ML12334A573

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Official Exhibit - NYS000129-00-BD01 - National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Land-Use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States, Paul Denholm, Maureen Hand, Maddalena Jackson, and Sean Ong (August 2009) Excerpted: P. 22
ML12334A573
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/31/2009
From: Denholm P, Hand M, Jackson M, Ong S
National Renewable Energy Lab
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 21538, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 NREL/TP-6A2-45834
Download: ML12334A573 (2)


Text

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

In the Matter of:

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 NYS000129 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #: NYS000129-00-BD01 Identified: 10/15/2012 Submitted: December 14, 2011 Admitted: 10/15/2012 Withdrawn: EXCERPT Rejected: Stricken:

Other:

Land-Use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States Paul Denholm, Maureen Hand, Maddalena Jackson, and Sean Ong OAGI0001377_00001

Buffer Areas Buffer Area 1

~Kilometers 01.25 2.5 5 Buffer Area 2 Spring Creek Wind Farm (CPV VVind) Buffer Area 3 Geneseo, Illinois Figure 11. Possible methodologies for assigning uniform land metrics to total area of wind power plants 6 Conclusions Although there is no uniformly accepted single metric of land use for wind power plants, two primary indices of land use do exist - the infrastructure/direct impact area (or land temporarily or permanently disturbed by wind power plant development) and the total area (or overall area of the power plant as a whole).

Based on the collected data, direct impact is mostly caused by road development, as opposed to the turbine pads and electrical support equipment. For 93 projects representing about 14 GW of proposed or installed capacity, the average permanent direct impact value reported was 0.3 +/- 0.3 hectaresIMW of capacity. Fewer projects (52 representing 9 GW of capacity) provide temporary direct impact data, with an overall average of 0.7 +/- 0.6 hectaresIMW of capacity. This implies a total direct impact area (both temporary and permanently disturbed land) of about 1 +/- 0.7 hectareIMW, but with a wide variation in this area.

We also found reported total-area data for 161 projects representing about 25 GWof proposed or installed capacity. Excluding several outliers, the average value for the total project area was about 34 +/- 22 hectaresIMW, equal to a capacity density of3.0 +/- 1.7 22 OAGI0001377_00028