ML103200668

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Relief Request VR-7, One Time Replacement Frequency Extension
ML103200668
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/19/2010
From: Robert Carlson
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Bezilla M
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
David Marshall NRR/DORL/LPL3-2 415-154
References
TAC ME4284
Download: ML103200668 (7)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 19, 2010 Mr. Mark B. Bezilla Site Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-PY-A290 P.O. Box 97,10 Center Road Perry,OH 44081-0097

SUBJECT:

PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 - RELIEF REQUEST VR-7, ONE-TIME REPLACEMENT FREQUENCY EXTENSION (TAC NO. ME4284)

Dear Mr. Bezilla:

By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), dated July 13, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML102020259), FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, the licensee, submitted Relief Request (RR) VR-7 from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operations and Maintenance of Nuclear Plans Code (OM Code) requirements for testing of Class 2 and 3 thermal relief valves for the third 1 O-year inservice testing (1ST) program interval for Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (PNPP). The third 10-year 1ST interval for PNPP began on May 18,2009, and ends on May 17, 2019. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), 50.55a(a)(3)(ii),

the licensee requested relief from the ASME OM Code, to extend the test/replacement interval for seven PNPP relief valves, beyond 10 years, on a one-time basis, until the April 2011 refueling outage.

The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's submittal and has determined that compliance with the specified code requirements would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. Therefore, the alternative proposed in RR VR-7 is authorized pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3){ii), for the third 10-year 1ST interval for PNPP. The NRC staffs safety evaluation is enclosed.

M. Bezilla

- 2 Please contact the PNNP Project Manager, Michael Mahoney at (301) 415-3867 or Araceli T.

Billoch Colon (301) 415-3302 if you have any questions on this action.

Sincerely, Robert D. Carlson, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 111-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. STN 50-440

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELIEF ALTERNATIVE REQUEST VR-7 RELATED TO THE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM, THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. S0-440

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), dated July 13, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML1020202S9).

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC), the licensee, submitted Relief Request (RR)

VR-7 applicable to the third 10-year inservice testing (1ST) program interval at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (PNPP). The PNPP third 10-year 1ST program interval began on May 18.

2009, and ends on May 17, 2019. The licensee requested authorization to use an alternative test/replacement interval other than the one required by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code).

The licensee requested authorization to extend the test/replacement interval for PNPP relief valves 1E12-FOOOS, 1E12-F002SC, 1 E21-F0031, 1E22-F0014. 1P4S-FOS17, 1P4S-FOS43A, and 1 P4S-FOS43B, beyond 10 years, on a one-time basis, until the April 2011 refueling outage.

Specifically, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code ofFederal Regulations (10 CFR) SO.SSa(a)(3)(ii),

the licensee requested to use the proposed alternative in VR-7 since complying with the current ASME OM Code requirements would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

"Inservice Testing Requirements," 10 CFR SO.SSa(f) requires, in part, that ASME Class 1,2, and 3 components must meet the requirements of the ASME OM Code and applicable addenda, except where alternatives have been authorized pursuant to paragraphs (a)(3)(i) or (a)(3)(ii).

In proposing alternatives, a licensee must demonstrate that the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety, or compliance would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. Section SO.SSa in 10 CFR

- 2 allows the NRC to authorize alternatives to ASME OM Code requirements upon making necessary findings. The NRC's findings with respect to authorizing the alternative to the ASME OM Code are given below.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

3.1 Licensee's Alternative Request VR-7 The applicable ASME OM Code edition and addenda for PNPP is the 2001 Edition through the 2003 Addenda.

I STC-S240, "Safety and Relief Valves," states that, "Safety and relief valves shall meet the inservice test requirements of Mandatory Appendix I."

Mandatory Appendix I, 1-1390, "Test Frequency, Class 2 and 3 Pressure Relief Devices That Are Used for Thermal Relief Application," states that, "Tests shall be performed on all Class 2 and 3 relief devices used in thermal relief application every 10 years, unless performance data indicate more frequent testing is necessary. In lieu of tests, the Owner may replace the relief devices at a frequency of every 10 years, unless performance data indicate more frequent replacements are necessary."

Alternative testing was requested for the following components:

Thermal Relief Valves Class Code 1E12-FOOOS -

Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Shutdown Cooling Suction Relief 2

1 E 12-F002SC - RHR Loop C Injection Line Relief 2

1E21-F0031 -

Low Pressure Core Spray Pump Suction Line Relief 2

1E22-F0014 -

High Pressure Core Spray (HPCS) Waterleg Pump Suction Line Relief 2

1P4S-FOS17 -

HPCS Room Cooler Emergency Service Water (ESW) Relief 3

1 P4S-F0543A - ESW Loop A Line Relief 3

1P4S-FOS43B - ESW Loop B Line Relief 3

The licensee is requesting authorization to extend the test interval for PNPP relief valves 1 E12 FOOOS, 1E12-F002SC, 1E21-F0031, 1E22-F0014, 1P4S-FOS17, 1P4S-FOS43A, and 1P4S F0543B beyond 10 years on a one-time basis (approximately 3 months) until the April 2011 refueling outage.

The start of the PNPP 2011 refueling outage, originally scheduled to begin on February 21, 2011, was rescheduled and now will commence on April 18, 2011. As a result, seven thermal relief valves (1E12-FOOOS, 1E12-F002SC. 1 E21-F0031, 1E22-F0014, 1P4S-FOS17, 1P4S F0543A, and 1 P4S-FOS43B) scheduled for replacement during the outage. will exceed their Code mandated 1 O-year replacement frequency dates ranging from February 28 through March 12. 2011.

-3 The licensee's justification for extending the test/replacement interval for relief valves 1 E12 F0005, 1E12-F0025C, 1E21-F0031, 1E22-F0014, 1P45-F0517, 1P45-F0543A, and 1 P45-F05438 beyond 10 years is stated below:

There are no planned plant shutdowns or system specific outages of sufficient duration prior to the start of the rescheduled 2011 refueling outage to complete the necessary thermal relief valve replacements. Requiring a plant shutdown or system specific outage of sufficient duration solely to replace these valves within their Code mandated 10-year replacement frequency results in an adverse impact on plant operation (unplanned plant shutdown) or requires entry into multiple Technical Specifications limiting conditions of operation.

In lieu of the 10-year replacement frequency requirements of 1-1390, FENOC proposes the replacement frequency of the listed valves to be extended one time to account for the rescheduled start of PNPP's refueling outage. The short duration extension through the end of the refueling outage would allow PNPP to avoid implementing an unplanned plant shutdown or system specific outage of sufficient duration solely to replace these valves within their Code mandated 1 O-year replacement frequency.

Upon NRC approval of the 10 CFR 50.55a alternative request VR-11 on May 16, 2003 (ADAMS Accession No. ML031150313), PNPP re-categorized these valves from pressure relief valves to thermal relief valves and extended their replacement intervals to 10 years. Since re categorization of these valves in 2003, more frequent replacement frequencies (less than 10 years) has not been necessary. Prior to re-categorization of these valves, starting from initial plant operation in 1987, 28 of 29 as-found set pressure tests were satisfactory within the as found set pressures of ASME Code Section III (1974 Edition through 1975 Addenda),

Subsections NC/ND-3612.3, "Allowance for Variations from Design Conditions," criteria for their respective systems. As such, based on past performance, the short duration replacement frequency extensions for these valves do not significantly impact acceptable levels of quality and safety.

3.2

NRC Staff Evaluation

The licensee has proposed an alternative in lieu of the requirements found in 2001 Edition through 2003 Addenda of the ASME OM Code Section ISTC-5240 and Appendix I, Section 1 1390. Specifically, the licensee proposes to extend the 1 O-year test and/or replacement interval for a period not to exceed 3 months on a one-time basis for thermal relief valves 1 E 12-F0005, 1E12-F0025C, 1E21-F0031, 1E22-F0014, 1P45-F0517, 1P45-F0543A, and 1P45-F05438. This will allow these valves to be tested and/or replaced during the next PNPP refueling outage scheduled to begin on April 18, 2011.

Relief valves 1E12-F0005, 1E12-F0025C, 1 E21-F0031, 1E22-F0014, 1P45-F0517, 1P45 F0543A, and 1 P45-F05438 are being used in a thermal relief application which is defined as a relief device whose only overpressure protection function is to protect isolated components, systems, or portions of systems from fluid expansion caused by changes in fluid temperature.

The relief valves at PNPP have had a favorable maintenance history with minimal performance issues. After nearly 23 years of service, only one set pressure test was found to exceed recommended ASME piping system allowable design values. Industry experience indicates that

-4 the failure rates of thermal relief valves are low and additional degradation of these components would not be expected to occur during the additional test interval extension period. Therefore, the NRC staff finds that PNPP's proposed alternative provides reasonable assurance of operational readiness.

Based on the review of the information provided by the licensee and industry experience with these types of valves, the NRC staff finds that allowing approximately 3 months extension to the OM Code 10-year test interval requirement for thermal relief valves 1 E12-FOOOS, 1 E12-F002SC, 1 E21-F0031, 1E22-F0014, 1P4S-FOS17, 1P4S-FOS43A, and 1P4S-FOS43B still provides reasonable assurance of the operational readiness of these valves. Compliance with the specified ASME OM Code requirements would result in a hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.

4.0 CONCLUSION

Based on the above evaluation, the NRC staff has concluded that the licensee's proposed alternative in request VR-7 provides reasonable assurance that thermal relief valves 1 E12 FOOOS, 1 E12-F002SC, 1 E21-F0031, 1 E22-F0014, 1 P4S-FOS17, 1 P4S-FOS43A, and 1 P4S FOS43B are operationally ready. The relief request is authorized for the third 1 O-year inservice inspection interval, which commenced on May 12, 2009, and ends on May 17, 2019.

Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 10 CFR SO.SSa(a)(3)(ii), and is in compliance with the ASME OM Code's requirements.Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR SO.SSa(a)(3)(ii), the NRC staff authorizes the use of VR-7 at PNPP through April 2011, which is the start of the next refueling outage.

All other ASME OM Code requirements for which relief was not specifically requested and approved in the subject request for relief remain applicable.

Principal Contributor: Michael Farnan Date:

November 19, 2010

OFFICE NAME DATE 2/PM LPL3-2IPM IICPTB/BC*

LPL3-2/BC ABillochCol6n MMahoney THarris McMurtray 11/15/10 11/18/10 11/18/1 0 11/10/10 RCarlson 119/10 M. Bezilla

-2 Please contact the PNNP Project Manager, Michael Mahoney at (301) 415-3867 or Araceli T.

Billoch Col6n (301) 415-3302 if you have any questions on this action.

ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML103200668 NRR-028 Docket No. STN 50-440

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsNrrPMPerryResource RidsAcrsAcnw _MaiICTR Resource RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource Sincerely, IRA!

Robert D. Carlson, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 111-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation LPL3-2 RlF RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource RidsNrrLA THarris Resource RidsOgcRp Resource RidsNrrDciCptb Resource MFarnan, NRR DMezke, EDO Rill OFFICIAL RECORD COpy