ML12178A123

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRR E-mail Capture - Clarification - Non-Conservative TS 5.5.13 - Containment Peak Pressure and UHS LARs
ML12178A123
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/01/2012
From: Nicholas Difrancesco
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Dupont S
Exelon Generation Co
References
Download: ML12178A123 (3)


Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:

DiFrancesco, Nicholas Sent:

Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:33 PM To:

stevie.dupont@exeloncorp.com; kevin.borton@exeloncorp.com Cc:

timothy.byam@exeloncorp.com; Zimmerman, Jacob; Mitchel.Mathews@exeloncorp.com; terrence.simpkin@exeloncorp.com; DiFrancesco, Nicholas

Subject:

Clarification - Non-Conservative TS 5.5.13 - Containment Peak Pressure and UHS LARs Gentlemen, Two clarifications.

During LaSalles public meeting on April 4, 2012, LaSalle cited use of AL 98-10 administrative controls for a non-conservative TS 5.5.13 (Pa) which was identified mid-2011. Imposing administrative controls in response to an improper or inadequate TS (AL 98-10) is considered an acceptable short-term corrective action. EGC proposed that the Containment Accident Peak Pressure analysis (TS 5.5.13) should come in under a separate licensee amendment request (LAR) submittal to facilitate timely review. Following staff discussions from an acceptance prospective only, the staff is in general agreement that there is no LIC-109 linked review concern predicated on EGCs ability to develop and submit a correction to Technical Specification 5.5.13 (which bounds EPU conditions) well in advance of submittal of your EPU application. I request your expected submittal date for this application to ensure internal alignment for concurrence of the public meeting summary.

Regarding LaSalles future ultimate heat sink (UHS) LAR, no regulatory decision has been made on the submittal content, LIC-109 acceptability, or its future review timeline. I encourage that UHS for EPU be considered a future pre-application topic for discussion with the staff.

Regards, Nick Project Manager - LaSalle U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Operating Reactor Licensing nicholas.difrancesco@nrc.gov l Tel: (301) 415-1115 From: stevie.dupont@exeloncorp.com [1]

Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 7:50 AM To: kevin.borton@exeloncorp.com Cc: timothy.byam@exeloncorp.com; DiFrancesco, Nicholas

Subject:

DiFrancesco request I talked with Nick, he stated that they had settled on two separate and most likely unlinked submittals on UHS (site and EPU). However, they would not be able to make a decision on the submittals are unlinked until they see the site submittal. I provided verbal assurance that the EPU plan was to not change technical specification and that we would be bounding the site submittal and not dependent on it. He did have a concern on the burden on the NRC staff with both LaSalle and PB EPU submittals and the site UHS submittal. He needed a date for the site UHS submittal to ensure staff planning. I explained that we did not have a current hard date schedule. I also informed him that I am invited to the site planning meetings and can keep him informed if a date is determined. I also mentioned that they are planning to include the UHS submittal as part of the site bi-weekly call with him.

Stevie G. Du Pont Power Uprate - Licensing

2 630.657.3339

                                                                                                    • This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to the Exelon Corporation family of Companies. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout. Thank You. **************************************************

Hearing Identifier:

NRR_PMDA Email Number:

399 Mail Envelope Properties (8DBF4F9959B56A41BFAD44DF618A435B06713242A9)

Subject:

Clarification - Non-Conservative TS 5.5.13 - Containment Peak Pressure and UHS LARs Sent Date:

5/1/2012 1:32:55 PM Received Date:

5/1/2012 1:32:00 PM From:

DiFrancesco, Nicholas Created By:

Nicholas.DiFrancesco@nrc.gov Recipients:

"timothy.byam@exeloncorp.com" <timothy.byam@exeloncorp.com>

Tracking Status: None "Zimmerman, Jacob" <Jacob.Zimmerman@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Mitchel.Mathews@exeloncorp.com" <Mitchel.Mathews@exeloncorp.com>

Tracking Status: None "terrence.simpkin@exeloncorp.com" <terrence.simpkin@exeloncorp.com>

Tracking Status: None "DiFrancesco, Nicholas" <Nicholas.DiFrancesco@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "stevie.dupont@exeloncorp.com" <stevie.dupont@exeloncorp.com>

Tracking Status: None "kevin.borton@exeloncorp.com" <kevin.borton@exeloncorp.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3654 5/1/2012 1:32:00 PM Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: