Letter Sequence Acceptance Review |
|---|
TAC:ME9733, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF Initiative 5B (Approved, Closed) |
|
MONTHYEARML12284A2132012-10-0404 October 2012
License Amendment Request to Relocate TS Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Controlled Program in Accordance with TSTF-425, Revision 3
Project stage: Request
ML12307A3032012-11-0202 November 2012
Acceptance Review for TS Amendment to Adopt TSTF-425
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML12342A3802012-12-18018 December 2012
RAI to Support Review of Application for Technical Specification Change Re Risk-informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program
Project stage: RAI
ML13008A3282013-01-0404 January 2013
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML13059A3292013-03-0808 March 2013
Second Request for Additional Information to Support Review of Millstone Power Station Unit 3 Amendment Application Regarding Risk Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to Licensee Control
Project stage: RAI
ML13113A3442013-04-17017 April 2013
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML13122A1602013-04-29029 April 2013
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML13115A0182013-04-30030 April 2013
Summary of the Audit to Support the Review of the Technical Specification Task Force-425 License Amendment Request
Project stage: Approval
ML13281A8332013-10-0909 October 2013
Request for Additional Information to Support Review of Millstone Power Station Unit 3 Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements T
Project stage: RAI
ML13309A7522013-10-30030 October 2013
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a License Controlled Program
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML14023A7482014-02-25025 February 2014
Issuance of Amendment Risk-Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program (Adoption of TSTF-425, Revision 3)
Project stage: Approval
2013-10-09
[Table View] |
Text
From:
Kim, James Sent:
Friday, November 02, 2012 2:22 PM To:
'William D Bartron' Cc:
'Wanda D Craft'; 'Mohamed A Elmaghrabi'
Subject:
Millstone Unit 3-Acceptance Review for TS Amendment to Adopt TSTF-425 (TAC No. ME9733)
Dear Mr. Bartron:
By letter dated October 4, 2012, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC) submitted for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) amendments to revise Technical Specification (TS) for Millstone Power Station Unit 3 (ADAMS Accession Number ML12284A213). The proposed amendment would modify TSs by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee controlled program with the adoption of TSTF-425, Revision 3. Additionally, the change would add a new program, the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (SFCP), to TS Section 6, Administrative Controls.
Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90 an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4125.
Sincerely, James Kim, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
