ML11255A305
| ML11255A305 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 04/01/2010 |
| From: | Richard Guzman Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Elkins S NRC/RES/DSA/RSAB |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0083 | |
| Download: ML11255A305 (1) | |
Text
From:
Guzman, Richard
- A R To:
Elkins. Scott Cc:
Yerokun. Jimi; Schaperow. Jason; Burnell, Scott Cotton. Karen; Hughey. John
Subject:
RE: SOARCA documents for review by Surry Power Station Date:
Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:15:00 AM Thanks Scott. We'll send you a confirmation email once we get the report from the licensee (separate transmittals) that they have successfully received and can open the attachments.
Rich From: Elkins, Scott Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:09 AM To: Guzman, Richard Cc: Yerokun, Jimi; Schaperow, Jason; Burnell, Scott; Cotton, Karen
Subject:
SOARCA documents for review by Surry Power Station
- Rich, Please find attached two SOARCA documents. These attachments include sections of the SOARCA NUREG for purposes of performing a fact check/error check by Surry Power Station personnel. The first document is a compiled collection of 13 pages extracted from the SOARCA Summary document which contains individual pages with Surry specific information to be checked for accuracy. The second attachment is the Surry Integrated Analysis document (Appendix B, 306 pages) in its entirety to be fact checked/error checked.
As we discussed in our teleconference with the licensee our interests in their review are to check the document for accuracy of facts and statements that pertain to plant specific information as stated in the documents. Consistent with the informal agreement RES made with the licensee when it volunteered to participate, we are it to review the draft NUREG for any plant-specific factual errors Dn.
Additionally, the licensee receives this information in its pre-decisional state which is not ready for release to the public. These documents are DRAFT and will be edited further and may include changes to how results are reported, before they are released by the NRC. It should be emphasized that this document should be controlled in such a manner as to limit its distribution to only those personnel necessary to complete the fact check/error check, as discussed in our teleconference with the licensee last week. Under no circumstances are they to be released to the public.
RES personnel are available throughout the review period for discussions/questions with the licensee regarding this request.
- Regards, Scott Elkins