ML11262A069
| ML11262A069 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/27/2010 |
| From: | Bo Pham License Renewal Projects Branch 1 |
| To: | Dover R AECOM |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0113 | |
| Download: ML11262A069 (4) | |
Text
al
/
Pham, Bo From:
Pham, B0 Sent:
Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:59 AM To:
'Dover, Robert'; Dillard, Steve Cc:
Hurley, Bobbie; Spangler, Nicole
Subject:
RE: Status - Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS I have the active version & will contact you if I have questions. Thanks!
Bo Pham Chief, Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-8450 From: Dover, Robert [mailto: Robert. Dover@aecom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:49 AM To: Dillard, Steve; Pham, Bo Cc: Hurley, Bobbie; Spangler, Nicole
Subject:
RE: Status - Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS Bo - the two revisions we just discussed are attached. I'm not sure if you have the active version, or Nicole does, so I am copying to both of you. The yellow highlights are the items I modified earlier this morning, and the two we just talked about are in track changes.
Please call if there are any questions.
Bob Dover 864-918-2892 From: Dillard, Steve Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:11 AM To: Dover, Robert
Subject:
FW: Status - Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS Importance: High From: Hurley, Bobbie Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:56 AM To: Duda, Steve; Dillard, Steve Cc: Pham, Bo
Subject:
FW: Status - Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS Importance: High Steve Dillard, Please call Bo directly to discuss the following. I am in my office, please call me down if you need me Bobbie Hurley Section/Office Manager 1
D 864.234.8913 t()(6) nooie, nuieyw-aeCOMcmM From: Pham, Bo [1]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:53 AM To: Spangler, Nicole; Hurley, Bobbie Cc: Perkins, Leslie; Logan, Dennis; Imboden, Andy
Subject:
RE: Status - Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS
- Bobbie, I need to speak to Steve Dillard/Duda about the NJPDES situation; need some clarification regarding pg. 41.
The obvious question came up because on pg. 2-38, where we talk about the Salem NJPDES permit, we say:
Correspondence provided with the applicant's ER indicates that a renewal application was filed on January 31, 2006. During the site audit, NJDEP staff confirmed that the application was still underRoing review, so the 2001 permit is still considered to be in force. No substantial changes in permit conditions are anticipated.
But for the similar paragraph on 2-41 regarding HCGS, we have a very different statement, which makes it read like we didn't consider much for HCGS during the audit:
Correspondence provided with the applicant's ER indicates that a renewal application was filed on August 30, 2007. However, the current status of that renewal is not provided within the ER and attached NJPDES permit (PSEG, 2009b).
Thanks.
Bo Pham Chief, Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-8450 From: Spangler, Nicole [2]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 9:43 AM To: Pham, Bo; Hurley, Bobbie Cc: Perkins, Leslie
Subject:
RE: Status - Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS Bo, Here are the responses/clarification to the comments.
Ptease Let me know if you wish to discuss any of these further so we can have the appropriate people on the phone.
Pg. 41 The current NJPDES Permit No. NJ0025411 for the HCGS facility was issued in early 2003, with an effective date of March 1, 2003, and an expiration date of February 29, 2008 (NJDEP, 2003). [hepermit requires that a e
prepared at least 180 days in advance of the expiration date. Correspondence prowdedi'A*Sedx:,B (Faqes B-67 toB-70) wi-h. othe applicant's ER indicates that a renewal application was filedoýAuYgut,30,"2007. [ _However, the current status of that renewal is not provided within the ER and attached NJPDES permit (PSEG, 2009b).
2
The ind6ustrial wasteWater discharges which are includeld under.theHC.GS NJPDES permit are sregulated at five a t'..
desatedDSNs 46 1A, 4C(mis*ing*;,, 16A(o`il/water sepa rator)- a' d SLIA (sewage treatment'lahs*iteSTP]). [Dischr6Ai.. s61A i-the disc harge for the coolhti waqter blowdown, and the permit established reporting and compliance limits for intake and discharge volume (in MGD), pH, chlorine-produced oxidants, intake and discharge temperature, total organic carbon, and heat content in millions of BTUs per hour, in both summer and winter (NJDEP, 2003).
Pg. 44 According the Figure B6 of Najarian Associates (2004),
Pg. 93/94 jTheý soi6e*'onomic.region, of influence (ROI) for Salem and HCGS is defined as thie areas in-which Salem and HCGS' employees and their families. reside, spend their income, and use their benefits,* thereby, affectingthe economic conditio*n'ýs":W othe region. I.. The Salem and HCGS RO! consists of a four-county region where approximately 85 percent of Salem and 82 percent of HCGS employees reside: Salem, Gloucester, and Cumberland counties in New Jersey and New Castle County in Delaware. Salem and HCGS staff include shared corporate employees and Imatrixed em~peyee-iworkers (i.e., employees who 'work. collaborativelv between, both ',facilities).
The following sections describe the housing, public services, offsite land use,_
visual aesthetics and noise, population demography, and the economy in the ROI for Salem and HCGS.
Pg. 100 ALso, the reference Ortho-Rodgers, 2002 should be corrected to Orth-Rodgers, 2002 Gloucester County is located northeast of Salem County. Gloucester County has approximately 325 mi2 (840 kM2) of land and in 2008, had an estimated population of 287,860 residents, which represents a 12.6 percent increase since 2000 (USCB, 2010a).it i"s,the fastestgrow-i'g ounty in New Jersey (based on percent increase in population) and has the fastest growing municipality (Woolwich Township) on the East Coast (Gloucester County, 2010). Major land uses in the county are urban (26 percent) and agriculture (26 percent),
with 30 percent of the county land area vacant and 10 percent wetlands (Gloucester County, 2009). There are 113 farms with a total of 9,527 ac (3,800 ha; 4 percent of the county land area) that have been preserved in Gloucester County under the New Jersey Farmland Preservation Program (SADC, 2009).
Pg. 132 Orth-Rodgers. 2002. "Planning for the Future: A Summary of Cumberland County Planning Initiatives,"
Prepared for the Cumberland County Department of Planning and Development. October 2002. Available at:
http://www.co.cumberland.ni.us/filestoraqe/173/251/761 /preface and text summary.pdf on May 17, 2010.
Pg. 134 http://www/salemcountyni.qov/cmssite/downloads/departments/Planninq Board/regiionalplan2004. pdf Also, on page 76 under shortnose sturgeon, Atlantic Sturgeon is mentioned for the first time and should have the scientific name (A.oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) included Nicole M. Spangler Environmental Engineer D 864.234.3283 nicole.spanqler@aecom.com A
Please consider the environment before you print this document 3
From: Pham, Bo [3]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 8:34 AM To: Hurley, Bobbie Cc: Perkins, Leslie; Spangler, Nicole
Subject:
FW: Status - Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS Importance: High
- Bobbie, Can you please set up the conference call me today instead of Leslie?
Thanks.
Bo Pham Chief, Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-8450 From: Perkins, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 5:50 AM To: Pham, Bo
Subject:
Status - Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS Importance: High Bo, I was having trouble getting on Citrix last night, so I was not able to work on DSEIS at home as I had planned.
When I tried this morning I was able to get on. I will definitely plan stay late in office after training today to finishing resolving OGC comments. However, I do need help following up with Bobbie Hurley to resolve some of the comment. She sent me an email yesterday indicating that she could arrange for have conference the appropriate technical person to discuss the questions,, since I am training it will be hard for me do a conference call.
If someone could follow up with her today, I would appreciate it. Attached is the version of Chapter 2 that I sent to her that includes OGC comments/questions. If we can get these comments resolved today, then I can make the changes this evening sent to Brian Harris. I will follow up with later this morning during one of my breaks.
Comment/questions are on pages 41, 93, 94, 100 in the attachment.
I will touch base with later this morning. My cell is ()(6'
- Thanks, Leslie 4