ML12251A005
| ML12251A005 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/30/2012 |
| From: | Gilmore D San Onofre Safety |
| To: | Siu C Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research |
| References | |
| LTR-12-0475 | |
| Download: ML12251A005 (3) | |
Text
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Aug 30, 2012 13:49 PAPER NUMBER:
ACTION OFFICE:
LTR-12-0475 LOGGING DATE:
08/30/2012 T-F0, on
~7 AUTHOR:
AFFILIATION:
ADDRESSEE:
SUBJECT:
Donna Gilmore (San Onofre Safety)
Ct4 DEDMRT CA DEDR DEDCM
~~4 NRCExecSec Resource AOpeJL V
Provides comments regarding the 8/29 NRC Public Meeting on Economic Consequences ACTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
LETTER DATE:
ACKNOWLEDGED SPECIAL HANDLING:
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION:
Appropriate 08/30/2012 No ADAMS DATE DUE:
DATE SIGNED:
T~p!ok~ £~3CYI-O (7 E -12, lb S 1% S E Oy- 0 1
Remsburg, Kristy From:
NRCExecSec Resource Sent:
Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:26 AM To:
Mike, Linda; Lewis, Antoinette; Remsburg, Kristy
Subject:
FW: NRC Public Meeting on Economic Consequences From: Siu, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:25:36 AM To: NRCExecSec Resource
Subject:
FW: NRC Public Meeting on Economic Consequences Auto forwarded by a Rule Good morning, Please see the comments below re: the 8/29 economic consequences public meeting.
Carolyn Siu 301-251-7568
Original Message -----
From: Donna Gilmore [1]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 20124:52 PM To: Siu, Carolyn Cc: Me
Subject:
Re: NRC Public Meeting on Economic Consequences Hi Carolyn, I was told at this meeting that you could get this information to the right person(s).
Please consider these facts when evaluating whether the NRC needs a policy change on Economic Consequences.
For example, the following is critical information that needs to be considered when deciding whether to restart or relicense San Onofre.
California's ports serve as a major economic engine for the state and the nation.
In 2008, port facilities processed an estimated $500 billion of goods.
More than 40 percent of containerized imports enter the country through California ports, and nearly 30 percent of the country's exports depart through them.
Their far-reaching economic contributions to the regional economy include:
The ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach generate more than $10 billion in state and local tax revenues a year.
Businesses that receive imports or ship exports through the Port of Los Angeles generate about $12.1 billion and stimulate an additional $5.5 billion in local industry indirect sales.
Employees for businesses that receive imports or ship exports through the Port of Los Angeles spend about $4.1 billion in the region.
With more than $100 billion of cargo moving through the Port of Long Beach every year, foreign and domestic shippers and steamship companies spend more than $5 billion in the region.
More than $10 billion a year is spent on wholesale distribution services for goods imported through the Port of Long Beach.
California ports also have a significant nationwide impact:
1
More thah three million jobs across the country are linked to California's public ports.
The Port of Los Angeles generates $21.5 billion in federal tax revenue.
More than $32 billion a year is spent nationwide on wholesale distribution services for goods that come through the Port of Long Beach.
source: http://www.pmsaship.com/default.aspx?ID=8 Thank you, Donna Gilmore SanOnofreSafety.org San Clemente, CA "Siu wrote:
> Good morning,
> The slides for the subject meeting have been made publicly available, and are accessible in the NRC's web-based ADAMS<http://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/main.Isp?AccessionNumber='ML1224lA316'>.
You can access them by clicking on the link.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
> Carolyn Siu
> Contract Administrative Assistant II
> Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
> Division of Risk Analysis
> U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
> CSB-4A06
> division line: 301-251-7430
> direct line: 301-251-7568
> fax: 301-251-7424
> Carolyn.Siu(nrc.gov<mailto:Carolyn.Siu(@nrc.gov>
> I haven't slept for ten days, because that would be too long.
2