "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com>, "Harris, Brian" <Brian.Harris2@nrc.gov>
Date: 10/10/2012 10:03 AM
Subject:
RE: Davis-Besse ACRS Subcommittee Question Response -- Performance Improvement International Report Steve:
We have a major problem on this (the ACRS) end with the PII report that was submitted for review. I have received comments from members such as useless, no value to our review at all because the report was heavily redacted, and we handle proprietary information all the time, why is this any different? I must admit, I knew this would happen, which is why I asked about the report myself. Im requesting that you send the un-redacted version of the PII report to the ACRS for review. As with all proprietary information we receive, the report WILL NOT be released to the public. I would like to remind you the person that has the most heartburn with the redacted report is Dr. Armijo, the Chairman of the ACRS.
Do not contact anyone else within the agency on this matter other than me (IOW, we can settle this issue without external involvement). Let me know how you will proceed in resolving this issue.
Kent From: dorts@firstenergycorp.com [1]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 7:52 PM To: Howard, Kent Cc: custerc@firstenergycorp.com; Harris, Brian
Subject:
RE: Davis-Besse ACRS Subcommittee Question Response -- Performance Improvement International Report The version of the report provided by FENOC letter dated May 14, 2012, was marked-up by the vendor, Performance
2 Improvement International, to redact certain proprietary information, and make the document a non-proprietary version suitable for access by the public.
Steve Dort Davis-Besse License Renewal From: "Howard, Kent" <Kent.Howard@nrc.gov>
To: "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>
Date: 10/01/2012 02:24 PM
Subject:
RE: Davis-Besse ACRS Subcommittee Question Response -- Performance Improvement International Report From: dorts@firstenergycorp.com [2]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 12:29 PM To: Harris, Brian Cc: custerc@firstenergycorp.com; Howard, Kent
Subject:
Davis-Besse ACRS Subcommittee Question Response -- Performance Improvement International Report Brian..... As a followup to the question by Dr. J. Sam Armijo at the Davis-Besse ACRS Subcommittee Meeting, FENOC provides the following information.
Dr. Armijo asked for a copy of the Davis-Besse Shield Building concrete testing results provided by the University of Colorado Test Report, which was included in the Performance Improvement International Report (Contractor Root Cause Assessment Report, proprietary redacted version) submitted by FENOC Letter dated May 14, 2012.
The Performance Improvement International Report is a large document, and was split into 7 smaller sections for entry into ADAMS, as follows:
ML12138A037 Report Section 1 -- Cover letter thru end of Appendix VIII, Exhibit 4 ML12138A049 Report Section 2 -- Appendix VIII, Exhibit 5 thru Exhibit 11, page 3 ML12138A058 Report Section 3 -- Appendix VIII, Exhibit 11, page 4, thru Exhibit 21 ML12138A067 Report Section 4 -- Appendix VIII, Exhibit 22 thru Exhibit 51, page 48 of 142 ML12138A073 Report Section 5 -- Appendix VIII, Exhibit 51, page 49 of 142, thru Exhibit 51 end ML12138A081 Report Section 6 -- Appendix VIII, Exhibit 52 thru Exhibit 65, page 4 ML12138A089 Report Section 7 -- Appendix VIII, Exhibit 65, page 5, thru Exhibit 78 [end of document]
The University of Colorado Test Report requested by Dr. Armijo is provided in the Performance Improvement International Report as Exhibit 52, which can be found starting on page 1 of ML12138A081, Report Section 6 -- Appendix VIII, Exhibit 52 thru Exhibit 65, page 4.
Should you have questions regarding this information, please contact Cliff Custer or me.
Thank you, Steve Dort Davis-Besse License Renewal ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution,
3 or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
Hearing Identifier:
Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number:
3943 Mail Envelope Properties (OF314078FD.9C0A93EC-ON85257AB8.0075C56A-85257AB8.007603FD)
Subject:
RE: Davis-Besse ACRS Subcommittee Question Response -- Performance Improvement International Report Sent Date:
11/16/2012 4:29:02 PM Received Date:
11/16/2012 4:29:08 PM From:
dorts@firstenergycorp.com Created By:
dorts@firstenergycorp.com Recipients:
"CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel" <Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Howard, Kent" <Kent.Howard@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
FirstEnergyCorp.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 5288 11/16/2012 4:29:08 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: