ML12314A248

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML12314A248
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 10/18/2012
From: David Silk
Operations Branch I
To: Rudolph W
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Jackson D
Shared Package
ML1236A033 List:
References
ES-201, TAC U01850
Download: ML12314A248 (13)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility:. ~t/er rA/ley Z-Date of Examination:

~ 2'1/1'"2.

Developed by:

Target Date"

-180

1.

-120

2.

-120

3.

-120

4.

~[5.

{-75}

6.

Written - Facility It.f'NRC

/I Operating - Facility ~NRC C I

Chief Task Description (Reference)

Examiner's Initials Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) tIIJ NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

~

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) li1 Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

~

Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]

Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms E8-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1"s, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

~

{-7D}

{7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

~

{-45}

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), suppa cumentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5. E 1-6, and ES-401-6. and any Form YJ ES-2D1-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30

9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

~

-14

10. Final license applications due and Form ES-2D1-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; jL ES-202)

-14

11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review
VA (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
V!/(

-7

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) v'J

-7

14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-2D2, C.2.e; ES-204) cJL
15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 lIP

-7

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) tJ:r II ~~~Iet dates are generally based on faCility-prepared exam;n.t;on, and are keyed to the exam;natlon date fied in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES~201, Page 25 of 28

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Examination: 9/24 thru 10/4 2012 Item Task Description

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.
1.

W

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of R

ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

I T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

T E

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected '<<,JA statements are appropriate.

N

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal
2.

evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications and major transients.

S

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of I

applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising M

exam integrity; and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
3.

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the W

safety functions as specified on the form.

1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit testes).

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified.

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE inSights) are covered in the appropriate
4.

exam section.

G

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

E N

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Printed Name 1Signature Date Initials a

b*

c#

~/~qllZ

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)

~JJ

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

~/~/r~

  • 5/t/f V
d. NRC Supervisor Note:
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief e amin
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

'f-C~e-,.....,(?rc. rc'(..J</'td r-uf\\....

b...A- (/ JC\\C),

\\....,~ II

,h~ ""eJ;,L:../.....K 45d'7 JJ~'II\\( f.t NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENOC Facsimile Rev. 0

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 Pre-Examination

1.

O~~AL-I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 9/24 -10/52012 (BVPS UNIT 2) as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Pu2.i /rz... @ S\\lfS. lAll:-t l-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, eva uate, or prOVide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licenSing eXaminations, except as speCifically noted below and authOrized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY

~~ DATE DATE NOTE 1.~ ~ork.:.

~

~:j~~

I~i~~z---

2. ~uL f'JEtlfVLfI tlA}
3. At::hA4'J. I. ~I<~

~ fI#:k 1I!Jtk

4. DAv~ ~t.LD
5. ~ j\\.\\.\\r\\\\V\\.:T. R....~l.~ iL S~r.. Or~,,' m~ ~
~~~/,:

~~~ ;~

6. Tk~A.6J11't0a.s\\K ~vtI\\....'Jo!ol\\.. L...o:; T

~~

(01S-11"t..

7. Ie rr'l A PI'tt'15 R 0 Japs vct/;drdliV ~

/(J...s--I?-.,

8. "K)(AQ~ 1offi\\~ 5:Ro J <fS ~o.\\\\~( ~

10 -G, -/2

9. A,Jj)!2£/J./ bohr go /()P5 VIfLJbItTD,( ~

/

(O/~/I:2,

10.

J) t

&,e" t:J

,XO

() PS V,Liq f..... ~

~'!',=--

7* I~'( ).

IO~~ -I~

7,.<.-.

11.

<:: kiedk1/:5w5Vp.,t..::;&/YI At:' ~

7-19-/2:

~

j)-~.Jf:IV!4yy7Vrs; E;<z-'IA v1.1\\J~ky

1.

~

10*'*'2....,

/13. /trr,;~r: LAt4~//z..,J fL.O) <::>1 jJA-L.l??'f'T/P') ~~

~2.-

I~/B"Z-if) 14./" !S..... <>.."" t='. t-lQ..~

~/ (JftJ4l~ " f~ gil/hi"'"

'A.

I~',,1)

~ Jo.Wlec,JJ L1Nlt

'SN\\ u""t 2.

~

f-l-17.

IO-1~{G NOTES:<!) 5ijtlel~t1ff \\ri*~el8C.ot\\~

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENoe Facsimile

~~cC.1:

ES-201 Examination Security ement Form ES-201-'

1.

Pre-Examination

()(2::c:""~AL I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ttl~~- 10 J'5 ( ~ I,)",-\\. 2.')

as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not oeen authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of t.1t.4/11- ~ g \\1 p~ OrV'[ 1-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, eva {ate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE 1~r1a~rclla1

\\V\\~rwdia{e m~{k

~ldl(r 2.~? &)AM)

U\\Jr1l. <)M

~-27-1l...

3.P'/llH¥In ~ II!J'I~ --I-2-A~O-----

~~~)~~~=~,---

8-).7*/~

~~/~

4&r("ddltuK. C~~O£ - W'lIJ. I 5/L!ID/IlL---viiUs g -/7,

6. !4,r.lv;c.eL KOjeJ5~ shIh }f1AAJ,16~
7. D 610 /0,..5 LJ CtTl077 Tt-o..l/AJ 1"'J-- "tiVJt 10- 'f,J L
8. M.~\\ \\(\\ "'<p~.:1./.....

'"\\~'-'-" ~j..-

'1-:N-J';;'"

/o-B-/.;L.

/)

.p.

'L

9. LJ,~

~Q-/~

fi-1-1.)
10. ~J'.J,..eJ-t..1<A.

l~>- "a.L.....:5",

rr;4t~ ~~i#tt--

11. ~#.tHC, ~ ~'cL

-r:i..tN£::j ~~I~

O/,;/p....~c **--

ICfilJ/L I

12. \\-\\\\,/0\\::.. ~~'-"-~-§"" \\\\..,..~~y-( S-"~sjr3=

l-l'-\\-\\k'

~:h~ \\0-'1- /2-- __

13.

/

../

14.
7 Z
15. Z

~ Z

~i 7

NOTES:

~~~oC 1..

NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENoe Facsimile

.. I Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES~301-3

. Facility: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Exam 9/24 thru 10f4 2012 Operating Test No.: NRC 2LOT8

1. GENERAL CRITERIA
e.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g.. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safetyfunclion distribution),

t.

There is no day-to-day repetltlon petween thIs and other operating tests to be adminIstered ::luring this examination.

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit testes) (see Section D. '1.a),

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts oftne operating test is within acceptable limits.

e, It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at Ihe desig,naled license level.

a.

Each JPMirIC:ludes the following, as applicable:

  • inltialoondltlons
  • Initiating cues
  • refarenoes and tools, inc!t,ldlng assoclate<!*procedures
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allomd for completion) and specific designation If deemed to be time critioal by the faoility licensee
  • speclfio performance criteria that include;

--1

  • detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenClature

, system response and other examiner cue$

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applloant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of crlUcal steps and their associated performance standards

  • restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
b.

Ensure thaUnychanges from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES*301-1 and 2) have not caused the t~ to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item d!strlbution, bank use, repetition from the last.2 NRC examinations) 1Specffied on those fOflTllll and Form ES.201-2.

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed In accordanee with Form I:;S*301-4 and a copy Is attached, Printed NllI'I\\e I Signature Date

'1/16/1.?

a. Author o;/n/J'J.,.
b. Facility Reviewer ("')
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

J/Js/J-C 9js/l"l

_~. NRC Supervisor NOTE:

The facility signature Is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

W

  1. Independent NRC reviewerinmal items in Column "0"; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG*1021. Revrslon 9 SUPiJ",ment i FENOC Facsimile Rev. AG

Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES*301-4 Facility: Beaver Vallell Unit 2 Date of Exam 9/24thru 10/42012 Operating Test No.: 2LOT8 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials Ei b*

C#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

I~~. Qw~ QjJ

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Q,W~ VP IV'J?~

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s} that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew fxL ~ ~

the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

I~ ~ ~

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

~ ~ I~

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

I}l i@W& ~

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time

~~ ~

constraints. Cues are given.

~

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

14 ~w\\\\\\- \\tl The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated

~

to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

I~ ~

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES

~

I~ ~

301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 0)

(submit the fonn along with the simulator scenarios).

@£ I~wa

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

tfJl ~w~ Wi

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew

~-

position.

IftIL.h)~~

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION Actual Attributes D.5.d)

1. Total malfunctions {5-8}

7 7

5 7

8

~ ~V~V

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3 4

3 3

4

\\..,d fit.. ~

3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 2

2 4

3 iYi.1 ~",,\\t ~

4. Majo"r transients (1-2) 1 2

1 2

1 lfi£ ~#vH ~ ~

5. EOPs enteredfrequiring substantive actions (1-2) 4-2 2

2 2 IRE (i)W~ ~'ii

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 1

0 1

0 lIZ ~ ~

. Critical tasks (2~3) 3 3

3 3

4 ~ @A~ m-Il NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENoe Facsimile Rev. AG

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Beaver Valle)! Unit 2 Date of Exam 9/24 thru 10/42012 Operating Test No.: 2LOT8 A

E Scenarios P

V 2

1 4

5 M

P L

I E

N T

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T

0 T

I N

I C

A T

Y S

A B

S A

B S

A B

S A

B A

L M

U N

p R

T 0

R T

0 R

T 0

R T

0 MH T

E 0

C P

0 C

P 0

C P

0 C

P R I U

RX 2

1 3

1 1

0 M

I A

NOR 1

1 2

2 1

1 1

S T

IIC 1,2,5 7,8 1

2,5,7 8

3,4,5 7,8,9 3,4,7 4,5,8 9

1,3.4 5,8 1,3,5 4,8 1,3,4 6,7,8 1,4,6 8,9 3,7 4

'2 E

9 R

MAJ 4,6 4,6 4.6 6

6 6

6,7 6,7 6,7 5

5 5

2 2

1 TS 1,3 2,4 1,5 2,4 I

0 2

2 RX 3

1 1

1 0

SROI-1

[8]

NOR 1

2 2

1 1

1 IIC 3,4,5 1,3,5 1,3,4 16 4

4 2

7,8,9 6,7,8 9

MAJ 6

6,7 5

4 2

2 1

TS 2,4 2,4 4

0 2

2 RX 0

1 1

0 SROI-2

[8]

NOR 1

2 2

1 1

1 IIC 4,5,8 1,3,4 1,4,6 14 4

4 2

9 5,8 8.9 MAJ 6

6,7 5

4 2

2 1

TS 1,5 2

0 2

2 RX 3

1 1

1 0

SROI-3

[8]

NOR 1

2 2

1 1

1 IIC 3,4,5 1,3,5 1,3,4 16 4

4 2

7,8,9 6,7,8 9

I MAJ 6

6,7 5

4 2

'" I I II TS 2,4 2,4 4

0 2

2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. H Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 1 of 4 FENOC Facsimile Rev. AG

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Beaver Vallell Unit 2 Date of Exam 9/24 thru 10/42012 Operating Test No.: 2LOT8 A

E Scenarios P

2 1

4 5

M V

E P

T I

N L

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0

N T

I T

I C

A M

T A

Y S

A B

S A

B S

A B

S A

B L

U N

p R

T 0

R T

0 R

T 0

R T

0 M(.)

T E

0 C

P 0

C P

0 C

P 0

C P

R I

U RX 0

1 1

0 SROI-4 NOR 1

2 2

1 1

1

[8]

lie 4,5,8 1,3,4 1,4,6 14 4

4 2

9 5,8 8,9 MAJ 6

6,7 5

4 2

2 1

TS 1,5 2

0 2

2 RX 1

1 1

1 0

SROI-5 NOR 0

1 1

1

[8]

lie 2,5,7 3,4,7 1,3,4 14 4

4 2

8 6,7,8 9

MAJ 4,6 6

5 4

2 2

1 TS 2,4 2

0 2

2 RX 0

1 0

SROI-6

[8]

NOR 1

2 2 ~ 1 1

lie 3,4,5 1,3,4 1,4,6 16 4

4 2

7,8,9 5,8 8,9 MAJ 6

6,7 5

4 2

2 1

TS 2,4 1,5 4

0 2

2 RX 3

1 1

1 0

SROI-7 NOR 2

1 1

1 1

[8]

lie 1,2,5 1,3,5 3,7 2

7,8

1

4 MAJ 4,6 6,7 5

2 1

TS 1,3 2

0 2

2 I

--1 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions: Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or control/ed abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. (.) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 2 of 4 FENoe Facsimile Rev. AG

ES*301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES*301*5 Facility: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Exam 9f24 thru 10142012 Operating Test No.: 2LOT8 E

P V

P L

I E

N T

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T

0 T

I N

I C

A N

T Y

p S

R A

T B

0 S

R A

T B

0 S

R A

T B

0 S

R A

T B

0 A

L M

U MH T

E 0

C P

0 C

P 0

C P

0 C

P RO -1 lXI 4,8 RO-2 lXI 3,4,7 4,

6,7 5

RX 2

RO-3 lXI NOR IIC MAJ 4,6 TS Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. H Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 3 of 4 FENOC Facsimile Rev. AG

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Date of Exam 9f24 thru 10f4 2012 Operating Test No.: 2LOT8 V

M E

N T

I N

I T

M Y

U p

S A

B M(.)

E R

T 0

0 C

P RX M

A S

T E

R Instructions:

4.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must selVe in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must selVe in both the SRO and the ATC positions. including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient. in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally selVes in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

5.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. (-) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

6.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 4 of 4 FENoe Facsimile Rev. AG

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Exam 9/24 thru 10/42012 Operating Test No.: 2LOT8 APPLICANTS ATC BOP SRO-I Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 5

1 2

3 4

5 2

3 4

5 1,3, 1,2, 1,4, 1,2, 1,4, 4,5, 2,4, 5,6, 4,6, 3,5, Interpret/Diagnosis 4,6, 4,6 5,8 3,5, 5,6, 6,8, 5,6, 7

7,8 7

7 6,7 8,9 9

7,8 Events and Conditions 1,3, 1,2, 1,4, 1,2, 1,4, 4,5, 2,4, 5,6, 4,6, 3,5, Comply With and 4,6, 4,6 5,8 3,5, 5,6, 6,8, 5,6, 7

7,8 7

7 6,7 8,9 9

7,8 Use Procedures (1) 1,3, 1,2, 1,4, 1,2, 1,4, 4,5, 2,4, 5,6, Operate Control 4,6, 4,6 5,8 3,5, 5,6, 6,8, 5,6, 7

7 6,7 8,9 9

7,8 Boards (2) 1,3, 1,2, 1,4, 1,2, 1,4, 4,5, 2,4, 5,6, 4,6, 1,2, 1,2, Communicate and 4,6, 4,6 5,8 3,5, 5,6, 6,8, 5,6, 7

7,8 3,4, 3,4, 7

6,7 8,9 9

7,8 5,6, 5,6, Interact 7,8 7,8, 9

1,2, 1,2, 1,2, Demonstrate 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, Supervisory Ability (3) 7,8 7,8 7,8, 9

1,5 2,4 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENOC Facsimile Rev. AG

ES-401 Written Examination Qual

'Checklist Form Es-401-6 Faclltty: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Exam 9/24 thru 10/5 2012 Exam Level: RO tEl SRO lID

1.
2.
s. NRC KIA;:. referenced for all questions
b.

refer",nced asavaiiable SRO are Section D.2.d of ES-401 The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions are repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office.)

exam was controlled as below (check the Item thaI applies) and appears appropriate:

L the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

\\/, the audii exam was completed before the license exam was started; or Z the examinations were developed Independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no dupllcatlon; or other

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Ba.nk Modified New percent from the. bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rast new or modified); enter the 14/1 110 60/24 actual RO I SRO.only question distribution(s) at ht.

(18.6%(4%)

(1.3%/0%)

(SO. 00/.100%)

7.

Between 50 and 60 p&rcent of the questions CIA on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent Ifthe 32/1 43/24 randomly selected KJAs support the higher (42.60/014%)

(57.3%/ge%)

cognitive levels; enter the actual RC / SRO question distribution{s} at right.

8.

Referencesihandouts provided do not give aWay answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9.

QUestion content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the TIer to which they are assigned; deviations are I

I. 10.

Question and format meet the B.

11.

The exam contains the requlred number of one--point, multiple choice Items; the total Is correct an d with value on cover sheet

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (1

'11 J7 /J;J-,

c rft/'2 c, NRC Chief Examiner \\.,.J.-.........::-..:.......:;;;;........:.:..--I~-.l"t..::..:::.J".f--'~+7"'f'r+--ty~-+--

f{rfkl

d. NRC Supervlsor Note:

"The facility reviewer's initials/signature are n01 applicable for examinations,

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial Items in Column *0"; chief examiner concurrence NUREG*1 021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENoe Facsimile Rev. AG

c ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: BVPS UNIT 2 Date of Exam: 9/24 thru 10/42012 Exam Level:

RO ~ SRO ~

Initials a

b Item Descri tion

1.

11>>

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and 1/1 documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors 0J reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as

~

a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are

/(/A

'ustified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half vJ

~~

or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader

.!l&~;a,::!!Ar~J..:.....!=-=--.1.;;B!.!".~tr4~fc~S,-.f-!.'.,4.~~~:::::::::__

/()/B/{2

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

_~V..;....~=-_\\1..:..~_L_D~""':"":":;"';""=-....:;:,&...;;-=----'-_-r"7'--

Ivlet /J:A oc/ \\\\('IZ

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired.

NUREG*1 021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENOC Facsimile

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12314A248&oldid=5248563"