ML12072A249

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML12072A249
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point 
Issue date: 03/08/2012
From: D'Antonio J
Operations Branch I
To:
Jackson D
Shared Package
ML112350689 List:
References
U01844, ES-201
Download: ML12072A249 (34)
v • d • e


Text

Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 l~r Facility:

2/72-Date of Examination: 1./6.. '2/0

~

Examinations Developed by: r;a~ NRC (circle one)

Target Chief Date*

Task Description (Reference)

Examiners Initials

-180

1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)

//!

-120

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

()

-120

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 7t

-120

4.

Corp!lrate notification letter sent (C.2.d) a

[-90J

[5.

Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]

/A

-75

6.

Integrated examination outline{s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1. ES-301-2. ES-301-5. ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C. 1.e and f; C.3.d)

/),

-70

7.

Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

~

-45

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES*301-4. ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

,4-,

-30

9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) ht

-14

10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202)

Id

-14

11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) ft.

-14

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

/k

-7

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

~

-7

14. Final applications reviewed; examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-204)

~

-7

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

~

-7

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

~

[ ]

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification lett~r~

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 24 of 27

ES-201 Facility:

Item

1.

W R

I T

T E

N

2.

S I

M U

L A

T o R

3.

W f

T II---r-----'

4.
a. Assess whether plant*specific priorities (including PRA and IPE inSights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N E

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

~ '...,..

(\\(). ~~me/Signature

a. Author

\\ l~ <Je"\\~\\I)~ ~

q\\~~V<f"'l

b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor Examination Outline Quality Checklist Date of Examination:

Task Description

a. Verify that the outline(s) flt(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301*2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

Form ES-201-2 Initials a

b*

c#

t I"" rr "f!::I!'"

.4'"

r Date I D/Jij;U)(,

\\

1\\

'~j

~

I 1

Note:

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c n
chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of £(0 I..J:};"I1-as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g.* acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore. I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of fi3)~,}.:,J.. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct. evaluate, or provi e performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as speCificaUy noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE Le~ b,,~m~.~-'

~~-

~{

~B:OL~'2:.(e-C

~

. c..t ~ rac.HJ SIt" j1iff'C

~..?,. \\

==

4,

~_ '/V"I r()yr-'Lt",v f~E'!*"'-jr:F "(-"')'fA I;>,q,:p m81.11111

5. -'.. ;..,,,

v" 1~--;-1s c,<-

6WJhy<jSU 8=& 5-, E Clf)T/}<).&"

7. L.:)~r'£ ft;~iQ'G>....

L?- S I VA-'-IV) j...n~ '(

10-0 i

8. 0' "'"1 Be l

(!~);>.,r; :Vb

!'s: U c,! (I

~o.if~~A.£~'\\j~ <::>~. Su&.

'~1~;' ----------

11.

NOTES; ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement rU.III..""-.."". _

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s} of fib l,J):11-as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may resuit in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of &:b~'Jg,).. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provi e performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as speCifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

1.

It'."20 6:.~m~~!i.'

a Ii

2.
A2~,.,~('er
3.

~ s;;rt:ff'I

~Jt.;(>

4.

/15

..f"t'1FF ;:./Vft~ (/';~{,o 3/:111" ck~

g rita <;... E C>f\\ TJ\\o...M.

====

LA t; 7 Plk--/V)j...n~ x IOAII/ ____________

_~

0

, *.* 1( ____________

1!f~A,s~1li~ o~"SJf*

re~

==

, ".. ~-~~.

~~~~~F'~;;; ;;::

==

Ii_

n,

~$ 171UJt/IS t?tI&4t-k

{-

~

IV"'"7~

J 7

1

.;;;;;~:.s 'R;;;;-'-

~e~

-~ :J%j~, '-/"'"

==

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement t"orm I;.;:)-"u '->I

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weekes) of r@ l..JJcO-as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of tile examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) of Mi..J+C'\\;). From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

1. R,~t"Y A)('X<l1Ar

.51\\0 2.;fo$e ll. L'-frztil,Ft fN}tO f'< U;;/I"1IiPt:$..

u/.r";/U

3. 73""y \\:!-

j+/-g. l

2 r\\I\\

I JI ::;;IIP'"",",,,

( 'I

(

.........~

1'F l(I~of:?P"

_ I

4. ~~lI\\ev'\\"t>""""I'}.

/4.::> S 1.,)1' t

5. ~.il.{.c,.d4 ~

(1PS

~: Jittjj~'~~(t'iJ~

JvYiS

==

8'~~!i-l)j,O/I 9.~=~

\\:2.-\\2-\\\\

10. ufll-l IA(V\\ L vU'IJ LZ/tl../I{
11.
12.
13.
14.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of fEb t..J:l.'>j,.. as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Itf>~JpjJ., From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct, evaluate. or provi e performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licenSing examinations, except as speCifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE NOTE leed ~~iX'~~l

.~~. Vri2~+('er S;r.. STA£Er*i~<iii.lZXe'e

\\Oi. -

~

fA.!'r-.Al/Pr: r:-"'ftA (I"'~(,o cfL~.

R~ J 50 t;E 0 r TAru;:.

kftu S I 4-t.,t I';).A--c~ t j2..cJ o~~~.

I

.A/./2c)A D p~ --r1<C'oA.... ; --",5 s;.J.. (,,'v'

  • Foe's fi!R;tln ~

7

~o

~s..

.~

~

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201*3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weekes) of 1£8",A/t. as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the phYSical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andior an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) oife1J.,l6..... From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations. except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY 1.0~

0h\\f"'\\_ rV'lA.-..1n..\\er

2. f{VIN ;VI =-KG".v A.I A C 1(,5
3.

_:::;;T-N-=:;.;/&);.;r-.+..l...-______ ---7.:1~~~~~~--

4.

~j7A"-

5.

-,S::=,=/~=--.."'-,,S'="-p._e-ru-9-...fL-S--'-t:--

6.

~Itn, ~PFZuAj.J~r 7,

IYsrE(}!52~

8.

(tfrrl(v£1"t!)fl;

9.

--.::~~M...:.l,.--=------_/L¥~~~~---

10.

~~c~~===:~~~~~;::::

11..~~~~~~~~

12.

1

14.
15.

NOTES:

ES*201. Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of r@ ~.JIi(:>-aS of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct. evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore.! am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of f'6)\\;J+C'IJ.. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct. evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE 51\\. 0

.J11'ff.-<-

~

~~

M

~- 1'--0 Sl.If t l&-

t!R:.5

'";f.'V t:tr T; -:K

~

-L h ~

~ v Iv 0 ihl1. __

o 5 M

. I i '2__

~L~~_ ~

t;;f~ I

~O

~'1~---

11.'

1"t'Z

12.

11<tf'2...,...a.::::

"J /11'.1,2

13.

I

~j

14.

ao

~:EIf~

iiJiilL-.. ~ ;gD

15. G~

~\\" ~'p..e C;...\\,'J<J JIIil. \\ Z.

L..

t ctr NOTES:

ES-201. Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of fU) L.j:l.'1 J-as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Fi3)~.)q,}.. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provi e performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing eXaminations, except as speCifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE Lad &.'\\m~~

~~...... ~_

'kP~'\\rttkV,gT/O'Y -

~I£?
;;r;p

~-

~.~!t;b.~

-'" ~.t' t d F r= -r./V.r t /I. I r',;(J {,a al.]'/1/

it.

. 't2P 2lJ:tJ..!}

cat 5-~ic '"<!#i,r-?

~7it:

a ~..., E CJ

<, T&..M 1

-G\\, <.. _

~__

(~ c., 7 £1.4-(,,1 VlPj--nwv-

\\

10-//. ~,r(I I U

/0 o~.~.

  • .A//2cJA)

D r ~.f (""~... ___ ; -:'\\.$:-..>. ~-J,

~s 1lf6~cln otlr!ftv 7 ~o

~e.:s 1'". 'TC71

._~J. ~./'

y vr r---r---- -..

"~,T u

A..,..-j:o.....HL.O ES-201, Page 27 of 28

leson, Robert R n:

Varga, Joseph F.

t:

Monday, February 20, 2012 8:16 PM Suneson, Robert R jed:

Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 1

eson, Robert R 11:

Suneson, Robert R Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:02 AM Alexander, Richard; Gaspar Jr., Jose R; Hock, Charles E; Mullek Jr., Francis E.; Brooks, Kevin L; labuda, Peter F; Baker, John R; Primrose, Eugene; lucas V, William J; Ravenscroft, Brian; Pelkey, Ryan A; Mckenna, Kevin M; Owen, David L.; McCarthy, Brian P; Dewey, Donald J; Montross, Richard P; Balletta, John F; Russell, David (DJ); Hedges, luke; Cosentino, Michael A; Varga, Joseph F.; Santini, Philip R; Campbell, Peter A; Hurbanek, Seath 5.; Ready Jr, James D.

Suneson, Robert R

~ect:

Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 1tlemen the exam on Unit 2 is complete and you are required to sign off the security agreement.

s is confirming to the best of your knowledge, you did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any

~rmation concerning the NRC license examinations administered during the weeks of 216/2012-2114/2012. From the e entered into this security agreement until the completion of the examination administration, you did not instruct, lluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these license examinations.

spond with the voting button yes (to sign off) or a response to me.

u may also come to my desk and physically Sign off of the agreement.

anks Sunny

~ase return your badges at the earliest convenience to either myself or Tim.

anks b Suneson

) Program Administrator 4-254-2635 (work) 5-440-3807 (Home) 5-401-6987 (Cell) 1bson@me.com (Home) 1

eson, Robert R Cosentino, Michael A Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:07 PM Suneson, Robert R Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 3

neson, Robert R Hedges, Luke Tuesday, February 14, 2012 6:23 PM Suneson, Robert R bject:

Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 4

eson, Robert R 11:

Gaspar Jr., Jose R Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:10 AM Suneson, Robert R ject:

Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 3

leson, Robert R n:

Hock, Charles E Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:27 PM Suneson, Robert R jed:

Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 2

leson, Robert R n:

Brooks, Kevin L t:

Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:23 AM Suneson, Robert R jed:

Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 1

leson, Robert R n:

Primrose, Eugene t:

Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:18 AM Suneson, Robert R ject Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 2

leson, Robert R n:

Mckenna, Kevin M t:

Thursday, February 16, 2012 9:22 AM Suneson, Robert R ject:

Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 1

leson, Robert R n:

Campbell, Peter A t:

Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:28 AM Suneson, Robert R jed:

Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 1

1eson, Robert R n:

Hurbanek, Seath S.

t:

Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:35 AM Suneson, Robert R ject:

Sign off Security Agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security Agreement 1

1eson, Robert R m:

Sullivan, Brian A t:

Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:07 PM Suneson, Robert R jed:

Sign off security agreement: Unit 2 ILO Security agreement 1

i ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:

Date of Examination:

Operating Test Number:

Initials

1. General Criteria a

b" c#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b.

There is no day-Io-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c.

The operating test shall not du~icate items from the ap!>iicants' audit testis). (see Section D.1.a.)

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce12table limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria
a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name I Signature Date "1tfV\\ S.MIl,il'i ~Ir)~~~"

Ir) {f,).i."JCJI

a.

Author

b.

Facility Reviewer(")

10.1,~III i Ir-/2;;'1 i

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d.

NRC Supervisor t/30 1'W1Z

(/

NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Ch~Cklist Form ES-301-4 Date of Exanf:-6'1l. Scenario Numberstl /:l/ Y Operating Test No.:

I 1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

I 10.

11.
12.
13.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrurhentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the eXfnination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario obje~ives.

Iftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary 1~learly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficil~ncies or deviations from the referenced pl~nt have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running tMe planned scenarios.

Every operator will be evaluated USing at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

l Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimym number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the silnulator scenarios).

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See S.clion D.5.d)

Actual Attributes Total malfunctions (5-8)

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)

Abnormal events (2-4)

Major transients (1--2)

I I I I

\\

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1:J.1;l EOP contingencies requiring SUbstantive actions (0-2) l I I I I

Critical tasks (2-3)

.3

/.3 I

~

Initials a

b*

c#

,~ OnF,4/

ES*301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 II

--" ~-

}-j,1J.

':3 /

/

Operating Test No.:,

Date of Exam:

Scenario Numbers:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

C#

r

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

~~D()

,J),IJ'

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

(

D

3.

Each event description consists of the point in th,,, scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event Ad' the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

~

the expected operator actions (by shift position) f/

the event termination point (if applicable)

)

I

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario (V

without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

,~ ~6 i 5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

~

.~t> f'"

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

~ ~

fl,...

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates, Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

~.. Nll\\ !/(J.

Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

~1 II'~ /I,

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated

~q ~

/1t.

to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

I

,()Jf fV All other scenarios have been aite""d in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

~

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6

~ !

I

.J!MI (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events 111 M ~

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

!}Mf ~ 1,,/

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d)

Actual Attributes

11.

Total malfunctions (5-8)

~

/

/

-.¢ ~ P tr i

tv'

2.

Malfunctions after EDP entry (1-2)

J.

f

/

  • M 6 I 3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3

/

/

!JIf r;d>.. r D

!I'

4.

Major transients (1-2) t

/

/

~1

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)

.l

/

/

&1-

~') rv f'*

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)

D

/

/

M

?

I 7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 3

/

/

.~ Uv tV

301 Transient and Event Checklist ES-301-5 lity: IPEC Unit 2 fln.c>r<:>ltinn Test No.: 1 P

P L

I C

A N

T V

E N

T T

Y P

E 1

CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

2 CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

3 CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

0-1 o-u

)

I

~O-I 1

(O-U 1

)

]

~O-I J

~o-u

]

)

]

~O-I

]

w-u

]

.tructions:

4 T

CREW POSITION

()

T A

S A

B L

R T

0 0

C P

M I

N I

M U

M(*)

R U

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required fOlr the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ility: IPEC Unit 2 Date of Exam:

2-6-2012 Operating Test No.: 1 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

V E

N T

T Y

P 1

CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

2 CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

3 CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

4 CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

T 0

T A

L R

M I

N I

M U

M(*)

U E

RX 0

1 1 0 0-1 NOR 1

1 I/C 4

4 2

o-u MAJ 5,6 2

2 1

TS 0

2 2

RX 1

1 0 NOR 1

0-1 IIC o-u MAJ TS RX 1

1 0-1 NOR 2

1 1

I/C 12 4

4 2

o-u 4

2 1

2 2

1 0 0-1 1

I/C 4

2 o-u MAJ 2

1 TS 2 2 tructions:

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP pOSition, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

-301 Transient and Event Checklist ES-301-5

ility: IPEC Unit 2 Date of Exam:

2-6-2012 Operating Test No.: 1 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

V E

N T

T Y

P 1

CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

2 CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

3 CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

4 CREW POSITION S

A B

R T

0 0

C P

T o

T A

L R

M I

N I

M U

M("')

E RX 0

0-1 NOR IIC o-U MAJ 5,6 TS RX 0-1 4

4 2 o-u MAJ 2

2 1 TS o

2 2 RX NOR 0-1 IIC O-U MAJ TS RX NOR 0-1 IIC O-U 2 2 tructions:

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-ot-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) maltunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

301 Transient and Event Checklist lity: IPEC Unit 2 Date of Exam:

2-6-2012 V

1 2 (Spare) 3 E

CREW CREW CREW L

N POSITION POSITION POSITION I

T

'J T

T Y

P S

R 0

A T

C B

0 P

S R

0 A

T C

B 0

P S

R 0

A T

C B

0 P

S R

0 A

T C

B 0

P L

R U

M(*)

U E

RX 1 0

)-1 NOR 1

1 1

IIC 4

4 2

)-U MAJ 2

2 1

TS 0

2 2 RX 1

1 0

)-1 NOR 1

4 4

1 2

)-U 2

2 1

0 2 2

)-1

)-U 2

1 0

2 2

RX 1

1 0 NOR 1

I-I IIC 4

4 2

I-U MAJ 2

2 1

TS 0

2 2 uctions:

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient. in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements speCified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301-5 Operating Test No.: 1 4

T M

0 I

CREW N

T POSITION I

A M

i i

i

ES*301 Competencies Checklist Form ES*301*6 Facility: IPEC Unit 2 Date of Examination: 2-6-2012 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO 0

RO CJ RO 0

RO SRO-I

[J SRO-I

[4]

SRO-I

[3J SRO-I SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 I nterpretlDiagnose 2-6 1

3-6 2,4, 7

2-6 1

3-6 2,4.

7 2-6 1

3-6 2,4, 7

2.

4-6 1,

3-6 1,2 4-8 Events and Conditions 8

Comply With and 1-8 1-6 1-4, 7

1-8 1-6 1-4, 7

1-8 1-6 1-4, 7

1,2 4-6 1-6 1-6 8

Use Procedures (1) 8 Operate Control NA NA 1,3 5,

NA NA I,

3-5, NA NA 1,3 5,

1,2 1-6 4,5, 1-8 Boards (2)

Communicate 1-6 8

1-6 1-5, 7

1-6 8

1-6 1-5, 7

1-6 8

1-6 1-5, 7

1-6 1-6 1-8 and Interact 1-8 1-6 1-8 1-6 1-8 1-6 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and 2,3 1,3 2,3 1,3 2,3 1.3 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1)

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2)

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: IPEC Unit 2 Date of Examination: 2-6-2012 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO

~

RO

[3J RO

[ill RO

[5J SRO-I n SRO-\\

0 SRO-I 0 SRO-I 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 Interpret/Diagnose 2-7 1.5 2,

4-6 I,

3-6 1,2 4-8 2-7 1,5 2,

4-6 I,

3-6 1,2 4-8 Events and Conditions 8

8 Comply With and 1-7

\\-6 1,2 4-6

\\-6 1-6 8

1-7 1-6 1,2 4-6

\\-6 1-6 8

Use Procedures (1) 8 8

Operate Control

\\-3 6, 7

\\-6 1,2 4,5 1-6 1-8

\\-3 6, 7 1-6 1,2 4,5 1-6

\\-8 Boards (2) 1-7 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-8

\\-7 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-8 Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1)

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2)

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will aI/ow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: IPEC Unit 2 Date of Examination: 2-6-2012 Operating Test No.: 1 I

APPLICANTS RO

[]J RO RO RO D

SRO-I D

SRO-I D

SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U 0 SRO-U D SRO-U 0 1

SRO-U D i

Competencies j~CENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 2

3 4

1 2

3 41 1 2

3 4

I 1 2

3 4

Interpret/Diagnose 2-7 1,5 I

i Events and Conditions I

1-7 1-6 Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

I II 1-3 1-6 Operate Control 6, 7 BoardsJ2) 1-7 1-6 Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) 1 Comply With and

. Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1 )

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2)

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6

" Facility: -rpr:;c ~i-t J Date of Exam: ~/(,1:)t'i)" Exam Level: RO [5g SRO@

Initial Item Description a

b*

c#

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

~ I~ Iy

2.
a.

NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions.

b.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

~ ~5 r

3.

SRO questions aH~ appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 fMt ~ ¥

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).

rY'

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

% r

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

~

_ the examinations were developed independently; or Zthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

_ other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO ! SRO-only

~fDk/J.~ In~ /j;"7~ 31fl" /VIti ~'1 ~ V

. question distribution(s) at right.

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension! analysis level;

[Jt.t\\l ~

the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly t7 selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter

--1,1" /").Dlo 5Q1" / CZI1I0 the actual RO ! SRO question distribution(s) at right.

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers I.H JJA or aid in the elimination of distractors.

t/

9.

Question content cO'lforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned;

.a..1 ~5 7 deviations are justified.

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.

g.ff i~_ P

11.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items;

,gr.ty % r the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

Printed Name! Signature Date

a. Author

-rIM Se~\\k.t.;.<; ~*"l').G~t..-.uv, I 110".)

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

t) rl'a~ JulhOofA. '6~'cp" V

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

.J" j) A ~f'O.Jv..:)

L.r~ /:v-

'l I

C>1l I

.,/

d. NRC Regional Supervisor n,., lA-I n JAC£C~", / fJ/d fA rl tfp~

I'" j Ie 'l1'& 11:2.

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-deVe~Xaminations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence reJ:juired.

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Date of Exam.3.!t,,/Ji'i'J.. Exam Level: RO~ SRO[5il 1L~:~!:..1lEC fk.\\i-t J Initial Item Description a

b' f-----

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

~.~ i1

2.
a.

NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions.

b.

Facility learn in\\! objectives are referenced as_~vailable.

~1 ~5 (J g"ff

3.

SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401

~. _?'

l:

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions

?

were r~eated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

~ %

_ the audit exam Ylas completed before the license exam Ylas started; or

~

_ the examinations were developed independently; or Zthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

_ other (explain) 6 Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest

~ (J new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only 5DZI:(J.tt1~ 117& 1ji,1. H~ /'JVlv ~~

question distribution(s) at right

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehensionl analysis level;

~ /J.

the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly lJ'trl1 selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter

.., '1f1 /')c/lo 5Q"/fl I BCfo the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right

8.

References/handouts prOVided do not give away answers I.H JJ l..

,.lin or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9 Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved

,8rJl rt5,41 examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

Iw I/.A Question J2s~chometric gualit~ and format meet the 2uidelines in ES AJ2J2endix B.

~-

fM:r..

11.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items;

~ U t1 the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

Printed Name I Signature Date

~

v:r ~crI """WI i 11o/l..l

a. Author

\\ 1M..je.,\\::1.\\ "

j:-I'l,.

.It

~

b. Facility Reviewer (0) f) t'tat\\ JU\\hii~", '16.J...l'Ql)!Ji v' fJ !II,7)",,;" /,;-T

-pJff

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

3*

  • rl1v_K

~

I J:~

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Jlwv.!(nt.IA~.v I MY Ip"/Ztiiz 1 /

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Tt'fC. Lh.HT Z Date of Exam: J~,t.{~Jo I';)

Exam Level: ROf}(l SRO~l Initials Item Description a

b c

~

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~ lif

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified

.,ga and documented

~ r

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors St>,

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

~~

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,

~

~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-on.lyj reviewed in detail f'"

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades Wp..

fllA ~4 are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity 1t> !1 of questions missed by half or more of the applicants

~

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader

~-II,'.J/)(:)...

"'.J~"if'l,\\~~~~

~ '\\)

~~.J~

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

~pht.v\\

I.\\N;S ~J"

t. - I ~ - 2,O( 1.

'J. J)'I/,J r Oft"c> / /Jpp,t:;U:.. ~

Z.-2-7-'Z;;;. /

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

1b.vItLt)~, JCltltso~ ;tIJJ///;:j5}

3-8"-12

/

(-

/

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12072A249&oldid=5263321"