ML110060026
| ML110060026 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 12/30/2010 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 75FR65249 00027, NRC-2010-0304, PRM-26-5 | |
| Download: ML110060026 (3) | |
Text
I"t PRM-26-5 (75FR65249)
DOCKETED USNRC January 4, 2011 (11:00am)Page 1 of I OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF As of: January 04, 2011 Received:
December 30 Status: Pending-Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. 80bc2027 Comments Due: Januar Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2010-0304 Nuclear Energy Institute
-Fitness-for-Duty Programs Comment On: NRC-2010-0304-0001 Anthony R. Pietrangelo on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute; Receipt of Petition for Rulemaking Document:
NRC-2010-0304-DRAFT-0017 Comment on FR Doc # 2010-26715 , 2010 ry 05, 2011 Submitter Information Name: Harvey Address: Ill Organization:
Braidwood Nuclear General Comment I worked a fall refuel outage as a Reactor Operator.
Coming out of the outage I had 4 days off and I chose to work 2 of them. I was then scheduled for 3 -12 hour shifts and was off again scheduled off for 4 days. I again chose to work 2 of my scheduled 4 days off. Those 4 shifts that I worked in the first week and a half of the cycle put a brick on any more hours of OT for the cycle. From 11/5 to 11/28 there were 9 days that I was scheduled off. Due to the work hour restriction I was not eligible to work any of those days. I had coworkers forced to work shifts that they did not want during that time period because I was at home unable to work. I really didn't need 23 days to recover from my 4 shifts of extra work. My coworkers really didn't want to work as evidenced that they were forced. Where is the quality of life/work balance in this situation?
.7 e a ip e .,= -2 6 --DS 16 https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/componentlsubmitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=Print&Printld...
01/04/2011 Rulemnaking Comments From: Sent: To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Gallagher, Carol Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:37 AM Rulemaking Comments Comment on PRM-26-5 NRC-2010-0304-DRAFT-0017.pdf Van, Attached for docketing is a comment from Mr. Harvey on PRM-26-5 that I received via the regulations.gov website on 12/30/10.Thanks, Carol 1 Received:
from HQCLSTRO1 .nrc.gov ([148.184.44.79])
by OWMS01 .nrc.gov ([148.184.100.43])
with mapi; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:37:12 -0500 Content-Type:
application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
binary From: "Gallagher, Carol" <Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov>
To: Rulemaking Comments <Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:36:32 -0500
Subject:
Comment on PRM-26-5 Thread-Topic:
Comment on PRM-26-5 Thread-Index:
AcusHMf9BR8d2dqGTBell2xjur/Ecw==
Message-ID:
<6F9E3C9DCAB9E448AAA49B8772A448C55EE2C8D422@HQCLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>Accept-Language:
en-US Content-Language:
en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
yes X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL:
-1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<6F9E3C9DCAB9E448AAA49B8772A448C55EE2C8D422@HQCLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>MIME-Version:
1.0