ML12017A153
| ML12017A153 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 12/20/2011 |
| From: | Caruso J Operations Branch I |
| To: | Goff C Susquehanna |
| Jackson D | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML110190451 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC U01842 | |
| Download: ML12017A153 (6) | |
Text
5 10 15 20 25 Susquehanna Comments 75 RO Questions Q#
Type of Comment 1
Technical 2
Breaker numbers swapped 3
Technical 4
Editorial Technical 6
Technical
- 7 Technical 8
Editorial 9
Overlap Rewrite Technical 11 Technical 12 Instrument 10 13 Technical 14 Susq thinks this is SRO level.
No comment 16 Editorial 17 Editorial 18 Editorial 19 Technical and similar to 2010 exam KA Match 21 Technical
! 22 Typo 23 Technical 24 Editorial Technical 26 Technical Resolution I
Adjusted initial conditions in stem to fit conditions better, edited 2 distracters for better fit Rearranged the breaker numbers to match the respected buses.
Question replaced, same KIA, higher quality question Changed initial to immediately. Did not accept "indicated level" vice "level" Modified stem conditions slightly to support new correct I
answer, modified answers accordingly Changed plant conditions in stem and revised implausible distracters Edited stem conditions to focus applicant response Accepted proposed wording Question replaced Replaced the possible solution (choices) with the wordings proposed by the licensee Adjusted drywell to SP DIP to ensure only one correct answer Accepted suggestion Added references and stem conditions to facilitate applicant analysis of all parameters Updated trends, determination of RO level, editorial changes No suqqestion. Changed to address awkward phrasinq Editorial changes to stem conditions, corrected distracter to say switches vice switch Accepted proposed wording.
Raised RPV level in stem to make question more operationally valid Based upon licensee comments, did not meet KIA.
Changed the KIA to A2.01 Re-wrote question to a higher power level to prevent multiple actuations and possible confusion Accepted Modified stem conditions and question to evaluate for valid level indicators instead of procedural choice. More RO-oriented Accepted proposed wordings.
Modified pump trip time for operational accuracy, and added ONLY to first two answers to prevent multiple correct answers Changed the question stem to indicate that temp 'reaches' 150 F.
27 Technical 28 Editorial 29 Technical 30 No Comment 31 Technical 32 Technical 33 Technical 34 Technical 35 Technical 36 Technical 37 Technical 38 Editorial 39 Editorial And similar to 38 40 Editorial 41 Technical 42 Technical 43 Technical 44 Technical 45 Technical 46 Technical 47 Technical Changed the reference to only provide the EOP table, believe that it is an RO and matches the KIA effectively testing fundamental basis for EOP.
Accepted, changed to bank Editorial changes to stem and adding ONL Y to answer C to prevent subset No Comment Added loss of 480V panel as confirmatory for alarms received to allow applicant to make correct determination on equipment lost. SBLC procedure use is limited due to possible combinations, but still meets A2 criteria.
Changed the stem to reduce the details to DC supply breaker tripped (loss of DC) and added valves numbers to all of the answer choices.
Raised RPV water level and added stem alarm condition to remove ambiguity. Answer A still plausible as AR/procedural guidance exists to inhibit ADS, edited answer A, added info; now says 'Inhibit Div I ADS' Changed stem and answer choices as per licensee's suggestion to add details associated with SLC initiation and pump discharge pressure indications.
Editorial changes to stem and added ONL Y to two answers to prevent multiple correct answers Changed the stem to include the proposed wording to notify applicants to only consider readings provided in the stem.
Changed stem conditions to shutdown margin testing in progress and edited distracters for clarity on ability to move rods Accepted proposed wording Accepted proposed wording. evaluated and determined testing different portions/concepts of APRM Accepted proposed wording Changed stem for clarity, added panel de-energized and edited distracters to ask required procedural action Minor editorial change with the question stem. and replaced an answer choice with proposed wording from the licensee.
Editorial stem changes and replaced one implausible distracter Changed one of the answer choices to more plausible distracter proposed by the licensee.
Editorial changes to distracters Edited answer table for greater discrimination to prevent correct answer just based on knowledge of isolation signal alone, need to resolve technical comment about which zones isolate Editorial stem changes, changed to lockout of SUB-10 and large steam break in U1 containment; removal of redundant 'CS Pumps' from each distracter
48 Technical 49 Technical 50 Technical 51 Susq feels GFE type?
52 Editorial 53 Technical 54 Technical 55 Technical 56 Susq thinks this is an SRO Q, 57 Technical 58 Editorial 59 Technical 60 Editorial 61 Editorial 62 Technical 63 Editorial 64 Technical 65 Technical 66 Editorial 67 Editorial 68 Technical 69 Technical 70 Susq questioning difficulty 71 Editorial 72 Technical Combined multiple bullets from the stem into one bullet.
Added details in the answer choices to better balance the plausible distracters.
Editorial stem challges for clarity, replaced answer with IR vice SR, since answer A was another SR Changed answer choices to proposed wordings from the licensee.
While an easier question, still has operational validity, will stay on exam Editorial change per licensee's proposed wordings.
Edited distracters for clarity, stating pumps running or not running Changed details in the answer choices to indicate that breakers indicated OPEN instead of tripped.
Did not accept comment relating to implausible answers.
First part of question asks impact of failure and is addressed by first part of answers, no implausible answers Agree probably SRO level, replaced the question with different random KIA of 201002 K1.01.
Editorial changes to stem to add trend on temperature and removal of extraneous info. Edited distracters to remove reasons; now answers just include a trend and a target level Editorial change per licensee's comments.
Edited question to make more difficult. Changed question to ask EDG status on bus lockout and to determine whether redundant pump in RHR loop can be used to restore SP cooling Editorial change per licensee's comments.
Removed the word 'system' from all answers DC source lost does not affect system, learning objectives cover concepts asked.
Accepted Changed the answer choices as proposed by the licensee.
Editorial stem changes for clarity, replaced one implausible distracter Changed stem and question editorial change.
Editorial changes made Changed answer choices as proposed by the licensee.
Editorial changes for correct station terminology, edited stem slightly for higher difficulty and introduction of third operator Replace question. Also change it with different generic KIA of 2.2.3.
Edited distracters for clarity and distinction between behavior of different lights Added a reference table to the question, and changed one of the answer choices to proposed wording by the licensee.
73 Editorial Accepted 74 Technical Changed answer choices as proposed by the licensee to make them more plausible.
75 Technical Added trend values to stem conditions
I Susquehanna Comments 25 SRO Questions Q#
Type of Comment 76 Technical 77 Editorial 78 Editorial 79 Editorial 80 Technical 81 Technical 82 Technical 83 Editorial 84 Editorial 85 Technical 86 REPLACED 87 Technical 88 Technical 89 I Editorial 90 Editorial 91 Technical 92 Editorial 93 Editorial 94 No comment 95 Technical 96 Technical Resolution Changed IC values in stem per licensee's suggestion based on simulator model run.
Minor editorial comments to the question stem per licensee's recommendations.
Added trends to stem conditions and editorial change to question based on licensee's comments.
Changed answer choices per licensee's recommendations.
Changed answer choices per licensee's recommendations.
Adjusted one of the answer choice per licensee's recommendation to make it more plausible.
Added technical details (Cont rad readings) and trends to stem and minor editorial changes to the answer choices.
Removed unnecessary stem statement per licensee's recommendations, and provided justification for applicants to answer the question without EAL references.
Changed the stem to assume NO operator actions to make the answer choices more plausible.
Adjusted stem conditions to upgrade question to SRO level knowledge, including determining source of leak, required leak isolation actions, and actions required by EO-100-104 Question Replaced with new question.
Changed question stem conditions to raise Rx power and added RCIC unavailability status. Provided technical justification for correct answer choice to clarify confusion for the licensee.
Added details in stem to clarify confusion on the answer choices.
Moved repeated statement up to the stem from the answer choices.
Minor editorial change in the stem.
Changed the stem and answer choices per licensee's recommendations.
Changed the stem and distracters to clarify possible choices due to plant condition not allowing use of one tank.
Minor edits to the question stem and answer choices per licensee's recommendations.
No comment Edited stem conditions to have reactor at power to make correct answer more plausible Added details to stem and answer choices to eliminate confusions.
97 Editorial 98 Editorial 99 Editorial
! 100 No Comment Added noun name of a component in one of the answer choices er licensee's recommendations.
editorial changes to stem and answer choices per e's recommendations.
Minor editorial change to the question stem per licensee's recommendation.
No Comment