ML12011A214
| ML12011A214 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse |
| Issue date: | 12/27/2011 |
| From: | Operations Branch III |
| To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML12011A214 (3) | |
Text
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENOC Facsimile Rev. 0 ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Facility: Davis-Besse Date of Exam Weeks of 12/5 & 12/12 2011 Operating Test No.:
Tier /
Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection RO OUTLINE 1/2 000005 AK2.03 Question 20 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have a Metroscope. Randomly selected AK2.01 as a replacement.
2/1 025 K4.02 Question 43 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have Ice Condensers.
Randomly selected 006 K4.26 as a replacement.
2/1 005 K4.12 Question 31 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have a piggy back RHR mode that interfaces with the containment spray system. Randomly selected 005 K4.02 as a replacement.
2/2 086 K1.01 Question 65 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have a cross-connect between fire protection and the service water system. Randomly selected 086 K1.03 as a replacement.
2/1 004 K6.15 Question 30 on the outline, DB does not have hard piped vents for the makeup pumps. Additionally, the K/A is apparently looking at a malfunction of the connection to LRS and the reason for venting to the LRS. Discussed with chief examiner on 9/7/11, and agreed to reject this K/A and randomly select another K/A. Randomly selected 004 K6.13 as a replacement.
2/1 103 A2.04 Question 55 on the outline, the K/A is addressing the impact of a failed containment evacuation alarm and the procedures to correct it. We could not locate any DB specific procedure that addresses contingencies for a failed containment evacuation alarm. Discussed with chief examiner on 9/7/11, and agreed to reject this K/A and randomly select another K/A. Randomly selected 103 A2.03 as a replacement.
2/2 001 A1.11 Question 56 on the outline, there are no subcooling requirements at DB for operating the CRDS during shutdown. Discussed with chief examiner on 9/7/11, and agreed to reject this K/A and randomly select another K/A. Randomly selected 001 A1.07 as a replacement.
SRO OUTLINE 2/1 076 2.4.20 Question 89 on the outline, There are no SWS warnings, cautions, or notes within the EOP network. The only EOP SWS references are for verifying auto starts and backup water supply to AFW. Randomly selected generic KA 2.4.45 as a replacement.
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 1 of 2 FENOC Facsimile Final ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Facility: Davis-Besse Date of Exam 12/5 thru 12/15 2011 Operating Test No.: 2011 NRC Exam Tier /
Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection RO OUTLINE 1/2 000005 AK2.03 Question 20 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have a Metroscope. Randomly selected AK2.01 as a replacement.
2/1 025 K4.02 Question 43 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have Ice Condensers.
Randomly selected 006 K4.26 as a replacement.
2/1 005 K4.12 Question 31 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have a piggy back RHR mode that interfaces with the containment spray system. Randomly selected 005 K4.02 as a replacement.
2/2 086 K1.01 Question 65 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have a cross-connect between fire protection and the service water system. Randomly selected 086 K1.03 as a replacement.
2/1 004 K6.15 Question 30 on the outline, Davis Besse does not have hard piped vents for the makeup pumps. Additionally, the K/A is apparently looking at a malfunction of the connection to LRS and the reason for venting to the LRS. Discussed with chief examiner on 9/7/11, and agreed to reject this K/A and randomly select another K/A. Randomly selected 004 K6.13 as a replacement.
2/1 103 A2.04 Question 55 on the outline, the K/A is addressing the impact of a failed containment evacuation alarm and the procedures to correct it. We could not locate any Davis Besse specific procedure that addresses contingencies for a failed containment evacuation alarm. Discussed with chief examiner on 9/7/11, and agreed to reject this K/A and randomly select another K/A. Randomly selected 103 A2.03 as a replacement.
2/2 001 A1.11 Question 56 on the outline, there are no subcooling requirements at Davis Besse for operating the CRDS during shutdown. Discussed with chief examiner on 9/7/11, and agreed to reject this K/A and randomly select another K/A. Randomly selected 001 A1.07 as a replacement.
2/2 027 K2.01 Question 58 on the outline, at Davis Besse the only fans in the iodine removal system are associated with emergency ventilation. Through discussions with the chief examiner, it was determined that we are unable to construct a discriminatory question for this K/A. Randomly selected 016 A2.02 as a replacement.
2/2 028 A4.02 Question 59 on the outline, through discussions with the chief examiner, it was determined that we are unable to construct a discriminatory question for this K/A.
Randomly selected 028 A4.01 as a replacement.
2/2 033 A3.01 Question 61 on the outline, at Davis Besse the SFPCS does not have any temperature control valves. Through discussions with the chief examiner, it was determined that we are unable to construct a discriminatory question for this K/A.
Randomly selected 033 K1.02 as a replacement.
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 2 of 2 FENOC Facsimile Final ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Facility: Davis-Besse Date of Exam 12/5 thru 12/15 2011 Operating Test No.: 2011 NRC Exam Tier /
Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection SRO OUTLINE 2/1 076 2.4.20 Question 89 on the outline, There are no SWS warnings, cautions, or notes within the EOP network. The only EOP SWS references are for verifying auto starts and backup water supply to AFW. Randomly selected generic KA 2.4.45 as a replacement.