ML110691148
| ML110691148 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 06/01/2010 |
| From: | Daniel Frumkin NRC/NRR/DRA |
| To: | Brian Metzger NRC/NRR/DRA/AFPB |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0069 | |
| Download: ML110691148 (1) | |
Text
Metzger, Brian From:
Frumkin, Daniel, Sent:
Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:02 PM To:
Metzger, Brian INZA-
Subject:
RE: OC Exemptions I don't have a preference. Since it is just cutting and pasting the common sections, there likely isn't much burden to do two.
Dan
Original Message -----
From: Metzger, Brian \\V_
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:39 PM To: Frumkin, Daniel
Subject:
FW: OC Exemptions Do you have an opinion or preference on this?
It seems like it would be easier in the long run to combine them into one SE especially since they're both for OMAs for the same purpose.
-Original Messa From: Miller, Ed AM:-
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:37 PM To: Metzger, Brian
Subject:
RE: OC Exemptions My personal preference is to generate two separate exemptions since we have two separate EAs (or will once I publish the second).
You guys can combine into one internal SE if you wish, but I would prefer to issue two separate exemptions.
Original Message -----
From: Metzger, BrianT Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 11:14 AM To: Miller, Ed
Subject:
OC Exemptions Ed, Can you remind me what the conclusion was as to whether the Oyster Creek exemption requests (TACs ME0756 & ME0780) needed to be two separate exemptions or if we can combine them into a single exemption?
- Regards, Brian Metzger Fire Protection Engineer, NRR/DRA/AFPB, Phone: 301-415-3972 Location: 0-1G13 Mail Stop: 0-1C15 1