ML11102A016

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

E-Mail Acceptance Review for TSTF-361-A RHR Lop Testing (TAC ME5853/ME5854)
ML11102A016
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/12/2011
From: Patrick Boyle
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Ajluni M, Stringfellow J
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Boyle P
References
TAC ME5853, TAC ME5854
Download: ML11102A016 (1)


Text

From:

Boyle, Patrick Sent:

Tuesday, April 12, 2011 9:36 AM To:

'njstring@southernco.com'; 'Midlik, David W.'; 'Hill, Lesa P.'; 'Ajluni, Mark J.'

Cc:

Martin, Robert; Lingam, Siva

Subject:

Acceptance Review for VEGP TSTF-361-A RHR lop testing - ME5853/ME5854 By letter dated March 14, 2011, SNC submitted a license amendment request (NL-10-2078), for the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request for Incorporation of Previously Approved Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler TSTF-361-A, 'Allow Standby SDC/RHR/DHR Loop to Inoperable Support Testing. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required.

This section stipulates that the submittal addresses the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Patrick Boyle, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation TAC ME5853 and ME5854 Dockets 50-424 and 50-425