ML103481017
| ML103481017 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point, 07200062, 07201030  |
| Issue date: | 12/13/2010 |
| From: | Kristina Banovac NRC/NMSS/SFST/LID/LB |
| To: | Czaya P Florida Power & Light Co |
| Banovac K NMSS/SFST 492-3571 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML103481017 (1) | |
Text
NRC FORM 699 (9-2003)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE Page 1 12/13/2010 I
TELEPHONE NO.
305-246-7150
.CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU Paul Czava ORGANIZATION Florida Power and Liaht Company SUBJECT Discuss NRC's acceptance review of the Turkey Point 10 CFR Part 72 Exemption Request and the necessary Request for Supplemental Information
SUMMARY
(Continue on Page 2)
Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) attendee: Paul Czaya NRC attendee: Kristina Banovac TIME 1:00pm Kristina Banovac, NMSS/SFST/LID/LB contacted Paul Czaya (acting licensing manag er at Turkey Point, and contact for the Turkey Point Part 72 exemption request, while Robert Tomonto, licensing manager, is on vacation).
The purpose of the phone call was to discuss the status of NRC's acceptance rev iew of the Turkey Point Part 72 exemption request, dated November 5, 2010, and the need for supplemental information, before the NRC could begin its detailed technical review.
The request for supplemental information (RSI) will be sent to Turkey Point. The specific RSI is for FPL to provide further justification for the exemption request, specifically addressing what are the" necessary provisions and specific wording and clarifications" in the proposed Amendment No.1 to CoC 72-1030, and why they are needed for the upcoming initial fuel loading campaign at Turkey Point. The incoming request repeatedly mentions, but does not explain in any detail, why Amendment No. 0 to CoC 72-1030 is insufficient for use at Turkey Point (even though the request mentions that FPL is planning to utilize this amendment), and why Amd. 1 is needed. FPL will need to provide further details on this.
The staff also noticed some discussion in the request that needs clarification re: how FPL's planned fuel loading schedule would "afford FPL flexibility for fuel storage options to address issues or rec ommendations resulting from security aspects of spent fuel storage." It is not clear what is meant by that statement/discussion. This would be the type of clarification sought in an RAI, but the staff will include it in the RSI letter to FPL, and FPL may choose to respond and provide that clarification now.
NRC staff indicated that the RSI letter is expected to be issued by 12/21/10. FPL staff indicated that a 30-day response time would be adequate for FPL to respond and provide the requested information.
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED NRC to issue RSI letter by 12/21/10.
FPL to respond and provide supplemental information 30-days after the issuance of the RSI.
NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Kristina Banovac ACTION TAKEN See above.
I~RE DATE 12/14/2010 TITLE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION NRC FORM 699 (9-2003)
ISIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION DATE PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER