ML11325A242

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (46) of Louisa Hamachek, Opposing NRC-2010-0029-0015, Energy Northwest, Columbia Generating Station; Opposing Draft Supplement 47 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings
ML11325A242
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 11/12/2011
From: Hamachek L
Nuke Info Project
To:
Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch
References
76FR54502 00046, NRC-2010-0029-0015
Download: ML11325A242 (1)


Text

?/ / /.Q0// Page 1 of 1 As of: November 16, 2011 Received:

November 12, 2011 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPost Tracking No. 80f6b26a Comments Due: November 16, 2011 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2010-0029 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Columbia Generating Station Facility Operating License Comment On: NRC-2010-0029-0015 Energy Northwest, Columbia Generating Station; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 47 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for the License Renewal of Columbia Generating Station Document:

NRC-2010-0029-DRAFT-0058 Comment on FR Doc # 2011-22415 Submitter Information

-]Name: Louisa Hamachek : Address: c.366 Clark St. -, Eugene, OR, 97401 Organization:

Nuke Info Project Co Government Agency Type: Federal Fn Government Agency: NRC CIO General Comment No Reliscencing of the Columbia Generating Station.You can not guarantee our safety in EarthQuakes the 3.5 in September is considered part of a frequent seismic activity on the fault line where Hanford is.ON THE COLUMBIA!not acceptable.

The NW energy depts have said we don't need the 7% generated by the NUKE- we can get by with solar, wind, RES AND MAINLY, TOTALLY, WITH ENERGY cONSERVATION.

a sound NO to Reliscencing-Its not worth the risk.Sorry no bomb stuff for you. ,-/0 S 6-https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648Of6b26...

11/16/2011