ML12012A341
| ML12012A341 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/10/2009 |
| From: | Bowe P Entergy Nuclear Northeast |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML12012A339 | List: |
| References | |
| RAS 21739, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12012A341 (50) | |
Text
Engineering Report No. __
IP.;..-...;.RPT~--,-O-,-9--,-0_006----:,-9__ Rev.
0 Page 1
of 192 Entergy ENTERGY NUCLEAR NORTHEAST Engineering Report Cover Sheet Engineering Report
Title:
IP3 ASME SECTION XI, IWL CONCRETE CONTAINMENT INSPECTION FOR 2009 Engineering Report Type:
New
[8]
Revision D
Cancelled D
Superceded D
Applicable Site(s)
IPID ANOI0 IP20 AN02 D IP3
[8]
ECH D
JAP D
GGNS D
wpoD Report Origin:
[8] Entergy 0
Vendor Vendor Document No.:
Prepared by:
Date:
12-10-2009 Verified!
Reviewed by:
Date:
12-16-2009
- Reviewed by:
Date:
- -/10!p;/t:J i
Approved by:
Date:
1-7-2010
- . For ASME Section XI Code Program plans per ENN-DC-120, if required.
IPEC00241279
~Entergy IPEO IP*RPT-09*00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pa~e 2 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 4.0 4.1 4.2 5.0 6.0 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 IPEC00241280 Title Scope and Objectives
3 Background
3 Details 4
Qualifications of Personnel.................................................................................... 4 Qualifications of Equipment.
,................................. 4 Accessibiellnaccessible Areas 5
Acceptance Standards 5
Evaluation of Results 5
Operating Experience..........................................................
6 OE12772 - North Anna 6
Event Number: 280-010730-1, Surry 1 6
Summary of Review 8
Conclusion.............................................................................................................. 9 Reference Material 9
Definitions..........................................
9
References:
Commitment Documents 11
References:
Development Documents 12
References:
Interface Documents 12
References:
Containment lSI Drawings 13 Attachments 13 Figures and Drawings 14 Inspection Reports 18 Resumes 156 Qualification Certificate 165 Exposed Metal Repairs - Before & After Photos 171 Unit 3 Dome Ring Inspection and Load Test Report 190
flEntergy IPSO IP*RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Page 3 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 1.0 Scope and Objectives This report satisfies the IWL requirements for the 3rd period of the 18t interval, and complements reports IP-RPT-06-00013, Rev. 0, and IP3-RPT-STR-03517, Rev. 0, for the containment of Indian Point Unit 3.
This report documents the general visual inspection of Class CC components and the Reinforced Concrete shell of Class CC pressure retaining components of the Vapor Containment (VC) for Unit 3 at Indian Point Energy Center. The inspection was done to identify signs of structural degradation that may affect structural integrity or leak tightness and to identify the required repairs andJor replacement activities to minimize degradation due to environmental conditions and aging. In addition, previous findings of past inspections will be addressed in terms of changes since the previous inspection.
This report was developed in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Code, 1998 Edition,Section XI, Division 1, Subsection IWL as required and modified by NRC, Code of Federal Regulation, Title 10, Part 50, Section 55a, "Codes and Standards,"(10CFR50.55a - 1999). This inspection satisfies the requirements of the above code, as outlined in ENN-EP-S-003, Rev. 0, "IWL Visual Containment Inspection," and in IP3-RPT-VC-03071, "Containment Inservice Inspection First Ten Year Class MC and CC Program 09/10/98 - 09/09/08," References 7.2.1, 7.4.6, and 7.3.4, respectively.
2.0 Background
The Indian Point Unit 3 Nuclear Power Plant, located in Buchanan, New York is operated by Entergy Nuclear Northeast, and was formerly owned by the New York Power Authority. The Indian Point Unit 3 Nuclear Power Plant is a 1025(plus)-Megawatt electric, Westinghouse design, four-loop pressurized water reactor that was placed into commercial operation on August 30, 1976.
The containment structure is a reinforced concrete vertical cylinder with a flat base and a hemispherical dome. A welded steel liner is attached to the inside face of the concrete shell to ensure a high degree of leak tightness. The cylinder consists of a side wall measuring 148 feet from the basemat to the springline of the dome, and have an inside diameter of 135 feet. The sidewalls of the cylinder are 4'-6" thick, and the hemispherical dome is 3'6" thick. The structure is supported by a 9 ft. thick basemat, which rests directly on bedrock.
The original design of the containment preceded the issuance of ASME Section III, Division 2.
As a result, the reinforced concrete primary containment was designed and constructed to the requirements of the American Concrete Institute, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, ACI 318-63.
IPEC00241281
~Entergy IPEO IP~RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Page 4 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 3.0 Details 3.1 Qualification of Personnel All of the inspections were performed under the direction of the IWL Responsible Engineer eRE). The RE is the Civil/Structural Design Engineering Supervisor at IPEC and a New York State Registered Professional Engineer in accordance with IWL Procedure. The Responsible Engineer has knowledge of the Design and Construction Codes as well as other criterion used in IP3's Containment.
Responsible Engineer eRE) met or exceeded the following minimum qualifications:
- Knowledgeable or trained in the design, evaluation and performance requirements of structures,
- Degreed Civil/Structural Engineer, 10 years minimum related experience with a post-graduate degree and registered PE license.
Inspection Engineers were members of the Civil/Structural group and met or exceeded the following minimum qualifications:
Knowledgeable or trained in the design, evaluation and performance requirements of structures,
- Qualified to perform visual examination either directly or remotely, with adequate illumination, to detect evidence of degradation.
Degreed engineers from the IPEC Civil Structural group performed the inspections under the direction of the RE. These engineers are knowledgeable and trained in the design, evaluation and performance requirements of structures and qualified to perform visual examination either directly or remotely, with adequate illumination, to detect evidence of degradation. All inspectors met the above requirements and their resumes and inspection qualifications are attached in Section 8.3. Each of the engineers received an eye examination to demonstrate that their vision met the requirements of VT-1 inspections, attached in Section 8.4. The walk-down team noted the conditions of structures. Areas of specific interest were photographed.
3.2 Qualification of Equipment During the containment inspection movable tripod binoculars were used in bright daylight and shade. Indoors, existing building lighting was augmented with hand held portable spotlights exceeding 110 foot-candle at 20 feet focused on the required area under examination. The portable lights were fully charged before each use and never operated longer than four hours straight. The acuity achieved met and exceeded the requirements of Section XI Table IWA-2210-1 for visual examinations and therefore were acceptable to be used for General Visual Containment inspections. The equipment used was able to detect fine cracks and determine details of the surface from all vantage points.
IPEC00241282
~Entergy IPEC IP*RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pae;e 5 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 Equipment used:
Celestron 20x80 Giant Binoculars, No. 990176 Streamlight (Litebox), Serial No. 037510 Illuminance Meter DLM2, rD. No. IP3M-0619-0003 The Celestron 20x80 Giant Binoculars was field tested on July 14, 2009 at a distance of 255 feet using a neutral gray card in natural light. This test was witnessed by Gopal Bhalla and Paul Bowe and achieved the acuity listed in IWA Table 2210-1 VT-3.
The Streamlight (Litebox) was measured on July 20,2009 by John Skonieczny and Paul Bowe in the back comer of the IP3 maintenance shop with a background lighting of 1.5 foot-candles.
3.3 Accessible/Inaccessible Areas The inspections were performed directly inside buildings, which are adjacent to the Containment Building and from the exterior using remote visual inspections. The location of the observation points is listed and shown in Figure 1. The equipment used enabled the inspectors to see the entire containment building. The entire top of the containment building dome was visible from the top of the !PI stack and from the containment dome via man basket and crane. This access will be limited to this inspection and will not be available in future inspections. The sides and slope of the dome were visible from the lower ground locations.
The only portions that were inaccessible are the attachment points between buildings, buried sections, and the sections behind the plant vent. The results of the inspections did not find anything that would warrant exploration of the inaccessible areas. The inaccessible areas are identified on the lSI drawing ISI-IWL-002.
3.4 Acceptance Standards The RE and inspectors found no indications that would require further detailed evaluations for accessible or inaccessible areas.
3.5 Evaluation of Results The Responsible Engineer reviewed the inspection checklists/notes and assessed the current condition of the structures. All defects were evaluated for their effect on the structure based on the applicable ACI, AISC, ASME Section XI, and NY State Building Codes. References 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.3.5, 7.3.6, and 7.4.7 were used to evaluate any flaws, indications, or degradation.
IPEC00241283
fjEntergy IPEC IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pal!:e 6of192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 The condition of structures are classified into one of the following:
Acceptable - Acceptable structures are capable of performing their structural functions, including protection or support of safety-related systems or components. Acceptable structures are free of degradation, which could lead to possible failure.
Acceptable with Deficiencies - Structures that are acceptable with deficiencies are capable of performing their structural functions, including the protection or support of safety-related systems or components. The deficiencies (degradation) are acceptable, but need monitoring.
Unacceptable - Unacceptable structures are those which are degraded such that they are not capable of performing their structural functions, including the protection or support of safety-related systems or components.
4.0 Operating Experience The following are two examples of the Operating Experience throughout the industry, in regards to IWL Containment inspections:
4.1 OE12772 - North Anna Inspection of North Anna Containment Concrete Structures Identifies Embedded Wood Abstract:
During a required visual inspection of the U-1 and U-2 containment structures, several pieces of wood were discovered embedded in the concrete. To date, three pieces of wood have been discovered from the external visual inspection of Unit 1, and one piece in Unit 2. The wood was most likely part of the forms used during the initial construction of the units. Based on an evaluation of the defects and the design of the containment structure, structural integrity of the containment has not been compromised.
4.2 Event Number: 280-010730-1, Surry 1 Event Date: 7/3012001, INPO Change Date 06/03/2002, Unit: 280, Surry 1 Event
Title:
Embedded Material in the Containment Structures Event Summary:
During July and August, 2001, detailed inspection of both Surry Unit 1 and Unit 2 containment exterior concrete was conducted for the ASME Section XI, IWL base line inspection. Augmented detailed inspections of the containment dome areas were conducted during refueling outages, Unit 1 in November 2001 and Unit 2 in April 2002. The purpose of the inspections was to verify that no significant degradation of the containment concrete had occurred and to recommend actions necessary to prevent further degradation. The earlier detailed inspections of the containment concrete IPEC00241284
"Entetgy IPEO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Paee 7 of 192 IP3 ASl\\1E Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 exterior resulted in finding numerous small cavities resulting from entrapment of air bubbles in the surface of formed concrete during placement and consolidation and numerous hairline cracks typical of concrete vessels subjected to elevated internal pressure testing. Minor surface defects were identified for future repair. During the augmented inspections in the refueling outages, small sections of dimensional lumber, debris, and wood chips were extracted from the containment dome areas, and the areas were patched. Three findings resulted in exposing the underlying reinforcing steel. The first involved repair of a spalled area down to sound concrete when a six inch long section of two by four lumber was found to extend into the structure past the reinforcing steel. The second was a five foot by three foot area of concrete that was missing the mortar and contained only coarse aggregate that extended sixteen inches into the structure. The third area involved a single reinforcing bar found without sufficient concrete cover. Repairs were made during the augmented inspection. Each of these areas was evaluated and found not to have adversely affected the ability of the containment structures to perfonn their design function. The containment structures were generally found to be in good material condition. The interface between the containment structure and grade was inspected with no findings. The interface between adjacent building slabs and the containment structure was inspected with no findings.
The interfaces with adjacent structures were inspected with no findings. Embedded material had been cast into the containment structures during original plant construction. The slight depression of the wood below the adjacent concrete indicated that the wood was likely concealed below a thin layer of cement paste immediately following removal of the concrete fonnwork. Over time this thin layer of concrete has spalled off, leaving the wood exposed. This event is not significant because the containment structures for both units were capable of perfonning their design function.
This event is NOTEWORTHY because three areas were found not to have sound exterior concrete covering the renforcing steel.
During the baseline IWL inspection at Unit 3 Indian Point, a small piece of wood was found embedded in the concrete. The wood was immediately removed and found to be 3" deep, thus, any issue of containment integrity was resolved.
5.0 Summary of Results The exterior inspection of the Unit 3 Containment Building was recently completed to fulfill the third period of the first interval for IWL inspections. The intent of this inspection was to monitor previously found anomalies, and identify new signs of structural degradation that could potentially lead to the design functional failure of the Containment Building structure.
Also, any findings requiring repairs shall have work orders and/or condition reports written as called for.
This inspection was completed as a general visual. When needed, optical enhancing equipment with zoom capabilities from 20x up to 80x were used. The inspection sheets, notes, and photos can be found in section 8.2. In some cases, photos do not show the same level of detail as was seen in the field due to lesser zoom capabilities by the camera in lise.
IPEC00241285
IIEntetgy IPSO IP*RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pa2e 8 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 The previous inspections, IP-RPT-06-00013, Rev. 0 and IP3-RPT-STR-03517, Rev. 0, identified several anomalies that have been reviewed and examined in the current inspection to determine if any further degradation has occurred. For the most part, the previous findings have remained unchanged over the past cycle. Those findings that have further degraded, such as spall areas increasing, were evaluated and deemed acceptable. Although the dimensions of these spalls may have, in some instances, exceeded the screening criteria set by Engineering Standard, ENN-EP-S-003, Rev. 0, the containment integrity is not in question. The remainder of the 2001 and 2005 inspection findings show no signs of further degradation and only require further monitoring at the next scheduled inspection.
During the 2009 IWL inspection, several general typical concrete conditions were identified throughout the structure. Multiple components, i.e. VCC-19, list these general comments such as minor cracks and pattern cracking, numerous bugholes, leaching, scaling, and spalling. The generalization of these comments indicate that the findings are note worthy only and will not impact the structural integrity of containment. At this time, none of these indications warrant specific monitoring, thus specific characterization is not required and the conditions will continue to be looked at in the broad sense. Cracks are included as general comments.
Reinforced concrete, such as containment, is expected to crack and none of the cracks have any significant width (considered tight) or rust staining. A sample comparison of areas with multiple cracks was made using photos from 2001,2005 and 2009, and no changes were identified. Therefore, the cracking on containment is concluded to be inactive pending the next integrated leak rate test (lLRT).
The majority of the structure has a plethora of bugholes that can be seen in all the exterior photos.
In addition to the previously found rust staining, it would appear that more exposed rebar and embedded pieces of metal show signs of rust staining. The rust streaks, in some instances, extend down over five feet. This can be seen in 2005 report photos U3-036215 and U3-066093. The major contributors to rust staining on the VC are the lightning arrestors, the vent duct, a steel cable hanging down from the handrail in a joint, and the handrail itself. None of these major contributors are part of the scope of this inspection, and play no role in the design function of the VC. The steel cable was removed during the vent duct refurbishment project and the other miscellaneous steel addressed immediately above was coated for protection.
However, the new findings of potential exposed rebar, miscellaneous embedded steel, and voids with rust staining are part of the scope, but do not appear to be excessive. The exposed steel seems to be the result of improper concrete cover during initial construction.
In September of 2009, a crane was used to coat the handrail, vent duct, and lightning arrestors.
At this time the opportunity was seized to coat a majority of the exposed metal embedments with evidence of corrosion, including rebar. Although the as-found conditions did not warrant immediate repairs, the coating application will prohibit future corrosion. The locations coated can be found in Attachment 8.5. Coating as a repair method was selected since future ILRTs could potentially cause any concrete patches to pop out re-exposing the steeL The coating used per work order 00196946, task 04, was a PPG Amerlock epoxy sealer and a PPG PSX 700 Engineered Siloxane Top Coat.
IPEC00241286
I Entetgy IF-EO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pae;e 9 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 This inspection, along with previous inspections, identified multiple 1" diameter pipe inserts in zones 4, 5, and 6. The pipes were filled with concrete and used in original construction as weep holes. The majority of these pipes can be found around the equipment hatch in zone 6.
Many stick out from containment approximately I". Others were cut flush and in many cases covered by concrete. In addition, multiple 1;2" drop-in anchor sleeves were found in the same zones. The pipes and anchor sleeves had minimal to no visible corrosion.
Leaching is visible over the majority of containment. Areas in close proximity to the spring line previously experienced the most leaching. As you move away from the spring line in either direction, the leaching stains significantly decrease. Based on the existing condition, leaching on containment is inactive. There are no current stalagtites or stalagmites and all visible locations are stains only. Using a sample of comparative photos from 2001 and 2009, the leaching stains all appear to be the same.
During the inspection of the pipe penetrations, some areas of concrete flaking around various pipe penetrations were found. The flaking has exposed aggregate, but the integrity of containment has not been compromised. This flaking occurred in zone 004 between El. 43' and 68' and can be seen in photos U3-046211 and U3-046212. Also, several joint spalls ranging from 3 to 4 feet long with exposed aggregate have been identified in zone 001 between El. 68' and 88'. These spalls are not exceptionally deep and would not impose an immediate threat to containment integrity. They appear to be from original construction and resemble a honeycombing condition. Additional degradation is not expected to appear before the next 5 year inspection.
The dome ring was load tested and found to be in good condition. Results and details of the test can be found in Attachment 8.6.
6.0 Conclusion The Containment Structure remains fully capable of performing its design functions. The Concrete Containment is Acceptable with Degradation in accordance with ASME Section XI IWL. The IWL components and structures are capable of performing their structural functions, including protection or support of safety~relatedsystems or components. The components and structures are free of degradation which could lead to possible failure.
Indications identified will not deteriorate beyond an acceptable condition prior to the next scheduled inspection.
The overall condition of containment has remained unchanged for the most part. Additional deficiencies identified during the latest inspection are primarily due to enhancements to the documentation of the inspection to improve proper characterization for future monitoring and trending. These deficiencies typically are below the screening criteria requirements and in the past were not documented for such reasons.
IPEC00241287
-EnteIgY IPEC IP*RPT*09*00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pal!e 10 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 7.0 Reference Material 7.1 Definitions Containment: The composite structure that serves as a leak-tight barrier that supports the load of the inside pressure in the event of a reactor coolant or steam system leak and prevents the uncontrolled release of radioactivity to the environment under normal and postulated accident conditions.
Accessible Areas: Those areas of the containment pressure retaining surface, including integral attachments, that can be examined directly or remotely without installation of temporary means (i.e.: scaffolding or ladder) to accomplish the examination.
Inaccessible Areas: Those areas of the containment pressure retaining surface, including integral attachments that cannot be examined directly or remotely due to permanent obstruction (i.e.: Embedment in concrete, interference of plant equipment or structures).
General Visual Examination: A visual examination performed either directly or remotely to assess the general condition of the accessible containment surfaces and to detect evidence of degradation that may affect structural integrity or leak tightness.
Structural Integrity: The ability of a structure or component to withstand prescribed design loads.
Evaluation: The process of determining the significance of examination or test results, including the comparison of examination or test results with applicable acceptance criteria or previous results.
Cracks: A complete or incomplete separation, of either concrete or masonry, into two or more parts produced by breaking or fracturing. The different types (e.g.: pattern, checking, hairline, D-cracking) of cracking are illustrated by photographs in ACI 201.1R-68 (see Figures A.l.la-h, A,1.2a-c, A.1.3, and A.1.5).
Cracking of the concrete cover is a common mechanism for any concrete structure. This condition is normally a result of normal expansion and contraction, which occurs within the concrete due to variations in temperature and stress.
Passive Cracks observed in the concrete cover are acceptable for continued service and do not warrant a review by the IWL Responsible Engineer. Passive cracks are defined as those having an absence of growth (when compared to the baseline examination results) and. absence of other degradation mechanisms at the crack (e.g.: bulging caused by corrosion buildup).
Distortion: Any abnormal deformation of concrete from its original shape. This condition is illustrated by photograph in ACI 201.1R-68 (see Figure A,2.2).
IPEC00241288
IPEC Ip*RPT*09*00069 I
REV. 0 Entergy I
Page 11 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 Distortion of the concrete structure would be a result of abnormal loading conditions (e.g.:
earthquake, water hammer) and the damage would be primary concentrated in the concrete cover. However, internal structural degradation may be possible.
Efflorescence (Leaching); A deposit of salts, usually white, formed on a surface, the substance having emerged from below the surface. This condition is illustrated by photograph in ACI 201.1R-68 (see Figure A. I.I.g).
Efflorescence (also referred to as leaching) is caused by exposure of the concrete to flowing or penetrating water that results in the leaching of certain salts, including calcium hydroxide, from the concrete paste. This condition normally occurs at locations of high moisture penetration and flow, such as cracks.
Popout: The breaking away of small portions of a concrete surface due to internal pressure which leaves a shallow, typical conical depression. This condition is illustrated by photographs in ACI 20l.1R-68 (see Figures A.2.7, A.2.7.1, A.2.7.2, and A.2.7.3).
Scaling (including peeling): Local flaking or peeling away of the near surface portion of concrete or mortar. Scaling may be loss of coarse aggregate particles as well as mortar. This condition is illustrated by photographs in ACI 20l.1R-68 (see Figures A.2.9.1a & b, A.2.9.2a
& b, A.2.9.3a & b, A.2.9.4a & b, and A.2.9.5a & b).
Spall: A fragment, usually in the shape of a flake, detached from a larger mass by a blow, by the action of weather, by pressure, or by expansion within the large mass. A spall is normally a circular or oval depression or in some cases elongated depression over a reinforcing bar. This condition is illustrated by photographs in ACI 20l.1R-68 (see Figures A.2.1O.1, A.2.1O.2, and A.2.11.a & b).
Corrosion: Disintegration or deterioration of concrete or reinforcement by electrolysis or by chemical attack. This condition is illustrated by photograph in ACI 201.1R-68 (see Figure A.2.16).
7.2
References:
Commitment Documents 7.2.1 Code of Federal Regulations; Title 10, Energy; Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities; Section 50.55a, Codes and Standards 7.2.2 Code of Federal Regulations; Title 10, Energy; Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities; Appendix J, Primary Containment Leakage Testing for water-cooled Power Reactors 7.2.3 Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 12, Inservice Inspection Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section XI, Division 1 7.2.4 USNRC NUREG-1522, Assessment of Inservice Conditions of Safety-Related Nuclear Plant Structures IPEC00241289
-Et IPEO IP*RPT*09*00069 I
REV. 0
'V'. nergy I
Pal!e 12 of 193 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 7.2.5 USNRC Inspection Manual, Inspection Procedure 62003, Inspection of Steel and Concrete Containment Structures at Nuclear Power Plants 7.2.6 USNRC IN 97-11, Cement Erosion From Containment Sub-foundations at Nuclear Power Plants 7.2.7 USNRC IN 97-29, Containment Inspection Rule 7.3
References:
Development Documents 7.3.1 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, Subsections IWElIWL 1998 Edition, No Addenda 7.3.2 ACI 201.1R-92, Guide for Making a Condition Survey of Concrete In-Service 7.3.3 ACI 349.3R-96, Evaluation of Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures 7.3.4 IP3-RPT-VC-03071, "Containment Inservice Inspection, First Ten Years, Class MC and CC Program."
7.3.5 IP3-CALC-VC-03244, "Acceptable limit for VC concrete Inspection per ASME Section XI, IWL 7.3.6 Report on Consolidated Edison's IP3, Containment Vessel Structural Integrity for Wedco Corp., dated February 21,1975 (NYPA file # 45-C-0347) 7.3.7 Final Containment Design Report by Westinghouse Corp., dated September 1970 (NYPA file # 41-E-0541) 7.3.8 IP3-DED-AS-031, Rev. 0, "ASME Section XI, IWL Containment Inspection Procedure," dated 7/25/01 7.3.9 Entergy Report IP3-RPT-STR-03517, Rev. 0, "IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection," dated 9/24/01 7.4
References:
Interface Documents 7.4.1 IP3-RPT-VC-1901 "Basis Document for Containment Integrity" 7.4.2 IP-SMM-DC-904, Rev. 4, "ASME Code Section XI - RepairlReplacement Program" 7.4.3 IP-C-Ol "Installation Procedure for Concrete Repairs" 7.4.4 SED-AD-22, "Condition Monitoring of Maintenance Rule Structures" IPEC00241290
-Enfetgy IPEO IP*RPT*09*00069 I
REV. 0 I
Paae 13 of 193 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 7.4.5 EN-DC-147, Rev. 0, "Engineering Reports" 7.4.6 ENN-EP-S-003, Rev. 0, "IWL Visual Containment Inspection" 7.4.7 Entergy Memo IP-DEM-01-005, From Richard Drake, To: ANII, dated April 6, 2001, "IWEIIWL Remote Visual Equipment Qualification" 7.4.8 Entergy Report IP3-RPT-VC-03071, Containment Inservice Inspection first ten year MC & CC program, 09/10/98-09/09/08. Rev. 1 dated Jan 11,2001 7.4.9 NYPA memo IP-DEM-95-139, from S. Guarnaccia to J. Janicki, resolution of PIDs 18440 through 18445 7.4.10 Entergy Report IP3-RPT-VC-03071, Revision 2, CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION FIRST TEN YEAR CLASS MC AND CC PROGRAM 09/10/98 - 09/09/08 7.4.11 Entergy Report IP3-RPT-STR-03398, Revision 0, ASME Section XI, IWE MC and Metallic Liners of Class CC components inspection, approved 7/31101 7.5
References:
Containment lSI Drawings 7.5.1 ISI-IWL-001 "Containment Concrete Roll-Out Drawing Elev. 34'-0" to 191'-
0" 7.5.2 lSI-IWL-002 "Containment Concrete Dome Plan, Above El. 191'-0" 7.5.3 ISI-IWL-003 "Containment General Arrangement."
8.0 Attachments.1.2.3.4.5.6 IPEC00241291 Figures and Drawings Inspection Reports Resumes Qualification Certificate Exposed Metal Repairs - Before & After Photos Unit 3 Dome Ring Inspection and Load Test Report
IPEO Ip*RPT-09*00069 I
REV. 0
-:::::-Entergy I
PaS/:e 14 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 Indian*Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant ATTACHMENT 8.1 FIGURES AND DRAWINGS IPEC00241292
e IPEO JP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~- Entergy I
Paee 15 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 t
t:...
IPEC00241293 L..
.1111_
.=.w::=.~~'"
_0_ =-_
___ 'W._
"-'WI'I'
~1IXl:;.ar=.~)
Ii!222I
~=~ra:r=~.~&i'~
~...EMlll"M a-lI'~)~Jt,.
r::R1I1JR. ~~ Pdl lXl-lalnu.
II IPEO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~- Entergy I
Pal!e 16 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XIJ IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009
......a **
IPEC00241294
--~-.;
I*
m~,.C1 nil lI:.R-IGVJ+H:s1' IJIl.I.......
I~F(l!tl:U-l.QCIlnU'
ftEntetgy IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pa2e 17 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009
===.~
j i
-+----------_..._---
IPEC00241295
A IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Pa2e 18 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI~ IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant ATTACHMENT 8.2 INSPECTION REPORTS IPEC00241296
OEntergy IPEC IP*RPT~09*00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pae:e 19 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XIJ IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009
~
-..........++++H+H+H+t+H I
IPEC00241297
eEntergy IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pae;e 20 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009
N--
-..- V'l.""TA6E'.
RlIIJT.:5 fa &\\JltE I Unit 3 Overall Site Plan Lelend em ~--..
CH-fire Protection Water Storage Tanka (typ)
~f1>-DlI~
Reft.leling Water Tonk Gate.21 to IP2 Waste,",old-up Tonic F'arm Prlmary Water Storage Tank ContractorIQutage Ent",. Tl'Qller Rome Building Oulage Support Building 00 Building J1J D~CllrICIl.
IPEC00241298 CSP Tanke Service Water Inl. Bldg.
Vantage Point 2
3 4
5 6
7 a
9 10 11 12
a IPSO IP*RPT*09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Page 21 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 ATTACHMENT 7.1 Sheet 1 of 1 DEMONSTRATION OF REMOTE EXAMINATION METHOD (SAMPLE)
Plant: Indian Point Energy Center - Unit 3 EQUIPMENT USED:
CELESTRON 20 X 80 GIANT BINOCULARS, No. 990176 Date:
July 15. 2009 Date: __\\2_*_t~_._0'\\
Date: _'_2._'_8_-_0_1 DESCRIPTION OF DEMONSTRATION: (Include discussion of appropriate viewing distance, lighting condition and resolution achieved.)
The neutral gray card with 2 line markings of thickness 0,015" and 0.03" to emulate concrete cracks was held at a measured distance of 255 feet from the Binoculars which were mounted on a tripod.
Weather Condition: Clear, with bright sunlight.
Results: Both lines on the test card were clearly visible.
LIMITATIONS:
None.
Demonstration Performed B~Y:
Signature: P. Sowe _
_~
f Demonstration Witnessed By:
Signature: G. Shalla b.61")"jH..-~
l Responsible Engineer Revieb. /J,li/j4" {J?
Signature: R. Drake 1;vtt/r~f(fJ/OA;(,.Date:
_----'--l...------'"/;"-~._-~_l_G_*"
Site Level III Review:/'
1/
Signature:
..:....IV'-J,I'--'-A-'--
Date:
Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANII) Review:
Signature: A. SChafino~
/f:5~
IPEC00241299 Date: _~-+~-'-/_I!'~;;'---"/-t>---
~ 7
IPEC IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Page 22 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 ATTACHMENT 7.1 Sheet 1 of 1 DEMONSTRATION OF REMOTE EXAMINATION METHOD (SAMPLE)
Plant: Indian Point Energy Center - Unit 3 EQUIPMENT USED:
Streamlight (Lightbox), Serial Number VEC124BXL Date:
July 20.2009 Illuminance Meter DLM2, ID No. IP3M-0619-0003 Calibration Due Date of 02/09/2010 DESCRIPTION OF DEMONSTRATION: (Include discussion of appropriate viewing distance, lighting condition and resolution achieved.)
Based on an expected viewing distance of 20 feet or less for the visual examinations to be performed inside the Aux Boiler Feed Pump Building, the demonstration proved a light intensity in excess of 110ft-candle was achieved at a distance of 20 feet using the DLM2 IIlumanance Meter. The acceptable illumanance is 50 ft-candle at 20 feet.
The test was conducted in the back corner of the IP3 Maintenance Shop with background lighting at 1.5 ft-candle.
LIMITATIONS:
Flashlight must be charged every four hours (use restricted to four hours or less).
Demonstration Performed By:
Signalu,e: P.Bowe ~
Date:
12-8-C>~
Demonstration Witnessed By:
Signature: J. Skonieczny /9.rfL ~
Date: --!...1J-=----_f_b_4----L-l~7 Responsible Engineer ReVie~7 ~..... q;~A',..;J
.. og~J...AY j( (u..//.",1/
11/ (,- /,j Signature: R. Drake,q:::-i '/ ~
/"~\\~;r1f,L-Date:
h~j Site Level III ReView:/'
/
Signature:
tV~.h'-A------- Date:
Authorized Nuclear inspector (ANn) Review:
Signature: A. SChafino~
Date: ---'3=+dL..=()+;j~/..:::;;CJ
~
77 IPEC00241300
IPEC IP*RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Paee 23 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT*3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: IPEC - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1st/3 rd Inspection Inspection Report No.: IP3*09*IWL*001
==
Description:==
_......!:::E.!:..I...:=3~4'_-......!:::EJ.:.I...;;:4;:::;3_'
Component No: VCC*01 Zone No: _0=0....1'--__
Drawing No.:
ISHWL-001 Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Celestron Giant 20x80 Binoculars Limitations:
Accessible areas only Date:__~C-F-'/:....::.s=+-,It.....,c>",--__
-:cr-7 Recording Condition RI NRI NI N1A Comments Leaching or chemical attack 0
~
0 0
1 Abrasion or erosion degradation 0
0 I2l D
Pop outs and voids D
D I2l D
Scaling D
~
D D
1 Spalls D
D I2l D
Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces D
0 I2l 0
Cracks 0
~
0 D
1 Exposed reinforcing steel D
0 I2l D
Deteriorating of concrete coating, if applicable D
D D
~
Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal D
D I2l D
surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts 0
0
~
D Other (bugholes)
D
~
D D
1 (NOte; ::;KetCnes or pictures '~'.::;;/ ClariTy InspeCtion areas anc locations.)
lttl Examined By: P. BoweL
...r '\\.
uate:" Examined By: J. Skoniecznv Date: JJi'~
PrintiSigna\\urM:~!ver' PrintiSignatur el Responsible Engineer Review:
Acceptable:
Yes [Xl No 0 (Detailed VT-1 Examination Required Attachment 7.3)
Comments: UttiJTIt6l; r;;, ~-r "* I0
~ Il
/7".
/
/
..~
RE Signalure: R. D;~~;:?~r/Cb,<<r@ -C#,~)L Date_~!_' -_-_h_t~~*"~-"",-1_6_}
Site Level III Review:
NLA /
Date:
PrinVSignature/Level ANII Review: ~
"rls~
Print/Signature IPEC00241301
AE IPSO IP~RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~ ntergy I
Paee 24 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORM VT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEC / Indian Point NO.3 ZONE No:
001 COMPONENT NO. :__--:V....:::C~C~-....::O::...:.1 A
Numerous bugholes, minor vertical and Joint cracks, leaching, scaling, and spalling. These are general 1
conditions noted on containment that have NO impact to the structural integrity and fall below the
(~
requirement for thorough characterization of indications for future monitoring. However, this condition was noted prior and continues to be note worthvonly.
IPEC00241302
IPEO IP-RPT*09-00069 I
REV. 0
~~ Entergy I
Page 25 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT-3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: IPEG - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1st/3 rd Inspection Inspection Report No.: IP3-09-IWL-001
==
Description:==
_-=E,-,-1.",,",34-,-'_--"E:.lI..., 4..:.,:3"'-'
Component No: VGG-02 Zone No:
~O~O~2~
Drawing No.:
ISI-IWL-001 Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Streamlight - Litebox flashlight Limitations:
Accessible areas only Recording Condition Leaching or chernical attack Abrasion or erosion degradation Pop outs and voids Scaling Spalls Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces Cracks Exposed reinforcing steel Deteriorating of concrete coating, if applicable Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts Other RI NRI NI NlA 0
0
~
0 0
D 18I 0
D D
18I D
D D
18I D
D D
18I D
D D
18I D
D D
18I D
D D
18I D
0
~
D D
0 0
~
0 0
0 18I 0
0 l2:l D
D Comments 2
1 E~::ined By: P. Bowe/...-t:1'.~
Date: Itkl09 Examined*~Y: J. Skoniecznv~,k,- Date: IJ. -/6-°1.
PrintlSignatuve/Level PrintlSignatuli/Level Responsible Engineer Review:
Acceptable:
Yes 18I No 0 (Detailed VT-1 Examination Required Attachment 7.3)
ANII Review:~~~~::::===~&~~~~C~_ Date:
~5,/-6 Print/Signature Site Level III Review:__--L-IJ:..,/,'-'8....L.-
~_ Date:
~_
PrintlSighature/LeveI
~~~
IPEC00241303
eEntergy IPEC IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Page 26 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI~ IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORMVT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3 /GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEe / Indian Point No.3 ZONE No:
002 COMPONENT NO. :__----:;v-=:e~C_-..;:O:.::2 1
Coating peeling and flaking on south end.
~
2 Painted wall; mat is visible as is the foundation
~
IPEC00241304
fa IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Pa2e 27 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT-3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: lPEC - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1st/3rd Inspection Inspection Report No.: IP3-09-IWL-001
==
Description:==
_--=E.:.:..1.....:.4=3'_---'E=::I"-.6""8"'-'
Component No: VCC-03 Zone No:
--:Ol:t.lO;:..J1'--__
Drawing No.:
ISI-IWL-001 Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Celestron Giant 20x80 Binoculars Limitations:
Accessible areas only g
9 Recording Condition RI NRI Nt N/A Comments Leaching or chemical attack D
[gI D
D 1
Abrasion or erosion degradation D
0
[gJ D
Pop outs and voids 0
0
[gI D
2 Scaling 0
[gI D
D 1
Spalls D
[gI 0
D 1,3 Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces 0
D
[gI 0
Cracks 0
[gI 0
D 1
Exposed reinforcing steel 0
0
~
0 Deteriorating of concrete coating, if applicable 0
0 0
[gI Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal
[gI 0
0 0
3 surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts 0
0
[gI 0
Other D
[gI 0
0 1
(Note: ::lKetenes or pictures 'C::;';Jj1i<--
to ClarifY mspecllon areas and locations.)
J. Skoniecznv (}P. tFI-~
Examined By: P. Bowe / '"4"
~
Date: ~ Examined By:
Date: IJ-I<
PrintlSi natu~e/Level Print/Si natufe'iLevel Responsible Engineer Review:
Acceptable:
Yes [gI No 0 (Detailed VT-1 Examination Required Attachment 7.3)
Comments:
VJl:A,,\\T1Iii./'r
.fblloJT if q I 10.. II
-- J;:.,*-r*";\\
Date:
I£_'"_._~,**._.
Date:_-L~+jI-,--I=7-/-0-<-I.=...O ANII Review:
Site Level III Review:__----'-N~/J'--A--'-----------Date:~
PrinVSjg~ature/Level
~a$6er:
Print/Signature IPEC00241305
a IPSO IP*RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Pa2e 28 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORM VT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3 /GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEC I Indian Point NO.3 COMPONENT NO. :__----=.V..=C..=C_-...:O=3 ZONE No:
001 Approximately 2" to 3" pop out at El. 48'-0" no more than I" deep. See photo D3-0InOl.
Numerous bugholes, minor vertical and joint cracks, leaching, scaling, and spalling.* These are generaJ conditions noted on containment that have NO impact to the structural integrity and faJl below the requirement for characterization of indications for future monitoring. However, this condition Scaffold connection hole spalled exposing the steel plate backing with surface corrosion and rust staining, approximately 6" x 8" with over 5' long rust stains (previously identified with no significant chan e). See hoto U3-0In02.
I 2
IPEC00241306
I EnteJgy IPEO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Page 29 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 IPEC00241307
I Entetgy IPEC IP*RPT*09-00069 1
REV. 0 I
Pae:e 30 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 2001 Inspection Photo IPEC00241308
A E IPEC IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~ ntergy I
Pa2e 31 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT*3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: IPEC - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1S!/3rd Inspection Inspection Report No.: IP3-09-IWL-001 Component No: VCC-04 Zone No: --'0....0"-=2'--__
Drawing No.:
ISl-IWL-001
==
Description:==
_---=E!.:.,.1.~43l:'.J_-....:E:=:I.:..:. 6~8,,-'
Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Streamlight - Litebox flashlight Limitations:
Accessible areas only g
9 Recording Condition RI NRI NI N1A Comments Leaching or chemical attack 0
[8J 0
0 1
Abrasion or erosion degradation 0
0 I:8J 0
Pop outs and voids 0
0
[8J 0
Scaling 0
0
[8J 0
Spalls 0
0
[8J 0
Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces 0
0
[8J 0
Cracks 0
[8J 0
D 1
Exposed reinforcing steel 0
0
[8J 0
Deteriorating of concrete coating, if applicable 0
[8J 0
0 2
Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal 0
D
[8J 0
surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts D
D
[8J D
Other (bugholes) 0
[8J 0
0 1
\\Note: tiKetcnes or pIctures me ~~
to clamy Inspectlon areas anc locations.)
J. Skoniecznv~k-Date!) -l6 Examined By: P. Bowe i~~Date:
- Examined By:
Print/Si nature7Cevel PrintlSi natur'7Level Responsible Engineer Review:
Acceptable:
Yes [8J No 0 (Detailed VT*1 Examination Required Attachment 7.3)
Comments:
VA1trA68
~JtJl:
itJSlDi: Au'!. Bc?'ILelZ ~6b BL)! LOll'./{-
Date:_----<-?/-:/-/;-=-I_G".-t,".....,/c....::O=----__
ANI! Review:
f;;;~
~/
/" i/ / J2'
. /
~.
RE Signature: R. Drake I K.j*;::/.:!;-YP't. (';)(.70(/ C"A'~J.Q.
Date:
/--6--/ (/
print/S.i.Q~t~re/Level//,~
n p--*""
,/,,,,,~.
Site Level 111 Review:
AI/11 Date:
Print/Signature/Level CW~
~
PrinVSignature IPEC00241309
IPEO IP*RPT*09-00069 I
REV. 0
-===-Entergy I
Pa~e 32 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORMVT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3 /GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEC /Indian Point NO.3 ZONE No:
002 COMPONENT NO. :__----:;V~C;,.:::C~-....::O:....:.4 1
Numerous bugholes, leaching, vertical cracks - all minor with NO impact to structural integrity or ~
warrant the need for further characterization.
2 Coating is peeling and flaking.
9~
IPEC00241310
A IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Pae:e 33 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI. IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT-3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: IPEG - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1st/3 rd Inspection Inspection Report No.: IP3-09-IWL-001
==
Description:==
__--=.EI!.:........!,;43!:!,.'_-.....!E:::!I.:....;.6~8~'
Component No: VCe-05 Zone No:
_O~O~3~
Drawing No.:
ISI-IWL-001 Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Stream light - Utebox flashlight Limitations:
Accessible areas only Recording Condition Leaching or chemical attack Abrasion or erosion degradation Pop outs and voids Scaling Spalls Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces Cracks Exposed reinforcing steel Deteriorating of concrete coating, if applicable Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts Other RI NRI NI N/A D
181 D
D D
D 181 D
D D
181 D
D D
181 D
D D
181 D
D 181 D
D D
181 D
D D
D 181 D
D D
181 D
D D
181 D
D D
181 D
D D
181 D
Comments 1
2 3,4 (Note: ::iKetCnes or pictures ~oe.P1 to ClariTy inspeCtion areas ana lOCatiOns.)
Examined By: P. Bowe ;--r.::fI~
Date: ~ Examined By: J. Skonieczny ["LIl k.~..
Date: /J.-'6~~
PrintiSignature!:evel PrintiSignatu{~e/el Responsible Engineer Review:
,:>'~
Site Level III Review:
tJLA Date:
~S!~fLeVel ANII Review: ~
- g..~
Date:_~4f~/--'G"'-J-F-h.!:...'I=:.{)---
PrintiSignature IPEC00241311
IPEC IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Page 34 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORM VT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3 /GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEC / Indian Point NO.3 ZONE No:
003 COMPONENT NO. :__----"V-=C=C_--:O=5 A
1 Minor leaching and discoloration.
i~B 2
Visible rust spots with staining behind penetrations H37, H47, and H49.
qi>
3 Patched area has visible cracking.
~B 4
Cracking with inactive leaching - minor with no significant crack width. See photo U3-
~~
037161.
IPEC00241312
I Entetgy IPEC IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Page 35 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 IPEC00241313
A IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Pa2e 36 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT-31GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: IPEC - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1st/3rd Inspection Inspection Report No.:
IP3-09~IWL-001
==
Description:==
_-=E....
- 1....:,.43....'_---'E""I.....6""'80<...'
Component No: VCC-06 Zone No:
_0;:;<.:00<...4'--__
Drawing No.:
ISI-lWL-001 Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Streamlight - Litebox flashlight Limitations:
Accessible areas only I
.~ fCkl.rf)
Date:
~~__
Recording Condition RI NRI NI N1A Comments Leaching or chemical attack D
[8]
D D
6 Abrasion or erosion degradation D
D l'8J D
Pop outs and voids D
D
[8]
D Scaling D
D
[8]
D Spans D
[8]
D D
2,4,5 Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces D
D
[8]
D Cracks D
[8]
0 0
1 Exposed reinforcing steet 0
D
[8]
D Deteriorating of concrete coating, if applicable D
[8]
D 0
3 Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal 0
D
[8]
D surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts 0
D
[8]
D Other (bugholes) 0
[8]
D D
3 V'Ime:,=,Ketcnes or plClUres '\\'.
~spectlon areas anc locations.)
J. Skonieczny~It..:
Date:/J--t' Examined By: P. Bowe /~V Date:i.Examined By:
PrintlS;gnaturVlLe~el -
PrintiSignaturo/tevel Responsible Engineer Review:
Acceptable:
Yes [8]
No 0 (Detailed VT-1 Examination Required Attachment 7.3)
Comments:
";A~Tfl("f:, ~,...s\\
~ 'nee !1:U.IO...,;.Je.L RE S'lgnature' R Drake I A~.Z4:{~(d~.-i-.l)(~lf<:,lA/(-
.... -._."'"~.
\\~,-
ok'} r-:;a~/
__ m----,
PrinVS!9'riature/Le,!~/
Site Level III Review:_~_A!.:.2./--'A:..:I-\\~
Date:
PrinVSignature/Level ANIIReview: ~~ ~
PrinVSignature IPEC00241314
e IPSO IP*RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Page 37 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORMVT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEC /Indian Point No.3 ZONE No:
004 COMPONENT NO. :__-----:V...:::C...:::C_-..;:O=6 1
Minor cracking, less than 1132" wide, and discoloration.
q~
2 SpaJling, 6"x4"x3" deep, with exposed aggregate around pipe penetration Lc. See photo
~B U3-047 162.
3 General bugholes and coating cracking, flaking, peeling visible from Pipe Penetration Area. q~
4 Spalling, 4" x 4", with exposed aggregate around pipe penetration J. See photo U3-047163'.t~
Spalling, approximately 1" out from penetrations PP (180 degrees), Y (180 degrees), and q{V--\\?
RR (270 degrees).
6 Localized efflorescent staining throughout the Pipe Penetration Area.
~6 IPEC00241315
~Entergy IPEO IP-RPT*09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Paee 38 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 2001 Inspection Photo IPEC00241316 IWL-043-004 U3-047162
~Entergy IPEC IP*RPT-09*00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pa2e 39 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 IWL*043*004 U3-047163 IWL*043*004 IPEC00241317 U3*047164
~Entergy IPSO IP-RPT*09*00069 I
REV. 0 I
Paee 40 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 IWL*043*004 U3*047165 IWL*043*004 IPEC00241318 U3*047166
A IPEC IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
-:::::'Entergy I
Paee 41 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT-3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: lPEC - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1st/3rd Inspection Inspection Report No.: IP3-09-IWL-001
==
Description:==
_-=E:.:.,1...:.:.68:.:,.'_-...,:E:::,:I::..;.8~8"-'
Component No: VCC-O?
Zone No:
_O~O~1=--__
Drawing No.:
ISI-IWL-001 Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Celestron Giant 20x80 Binoculars Limitations:
Accessible areas only Recording Condition RI NRI NI NlA Comments Leaching or chemical attack 0
IZI 0
0 1
Abrasion or erosion degradation 0
0 t2I D
Pop outs and voids 0
D
[8,j D
Scaling D
[8,j D
D 1,2 Spalls 0
[8,j 0
0 1,2,3 Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces 0
0
[8,j D
Cracks 0
[8,j 0
0 1
Exposed reinforcing steel 0
0 IZI 0
Deteriorating of concrete coating, jf applicable 0
0 0
IZI Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal 0
0
[8,j 0
surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts 0
0
[8,j D
Other (bugholes) 0
[8,j 0
0 1
{NOte: ::iKetCnes or pictures ~ u"
'!..L L~pectlOnareas anc lOcatiOns.}
J. SkoniecznyJ-tk r
Date: tJ.-t Examined By: P. Bowe / -r.:::>)-""J" Date: ~ Examined By:
PrintlSignatun VLevel PrintlSignatur.~ evel
~
Responsible Engineer Review:
Acceptable:
Yes [8,j No 0 (Detailed VT-1 Examination Required Attachment 7.3)
Comments: V.wffl6f.':2",'[11 q (Rt>fl\\ 'F'6.U j2..t-I ('Pc:'. zo)
Date:_"'-/_:-----<C6_,-_/_t;_"---~
Site Level III Review:---:_---L.:M'-#-0
......I'-'--
Date:
Print/Signature/Level ANIIReview:~ ~
Print/Signature IPEC00241319
AE IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~ntergy I
Page 42 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XIJ IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORM VT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEC /Indian Point No.3 ZONE No:
001 COMPONENT NO. :__~V....:::C~C_--:O:.:..7
,t',
I Numerous bugholes, minor vertical and joint cracks, leaching, scaling, and spalling - all minor and cfJ[3 previously identified.
Horizontal and vertical joint intersection with spalling exposing aggregate and scaling.
~6 (previously identified)
Numerous areas of 3-4 ft long joint spalls with exposed aggregate. (previously identified) ~
IPEC00241320
IPSO IP*RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~- Entergy I
Palle 43 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECllON RECORD OF VT~3/GENERALVISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: IPEC - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1sl/3rd Inspection Inspection Report No.: IP3-09-IWL-001
==
Description:==
_---=E!.:..1...l:!:6~8'_---"E=.!I......8:.c:8"-'
Component No: VCC-08 Zone No:
......:O~Oi!.::2=--__
Drawing No.:
ISI-IWL-001 Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Streamlight - Litebox flashlight Limitations:
Accessible areas only 9
g Recording Condition RI NRI NI NlA Comments Leaching or chemical attack 0
~
0 0
1 Abrasion or erosion degradation 0
0 181 0
Pop outs and voids 0
0
~
0 Scaling 0
0 181 0
Spalls 0
181 0
0 1
Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces 0
0 181 0
Cracks 0
[gJ 0
0 1,2 Exposed reinforcing steel D
0 181 0
Deteriorating of concrete coating, if applicable 0
181 D
0 4
Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal
~
0 0
D 3
surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts 0
0
~
0 Other (bugholes) 0
~
0 0
1 (NOte: ::iKetenes or pIctures m('
to ClarITY inspeCtion areas ana locations.)
D~
Date:
- Examined By: J. SkoniecznvG..ue..
~
Examined By: P. Bowe(~
Date:
- J-PrintlSi natur ~tevel PrintlSi natuPllewl Responsible Engineer Review:
Acceptable:
Yes ~
No 0 (Detailed VT-1 Examination Required Attachment 7.3)
Comments:
VANTltl.£ B,...r.; A\\,Ij,. £;P\\l.efZ., ~¢'~
(t?,.H\\..(:)U.)b G,j~,C>E.)
..~7* /;? 1,///1. ;/
RE Signature: R. Drake h/!:"'e.?t/~p*> ('\\",,'i//.,£~F't/{_~**
Date:
t.' ~).._-/ a
/"....
PrinVSlgnature/Level/'
~-."'"
c~*"
Site Level III Review:
tJLA Date:~~~
PrinVSignature/Level ANII Review: ~
lfies.e::r-Date:
?Jis-Ao PrinVSignature IPEC00241321
A IPEO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
-:::;::Entergy I
Page 44 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORM VT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEC / Indian Point NO.3 ZONE No:
002 COMPONENT NO. :__---"V-=C=C'----=O=8
~
1 Numerous bugholes, leaching and vertical cracking - all minor and previously identified 2
Large pattern cracking and joint cracking, less than 1/16" wide (previously identified). See ~D photo 027211.
Exposed embedded plate, 2" diameter with a 3" diameter spall, with rust staining. No rpt'f>
noticeable change since 2001 inspection. See photo U3-0272 12.
Coating peeling and flaking.
~B IPEC00241322
ItEntergy IPEO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pal!e 45 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 IWL-06S*002 U3-026213 IWL-06S-002 IPEC00241323 U3-027211
~Entergy IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0 I
Paee 46 of 192 IP3 ASME SectionXI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 2001 Inspection Photo IWL*068*002 IPEC00241324 U3*027212
IPEC IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
~Entergy I
Palte 47 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT-3/GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Plant: IPEC - Unit 3 Interval Period: 1st/3rd Inspection Inspection Report No.: IP3-09-IWL-001
==
Description:==
_-=EI:.:.,..=68...'_-.....:E=I.:..;.8=8::;.,.'
Component No: VCC-09 Zone No: _0""'0...,3<--__
Drawing No.:
ISI-IWL-001 Work Order No:
138856 Equipment Used:
Celestron Giant 20x80 Binoculars Limitations:
Accessible areas only
--~
9 9
Recording Condition RI NRI NI N1A Comments Leaching or chemical attack 0
121 0
0 1
Abrasion or erosion degradation 0
0 121 0
Pop outs and voids 0
121 0
D 3,5 Scaling D
D
!Xl 0
Spalis 0
121 0
0 1
Corrosion staining on concrete surfaces 0
121 D
0 3
Cracks D
121 D
0 1
Exposed reinforcing steel
!Xl 0
0 0
3 Deteriorating of concrete coating, if applicable 0
0 0
121 Excessive corrosion of the exposed embedded metal 0
0 121 0
surfaces Detached embedment or loose bolts 0
D
!Xl D
Other (bugholes, exposed aggregate) 0 121 D
D 1A (Note: :::iKetcnes or pLctures ~'"
~~nspectLon areas anc LocatLons.)
Examined By: P. Bowe / ~V Date:
11-~/DCf Examined By: J. SkonieCZny~~
Date:lj---(f PrintiSi nature/Level PrlntlSi natu LeVel Responsible Engineer Review:
Acceptable:
Yes 121 No 0 (Detailed VT-1 Examination Required Attachment 7.3)
Comments:
~IJTIlb£ ~l,JT-I\\-:; f"RP"" rI6l)l2.G l D.,,) ?G '20 Date:._-'-,~~0'---'s=---.;b<--:.I1-="---
RE Signature: R Drake 17f.~o?""'-"-LL.:.:...::L-r-~L...A~"-----'''-- oate:_----:./_
i
~_0_*~_~_1:'-0_-*_*
PrinV~l9 Site Level 111 Review:__-<-N::..;h'-"It...:....-
Date:
~g::ILeVel ANIIReview: ~ ~
Print/Signature IPEC00241325
A IPSO IP-RPT-09-00069 I
REV. 0
-=;::;-Entergy I
Page 48 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 FORM VT-3C CONTAINMENT INSERVICE INSPECTION RECORD OF VT - 3 /GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION STATION/UNIT: IPEC /Indian Point NO.3 ZONE No:
003 COMPONENT NO. :__----:V..=C..=C_-...::O:.:::,9 Numerous bugholes, leaching, spalling and cracking - all minor and previously identified.
~
Void with rust and staining. This indication based on previous inspection photos is located 2
in the Auxiliary Feedwater Building and therefore is being moved to zone 2 based on
~
containment rollout drawing lSI-IWL-OO1. See component no. VCC-08 for comparative photos.
3 Two 1" diameter pop outs with exposed rebar and minor rust staining. The indications are t?E>
visible from Electrical Tunnel roof, located at EL 80'-0". See photo U3-037283.
4 Two areas of exposed aggregate, 12" x 4" and 12" x 6", visible from Electrical Tunnel roof.
~~f>
See photos U3-037284 & U3-037285.
Void from wood removal during 2001 inspection, 2" x 1" x 3" deep, and a piece ofexposed
~P metal, 2" xl", with surface corrosion and staining, immediately adjacent. The indication is visible from Electrical Tunnel roof, located at EL 73'-0". See photo U3-037282.
IPEC00241326
-Entetgy IPEC IP-RPT*09*00069 I
REV. 0 I
Pal!e 49 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 IWL*68*003 U3*037282 IPEC00241327 2001 Inspection during removal of wood
I Entetgy IPEO IP-RPT-09-00069 1
REV. 0 I
Pa2e 50 of 192 IP3 ASME Section XI, IWL Concrete Containment Inspection for 2009 IPEC00241328