ML102990362

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
6.1 Uneven Force Along Tendon
ML102990362
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/04/2010
From:
Progress Energy Co
To:
Office of Information Services
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0116
Download: ML102990362 (63)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:A6.1 Uneven Force Distribution along the Tendon due to Duct Friction

== Description:== The tendon force varies along the length of the tendon, with a maximum force at the jacking locations and a decreasing force towards the center of the tendon. These variations can lead to non-uniform pre-stress levels in the concrete material. The load F(x) at position x along the tendon is approximated by (FM 6.1 Exhibit 1 is the CR3 Design Basis Document 11 Rev.6 and contains numerical values): F(x) = F(O) exp (- p a - K s), where F(0) = Load at the jacking point, p = Angular friction coefficient, a = Total angle change (rad), typically p = 0.16, K = Wobble friction coefficient, typically K = 0.0003, and s = Length of tendon "straight" portion (ft). When K and/or p are too high, the concrete is locally subjected to a higher pre-stress. This issue has been somewhat reduced after issuance of RG 1.107 "Qualifications for cement grouting for pre-stressing tendons in containment structures" and RG 1.90 "In-service inspection of pres-stressed concrete containment structures with grouted tendons" led to using petroleum greases rather than grout for corrosion protection of highly stressed tendons (FM 6.1 Exhibit 2 is a 1982 paper by H. Ashar and D.J. Naus on the topic). Around penetrations, tendon curvatures are larger and friction losses are more important (FM 6.1 Exhibit 10 is an excerpt from the original Gilbert calculation on tendon force friction losses around the equipment hatch penetration). The higher localized stresses can cause local micro-fracturing or local enhanced creep rates. Data to be collected and Analyzed:

1. Compare the shop and field lift-off data collected during containment IWL inspections (FM 6.1 Exhibit 3 displays the shop and field measurement data for the various surveys and FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 is a summary of all these data);
2. Draw expected tendon force along the 120' long tendons (FM 6.1 Exhibit 5 is a curve of the force along a hoop tendon drawn using the equation and numerical values in the above description);

3/4/10 Page 1lof 3 Draft 1

== Description:== 6.1 Uneven Force Distribution along the Tendon due to Duct Friction The tendon force varies along the length of the tendon, with a maximum force at the jacking locations and a decreasing force towards the center of the tendon. These variations can lead to non-uniform pre-stress levels in the concrete material. The load F(x) at position x along the tendon is approximated by (FM 6.1 Exhibit 1 is the CR3 Design Basis Document 11 Rev.6 and contains numerical values): F(x) = F(O) exp(- IJ a - K s), where F(O) = Load at the jacking point, IJ = Angular friction coefficient, a = Total angle change (rad), typically 1-1 = 0.16, K = Wobble friction coefficient, typically K = 0.0003, and s = Length of tendon "straight" portion (ft). When K and/or 1-1 are too high, the concrete is locally subjected to a higher pre-stress. This issue has been somewhat reduced after issuance of RG 1.107 "Qualifications for cement grouting for pre-stressing tendons in containment structures" and RG 1.90 "In-service inspection of pres-stressed concrete containment structures with grouted tendons" led to using petroleum greases rather than grout for corrosion protection of highly stressed tendons (FM 6.1 Exhibit 2 is a 1982 paper by H. Ashar and D.J. Naus on the topic). Around penetrations, tendon curvatures are larger and friction losses are more important (FM 6.1 Exhibit 1 0 is an excerpt from the original Gilbert calculation on tendon force friction losses around the equipment hatch penetration). The higher localized stresses can cause local micro-fracturing or local enhanced creep rates. I Data to be collected and Analyzed: 111

11. Compare the shop and field lift-off data collected during containment IWL inspections (FM 6.1 Exhibit 3 displays the shop and field measurement data for the various surveys and FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 is a summary of all these data);

I 2. Draw expected tendon force along the 120' long tendons (FM 6.1 Exhibit 5 is a curve of the force along a hoop tendon drawn using I the equation and numerical values in the above description); C(JI 3/4/10 Draft 1 -PII Pi o~rietaF'( Cs"fi:h:: ilial, 2099 2010 Page 1 of 3 ~ ~elease to tl. 'tJdrtywl'maUl=peftllission '-l

3. Review grease losses in tendon sleeves (FM 6.1 Exhibit 6 displays the field measurement for grease losses for the various surveys and FM 6.1 Exhibit 7 is a summary of all these data);
4. Compare shims being used at the shop and field ends (FM 6.1 Exhibit 9 displays the shim thicknesses used at the shop and field ends as observed during surveillance 8 (last surveillance to date));

Verified Supporting Evidence:

a. Differences of 2-3% between the shop and field lift-off data are expected. CR3 surveillance data show much larger differences, up to 8% in survey 2 tendon 53H44, up to 12% in survey 4 tendon 13H40, up to 18% in survey 5 tendon 46H30, up to 20% in survey 6 tendon 42H33, up to 11% in survey 7 tendon 62H02, and up to 12% in survey 8 tendon 13H37 (FM 6.1 Exhibit 3 and FM 6.1 Exhibit 4);
b. The friction contributes to an un-even load distribution (FM 6.1 Exhibit 5). In particular around penetrations, the variation in the tendon force is large. For example, the difference between T1 = 172 ksi and T4 = 135 ksi (page 1 of 3 in FM 6.1 Exhibit 10) is equivalent to 25% variation;
c. Observations made by PSC personnel show the forces required to move the tendons out of the sleeves are much larger than the weight of the tendons (FM 6.1 Exhibit 8);

Verified Refuting Evidence:

a. The maximum force on a tendon running from buttress (n) to buttress (n+2) corresponds to the minimum force on a tendon running from buttress (n+l) to buttress (n+3). On average, the forces balance each other and the pre-stresses are relatively constant in various areas of the concrete.

Discussion: The shim heights for the hoop tendons are very even between the shop and field ends as observed during IWL surveillance #8 (FM 3/4/10 2999-2Q10-Page 2 of 3 Draft 1 D I I

3. Review grease losses in tendon sleeves (FM 6.1 Exhibit 6 displays the field measurement for grease losses for the various surveys and FM 6.1 Exhibit 7 is a summary of all these data);

I I 4. Compare shims being used at the shop and field ends (FM 6.1 Exhibit 9 displays the shim thicknesses used at the shop and field I ends as observed during surveillance 8 (last surveillance to date)); I I Ver~fied -;-~~porting Evidence: I I I

a. Differences of 2-3% between the shop and field lift-off data are expected. CR3 surveillance data show much larger differences, up to 8% in survey 2 tendon 53H44, up to 12% in survey 4 tendon 13H40, up to 18% in survey 5 tendon 46H30, up to 20% in

-survey 6 tendon 42H33, up to 11 % in survey 7 tendon 62H02, and up to 12% in survey 8 tendon 13H37 (FM 6.1 Exhibit 3 and FM 6.1 Exhibit 4);

b. The friction contributes to an un-even load distribution (FM 6.1 Exhibit 5). In particular around penetrations, the variation in the tendon force is large. For example, the difference between T1 = 172 ksi and T4 = 135 ksi (page 1 of 3 in FM 6.1 Exhibit 10) is equivalent to 25% variation;
c. Observations made by PSC personnel show the forces required to move the tendons out of the sleeves are much larger than the weight of the tendons (FM 6.1 Exhibit 8);

i--V-e-ri-fi-ed-R-e-fu-t-ing Evidence: I

a. The maximum force on a tendon running from buttress (n) to buttress (n+2) corresponds to the minimum force on a tendon constant in various areas of the concrete.

,I,l l running from buttress (n+1) to buttress (n+3). On average, the forces balance each other and the pre-stresses are relatively L---------------- ------------------------------- i i Discussion: The shim heights for the hoop tendons are very even between the shop and field ends as observed during IWL surveillance #8 (FM L _________________________________..:...________ 3/4/10 Draft 1 ~1~r8~ristry Co~fiaeEltiBI, 2000 2010 DtRttlt=~e~!!e te tAir~ pal1:9.'V itliout l"eEmissio~ Page 2 of 3

6.1 Exhibit 9 outlines the values). This indicates that the different lift-off values recorded at the shop and field ends (FM 6.1 Exhibit 3 and FM 6.1 Exhibit 4) are NOT due to installation issues. Additionally, grease losses are limited (FM 6.1 Exhibit 6 and FM 6.1 Exhibit

7) and cannot explain some of the tendon forces asymmetries.

We must note that a tendon running from buttress (n) to buttress (n+2) will have a maximum force at buttresses (n) and (n+2) (jacking points) and a minimum force at buttress (n+l) (its center)"while a tendon running from buttress (n+l) to buttress (n+3) will have a maximum force at buttresses (n+l) and (n+3) (jacking points) and a minimum force at buttress (n+2) (its center). Overall, the tendons will compensate and the average pre-stress is the same everywhere. Friction forces are particularly important around penetrations where the curvature of the tendons can be much larger. These local pre-stress gradients are in practice handled by adding high amounts of steel reinforcement in these regions of the concrete structure.

== Conclusion:== The differences between shop and field lift-off measurements are high at CR3. The uneven force along the tendons did not initiate the delamination. 3/4/10 Draft 1 Do pr~e eo44hi depa tV-iattt pcrm0-n Page 3 of 3 ~ Exhibit 9 outlines the values). This indicates that the different lift-off values recorded at the shop and field ends (F.M 6.1 Exhibit 31 I and FM 6.1 Exhibit 4) are NOT due to installation issues. Additionally, grease losses are limited (FM 6.1 Exhibit 6 and FM 6.1 Exhibit I I 7) and cannot explain some of the tendon forces asymmetries. [ i II' We must note that a tendon running from buttress (n) to b.uttress (n+2) will have a maximum force at buttresses (n) and (n+2) Oacking points) and a minimum force at buttress (n+1) (its center) while a tendon running from buttress (n+1) to buttress (n+3) will have a I maximum force at buttresses (n+1) and (n+3) Oacking points) and a minimum force at buttress (n+2) (its center). Overall, the tendons I will compensate and the average pre-stress is the same everywhere. I, Friction forces are particularly important around penetrations where the curvature of the tendons can be much larger. These local pre-stress gradients are in practice handled by adding high amounts of steel reinforcement in these regions of the concrete structure. I ! f-----------------.---.- --- i I

Conclusion:

I

.--***-----*------------*-----------------------------*---1 I The differences between shop and field lift-off measurements are high at CR3.

I The uneven force along the tendons did not initiate the delamination. I .1 ___ - 3/4/10 Draft 1 -PII P16f31 ietsl y Corrfidelltial, 28M 2010 Do:aet I ~le&5G<t third ~art9 :: iti'le!:lt J3erm iss jQ!' I .----~ Page 3 of 3

FM 6.1 Exhibit 1 page 1 of 1 Progress Energy CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 Page 27 of 44 Rev. 6 DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT SYSTEM NAME: CONTAINMENT - CYLINDRICAL WALLS, SYSTEM CODE: HAUNCH AND BUTTRESSES N/A PARAMETER SOURCE REASON

2.

Capacity of liner to resist G/C, Inc. Struc. Caic. The liner undergoes the same additional prestress limited FC 1.01.7/8 and 9. deformation as the concrete to 1.2 x fy =36 ksi. shell. Its resistance to such deformation is limited by its yield strength which is assumed to be 20% greater than the guaranteed minimum liner yield strength.

3.

Limit concrete tensile stress G/C, Inc. Struc. CaIc. ACI 318-63, Sec. 2605 limits due to membrane loads to FC 1.01.7/9. tensile stress in unreinforced 200 psi. concrete to 1 3-fjc Reinforcement provided to carry discontinuity stresses; prestressing system carries membrane stresses.

4.

Design anchorage zones

1.

Analysis and design of Extremely high stresses in the for: tendon anchorage zones, anchorage zone require special

a. bearing GAI Report 1730, 1970.

consideration.

b. spalling
2.

G/C, Inc. Struc. Calcs.

c. tensile splitting FC 1.01.7/56a through
d. transfer of unbalanced FC 1.01/7/57 and tendon forces FC 1.01.8/52 through FC 1.01.8/55.
3.

G/C, Inc. Struc. CaIc. FC 1.01.7/16.

4.

G/C,"Inc. Struc. Calcs. FC 1.01.3/303-315.

5.

Design parameters FSAR Sec. 5.2.5.2.1. 1.c Friction and wobble coefficients

a. coefficient of tendon (for reference only).

were specified by Prescon for the friction, 0.16 BBRV multi-wire tendon system.

b. wobble coefficient, G/C, Inc. Struc. CaIc.

Tests have shown the friction 0.0003 FC 1.01.7/16. coefficient to be closer to 0.08 but use of 0.16 is conservative. The 0.0003 wobble coefficient is still representative of industry practice.

c. max. allowable stress in tendon - less than 70% of minimum guaranteed ultimate strength.
6.

Draping around major openings - establish forces radial to opening. G/C, Inc. Struc. Calc. FC 1.01.7/16. G/C, Inc. Struc. Calcs. FC 1.01.15/1 through FC 1.01.15/46 and FC 1.01.16/1. As required by Section 2606 of ACI 318-63. A draping pattern was required which allowed tendons to pass around openings, but such that the radial pressure exerted in a direction toward the opening was minimal. Tab 1/1, Revision 6 FM 6.1 Exhibit 1 page 1 of 1 ~ Progress Energy CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 Page 27 of 44 Rev. 6 DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT SYSTEM NAME: CONTAINMENT - CYLINDRICAL WALLS, SYSTEM CODE: HAUNCH AND BUTTRESSES N/A PARAMETER SOURCE REASON

2.

Capacity of liner to resist G/C, Inc. Struc. Calc. The liner undergoes the same additional prestress limited FC 1.01.7/8 and 9. deformation as the concrete to 1.2 x fy = 36 ksi. shell. Its resistance to such deformation is limited by its yield strength which is assumed to be 20% greater than the guaranteed minimum liner yield strength.

3.

Limit concrete tensile stress G/C, Inc. Struc. Calc. ACI 318-63, Sec. 2605 limits due to membrane loads to FC 1.01.7/9. tensile stress in unreinforced 200 psi. concrete to 3.f1'c Reinforcement provided to carry, discontinuity stresses; prestressing system carries membrane stresses.

4.

Design anchorage zones

1.

Analysis and design of Extremely high stresses in the for: tendon anchorage zones, anchorage zone require special

a. bearing GAl Report 1730,1970.

consideration.

b. spalling
2.

G/C, Inc. Struc. Calcs.

c. tensile splitting FC 1.01.7/56a through
d. transfer of unbalanced FC 1.01/7/57 and tendon forces FC 1.01.8/52 through FC 1.01.8/55.
3.

G/C, Inc. Struc. Calc. FC 1.01.7/16.

4.

G/C, Inc. Struc. Calcs. FC 1.01.3/303-315.

5.

Design parameters FSAR Sec. 5.2.5.2.1.1.c Friction and wobble coefficients

a. coefficient of tendon (for reference only).

were specified by Prescon for the friction, 0.16 BBRV multi-wire tendon system.

b. wobble coefficient, G/C, Inc. Struc. Calc.

Tests have shown the friction 0.0003 FC 1.01.7/16. coefficient to be closer to 0.08 but use of 0.16 is conservative. The 0.0003 wobble coefficient is still representative of industry practice.

c. max. allowable stress in G/C, Inc. Struc. Calc.

As required by Section 2606 of tendon - less than 70% of FC 1.01.7/16. ACI318-63. minimum guaranteed ultimate strength.

6.

Draping around major G/C, Inc. Struc. Calcs. A draping pattern was required openings - establish forces FC 1.01.15/1 through which allowed tendons to pass radial to opening. FC 1.01.15/46 and around openings, but such that FC 1.01.16/1. the radial pressure exerted in a direction toward the opening was minimal. Tab 111, Revision 6

FM 6.1 Exhibit 2 page 1 of 1 H 1/1* Overview of the Use of Prestressed Concrete in U.S. Nuclear Power Plants H. Ashar Division of Engineering Technology. Ofice of Regulaiorv Research, US. Nuclear Regudaony Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. U.S..I. D.J. Naus Oak Ridge National Laborato'.y P.O. Box Y. Bldg. 9204-1. VS 16, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830. U.SA. Abstract The containment system of a nuclear power plant provides a key part of the overall plant's engineered-safety features. The structure serves as the final barrier against release of any radioactive fission products to the environment and consideration of public safety is one of the primary criteria in providing such a barrier. Originally the containment was envisioned as a static pressure envelope fabricated of steel and which would adequately contain the fission products released from the primary system during any credible accident scenario. As the size of the nuclear power plants increased, the costs of fabricating containment structures from stress-relieved steel plate became significant and it became advantageous to fabricate the containments of concrete. In addition to economic advantages, the concrete containments could be fabricated in vir-tually any size (thickness) and shape, they generally utilize indigenous materials for their construction, and they exhibit a ductile mode of failure (leak before break) which is pre-dictable and observable. The paper outlines the extent of the use of prestressed concrete containments in nuclear power plants.

However, the accident at Three Mile Island has changed the design parameters associated with the containment.

In addition to containing the radio- .activity during a postulated maximum LOCA, future containment designs should also provide for pressures generated during degraded core accidents. The change might give a slight edge to the application of prestressing in containmtnt design. The evolution of large size prestressing systems in the United States and abroad has been the result of the need to resist high pressures with the minimum number of tendons. Furthermore, corrosion inhibiting materials evolved simultaneously with the use of large size prestressing tendons. Cement grout and organic-petrolatum-based compounds needed to be specially formulated to assure thorough penetration through the tendon elements. Early in the development of prestressed concrete containments extensive dialogue occurred between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (k usry relative to the use of portland cement grout as a corrosion inhibitor. Concern by the regulators relative to the inability to inspect the prestressing tendons to insure their structural integrity resulted in the issuance of two regulatory guides (RGs) by the NRC: (1) "Qualifications for Cement Grouting for Prestressing Tendons in Containment Structures (RG 1.107)" and (2) "Inservice Inspection of Prestressed Concrete Containment Structures with Grouted Tendons (RG 1.90)." According to some observers this action eventually elimi-nated any incentives for the use of grouted tendons in prestressed concrete containments. In th. Ilnita fiti-* idlLton and functional capability of the ungrouted post-tensioning systems of prestressed concrete nuclear power plant containments be periodically assessed. This is accomplished, in part, systematically through an inset-vice tendon inspection program which must be developed and implemented for each containment. An overview of the essential elements of the inservice inspection requirements is presented and the effectiveness of these requirements is demonstrated through presentation of some of the potential problem areas which have been identified through the periodic assessments of the structural integrity of containments. Also, a summary of major problems which have been encountered with prestressed concrete construction at nuclear power plant containments in the United States is presented; that is, dome delamination, cracking of anchorheads, settlement of bearing plates, etc. The paper will conclude with an assessment of the over-all effectiveness of the prestressed concrete containments. -I-FM 6.1 Exhibit 2 page 1 of 1 H 1/1* Overview of the Use of Prestressed Concrete in U.S. Nuclear Power Plants H. Ashar DMsioll oj Ellgineering Technology. Q{Jice oJ Regula/orr Researcfl. US. Nuclear Regllimory Commission. /1lashingloll. D.C. 20555. CS.A, OJ. Naus Oak. Ridge Natiollal Laboratory. P.O. Box Y. Bldg. 9204-1,.I-fS 16. Oak. l~idge. Tell/lessee 37830. C.S.A. Abstract The cont,ainment system of a nuclear power plant provides a key part of the overall plant's engineered-safe ty features. The structure serves as the final barrier against release of any radioactive fission products tothe environment and consideration of public safety is one of the primary criteria in providing such a barrier. Originally the containment was envisioned as a static pressure envelope fabricated of steel and \\'hich would adequately contain the fission products released from the primary system dur:ing any credible accident scenar:io. As the size of the nuclear power plants increased, the costs of fabricating containment structures from scress-relieved steel plate became significant and it became advantageous to fabricate the containments of concrete. In addition to economic advantages, the concrete containments could be fabr:icated in vir* tually any size (thickness) and shape, they generally utilize indigenous materials for their construction, and they exhibit a ductile mode of failure (leak before break) Ivhich is pre-dictable and observable. The paper outlines the extent of the use of prestressed concrete containments in nuclear pOlver plants. However, the aCCident at Three Nile Island has Changed the design parameters associated I.ith the containment. In addition to containing the radio-activity during a postulated maximum LOCA, future containment designs should also provide for pressures generated during degraded core accidents. The change might give a slight edge to the application of prestressing in containm~nt design. The evolution of large size pre'stressing systems in the United States and abroad has been the result of the need to resist high pressures I.iCh the minimum number of tendons. Furthermore, corrosio~ inhibiting materials evolved simultaneously with the use of large size prestressing tendons. Cement grout and organic-petroLatum-based compounds needed to be specially formulated to assure thorough penetration through the tendon elements. Early in the development of prestressed concrete containments extensive dialogue occurred betIVeen the Nuclear Regulator Commiss' on J. us ry re ative to the use of portland cement groucas a corrosion inhibitor. Concern by the regulators relative to the inability to inspect the prestressing tendons to insure their structural integrity resulted in the issuance of two regulatory guides (RGs) by the NRC: (1) "Qualifications for Ce:uent Grouting for Prestressing Tendons in Containment Structures (RG 1.107)" and (2) "lnservice Inspection of Prestressed Concrete Containment Structures IVith Grouted Tendons (RG 1. 90)." According to some obse.rvees this action eventually elimi-nated any incentives for the use of grouted tendons in prestressed concrete containments. unc lena capability of the ungeouted post-tensioning systems of prestressed concrete nuclear power plant containments he periodically assessed. This is accomplished, in part, systematically through an inser-vice tendon inspection program which must be developed and implemented for each containment. An overview of the essential elements of the inservice inspection requirements is preoented and the effectiveness of these requirements is demonstrated through presentation of some of the potential problem areas which have been identified through the pet-1odic assessments of the structural integrity of containments. Also, a summary of major problems which have been encountered with prestressed concrete construction at nuclear power plant containments in the United Scates is presented; that is, dome delamination, cracking of anchorheads, settlement of bearing plates, etc. The paper will conclude with an assessment of the over-all effectiveness of the prestressed concrete containments. FM 6.1 Exhibit 3a Survey 1 page 1 of 4 tVIA FIVri 6 rgr.'-MIFSs reprr COIIFIMIiATIC41 rEST v'IME flDoPfs L 431 -IECT I 011 PERIO D Fr&.V IOS aJ~'1 CACA 7.119 L I roacK LIT.OF FORC J' I, At t of c ._*r.. -'° .2 _7.,.Z ~3 2. l.* l..OA*lI*.4: I to B6"uljer of bult~ece Iboareut to end of tar .4.l'l. TIliidCI*ISS: Cleat dlctanro botvocn bra*LinB pltel Cnd aireld lBIVZWZ: At time ei Inertellatton or prcvlous huryatilaoc GidI+iIkAL: At. tie of" etartl,,ln current eurve*tloabce, LITT-Orr Cm tD I? ltat XOK-6'F 1.OKC9I AV ;. OF SitI, GAGA E FIM.L SHMi FORCE 2 Ems uITRE Tmr~arsj tI wj*I I rus. FORCE THbIoErSS (k IVl (klI..) F M I.t' VIOUS PP TCINAL ( oft ) (lIr.) (in.) L.-- .4 1I-Z /2 4,. /1 'A ..,.+--_.,+..__ /-.. ..=_, .z. 7,. i .,,I,-.., FREACTOR DATE PLW TEX tw.r

Itr, l~l~

14 1? J .4 /*4r..- * , r N1OTE A: FORCE CALCULATION, (1) Force (8 Lift-off - Jack Ptessire it Jack c iecoc Agea OR: (2) Datersoea force from calibratien curve NOTE St Reactor ioildtarg internal temperature viii be reed uhing CI-274-T. or CL-27T-TE (temperature read at Johason Yafiel Ilt-) "OTC1 C: wire Force (Column 8) La defined ms follovo. W.F. - CCluon 7 163

  • Column 4 of Data mhect I NOTE D; lrpcctod lift-off force (colu-o 4) is defloed as folto'e:

INo. of effective wires ct installation (ot previolue Lnspeetlou) X Ave. predicted.. 1e foace ehowo on FIg. I at time of Inspection. idoo. USg washer.

6.

Contractor Review by: Dote: FP.,C. Approval bys Dates il I sill-FM 6.1 Exhibit 3a

,:7 IlISI'EctlOil PEalOD I

T"'""I 1 T.O. t[lCJ\\TI~ \\

  • i
1. V.=.!1'1

"'~.I' 17<"r 1.1.rt(.. 3 ~

c::

ti~ I.d(..,-

t.:.A.

Z. l>.:.1!'" + ") ~ .~". '1~ S"

z.:L
l. -y.:....!.:...,

/~~ ~ ~."...

'.kS 1o.T.'~

. --...... IJ+/- ,~ ..Y

L:l.

. ---:"0'

5

.:zJ: -..,...,..:..:!.~ ... ~ In,.-':. ~..2.3 I~. 3 L..!/

i. ".,:!j"
r:

/~.

' '7..t.
V"

,..~) 3 .J..L ~ Survey 1 MTA fllfr.T 6 I'IIF.STnr.ss r('~rF. ('(!f'Fln~IIIT!(\\II TEST rolF. Tn<OO~S Lr"*OFF Ctl!inl110fl tOKCi A\\'C. OF Sill!! 2 E:;r.s \\ltaE TUlr.x~fS1Li!!'...L kl

  • F(lr.CF.

l'!1tV lOllS I'I'lr.INAL 7 a lC! ,~ *...!s;Jp "IL!:I...')"' ~. ..' J J:!:o ~ ..!.!.1 &!J . gt /~v....z- ...:L-, /aEr Zi* / I~II "-1&0 ~ ~ . 'I I~S- .~

?3;.

..:r... !ill6 .!l:Z.'1 "l..:!:£<1 ~ !:t.S.... '7&1 -Z- ....:l- ~ /.:::.;J .2- .:.L. /,:t2.s" 9~:3 ..t:.2f,

'.0;-

.~1

~e

~ TI !~ ~. j ** -' lIat! A: I.DCl-r.Fr ~ tU..: .1.:1. IJ:.:;....

JJ.

.i.F..J.2.

1' l..
:f..:t "
z..c a..1~'
L..:t

"..LZ:.~ -r.., .!.:!:!:? -~ ~,,~;. .7..... ~ .::...;J. ~,.~ - ....e.!.

z::L

~ FOlIC! CALtlILAItON: (!) For.. e LUt-off

  • J~'" Pr *** "r. a J ** k 'htoG Ana 0lI: In Dot... l.. a force tr... coll~ratlc.. cur'"

HOT! '1 page 1 of 4 P.£.I.CTOR MTt HI)(: Tr.~l' I". l~'P, r.r 'r Th'T UT. 7~IT1'1S 14 n !~ 17 £' .!l2~ L.o," !' ':.~ ~- L::.:. ..1:.::..~. 'of .~.I

.L!..~

.4p:.<' ~'; .i:;:. -:t"'V. I ~~ -!L.f..' ::!..!..:: ~;;: ~~~-: ~: I ~ {,~... r:t.'" 5.: .~-: ... ~ ~: .L- ~, t.L:J." <11\\.--: ' '.:..!.:::: ~., ~j ~/ .t:.:...!: i.!!::.' .~O;-' I J **.- ~ a.aClor a..alell", W..... l tetoptroturo,,'11.... 04 ull., tl-Zl'-T£ or CI-Z7l-TE (tesp.ntur. rud at Joll",o" raMI n-I) lIorE C, V.. a Force (Col...... ) La clefb.4.. (oll""i. V.f ** Ctllu'ltft 7

16) - Col_.. 01 lIata :Ollnt 1 IIOTt D:

bp.cCod un-ou (oreo (colu,," 4) " doUIICd.. [all"".: lio. or.cr.. Uva ~Iru At loalolhtlon (or prnlou. in.poulo,,) II Av ** prNlct.4 ** t. ro,... luNa 011 Fla. 1 It U ** oC '... pecUon. I.C::An~': to.. lluoo11n or bull.... hoarut to ond of to""o'"

  • *1":1 TIIII;~tSS I fUVIIII;;;:

~UC1t""LI thAt dluon ** "tva. II beo~,". piau and Itu.. ln. wUliu

  • At tI... 01 lnotlll.tloa or~ prey'oul aurunlon.l.

At "co or ttlrtlns curr."t our... !U... c ** Contract 0' R.ylw ~11 __________ Doto: _________ _ r,p,c. IIpprovd.71 __________ DotO! _________ _

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3a Survey 1 page 2 of 4 DATA 11cc:! 7 ?RV.STPSS FORCE CClFTRMHATIOI TEST VPYTICAL T¶Flc mo5 123 ECTION PERIOD I..

  • tOCATtO`

I z. la_.. "1"

3. 3Y 6

T

5. -,5'6

._V, X _ 23,.- Trfw LlTT-OFP COWI~lT 111 PREVIOUS EXP 0 GACGE AVG. Of SHllM

FOIIC, Llr.OF ~Cf PRESS.

FORC9 2 EN4DS WIRE T14!CKIIESS-ti~.1- -i) (W.). (Ulnti ) (kips) FORCE firvioun oBR*IC AL '0-' T"le 165 ,V11i 5 2. 1567.5- 'JFI1s %M, V 4, 161ff 5- ~ /? .6-3 7S /5 o /517 q-ias 1637 /Y7?. 6 3 Z. IU IL76 ro 1~ 'I

  • 77. joa~

L4..L 1 REACTOR DATE LOCX-OFF BLDG UM?4 ty? 75.E CAGE FINAL SH14M fnsS. FOCES THICKFESS .XsItl Mki913 (In-) rXFr EXT.

  • T~*

it 12 t) 14 is 16 12-.*_ 8,:Z 17 89g ':f / V~i~? A 73 /5&1,5 /0 _a' 12 10, 11z"~ t I IL.C, A C-VA L, L Ir i-C, NOTE A: FORCE CALCUATION: (i) Farce 0 Lift-off - Jack Pressure a Jack Plecos Area OGt (Z)'DetarmLae force from calibration curve NOTE 5: Reacator Suldlu interesl temperature will be re*d uelog CI-27A-TE at Cl*j$-.I (temperature tead at Johnson Panel 11-5) MOTE C: we*e Force (Column 8) Is defined as follows: 3 Coluun 7 163 - Column 4 of Data Sheet 2 7z V"V rV,X I NOTIE D: IL3 Tc--';;A-il 5 i r y z

  • 6 5

V 8 Expected lift-off force (column 4) Is defined ae follows% 110. of effective Wirte at Installation (or previous Inapection) X Ave. predicated wire force ohown on FIS. 2 at time of Inapection. LOCTICNc: T or A - top or bottom (veiLccal tendon). Si11 TdICNELS: Clear distunce betweeo bearhrn pinto an etrcing waser. FW.1;O~r2S: At time of c n.Iellatton or krewta0u8, yvatllance. OUIGIUAL: At tmee of etrcting current t eurveillantce. Contractor Review by: Date: F.P.C. Approval by: Daae: / 22-1p FM 6.1 Exhibit 3a 11'SPtcti0li PtalOD ~ 2.:2..!!:! S" l.3ltvli

... :.~.f.:n::3

.J:. ...:r:.. L .L L .. s. ~v, or

."-'kNOTE*

III 'IG;;O':>~o\\) JI,S IC;:,'/ ]' :;::.s-G V trC~:~ fORCE IS.:J.!a 11tl Survey 1 OAT#. Sl![r.T, PRY.STR,S! roRr.~ CCltlflRHAtlCII Tr.~T VF.ftT ICAL T[!UlO~5 un-orr COlInITImt raact Ave. or SIlIK 2 tlllIS "lIE TKtClC~!SS [1~ll \\1

  • FORC!

'RrVlOU~ QRICI~AL 8 I 'lli 'OJ 'lb', 1~4' '~ ~.S <t,.w T 'J' ,J " 8 1/" '!:J2. 'l,m TIE" 1'Irli.. fI~

x 1m toJ'l!J.:J

~";" !.Jt: lZ&s* 11J.8. ~,O~ Tf.j"iI 8-C' '"!::t: lIarE A: LOCt-O,"' FIlIAL SKIli roatl TIIICIQ."ESS kl

  • 1ft I) 8,2 '?M

'5 -.!L1i U 15.f{L5 '3- * !'I~" -z.:z till u IruJ 7J. lill*s I~ rORo:E CA!.CUI.\\t10K, (I),.... (! Luc-oft

  • Juk P.......... J.ck PlatOD A...

Da, (II* an... 1D. force fr_.oll.... Uoa,ur'. lIarE., page 2 of 4 l!!...0..ir ' IJ 17 I(lft " 6..2.... Il.b..ln 102" ~,,, '~71 103' g '~"T IJll' J&: I~.1/" a.. ccor lulUI", laClfall ll'"l'... ture "Ill h r.. eI 10.1"1 CI-274-1£ or c1*nS-n (toO:P'flC.... rud It Jo:.OIOD raool U-.) lIarE c: Wire Fa... (Col.... n I) II oIlfloeci ** fall....., V., ** ep"" 7 163

  • Colu... 4 of D.t.. Shaft 2 liar! D:

Eapcctc4 Ufc-~ff fore. (.ob... 4) 10 ** fl... d ** foU.... ' 110. of.ffeeth... I.ao.C IOlu1luioo (Dr p.. wI.... tnlP""O") I AVI.,redle.te. "tre 10'".how" on F'a. 2., ~l.. 01 h'.pectloft. tDCAtlc:J: f or ** cop Or "atlOID ("', C1cd c.odoo). ~. SilllI t"dlCl::tSS: Clcat dlounce ".tv.... " ** rfllll pllll 'nc!...... Ina v.. bor. pi\\E':io-;s: At Cleo 0' t,,"t.\\lItlon 0..""1........ null ** c ** lC;1.~AI.: AC tl.. of ItArch; cu.unt.ur".Ul..... .~ CollttlClOr ledav 1>;: _________ DeCII ________ _ f *** C. App.o",ll>,: _________ Doce: ________ _

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3a Survey 1 page 3 of 4 PA Asih~rT 7 A MCK C."MM(q(fgATf"v rTMT V!!f?ICAL TI1III'IS ixS MCTICN rut 100 I .1REACTOR DAT LIFT-OFF MiDITI24 LOCK-OFr ISLD TNFp ET. 1 CAGE AVG. OF SIIM CACE FINAL SHIMl FORCE PRESS. FORCE 2 ENDS iRIE THICKNFSS (In,) PRESS. FORCE THICKIESS F

1)

(let) (kli*l) kis) FI0RCR Ptlvbot'S _R11TA (iqi) i r.g T 1T1AL PA,£V lOU$ I.P. Ltl',AT (kt ) 1 2 (2*. I!q T_

2. l~j~

j /. 2, EXPEC LIFI-OFFI (ktls & 6 7 ea

1.

iI 2 93 I Is 6, J S-2-* j /5_s-

X.

Z7 TIZ.. 132/* TI3 J3 -L-IF r-CI si_ _Ur'-r - ~ VOTE A: FO=E CALCULATION: (1) Force 0 LIft-off - Jack eraamere a Jack Piston Area Olt: (2) Determine force from calibrtiion curve OTE B0: Reactor buildlat Internal temperature will be read using CI-274-TE or CI-275-T (temperature good at-iobneom Panel 11-B) LOC-%TII: T or S - top or bottom (we LLuA tendon). SH'LN T!!M1C:£ESS: ClcAr dLstance bewccn beastr Plato and treass At tlme ofr i rllielo iou surveillantc GCAIJM.;: At. time of otarftng currantn arvuillaoe. NOTZ C: Vire Force (Column 8) is defined ac fo(lova: W.F. a Colu-n 7 163 - Column 4 of Data Sheet Z KOTE 0: 14'*ccted lift-off force (Column Is) io defined c "falloutl Nio. of effectcive wtea CE lnstalatlon (or previous tn*zpction) I Ave. predicated vire foos eshown on FIX. 2 aE time of Inspection. Ing vasahr. 0. Contractor Review by: Date: FrP.C. Approval by: _ _-te: INn -:i -i-il-i.-:l-{ FM 6.1 Exhibit 3a IXSn:CTIOlf rr.UOD --:-#-.---..L..-----r ~ ~T~F"~~~~Z. _________ ~----)r ~ CACt 1 I'

. t. 12.'11" I~:':I J.
4.

). t(,(,.ATIO'f .I.. x... I I I.1 pruS. hi ~ JOTt 10= Survey 1 ~!!..lA 1'!I!,;S'fRf:'\\'~ roH("fr <X<I<f'fR'fJ<TfClf ff'!tT \\'r.~T1r~'L TI'H~S L1 FT*OFr nllfDIT 1/)1/ I'ORC& love. OF 2 tltos IIIIt FOReF. e ~,S' ~7 ~S' l~tC("J SIlIM TM!CK~FSS PRIVIOtlS 9 J!tt" .12:.' lOCt(*OFF CAU FIlIAL SIIIK russ. rOKCE tHICICI'ESS (~. !! Iro) (I" ) 1 II

1)

J:J.;:r-<2£F c'~y' ...Ll. rr -.cfF OA)l-y roaa: CA1.CllLAtIO", (1) Force ~ LU,-off

  • Jack 'r... ure " Ja.k '0. Area 011:

(1) Det... L.... foreo fr... allbra, L.... e...". alOlE I: page 3 of 4 lI.CACTOR IlATt 'L~ TFMP !~S'. !"~P. tT of nIT. EXT l':1T1A4, l' U 16 I' -- aeactDC lun.t"' '"urllll u.. pnatur. "Ill be rea. uol", Cl-l14-tt or CI-2JS-tt (tnoperuure..... t*Jobuo. Panal \\1 ** ) ~ \\.OC.\\ TtC!{: S:! L'I t!t1CJ(!:t!S, UIC L-:Al.,

  • 1

,J..........,. !lOTI: C: ilL.. Fore. (Cob..... ) '" daflad I. follova: w,r ** Coll,"'n 7

16) - Coluan
  • 01 Dua 5h.., Z IIOfE D:

f.o., ** etc. 1I1&-0f( force (col.... 1,,) '" deU"ed.. *'011...... lto. of Iflc.U.. o vLr *** t 'o&&llla,'oa (or,r.orloUl IMpe.llo.. ' 1 II" ** predt.., ** "'ra lo,co.b....... (0" U,. 2 a, ll.e,,' lnspeulol\\. Cleu dlltance 'ltv.e" "Uf'" fluo a.... tn... l", VUhl., lie tim. 01 t.ocdUtlol\\ or '.,,1..... u... olU."u. At tllIl of turtl", cur.. "c,.urvoUl.. ce. Co"'r'.lor Re"te.. "y: _________ DUO: __________ _ F.',C:. Ap,roval.,. ____________ Dare: _________ _ I '1 j' ]1'1--1-1 FM 6.1 Exhibit 3a Survey 1 page 4 of 4 i PR.qTRPSS FOR MRCC1TMRATT04 WPST C ISFECTLC5 PERIO~D / REACTOR DATE ?.IT-07Fcfl~ltt~t4LOMOEPF NKJ Tfltp 1=.P VKSP. BIT PREVIOUS tECiTcf I CAGE AVG. of SIIL'i GOME FINAL SIILH FORCE LIFT-Orr rORcEj pRESS. FORCE 2 EMS winI ThIiOKNESS (La.) PRESS. FORCE 11:1CLItSS 0 L _01. lCATF1M (kt, "hpI II,( fIptl (kips M1XQ ?Rr.CE O-S VNICINAL ftsil (isp%) (ina.) INt. 1rT. ?211TAIA I 1 6 7 8 9 If) 1i 12 1)1.IS I ? 13_ -it-5, NOTcA .4 FORC 3-YUATOX rl FoUa itpt-.al PeaeaJc i~nAe 7-4. (2) Dete1.n /.- t. ei rti s u t I t LOCATJIl I to 6 -rumb., of buttress easres to andl OfL SIMC TiIIC1OESSt Clear distance betweena bescing Flate and attes, FREV2OUS; A: time of Installation or previous survaillsam -01IGIMAL: At tin.. of starting curren; surveilllance. NOTE 9: Reactor %wilding internal temperature vtIl be read using CI-274-TE or CI-275-TE (temperhture ree4 at Johnsoo panel it-1) NOTE C: Wire Force (Columa 8) is deflined as folLowe: W.V. - CoFSej 7 163 - Coluan 4 of Data Shoat 3 NOTE a: Expected lift-off force (column A) Is defIned so follows: No. Of effective wires at Iftstalltico (or previous Inipection) X Ave. predicted wite force shown on Fig. 3 ar time of Inspection. endpae. &rag washer. Contractor Revicv by; Dates F.P.C. Approval by: _ Dace: Mis ift M W U FM 6,1 Exhibit 3a Survey 1 page 4 of 4 ~~"! ~IIVP:T a ~- PRF.!lT~r.S~ F~Rcr. Cfl'frIR.'Io\\Tlo!! Tr.ST -=/t-...:./ I!I'OP Tr~'I\\(\\If~ t:lsrtCTlO~ r£R1OD

x Ii\\

JUCtCll DAtt TC':\\1l'~ I.! !l-orr IX'NIItTlOff LOM(-O'[ M.\\)(; Tflfl' .!m.. ill!:.:....!! tU[crb I f\\lIlC£ 'RtVIOUS CAGE ,we. or SKIll CAGE FlIAL 511111 ro!l.c£ LtFT-OfF roaa I rR£SS. JOla Z EI:!l5 1110 T11lCI:JIUS (tD.) .ws. reatE T1I1C1QjtSJ 0, . I,D. I "CAT!"!: ilt.lell ikl~'l IKIII IUe'l iUe'l [!.!R(t Pftr:v I 2l'S ~RICINAt !hll !Ue-) !In,l INt. ,leT, I'I!IU!.S I 1 l 4 5 6 7 8 9 I~ 11 It P 1~ 15 16 \\1 '-

1. '=!.!!.1..(:o Sol J:Ph-

/~it :1 .:z.L 15'(1'1 I,r!.:! '1. :r"~1 ~

L,L,

!.!iLJ .L a:J." :z:.~.'11 j ** IS: ~"I A'?~:'" 5* tis* I.~.,- 9,.2!." k .:k.I. ,~.~- -#J~ a~ ;,I,"',"it -./

2. 13"1'~

,~.:'

J

~I I'~

J..L t.:n::.-J.

~~.. I ~t' I.> t -.. ~ -<--0' . -r S" kr 1~"I *.r 1;e.s-.... ~ t!f~ .l;.U ~

  • cr ".,.

I; ~

3. ~~ Ji..!' TI

~.~ /~\\; 3

L.:!......

u:I7 /~~~ idL" -.J.:!,;.- ~7 -c!.~ 2£.'- SJ:. 1.l:L:.~ 04-0 ~ ,...!:.l -:-- .~ :t..L !Ji!L<f '1f.:.'$';;/ ~ W ~ L!:.:.:.4 ~". ....,:~ 2//.': ,4. I.'I!!.:LJ "i...;.!... .~\\ /"7'..:!::t r :;

L2:r I.u:J

"':.!:f::. 6.:.:.!; ~ ~~ 7"1' TJ: t::::.. 't- --0:- L..:.!. /mf

1..£.

iJ,::.!.i.!' ~

r.i

~

f.

.'.:,~ /,.,

.5. (:!!.2

~, ,*n.l,s ?,~':':-t --1~ ,.J::.i-" £!.'" s*~ ~ :z.u,- t..:::Ir ~ ..::l.-~

z2

/~ ,.1,-: -:-r S

LL.>

I..llJ

J.L.

I~*'f,- dj,:-. ~. -rt*,.~{ ~ ~ .I'I.H:'f i~ cll.?!."f &.X:.~ :if.! i,*i* i.:.i.. ,S J2i1. ':!.i!.s .4! I~, i"~t ~. ~ ,-.0' /~ ~ 2..:t. w,r

z..:.t..

24 /.':..

  • 7.-1c~ L::

/'1.1 B,.!?;*

i7J~-

.-:.~ ~ .. 2:L'. ~',~ ~. h'..::.!. oS ~ (! J.:.:::t .£:j .w... ~ ,: s.*.. :: "1' ~ .~.

1 ~ iTi-:-

~ f4-I:c;,: ~v_ ' { ~ ~ l-t;u;,.r ~. /~!i '-:.:£!.. g~~ ~

2:

J~~. .::L. /t'v' £!: ~l." 1-j ~ "~ t1: ~ ~ ~ ~J/t ..,~., II~-:~ -.~~.' - ,,'f!:!:.~

T I~S' f~~'

E~A

z.::.;;

rr" !:t..!.- 11

  • iiL::

1-' , -~ 5-' .'t 2.J.5 .I.J:!.! ~ ~' 1::1 I~ ~ (:3",ds/n , 10. '.!...=.L: - /¥_.. ".¥ IW ~f -n',;; /££.' A*" " -/ .: ~:,

J ~ ~~.r

't",., ,,::.!::.r J!.:.:...- ~. -. S' ~ /~ ~ J.;.:l 1.2;1..:.- I t NOTE AI I rellu CALCIllAYIOII: (1) Force @ LU,..,ff.. Jack rreuyre.. Jock plor"" Aree 01 * (2) Dotomlno lorto fro. caltbratl_,,,rvo IIOTE.: auctor lulUlDa lDcernal co."""'uro \\11.1\\ be ro" u.LDI tt-114-Yt Or Cl-2U*fI (lta,.tal".. uI4 a, Job..-o. h... l u-.) , p:r.ClD IIOTt c: IU.. ror.. (COI_ 8) 1I cloUud oa follow" . V.F. - Col'_ 7 l6J ~-:::';:to~l_=-4'-:0~f~D;:'.::C:':.:-::'S... ~.~c~3 1/0tE D: hpI,tecl llft-of( for.. (colu.... 4l Sa oIdlDCd.. (oU.... " Ho. Clf _fleetlv. vb.. u IlIatdlellQQ (or provl..... l"'puttoD) I Au. p.dlcced vlra fOfce ahovn DD fll. 1 ** tl.. of l""peccl.. lI. LOCAU(;:I: l Co 6 - 1:........ Df lIuuu.. uan. tD..... of tend..... '_ SIII:i i!llClC>ES$. Clear dln.nn bltvun "a.IDI,hto aad U....,oa waaber. fU1IOI:S; '~!\\ICC(AL: A: tlse of InsLtlluloft or,ravlo...... yalU...... At. tiu a~ IlITt'~ currin; Iw,vclllanci. I ~I.1' -.11 11/1 I 1--1 I CDIIUactor I... l." ",1 _________ Detat _________ _ F.p,C, Appro.at "7'

0... : -------

F.M 6.1 Exhibit 3b Survey 2 C page 1 of 4 0 t I1KA SIFEET 6 PRESTURESS FORCE CO9IFiSIAT10W TEST Il"i TYJITNIS 31SMY*0"7r "laJv 1.0. VflCATImI fbi,.) fbi,.) L IYT-OFT CfuebTTIOM 'rKC' LMC-OFF UIACrOt rATs R3Lt E~ InsM ?a~ INS?. IT PREIOUS FORCE LIFT-OFF FORCE 4

6.

CAM Avn. 01 S.ut ?RESS. FORCE 2 ENDS WIRE TRICKNESS fin,) (let ) _ (ipsve (itps !981 EMS PREV IOUS ORIGINAL. 5 6 1 ?! IM Ii-%' ' 9I

  • 527 ~

tO__V 16A3~ CAGE FRESS. FINAL SoDI FORCE TI*uESlSB (llo) (bI,.) (Ol.) F INII XAT1 l S iA. It I2 I 1 14 11 16 it A~LMOr.P16 7-k I11ý1 M.1

  1. Sky

&L-O5? 4 AAMF "(.. (a~z 2L 782 GMTIT UKS '.B-eo OCS 'en / /0/ pure At rOtcg CALcfLATtIm: (i) Farce @ Lift-off - Jack Pretouro a Jack Piatoo Area ORs (2) Determino force rro cealibration curve NOTE It ecacter Building InterMl te*peaturOe will be reed aging Ct-214-TE or CI-275-Tt (tweperotlro read at John.. rfeel 1)-B) NOTE Co wire Force (Column 8) Ii defined of follows$ V.F. Column 7 163 - Column 4 of Data Sheet I NOTE fO* Mope ted lift-off force (Coluos d.) to defined of folow0s: No. of effective wire& at Installatios (or previous Inspection) I Ave. predicted wrte force showe on Fit. I at ties of inspection. LOCATIOVI SMIN TrI1C)ODESSI PRtlVI ASs MRICINALs I to 6 Numb*e of buttreso feorest to end of tendon. Cleat d*[sence betvoee bestlil plot* end stressnig wisher. At time of Instetlation or previous surveillance. At time of stoattil turrent surveillance. Contractor Rrv1e bys te .F..C. Approval Syl vo_________ ites fPto I$ SP-102 . Ote 11114111L M911, -,?I I (-601 Exhibit3b ,IISP£cfJaI nlJoo __ :tt_... Z=-___ _ I;D. I 1,~>>1 2J)3Z~ 1.lI~ .,l)~ '.DCATION I I :s:

  • 1:

5 .. alOllS roan (tip') IIP!mD UFT-orrFOIICI (Up') CAc:t PlU', (Ohf) roaci (tip.' 6 Survey 2 ( 0 Il/\\TA SItr.ET 6 "'STatU FOlIC! COIIrlal'ATIOM nSI (!!!!! TflItxlllS UFT-CIrr COIIDtTtOM rOllcr; Ave, or &11," t !lIDS VIII TIIfCICMESS !Ift,! (1oIpI) rOllCI "EVIOUS ORICI,,"" 1 10 ItItO;"S ~ 15~'5 ~1 ~. V'tI ~.".S- ~ ai tii ,~- W page 1 of 4 (, .tACTOII DATI tDCI*O" ItIlC TltK!' 'NSf. IItS'. IT CACE rlllAl. 111 Df "ESS, FOItCI ntClJful

  • r

('II) (lo"l! (Ceo) INT. UT. l11tT I"LS It !Z !) I.. IS 16 I ~ oh " '1L Th "~1o~CS /(" ON'-"'_ is 1i. U

  • 4.~-410 'DGS I~I IJL'T o.LJt:

~"'iD u.. -at 'f-Z'MO ~ /fll 'All. 7a..I. 15~ l!! '1Z ~Q:$ /~ s.l)J.U. +/- ~S'" 10.' B: WI ~ 1aJLIY' ~ ~S ~~ ~ l.l 8Z. ~-'ao~ /6J ..3- .:t- ..:L _01;/4,'1-- -L liar! A, I"OttCI CALCVUTIOM: (I) 'ore. @ LI (C,oU

  • J.c' P1"... ~rl a Julo "atoa Are.
OIl, (2) Dot.r.lft. fore. rro-cIII.r"lo. car **

lion I, butor Iu""'" IntnN' t""un.,. "lU.. re".""1 (l*nCo*n or CI.27S*Tt MarE C. Vir. 'orci (Col..- I) I. d.flaed '1 followl' v.r ** Col_, I')

  • Col..n.. 01 D *** Sh ** t 1 lIarE D:

(c.-p.r.cUTI r ** '.t Job",.. r *** l 11*1) t.ptet.d llfc ** lf r ** e. (eolu ** '1 I, d.fl ** d I~ follou'l.0. of.ffeetlwe vlre. It 1 ** t.ll.tl.D (Of,... Ioul 1"'rICllo.) I *.e.,r ** lcce' vlrl force.houft Oft rll. I.t ll ** of In"lclloa. toClTION. to,.....,.f ""t, ********* t to In' of t ** 40 ** CII'ClIlALI At CI.1 of It.rtl~ ~urrt.t Idl ** lllincl. SIItM TNl~lSS. CI ** r.lle.nCI ** t ******* 'I~I,'11. and Il" ** lnl.llh.r. nrY1OUS. At tl.. of l.. tell.lIe. or ".,Iou. 'an.lIl'Dee, Contnctor ' ** Iw "'~te: 7-ZS -80 r.r.c, Appr..,l.,. ntt ** ________ _ ,... )) S,-In 0 tNto 1I/14IJ7

FM 6.1" Exhibit 3b Survey 2 DIATA SHEET I Pu!STMESS FOR"t CONVIUMATION 3IS1 VERTICAL TT~ttMq page 2 of 4 (' I! iHsPencflm f200v AZ. IF VA el 1.1FF-OF? CONDIIO '-OCK-OF, REACrO DATE 11.t0 TliN? INSP. _0_P__by rIEVIOUS TORd1 LIt 1 0. LOCAION (Ibipi Z.V3 S T _mi PECTEP WEC OFT FRmCE TRESS. F bfe RTA Wi AVG. or MA11 GAC! IFINAL SHIN ONCE 2 INDS wiltt TIIICSHESS (to.) FEss. r ORCe TMICEIMSS kIpv) ilL)9. FOR FIp.EVIOUS OtIIINAIH (111 (*tell ifi.) 1rrW EXt. IWITIAIS 7 S 1o.. IL 12 13.., 14 )iI is i

4) ( 0

-5 ,r T I -t*,' T _ 9, _L,IMi - h, L IL 80- 3M o ".-""S 1.911 'ý29 .%Tze to* 1Wo-W ,13-q0._ -LO.*F* /fo

4 +11 r 7Q.mr 8+/-

Fo'CE CALCULATION, (1) Fet. @ Lift-off Jack pressure a Jack pate. Arco ,C Olt (2) Meeoraine force from cal Ibration curve Z Reactor bolldl4 [sternal teopetetute will be read using CI-274-TE! at CI-2iS-Tt (tesperature road at Jomnson Pon*r 1-1) Vire Force (Cola.. 5) to deaned as follouso IIle Cal~m., 7 163 - Coluo" 4 of etai Sheet 2 SITM 01 Expected lift-off totoe (colwn.') lI delrlied ao follow$ go. of elfective wiiro at intoallatl. (or previous Inopectlen) I Ave. predIcoted vwrI force sihme on rig. 2 at lfe of Inspecttoo. ~Ib C,j A l-(023 14CATIONi SNMINI UCKllLSSo OtIORNALi T or I - top or bottom (vottical tendon). Clear disa*.c betvween bearing plate snd serassing weaher. At tie. of installation or prevlous surveillance. At time of oatrtitr curtent ourvellatue,. Contrracor Review,,.4 A F.P.C. Approval by: Dates rate 36 St-lit Date H1114171 FCOUEI rw-tmultz 14 FM 6.1" Exhibit 3b ( IlISrtCTlOlll Pt:~ 10D _:lt~z.=-____ _ t.P. toCATIOIII -r - ,.~. T

f. z:st5

'.12.~. T '.5II...i! T ,. s!!z.o.1. !:!m!! rlEYlOVI fORCI (lelp') onen. LIFT-OPT fORCI (Iel".) 7:9... 7.5-7£ II U l~tlOlllI T or ** top or.01100 (oo,llc.t london). rottCI (loIpll IIOfI A, Survey 2 C' IIATA ",hI 7 rarsT,tsS fOlIC!! (1111""""TIOII USI 'DTI(AI. TDtIlllllS Ltrr*OPT CONP1TI0III FOfIe! AVG. or f INIIS '.I,tl 7 I~ 158..0 11l.8. IW 1.!r3g VIII! FOR~

  • CACI "ISS.

(1.11 t.OCIt-o,_, ___ _ "NAI. SIIIH rORtI Tn I ClNtSS 01,.) UII,) , I

  • r lIrl'.

I' page 2 of 4 C* !IT. 1111!.1!ll 1 16 U rORCI CAI.CUUTIIl'" (I) rorce @ Lift-off* Jacle 'uII.r ** JIClr.,Iotoo Ar.. /'- Z-I ~ Oft. U) Det.... I... I.rce troo eelll.utl.. cuno fI)'" nfQ IIOH., '::;ct! 7I.JI#~:- /tJ,.r.1. k I ** ctor '.II'I~ la'.rllOl t~.retbt. viii ~. r *** u.t~ CI.27'-I1 ~ Ct-27S-I1 (t~.I.turo r **** t JOh... on 'a"et'!I ** ) "OTI C, Vir. ro.co (Col_ I) Ie **,.......,011.... 01 lI.r ** Cftl..., 1 16'

  • CoI~,.1 Pate She.t Z 110ft O.

tap.eta',trt-o', loceo (eol""~) I *** Ilpe' ** 'ollawl. 11o. of.II.ett ** vir *** t t"I,.II.tloll (or,rl.lo.. Ine,lc'laR)

  • Ave.,ndlut.'.Iu loree.hCNO 0" tt *. 2 u.... of h.,eetto **

SIIU. tnICXKESS, Cl ** r.ltt.aco ** tv *** '.Irt~,I.to Ind.tr *** '". v ** h.r. PIl!VJOUS, A~ ~I.. o' I",t.ll.t'.. er "evlou,,.F.IIII_ftC ** IlItGI"'I., At II ** or.t.rtt"- cu,r.nt ** r ** lll.net. Co"trme, hot **..,:S).t'~~- Pit., 7-25--80 r.',e, Ipproo.l "': Oat., ________ , ** ~ n sP*ut Ddt 1t/14/H

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3b IqSPtCT1IO PERIOD atZ Survey 2 C IATA Sli*lT I PIETM SS PONCI CoNrUIATIOON TST VERTICAL Trlx *S

  • I !

page 3 of 4 C 1..OL OCAT 1IN 2.2 Ttwwu ,g!Y1Ou 1:11,CMZ LIFrT-ODF lRCl (hips) 4 SIrT-orv CNuirrit" VGoCE AWC. OP LOCK-OTF CAC9 Fri CACr PIUS. (Kt) 7+/-ho Sill" PONCI 2 Ell. WRIN THICKNESS (in.) I rtESS. POPC= Tat (htlyl (hips) FORCZ PREVIOUS ORIGINAIL (golt (h ip.) 6 1 m S - 11 12 171. ,~ 7 W_'p MrTI At VORCE CALCINLATION: (1) Force 6 Lift-off - Jack Pressure x Jack Plato. Area MIi1 (2) Delermlne force from celibratlo. curve 'AL SHIM LCVIESS Inu.) 13..H tIACTOt OATE ZLDC TrEH INS?. INSP. 91 7'- IT aL 16 16 qiIfts INITIALS I I "C-NOTE It Reactor Uuildirg lotereul temporetwe uill be trod ueing Ci-174-TE at Ci-273-Tt (teuPireture teed at Jdmno. Paelt 11-9) WMT Ca WIT* Force (Cotlumn ) to defined em follo...

16) - Colm 4 of Date Sheet 2 Zupected lift-off force (colua. 4) it defined go reliowee We. of effective vife$ at Ifatetlatto. (or previous Inspeetlon)

Z Ave. predicated vivo force shown on Fig. 3 at time of ieperctioo. ItCATMOl T or 5

  • tOp or bottoes (vertical tendon).

BItD TIHIC'NU.S$ Clear distance batwees bearing plate and Stressing uilbhet. T fIE I I At time of Inetellatloe or previous suvellaence. P'1CIPALI At tla4 of starting current eurvettlance. Contfactor S*owii by$ at7 VP..C. Approval by: or_____Deter_____ vote 36 SP-IlU Date 1111117O M, P-Son I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3b l"'nCTI~ PUIOD _#_...;Z=-__.....;.._ "D. r - tJ:~ un.orr POIIC, (U,.l CACI nus. (l.n 6 Survey 2 ( bATA '!If" 1 ,urnESS rolel CIIII'IRtlATIOII TtST ,[aTICAL Tr.N"""' tOllC! AVe. 0'

r !1ItlS CUp.'

lila! roac! * '"I" TlI'CIII!SS (10,) ,JEYIOUS ORICI~A~ LOa*or, 'OIICI (ll,.) z page 3 of 4 .' I ( lUc:tOa DAT! DC T!1t" IllS', '"SP. " '111101. III" TlIICIIIUS Uo,) . tlrT. !!T. IlInlAtS I I IS 11 7A 8L '1.1 lJGS "r- .J:. 7L 11L III!!/Bo ~ Iv} tearl A. roACI CALCUlATIONI el) '~e. @ Llft*ofr

  • Jle' 'r **** r ** Jle' '1lt.o A, **

(1111 en IIn.,.I...,.re. fr.. callbrutH,.n. IIOTI I. ~ ** ctor I.CI'I~ I.t.rftal t....,.t.,. will b., ***** C~ Cl.274.TI ow CI*1".TI (,.... ' *** r., *** It Jd,n.Oft, *** 1 11.8) IIOTI C. VI,. 'ore. CCoI... ') tl ** fCna'.1 lollow ** V.r ** ClOt....., Z 16'

  • CoI~
  • 0' lilt. Sh **, 2 limo.

1.,let ** I,'t ** rr fore. (col... " I. d.rl...., 'ollowI' "0, 0'.r,.ctl., vCr.'.t I ** t.ll'lloo (.r,r ** lovi '~,"et'on) I A *** "r"lel',' vi ** 'or".howe 00 "a.:r.t tl.. 0' 1 ** plCtl.o, tRIK TRtCllltsS. Cl **, 'I,"oc, b.t **** ".,I~,I.to.... t""'na v ** h.r. PlEY10U!1 At tl.. 0'.... t.t'.tl... r ".. lev. Iwr.,llllftC ** OIICIIIIAI,! At t I... f rtl~ e.n.nt,,,n,UlaftC ** 1'... )6

6.1 Exhibit 3b

  • K,*

'ey 2 page 4V4 DTI~A SIIVETS potSTEss VoteCr 00WNI INTIIW TVW1. INSPECTION VC1RICO 2L 2-SL"1 8.53111

9. j5V23 REACTORU SATS BSDG TEMP I1151.

TEWWIx _3 F, is-~ rREviTUDS FORCE LIFT-OFF r oact Rivle CACE S T T "CRC' tube) a I I 1 I IaII I Q AVC. Of i 2 Elms vile 1 S I~, ?.77- '57 J1 ~ h sit[" CACE TIIICrNISS (in.) PRESS. e lOi s 1ff E-OS'P FINAL SlIM 1351.. by FORCE THICKNESS Wel (on. n* g* Or 7' 3513e

73. tZ. tilzvro =0d I

NOTE A: ORCEr CALCULATION: (I) Force S Lift-off a Jack rteeeure a Jack Flit** Area OR* (2) Datemine force froem olibtcstio curve NOTE at loactor Building Internal temporeture viii be reed using Ct-274-TE or CI-21S-TE (temperature read at Johnson ravei 1i-u) Ism1* C: witre Force (Col.- I) is defined as ftllows$ V.r. - Cotn4n a 161 - Cet' 4 at Dota Sheet 3 LOCATIONt I to 6 - Number of huttresi oear.. to 0nd of t SHLD ?HICKNESSt Cleor dietnceas betwee beering plate and acres NMI1 03 expected lift-off force (column 4) is defined as folloWaN Nw. of effective wire* et foeielatletm (or prevoee iou peciio I Ave. predicted wire forte shoew en FiS. I at time of lIepectlon. sedes. miss washer. Cunieatfor Review y F.F.C. Approval by,*-__________ eet_

P0EviIs, ORICINALS At ties of Iotatlatlot or previoue eurveellao At time of starting current survelillnce.

VagQ 31 sp-182 Date liII4ill E4IOUEI MC*IOSURE Is pM 6,1 Exhibit 3b * ~./ IIISPIClIOil HI100 __ 2t_2.=~ __ _ I.,. '".ATI!!!! ) 2 ranrous POICI ""til UHc:rm LI rt-(lrr POleII: nt,.) cae! 'IISS. !!tU s rola: 'Up., 1IOT1 AI t rveY2 DATA !II':", p.r.nnss,OtIC!! COI/t'! RHATUII un IIOOP 'mllIONS rOIC' A¥C. or 2 ENOS (U,,, 'uz. IWo.G "f IIff~ P 5111H CACI 'IIIAI. SIIIM Villi: TlIlCJNESS cae.' PUSS. POla TlIICIClIESS yn.er '.EYlnl~ ~rcliAL~(c.,) (kIp') (' *. 1 9 10- - II II

1) rolca CALCULATION I (I) '.rc. @ llf,.. "
  • J.e. r~".ur ** J.c **,.t.. At **

01, (2) D.t.r.i ** fore. fro. c.llb~atl.. cur ** fIOtI., IUCTOI DATI ...lie I.,..

INSP, IllS', IT 0,

lift. t!T. 'NIT!.!!:! 14 IS 1! 7.L "Jt 'f/tt,l'" ~S' n 77 'tffi.J;o l'lGS' lI,n. 0 U. tc2.. 'tttl~o 2)G,S', 71 ss: ~"'o ~J ~ ~o ~~ t:rc..st. -'t 1L I!.. "~Io J)CS JL u._~' lQ 7' ~ 0 ~.$I

73. 17 'llu-IrD ~

7% 7Z ~l9o~ I~) ' ** ctor 'uI141~1 I~.rftal C.-p.ratur. viiI" r ** ' ** Inl CI*Ill*TI or C(*lfS-II (c.. p.r.tur. r.a'.c Jubnaa. *********, NOT'I c: Ulr. rorc. (COI..- 8) 1. 'alln.'., follow., v.r.* ~r'-="!-7..,.-......,,.......~_....,..,.._......

16) -

CoI~ 4 of Oat. Sb **, S Il0l'1 01 I.peere' Ilft*.rr foru (colu_ 4) It 4.,....... follovn II ** er.".ul... "Ir.. a' h *** UaU ** C.r.ro..,.... -Inap.ul. I A.... pr ** lc, ** wlr. fore ** houn.n rl,. 1.1 tla,*o',aap.ctloa.

LOCATION, I 10 6
  • Mu.b" 01 "Clr,a.... r.a 10 en' 0',.&don.

SHtH THIClHISS, CI.e,.,.taac.,.tv... 'I.rl~.1., ** nd.tr.l.lnl "I.h.r. ralV I OUS I OI1CINALI "0." II lIP-lIZ Al II.. 01 INUtlul.. or.,... 10011 ** r ** llhl>C **. At tl.. of.,.reln. curr ** ' ** rw,III.ACI. Cun.uctor layl.., "I~~ ~5-ilo_ r.'.c. APPfO'" b" t::Z. 0.'11 ________ _

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3c Survey 4 page 1 of 1

SUMMARY

OF LIFT-OFF FORCES TABLE 1 CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 10TH YEAR ALLOWABLE LIFT-OFF SURVEILLANCE TENDON END FORCE (KIPS) LIFT-OFF AVERAGE NUMBER DESIGNATION MAXIMUM I MINIMUM FORCE (KIPS) (.IPS) 64H19 Field 1721 1249 1446 64H19 Shop........ _1493 1470 13H20 Field 1721 1249 1460 13H20 Shop 1451 1456 51H26 Field 1721 1249 1334 51126 Shop 1487 1411 13H40 Field 1721 1249 1558 13H40 Shop 1 1383 1471 51H41 Field 1721 1249 1346 51J41 Shop 1377 1362 D105 Field 1721 1249 1413 D105 Shop 1492 1453 D212 Field 1721 1249 1260 D212 Shop 1292 1276 D328 Field 1721 1249

1602, D328 Shop 1635 1619 12V1 Field 1721 1249 12VI*

Shop 1535 1535 34V4 Field 34v4* Shop 1721 1249 1623 1623 56V2 Field 56V2* Shop 1721 1249 1648 1648

  • Lift-off occurring at Shop end only TP417ds FM 6.1 Exhibit 3c Survey 4 page 1 of 1

SUMMARY

OF LIFT-OFF FORCES TABLE 1 CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 10TH YEAR ALLOWABLE LIFT-OFF SURVEILLANCE TENDON END FORCE (KIPS) LIFT-OFF AVERAGE NUMBER DESIGNATION MAXIMUM J MINIMUM FORCE (KIPS) JKIPS) 64H19 Field 1721 124~ 1446 64H19 Shop 1493 1470 13H20 Field 1721 1249 1460 13H20 Shop 1451 1456 51H26 Field 1721 1249 1334 51H26 Shop 1487 1411 13840 Field 1721 1249 1558 13H40 Shop 1383 1471 51841 Field 1721 1249 1346 51H41 Shop 1377 1362 v 0105 Field 1721 1249 1413 0105 Shop 1492 1453 D212 Field 1721 1249 1260. D212 Shop 1292 1276 D328 Field 1721 1249 1602. D328 Shop 1635 1619 12Vl Field 1721 1249 12Vl* Shop 1535 1535 34V4 Field 34V4* Shop 1721 1249 1623 1623 56V2 Field 56V2* Shop 1721 1249 1648 1648

  • Lift-off occurring at Shop end only TP417ds

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3d Survey 5 page 1 of 1 TAELE

SUMMARY

OF LIFT-OFF FORCES F Y Tendon Number Tendon End Allowable Lift-Off* (Kips) Maximum Minimum Actual Lift-Off (Kips) Average Lift-Off (Kips) I .9 4 4 34V6 34V6 56V15 56V15 61V14 61V14 D215 D215 D224 D224 D231 D231 3 SHI 35 11 42HI 42HI '46H21 46H21 46H28 46H28 46H29 46H29 46H30 46H30 46H47 46H47 62H8 62H8 Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop Field Shop 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1721 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 1249 N/A 1590 N/A 1541 N/A 1587 1579 1458 1412 1438 1332 1337 1568 1577 1507 1613 1427 1423 1374 1376 1280 1321 1371 1138 1472 1464 1462 1407 1590 1541 1587 1518 1425 1335 1572 1560 1425 1375 1300 1382 1468 1435 0 Allowable vahees as presenmed u based am the FPC T*h Spec requirements as nVu4ied and P-artzd In SF.82, Rev 10. Additioal acptane criteria for OMpUA= to Rq. Guide 1.3$. Rev 3, mare mmazized In Rev It of SP-1I2 and b applicable. Bae. 951 buse, and 90% base values req dM for oosmlderatne &ad performanot o( specion a*-tivnes accdwrd io S?.182. Rev II ame provided In ueparate tendon Curm i Appeodix I. See also Eandom 44, 45. WWd 46 fo tendon group accepn Criteria. 13 \\. FM 6.1 Exhibit 3d Survey 5 page 1 of 1 TABLE 1: '

SUMMARY

OF LIFT-OFF FORCES Allowable Lift-Off* Actual Average Tendon Tendon (Kips) Lift-Off Lift-Off Number End Maximum Minimum (Kips) (Kips) 34V6 Field 1721 1249 N/A 34V6 Shop 1721 1249 1590 1590 56V15 Field 1721 1249 N/A 56V15 Shop 1721 1249 1541 1541 61V14 Field 1721 1249 N/A 61V14 Shop 1721 1249 1587 1587 D215 Field 1721 1249 1579 D215 Shop 1721 1249 1458 1518 0224 Field 1721 1249 1412 0224 Shop 1721 1249 1438 1425 0231 Field 1721 1249 1332 0231 Shop 1721 1249 1337 1335 35H1 Field 1721 1249 1568 35H1 Shop 1721 1249 1577 1572 42H1 Field 1721 1249 1507 42H1 Shop. 1721 1249 1613 1560 '46H21 Field 1721 1249 1427 46H21 Shop 1721 1249 1423 1425 46H28 Field 1721 1249 1374 46H28 Shop 1721 1249 1376 1375 46H29 Field 1721 1249 1280 46H29 Shop 1721 1249 1321 1300 46H30 Field 1721 1249 1371 46H30 Shop 1721 1249 1138 1382 46H47 Field 1721 1249 1472 46H47 Shop 1721 1249 1464 1468 62H8 Field 1721 1249 1462 62H8 Shop 1721 1249 1407 1435

  • Allowable vlhoct u,racllalue baled 011 cbe FPC Ted! Spec: nquiRmcDIlI u nqulnd and IIIIDm&lIz.e.t III SNal, Rev 10. AdditIoaallliClCltpWlCe crikria (<< CIXDp!i&D:e 10 Rca, Guide t.3$.ltev ".... 1IUIIIIIIUizaI1D Rev It of SP-tala II applicable. Bue, "" base, a 901 base values ~

for coasldentioD a perf_ at IPspedIoa 1M-iDes accord!Qs 10 sP-Jal, ReY J J are provided III ICpVaIC 1eDd0ll QIIYCIID AppcodiJ 1. See aIJo EIIdocum 44,4', IDd 46 for laldoa IfOUP,aecepuoce criteria. 13

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3e Survey 6 page 1 of 5 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE Florida CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT Power. UNIT 3 CORPORATION V. TENDON LIFTOFFS AND DETENSIONING A liftoff is performed on each surveillance tendon to monitor the force exerted by the tendon onto the structure. PSC Procedure SQ 9.0 (Volume 2, Section 9, Appendix F) details the steps to be taken to perform a liftoff. The results are documented on Data Sheet SQ 9.0 and are summarized in Table VIII. It should be noted that performing a liftoff has only a localized effect on a tendon; therefore, it is acceptable to use the same jacks for both ends of a tendon by executing the liftoff on separate occasions. Vertical tendon lifloffs were found to be above the base value except for 12VI which was above 95% of base, and all dome liftoff averages were above the base value. Horizontal liftoffs revealed two isolated areas 421130 to 42H36 inclusive and 51 H26, 51 H27 where average tendon lifloffs were between 90% and 95% of base value. One tendon 421135 was found to be below 90% and detensioned for continuity test per FPC requirement. This continuity test revealed that all of the wires were continuous, one wire was removed for testing and the tendon restored to base value -0% +6%. All other tendons found between 90 and 95% of base value were subsequently restored per procedure to base value -0% +6%. These low liftoff results were documented on NCR's -010, 011,012,.013, and 014 for 42H30 - 36 and NCR 005 for 511H26. All other tendon liftoffs were either above base value or 95% of base value and therefore acceptable. The average normalized liftoff for each group, vertical, dome and horizontal, exceeded the minimum required and is acceptable. After completion of liftoffs, protruding wires were found to tendons 51 H26(1), 51 H27(2) and 62H46(2). These wires, once removed, were found to have broken behind the anchorhead. No corrosion was found to indicate wire failure due to deterioration and it is suspected that slight tendon head rotation while setting back down sheared the wires against the shims. In all cases the broken wires were on the outer comer edge of the tendon bundle and no gauge movement was noted to indicate failures during liftoff. These wires were probable "pinched" during original installation and additional work on these tendons has broken the wires. NCR's FN604-003,007 and 015 recorded these occurrences. 34

  • j

~

  • FM 6.1 Exhibit 3e Surv~y 6 10TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE rOST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE

. CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 V. TENDON LIFfOFFS AND DETENSIONING page 1 of 5 £tCt~ Florida Power* CORPORATION A liftoff is perfonned on each surveillance tendon to monitor the force exerted by the tendon onto the structure. PSC Procedure SQ 9.0 (Volume 2, Section 9, Appendix F) details the steps to be taken to perfonn a liftoff. The results are documented on Data Sheet SQ 9.0 and are summarized in Table VIII. It should be noted that performing a liftoffhas only a localized effect on a tendon; therefore, it is acceptable to use the same jacks for both ends of a tendon by executing the liftoff on separate occasions. Vertical tendon liftoffs were found to he above the base value except for 12Vl which was above 95% of base. and all dome liftoff averages were above the base value. Horizontal liftoffs revealed two isolated areas 42H30 to 42H36 inclusive and 51 H26. 51 H27 where average tendon liftoffs were bctween 90% and 95% of base value. One tendon 42H35 was found to be below 90% and dctensioned for continuity test per FPC requirement. This continuity test revealed that all of the wires were continuous, one wire was removed for testing and the tendon restored to base value -0% +6%. All other tendons found between 90 and 95% of base value were subsequently restored per procedure to base value -0% +6%. These low liftoffresults were documented on NCR's -010.011,012,.013, and 014 for 42H30 ~ 36 and NCR 005 for 51 H26. All other tendon liftoffs were either above base value or 95% of base value and therefore acceptable. The average nonnalized liftoff for each group, vertical. dome and horizontal. exceeded the minimum required and is acceptable. After completion of liftoffs, protruding wires were found to tendons 51 H26( I). S 1 H27(2) and 62H46(2). These wires, once removed, were found to have broken behind the anchorhead. No corrosion was found to indicate wire failure due to deterioration and it is suspected that slight tendon head rotation while setting back down sheared the wires against the shims. In all cases the broken wires were on the outer comer edge of the tendon bundle and no gauge movement was noted to indicate failures during liftoff. These wires were probable "pinched" during original installation and additional work on these tendons has broken the wires. NCR's FN604.003,007 and 015 recorded these occurrences. 34

.. FM 6.1 Exhibit 3e Survey 6 page 2 of 5 ( 20TII YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 TENDON LIFTOFFS Florida Power C01PORATION TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCTPT WIRES No. j LIFTOFF VALUE BASE I _BASE I FACTOR I 12VI SIHOPf/OP 162 8833 4390 1471 1471 1530 1453 1377 -9 YES 23V2 SHOPrTOP 163 8778 4820 1609 1609 1482 1408 1333 37 YES 61V21 SHOP/TOP 163 8833 4550 1525 .1525 1482 1408 1334 38 YES D113 SIIOP/2 163 8778 4267.5 1424.7 1427 1369 1301 1232 -35 YES FIELD/6 163 8833 4265 1429 YES DII5 SITOP/2 163 8778 4062.5 1356 1380 1347 1280 1213 -12 YES FIELDI 6 163 8833 4190 1404 YES D212 StOPl 162 8833 3820 1280 1335 1317 1252 1186 15 YES FIELD/3 162 8778 4160 1389 YES D304 SHOP/4 163 8778 4810 1605 1598 1397 1327 1258 -64 YES FIELD/2 162 8833 4748 1591 YES D311 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4220 1409.5 1408 1335 1269 1202 0 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4200 1407 YES "FM 6,1 Exhibit 3e ( ~~.... Survey 6 ( 20TH YEAR'SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNITJ TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE 12VI SHOPITOP 162 8833 4390 1471 1471 1530 2JV2 SlIOPITOP 163 8778 4820 1609 ]609 1482 61V21 snoPITOP ]63 8833 4550 1525 .1525 1482 DIU SltOP/2 163 8778 4267.5 1424.7 1427 1369 FlELD/6 163 8833 4265 1429 DllS SIIOP/2 163 8778 4062.5 1356 ]380 1347 FtELD/6 163 8833 4190 1404 0212 snoP/. 162 8833 3820 1280 1335 1317 FIELD/3 162 8778 4160 1389 D304 SHOP/4 163 8778 4810 1605 1598 1397 FtELD/2 162 8833 4748 1591 D311 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4220 1409.5 1408 1335 FJELD/2 163 8833 4200 1407 ..... ***.1 9S% BASE 1453 1408 1408 1301 1280 1252 1327 1269 Florida ............. Power CORPORAnON page 2 of 5 ( 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT BASE FACTOR 1377 -9 YES 1333 37 YES 1334 38 YES 1232 -35 YES YES 1213 -12 YES YES 1186 15 YES YES 1258 -64 YES YES 1202 0 YES YES

FM 61-Exhibit 3e C._ t. Survey 6 C 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 page 3 of 5 ( Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 42H18 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4690 1565 1476 1495 1420 1346 -56 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4137 1386.5 YES 421129 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4500 1502 1448 1445 13b3 1300 -7 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4160 1394 YES 421130 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4355 1454 1389 1469 1396 1322 -32 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3950 1324 NO 421131 SHOP/4 163 8778 -4100 1369 1338 1460 1387 1314 -21 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3900 1307 NO 421132 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4320 1442 1355.5 1452 1380 1307 -15 NO FIELDI 2 163 8833 3785 1269 NO 421133 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4490 1499 1361 1474 1400 1326 -35 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3650 1223 NO 421134 SltOP/4 163 8778 4240 1415 1377.5 1452 1380 1307 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 4000 1340 j -1 1 1 1 NO FM 6:*1 Exhibit 3e Co \\..... -' Survey 6 ( 10TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LlFfOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFfOFF AVE. BASE 95% WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE 42"18 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4690 1565 1476 1495 1420 FIELD/2 163 8833 4137 1386.5 421129 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4500 1502 1448 1445 1373 FlELD/2 163 8833 4160 1394 421130 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4355 1454 1389 ]469 1396 FIELD/2 163 8833 3950 1324 42H31 SHOP/4 163 8778 -4100 1369 1338 1460 1387 fIElD/2 163 8833 3900 1307 42)132 5110P/4 163 8778 4320 ]442 1355.5 1452 1380 FIELD/2 163 8833 3785 1269 421133 5110P/4 163 8778 4490 1499 1361 1474 1400 FIELD/2 163 8833 3650 1223 421134 Sn01'/4 163 8778 4240 1415 1377.5 1452 1380 FIELD/2 163 8833 4000 1340 Florida .............. Power CORPORATION 900/. NORMALIZISG BASE FACTOR 1346

  • 56 1300

-7 1322

  • 32 1314

-21 1307 -15 1326

  • 35 1307 page 3 of 5

( ACCEPT YES YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

FM 6:1 Exhibit 3e Survey 6 C a 20Tt-YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 page 4 of 5 ( Florida Power CORPO1MT1ON TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 421135 SHOP/4 163 8778 4110 1372 1296.5 1455 1382 1309 -17 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3693 1221 NO 421136 SI1OP/4 163 8778 4490 1499 1408 1503 1428 1353 -65 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3930 1317 NO 42H37 SItOP/4 163 8778 4310 1439 1401.5 1452 1379 1306 -14 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4070 1364 1 YES 421144 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4510 1505 1471.5 1427 1356 1285 10 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4291 1438 YES 511125 SHOP/i 1 163 8833 4090 1370.5 1363 1401 1331 1261 38 YES FIELD/5 163 8778 4060 1355.5 YES 511126 SHOP/I1 163 8833 4190 1403.5 1320 1514 1438 1363 -75 NO FIELD/5 163 8778 3705 1237 NO 511127 SIHOP/I 163 8833 3787 1269 1265.5 1368 1300 1231 71 NO FIELD/5 163 8778 3780 1262 NO . FM 6:1 Exhibit 3e ( Survey 6 C 20TI-1 YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TilE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TilE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE 421135 SHOP! 4 163 8778 4110 1372 - 1296.5 1455 1382 FIELD! 2 163 8833 3693 1221 421136 SHOP! 4 163 8778 4490 1499 1408 1503 1428 FlELD/2 163 8833 3930 1317 42H37 SHOP/4 163 8778 4310 1439 1401.5 1452 1379 FIELD! 2 163 8833 4070 1364 421144 SHOP! 4 163 8778 4510 1505 1471.5 1427 1356 FlELD/2 163 8833 4291 1438 511125 SIIOPll 163 8833 4090 1370.5 1363 1401 1331 FlELDIS 163 8778 4060 1355.5 511126 SHOP!l 163 8833 4190 1403.S 1320 1514 1438 FIELDIS 163 8778 3705 1237 5tJI17 SHOP/l 163 8833 3787 1269 1265.S 1368 1300 FlELDIS 163 8778 3780 1262 90% BASE 1309 1353 1306' 1285 1261 1363 1231 Florida Power CORPORATION NORMALIZING FACTOR -17

  • 65

-14 10 38 -75 71 page 4 of 5 ( ACCEPT NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO NO NO

-FM 61 Exhibit 3e ( Survey 6 (. page 5 of 5 - (- 20TII YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIHE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LIFTOFFS Florida Power CORPOPATiON TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90%0/ NORMALIZING ACCEPT I WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE IFACTOR 511128 SHOP/ 1 163 8833 4445 1489.5 1450.5 1518 1442 1367 80 YES FIELD/5 163 8778 4230 1412 YES 53112 SHOP/5 163 9501 4400 1624 1611 1424 1353 1281 12 YES FIELD/3 163 9501 4330 1598 YES 531-146 SHIOP/5 163 8833 4340 1454 1459.5 1472 1399 1325 -35 YES FIELD/3 .163 8778 4390 1465 YES 621441 SHOP/2 163 8778 4230 1412 1426 1422 1351 1280 16 YES FIELD/6 163 8833 4297.5 1440 YES 621146 SIIOP/2 163 8778 4280 1429 1485 1465 1392 1318 -27 YES FIELD/6 163 8833 4600 1541 YES -'fM 6':1 Exhibit 3e ( Survey 6 ( 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TilE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% WIRES No. LIITOFF VALUE BASE 511128 SHOP/I 163 8833 4445 1489.5 1450.5 1518 1442 F1ELD/S 163 8778 4230 1412 53112 snoPls 163 9501 4400 1624 1611 1424 1353 FlELD/3 163 9501 4330 1598 53H46 SHOPIS 163 8833 4340 1454 1459.5 1472 1399 FIELD/3 .163 8778 4390 1465 62"41 snOPI2 163 8778 4230 1412 1426 1422 1351 FIELD/6 163 8833 4297.5 1440 621146 S1l0P/2 163 8778 4280* 1429 1485 1465 1392 FlELD/6 163 8833 4600 1541 ..-r...'11 Florida ...z-r.. Power CORPORATION 90% NORMALIZING BASE FACTOR 1367 80 1281 12 1325 -35 1280 16 1318 -27 page 5 of 5* ( ACCEPT YES YES YES YES YES YES YES' YES YES YES

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3f Survey 7 page 1 of 4 25TII YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE Florida Power CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 A Progress Energy Company V. TENDON LIFTOFFS AND DETENSIONING A liftoff is performed on each surveillance tendon to monitor the force exerted by the tendon onto the structure. PSC Procedure SQ 9.0 (Volume 2, Section 9, Appendix F) details the steps to be taken to perform a liftoff. The results are documented on Data Sheet SQ 9.0 and are summarized in Table VIII. It should be noted that performing a liftoff has only a localized effect on a tendon; therefore, it is acceptable to use the same jacks for both ends of a tendon by executing the liftoff on separate occasions. All dome tendon lifloffs were found to be above base value and acceptable. Vertical tendon lifloffs were found to be above the base value except for 12V01 which was between 90% and 95% of base requiring adjacent tendons to be tested. The adjacent tendons were both between base value and 95% and therefore acceptable. Tendon 12V01 was retensioned to base value -0%,+6% per procedure and left as acceptable. Vertical tendon average (allowing for removal of tendons exhibiting anchorhead rotation) was above the required minimum and acceptable. The low liftoff result for 12V01 was documented on NCR FN750-016. Horizontal liftoffs revealed one isolated area 461130 to 461138 inclusive where tendon liftoffs were between 90% and 95% of base value, one tendon, 461136, was found to be below 90% of base value. After testing, all the tendons in this area were subsequently restored per procedure to base value -0% +6%. Of the other horizontal tendons tested (6 total) two were found above base value and four were found to be between base value and 95%. After removal of horizontal tendons that exhibited anchorhead rotation, average normalized horizontal liftoffs were above the required minimum and deemed acceptable. During liftoff, rotation of the anchorhead was noted to tendon D339. During subsequent detensioning (as scheduled) a broken wire was discovered at the field end. This wire, once removed, was found to have broken behind the anchorhead. No corrosion was found to indicate wire failure due to deterioration and it is suspected that the tendon head rotation sheared the wires against the shims. The broken wire was on the outer comer edge of the tendon bundle and no gauge movement was noted to indicate failure during liftoff. This wire was probable "pinched" during original installation and additional work on this tendon resulted in the wire finally breaking. NCR FN750-004 recorded this occurrence. 27 FM 6.1 Exhibit 3f Survey 7 25TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIO~ING SYSTEM AT TilE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLAl't'T UNIT 3 page 1 of 4 ~ Florida Power A Progress Energy Company V. TENDON LIFTOFFS AND DETENSIONING I '-..J A Iiftoffis perfonned on each surveillance tcndon to monitor the force exerted by the tendon onto the structure. PSC Procedure SQ 9.0 (Volume 2, Section 9, Appendix. F) details the steps to be taken to perfonn a liftoff. The results are documented on Data Sheet SQ 9.0 and are summarized in Table VIII. It should be noted that perfonning a IiflotThas only a localized effect on a tendon; therefore. it is acceptable to use the same jacks for both ends of a tendon by executing the liftoff on separate occasions. All dome tendon liftoffs were found to be above base value and acceptable. Vertical tendon liftoffs were found to be above the base value except for 12VOI which was between 90% and 95% of base requiring adjacent tendons to be tested. The adjacent tendons were both between base value and 95% and therefore acceptable. Tendon 12VOI was retensioned to base value -0%.+6% per procedure and left as acceptable. Vertical tendon average (allowing for removal of tendons exhibiting anchorhead rotation) was above the required minimum and acceptable. The low liftoff result for 12VOl was documented on NCR FN750-016. Horizontal liftoffs revealed one isolated area 461130 to 46H38 inclusive where tendon liftoffs were between 90010 and 95% of base value. one tendon, 46H36. was found to be below 90% of base value. After testing, all the tendons in this area were subsequently restored per procedure to base value ~O% +6%. Of the other horizontal tendons tested (6 total) two were found above base value and four were found to be between base value and 95%. After removal of horizontal tendons that exhibited anchorhead rotation, average nonnalized horizontal liftoffs were above the required minimum and deemed acceptable. During liftoff, rotation of the anchorhead was noted to tendon 0339. During subsequent detensioning (as scheduled) a broken ~'ire was discovered at the field end. This wire, once removed. was found to have broken behind the anchorhead. No corrosion was found to indicate wire failure due to. deterioration and it is suspected lh3t the tendon head rotation sheared the wires against the shims. The broken wire \\\\'as on the outer comer edge orthe tendon bundle and no gauge movement was noted to indicate failure during liftoff. This wire was probable "pinched" during original installation and additional work on this tendon resulted in the wire finally breaking. NCR FN7S0-004 recorded this occurrence. 27

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3f Survey 7 C, pagee Iof 4 25TI YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE OST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE Florida Power CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT Power UNIT 3A Progress Energy Company UNIT 3 TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 TENDON LIFTOFFS tiJ TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT WIRES INo. _LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 12V01 SHOPfrOP 161 8783 4360 1446 1446 1528 1451 1375 -9 NO 12V02 SHOP/TOP 163 8783 4660 1546 1546 1599 1519 1439 -80 YES 23V24 SHOPITOP 163 8783 4587 1521.8 1521.8 1527 1451 1374 -9 YES 45V14 SHOP/TOP 163 8833 4650 1552 1552 1580 1501 1422 -61 YES 61V08 SlHOP/TOP 163 8783 4450 1476 1476 1494 1419 1344 23 YES 461121 SHOP/6 163 8783 4166.6 1381.4 1388 1446 1374 1302 -12 YES FIELD/4 162 8833 4180 1394.7 461129 SlIOP/6 159 8783 4060 1345.9 1407.1 1427 1356 1284 8 YES FIELD/4 159 8833 4400 1468.3 461130 SIIOP/6 162 8783 4200 1392.6 1355.6 1442 1370 1298 -8 NO FIELD/4 161 8833 3953 1318.7 461131 SHOP/6 163 8783 4073 1350.2 1343.3 1456 1383 1311 -22 NO FIELD14 161 8833 4006 1336.5 461132 SMOM6 162 8783 4180 1385.9 1366.8 1455 1382 1308 -22 NO FIELD/4 163 8833 4040 1347.8 1 1 1 00 FM 6.1 Exhibit 3f ( Survey 7 (, 25TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TilE ~~ POST-TENSIONINGSYSTEMATTHE ~~~ Rorida Power CRYSTALRIVERNUCLEARPLANT ~;J AP En Campa UNIT 3 rogress ergy rrf TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 TENDON LIFI'OFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING 'VIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 12VOI SHoprrop 161 8783 4360 1446 1446 1528 1451 1375

  • 9 12V02 SHoprrop 163 8783 4660 1546 1546 1599 1519 1439
  • 80 2JV24 SHoprrop 163 8783 4587 1521.8

. 1521.8 1527 1451 1374

  • 9 45VI4 SHoprrop 163 8833 4650 1552 1552 1580 1501 1422

~61 61V08 slIoprrop 163 8783 4450 1476 1476 1494 1419 1344. 23 46IJ21 SHOP/6 163 8783 4166.6 1381.4 1388 1446 1374 1302

  • 12 FIELD/4 162 8833 4180 1394.7 461129 SHOP/6 159 8783 4060 1345.9 1407.1 1427 1356 1284 8

rJELD/4 159 8833 4400 1468.3 461130 SIIOP/6 162 8783 4200 1392.6 1355.6 1442 1370 1298

  • 8 FIELD/4 161 8833 3953 1318.7 461131 SHOP/6 163 8783 4073 1350.2 1343.3 1456 1383 1311
  • 22 FIELDf4 161 8833 4006 1336.S 461132 SIIOP/6 162 8783 4180 1385.9 1366.8 1455 1382 1308

-22 FIElD/4 163 8833. 4040 I 1347.8 I ACCEPT NO YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO NO

FM 6.1 Exhibit 3f Survey 7 C pagee of 4 25TII YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIE FloridaE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT Pwer UNIT 3 A Progress Energy Company TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 -TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT _ _WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 461133 SHOP/6 163 8783 4200 1392.6 1357.8 1450 1378 1305 -17 NO FIELD/4 163 8833 3966 1323.1 461134 SIlOP/6 162 8783 4200 1392.6 1424.7 1521 1445 1369 -86 NO FIELD/4 163 8833 4366 1456.9 461135 SIOP/6 163 8783 4240 1405.9 1376.8 1459 1386 1313 -25 NO FIELDI4 163 8833 4040 1347.8 461136 SHOP/6 163 8783 4080 1352.5 1343.5 1497 1422 1348 -63 NO FIELD/4 163 8833 4000 1334.5 461137 SHOP/Q6 162 8783 3700 1225.7 1293.45 1414 1343 1272 20 NO FIELD/ 4 161 8833 4080 1361.2 461138 SII0P/6 163 8783 4093 1356.9 1353.4 1459 1380 1307 -19 NO FIELD/4 162 8833 4046 1349.9 461139 SHOP/6 163 8783 4146 1374.6 1356.2 1410 1339 1269 23 YES FIELD/4 163 8833 1_4010 1337.8 1 1 1 . FM 6.1 Exhibit 3f (... Survey 7 ( 25TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TilE ('~ POST-TENSIONINGSYSTEMATTIiE ~ ... ~ Florida Power CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT ~.-l AP En Compa UNIT 3. rogress ergy fro( page of4 TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFEer. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT 'VIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACfOR 461133 SHOP/6 163 8783 4200 1392.6 1357.8 1450 1378 1305 -17 NO FIELD/4 163 8833 3966 1323.1 461134 SIIOP/6 ]62 8783 4200 1392.6 1424.7 1521 1445 1369 -86 NO FIELD/4 163 8833 4366 1456.9 461135 SHOP/6 163 8783 4240 1405.9 1376.8 1459 1386 1313 -25 NO FlELD/4 163 8833 4040 1347.8 461136 SHOP/6 163 8783 4080 1352.5 1343.5 1497 1422 1348 -63 NO FIELD/4 163 8833 4000 1334.5 461137 SHOP/6 162 8783 3700 1225.7 1293.45 1414 1343 1272 20 NO FIELD/4 161 8833 4080 1361.2 461138 SJIOP/6 163 8783 4093 1356.9 1353.4 1459 1380 1307 -19 NO FIELD/4 162 8833 4046 1349.9 461139 SHOP/6 163 8783 4146 1374.6 1356.2 1410 1339 1269 23 YES FJELD/4 163 8833 4010 1337.8

FM 6:1 Exhibit 3f Survey 7 C page 4 of 4 C OST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE Power CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANTA E UNIT 3 A Prgres Energy Company TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LIFTOFFS W TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT _VIRES No. jLIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR__ 531116 SHOP/5 163 8752 4560. 1498.2 1475.4 1496 1422 1347 -63 YES FIELD/3 163 8783 4380 1452.7 621102-SHOP/6 163 8752 4473 1469.4 1551.6 1466 1393 1319 -33 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4970 1633.9 621109 SIIOP/2 163 8752 4346 1427.3 1431.8 1420 1349 1278 13 YES FIELD/6 163 8752 4373 1436.3 D126 SHOP/NEAR 3 163 8833 4180 1394.7 1376.9 1345 1278 1211 -18 YES FIELD/NEAR 5 163 8783 4100 1359.2 D212 SIJOP/NEAR I 162 8783 3813 1263.4 1292.2 1311 1246 1180 15 YES FIELD/NEAR 3 162 8833 3960 1321.1 D339 SIlOP/NEAR 5 163 8783 4560 1512.8 1507.3 1439 1367 1295 -1i1 YES FIELD/NEAR I 163 8833 4500 1501.8 w o FM 6:1 Exhibit 3f (,' " Survey 7 ( 25TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE ("~ POST-TENSIONINGSYSTEMATTHE ~~~ Florida Power CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT ~-' AP E Com UNIT 3 rogress nergy pany page 4 of 4 C TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 - TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECf. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT \\VlRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 531116 SHOP/S ]63 8752

4560, 1498.2 1475.4 1496 1422 1347

-63 YES FIELD/3 163 8783 4380 1452.7 621102 SIIOP/6 163 8752 4473 1469.4 1551.6 1466 1393 1319 ' -33 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4970 1633.9 621109 SHOP/2 163 8752 4346 1427.3 1431.8 1420

1349, 1278 13 YES FIELD/6 163 8752 4373 1436.3 DI26 SHOP/NEAR 3 163 8833 4180 1394.7 1376.9 1345 1278 1211
  • 18 YES FIELDI NEAR S 163 8783 4100

. 1359.2 0212 SHOP/NEAR I 162 8783 3813 1263.4 1292.2 1311 1246 1180 15 YES FlELDI NEAR 3 ]62 8833 3960 1321.1 D339 SI IOPI NEAR S 163 8783 4560 1512.8 1507.3 1439 1367 1295 -11] YES FIELDI NEAR I 163 8833 4500 1501.8

I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 1 of 5 DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N 1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGEi 36 I) DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30rý YEAR CONTAINMENT IWI. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 Pr9F= I 8.0 TENDON LIFTOFFS 8.1 MONITOR TENDON FORCES 8.1.1 A liftoff is defined as the force required to lift the anchor head off the shim stack and is representative of the force held by that tendon. A liftoff is performed on each physical surveillance tendon to monitor the force exerted by the tendon onto the structure. PSC Procedure SO 9.0 in Appendix F details the steps taken to perform a liftoff. The results were documented on Data Sheet SQ 9.0 and are summarized in Tables 40 thru 45. 8.1.1.1 It should be noted that performing a liftoff has only a localized effect on a tendon: therefore, it is acceptable to use the same jack for both ends of a tendon by executing the liftoff on separate occasions. 8.1.2 All of the vertical and dome tendon liftoffs were found to be above the minimum design and above 95% Predicted Force as required by IWL-3221.1. Three of the five horizontal surveillance tendons were found to be below 95% Predicted Force but above 90% Predicted Force. The liftoff requirement stated in IWL is: Tendon forces are acceptable if: (a) The average of all measured tendon forces, including those measured in IWL-3221.1(b)(2), for each type of tendon is equal to or greater than the minimum required prestress specified at the anchorage for that type of tendon; (b) The measured force in each individual tendon is not less than 95% of the predicted force unless the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the measured force in not more than one tendon is between 90% and 95% of the predicted force: (2) The measured forces in two tendons located adjacent to the tendon in IWL-I 3221.1(b)(1) are not less than 95% of the predicted forces: and (3) The measured forces in all the remaining sample tendons are not less than 95% of the predicted force. 8.1.3 Based upon the unacceptable horizontal tendon liftoffs, adjacent tendons were monitored for force until an acceptable liftoff reading was obtained on both sides of the selected tendon 13H36 required testing of 5 adjacent tendons, 46H21 and 62H30 also required testing of five adjacent tendons. Of these tendons, six were above 95%, five were between 95% and 90% and four fell just below 90%. All tendons below 95% were restored to Predicted Force - 0%, + 6% and locked off. The restoration of these tendons is summarized in Table 46. 8.1.4 The average of the As-Found normalized liftoff values was above the minimum requirement, despite the low liftoffs, and deemed acceptable per PSC Procedure SQ9.0 Section 10.4. 8.1.4.1 The average normalized tendon force in Unit 3 for each group and their respective minimum design are. Vertical Tendon: Group Average = 1535.2 Kips Minimum Design = 1149 Kips Hoop Tendon: Group Average = 1347.4 Kips Minimum Design = 1252 Kips Dome Tendon: Group Average = 1367.3 Kips Minimum Design = 1215 Kips 8.1.4.1.1 As depicted above, all group averages are above the required group minimum and are therefore acceptable. The actual values for each tendon and its corresponding group are summarized in Table 47. 8.1.5 Upon completion of the liftoff, a visual verification is performed to identify any changes in the condition of the tendon end. No additional or broken wires were noted during or after liftoffs. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 1 of 5 OOCUMENT NUMBER: ...::C::..:Rc::..N.:..:I~OO~2:.:.:*504= ___________ REVISION: _0_ PAGE: 36 DOCUMENT TITLE PROJECT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWlINSPECTION 30tH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 8.0 TENDON LIFTOFFS 8.1 MONITOR TENDON FORCES 6.1.1 A liftoff is defined as the force required to lift the anchor head off the shim stack and is representative of the force held by that tendon. A liftoff is performed on each physical surveillance tendon to monitor the force exerted by the tendon onto the structure. PSC Procedure sa 9.0 in Appendix F details the steps taken to perform a liftoff. The results were documented on Data ~heet sa 9.0 and are summarized in Tables 40 thru 45. 8.1.1.1 It should be noted that performing a liftoff has only a localized effect on a tendon; therefore, it is acceptable to use the same jack for both ends of a tendon by executing the liftoff on separate occasions. 8.1.2 All of the vertical and dome tendon liftoffs were found to be above the minimum design and above 95% Predicted Force as required by IWI..-3221.1. Three of the five horizontal surveillance tendons were found to be below 95% Predicted Force but above 90% Predicted Force. The liftoff requirement stated in IWI.. is: 8.1.3 8.1.4 8.1.4.1 Tendon forces are acceptable if: (a) The average of all measured tendon forces, including those measured in IWI..-3221.1 (b)(2), for each type of tendon is equal to or greater than the minimum required prestress specified at the anchorage for that type of tendon; (b) The measured force in each individual tendon is not less than 95% of the predicted force unless the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the measured force in not more than one tendon is between 90% and 95% of the predicted force; (2) The measured forces in two tendons located adjacent to the tendon in IWI..- 3221.1(b)(1) are not less than 95% of the predicted forces; and (3) The measured forces in all the remaining sample tendons are not less than 95% of the predicted force. Based upon the unacceptable hOrizontal tendon liftoffs, adjacent tendons were monitored for force until an acceptable liftoff reading was obtained on both sides of the selected tendon. 13H36 required testing of 5 adjacent tendons, 46H21 and 62H30 also required testing of five adjacent tendons. Of these tendons, six were above 95%, five were between 95% and 90% and four fell just below 90%. All tendons below 95% were restored to Predicted Force - 0%, + 6% and locked off. The restoration of these tendons is summarized in Table 46. The average of the As-Found normalized liftoff values was above the minimum requirement. despite the low liftoffs, and deemed acceptable per PSC Procedure S09.0 Section 10.4. The average normalized tendon force in Unit 3 for each group and their respective minimum deSign are: Vertical Tendon: Group Average = 1535.2 Kips Minimum Design = 1149 Kips Hoop Tendon: Group Average = 1347.4 Kips Minimum Design = 1252 Kips Dome Tendon: Group Average = 1367.3 Kips Minimum Design = 1215 Kips 8.1.4.1.1 As depicted above, all group averages are above the required group minimum and are therefore acceptable. The actual values for each tendon and its corresponding group are summarized in Table 47. 8.1.5 Upon completion of the liftoff, a visual verification is performed to identify any changes in the condition of the tendon end. No additional or broken wires were noted during or after liftoffs.

I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 2 of 5 DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 37 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30T" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 BMW

-ýýMC;NiTdKiW6-,TENe,6N' Vp-It 4 f -

I z w be z w U.T 0 a -J a-IL U.. A.a >0)r to I-0 Zw ku zo It Uj Z ar =;5 0wo I I I I I I I TOP 14.75 161 8784 1559.95 12V01 155995 1525 1449 1372 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 158 N/A N/A TOP 12.50 153 8780 1456.80 45V20 1456.80 1507 1432 1357 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 163 N/A N/A TOP 13.00 163 8784 1505.98 61V08 150598 1491 1416 1342 NO 0 YES BOT 4,00 163 N/A N/A TOP 12.00 161 878.4 1580018 61V17 1580.18 1498 1423 1348 NO 0 YES SOT 4.00 183 N/A N/A m m U'w BT 1 6.50 163 8784 1344.08 13H36 1385.23 1484 1410 1336 YES 5 NO BT 3 7.25 163 8780 1426.63 BT 2 5.75 163 8784 1546.48 42H46 1558.63 1456 1383 1310 NO 0 YES BT 4 6.00 163 8780 1570.80 BT 4 5.75 163 8780 1319.34 46H21 1330.02 1441 1369 1297 YES 5 NO BT6 6.00 163 8784 1340.71 BT 1 8.00 163 8784 1532.96 51H34 1464.70 1487 1413 1339 NO 0 YES BT 5 7.00 163 8780 1396.45 BT 2 6.75 163 8784 1249.64 62H30 1290.84 1413 1342 1272 YES 5 NO BT 6 6.75 163 9501 1332.05 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 2 of 5 OOCUME~NUMBER ~C~R~.N~I~0~02~.~~~ ____________________ _ REVISION: _0_ PAGE: 37 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE JOTH YEAR CONTAINMENT IWI.. INSPECTION PROJECT nTlE 3OT.. YEAR TENDON SURVEILlANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01f./"/08 (/) ~- W AU ~ u.: ~:a ZO a~ (').5 9 II. tit WW Z >CI) Q, ~- ~- 8 i c-i=w ~-;- ~ oCl) >CI) ~i ffi~ uo: Zc ~ A:D. ~e =... CI)% u.: ~! ai~ ~~ 0D. Z w ~!2 IfJ ~ ~~ 0-II.w w m- "Jf.- ~- aw C Z ~(,) t-II. ~

r::r:

III 10 cO: lLi 0 ~ 0 ~ TOP 14,75 161 87M 1559,95 12V01 1559.95 1525 1~9 1372 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 158 NlA N/A TOP 12,50 163 8780 1456.80 45V20 1456.80 1507 1432 1357 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 163 N/A NJA TOP 13.00 163 8784 1505.98 61V08 150598 1491 1416 1342 NO 0 YES BOT ",00 163 NlA N/A TOP 12.00 161 8784 1580.18 61V17 1580.18 1498 23 1348 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 163 N/A NlA II) ~- t-U III I u: ~- t!?o za I ~g ~cn 9 ~I ";0; ~u; WIU ZIU UIII: ~i ~ =l >0 wSi co 0i i ail ai~ ~~ § ; Q-I~ I 1-C Z II. ~~ W C C BT 1 6.50 163 8784 13404.08 13H36 1385,23 8-' 1410 1336 YES 0 5 NO BT 3 7,25 lS3 8780 1426.63 BT 2 5.75 163 8784 1546.48 42H46 1558.63 1456 1383 1310 NO 0 YES ST" 6.00 163 8780 1570.80 8T4 5.75 163 8780 1319,34 46H21 1330.02 1~1 1369 1297 YES 5 NO BT6 6.00 163 87M 1340,71 BT 1 6.00 163 878-' 1532,96 51H34 1464,70 1487 1413 1339 NO 0 YES ST5 7.00 163 8780 1396,45 8T 2 6.75 163 878-' 1249,64 62H30 1290.&& '3 130&2 1272 YES 5 NO BT6 675 163 9501 1332,05

I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 3 of 5 DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 38 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30I" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 PrgreS ~Erg I-I I I I I I I I I I I BTz 3 z us 28 1302.57 BT 11, BT3 625 162 8780 12.891 01 29 BT3 62 6 70 18.6 1269.64 1287 1223 1159 NO 0 d YES ST 5 6.00 161 8784 1290.12 OT 1 6.38 162 8784 1259.76 D2112 127781 1305 1240 1175 NO 0 YES BT3 6.50 162 8780 1295.87 BT 4 7.00 163 8780 1527.21 D238B T .0 13 188 458 1511.53 1348 1281 1213 NO 0 0 YES BT6 6 00 163 8784 1495.86 BT 11 7.0 163 874 1308 BTI 700. 163 8784 1310.65 13H35 13044.2 1368 1298 12295 N YES N BT 3 6.75 163 8780 12302.57 ST 1 7.00 163 8784 1350.83 1 3H37 1289876 1475 1429 11328 YES No BT 3 5750 163 8780 1386.395 BT 1 6.50 163 8784 12491.4 13H38 1244.25 1373 1304 12350 YES NOS ST73 5.75 163 8780 1232,57 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 3 of 5. DOCUMENT NUMBER:.::C::.:Rc.:.*N.:.:'~OO==2=-:.5O'= ___________ REVISION: 0 PAGE: ~ DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IVVL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30 TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 m ~ u.: (l)Q ~Q 1&1 ~(I) Q(.) Z (.)C Q II. I a:_ cL_ I-W WI&I ZZ 4(~ 11.- Z..: UD:: g Q 1 I-W 0"

¥ Ii. ° "0

"m 4(0 ~;!

II::
>:a.

~!: W_ z Cl)Z (.)Di: ~ "~ ~:::) ,p:: OQ. Z W

I!2

~I ~ ~~ m2 1:1:.::

u. w w

1:1-

  1. - l-

..,0 ~~ rhu I-II. ..I ~ QW W ~ 4(": 4((.)

0) 4(

BT 3 625 162 8180 1289.16 0129 1289.64 1281 1223 1159 NO 0 YES BT 5 6.00 161 8784 1290.12 8T 1 6.38 162 8784 1259.76 0212 1271.81 1305 1240 1175 NO 0 YES BT3 6.50 162 8780 1295.87 BT4 7.00 163 8780 1527.21 023B 151153 1348 1281 1213 NO 0 YES BT6 6.00 163 8784 1495.86 lII:_ ~ I!!i ~ uJE ~U) 9 ;1 ! Ii._ a:_ II Q U ..:0 ~i "(I) il z ~i ~ >~

>:Q,

~ ~ m-III ~~ Ie ai-l- ~I 0 (I) 0') 8T I 7.00 163 8784 1310.35 13H33 1306.46 1366 1298 1229 NO YES BT 3 6.75 163 8780 1302.57 BT,. 7.00 163 6784 1350.83 13H34 1368.61 1475 1402 1328 YES NO BT3 7.00 163 8780 1386.39 8T 1 6.56 163 8784 1249.64 13H35 1244.25 1373 1304 1235 YES NO 8T 3 6.38 162 8780 1238.87 8T 1 6.88 163 8784 1387.69 13H37 128987 1368 1299 1231 YES NO BT3 5.75 163 8780 1212.05 BT I 650 163 8784 1411.54 13H3B 1395.05 1444 1372 1300 NO YES BT 3 7.00 163 8780 1378.57

I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 4 of 5 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWi. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 Pir]ss A4.*r,,H2 D k NlT0IG K0. c* :OI E z. 2" UsI w a 0 I I .i, CL I IA: I-* W zw C w 'U. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BT 4 7.00 163 8780 1352.87 46H19 1358.61 1402 1332 1262 NO YES BT 6 7.50 163 8784 1364.35 BT 4 675 160 8780 1269,04 46H20 1298.13 1467 1394 1321 YES NO BT6 725 163 8764 132722 BT 4 5,75 163 8780 1315.98 46H22 1311.48 1488 1412 1337 YES NO BT 6 6.38 163 8784 1306.98 BT 4 6.00 161 8780 1336.10 46H23 1329 97 1425 1354 1283 YES NO ST 6 5.75 163 8784 132385 BT74 6.75 153 8780 1419.92 46H24 1425.85 1472 1398 1325 NO YES BT 6 7.50 183 8764 1431.78 -tBE5 -23 DAET -9. -ofd~I4-- ýb6NFR-BT72 6.50 163 8780 1368.28 62H29 1369.63 1421 1350 1279 NO YES BT 6 6,38 163 9501 1372.98 BT 2 6.25 163 8780 1269.04 62H31 1269.04 1475 1401 1328 YES NO BT6' 6.00 163 NIA N/A 6T 2 7.00 163 8780 1332.75 62H32 1332.75 1455 1382 1310 YES NO BT 6 650 163 N/A N/A BT 2 519 163 8780 1242.22 62H33 1313.39 1461 1388 1315 YES NO BT6 6.50 162 8784 1384.56 BT 2 7,00 163 8780 1393.10 62H34 1378.71 1432 1360 1289 NO YES BT 6 6.75 162 8784 1364,32

  • TENDON NOT ACCESSABLE AT BUTTRESS 6, I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 4 of 5 DOCUMENT NUMBER:..::C:::.;R:.:.:.N.!.:'~00~2~.5()4~ ___________

  • REVISION: _0_ PAGE:

39 OOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT M1..IN$PECTION PROJECT TITLE 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER OA TE: 01124/08 ~- u: u.: (/)0 W (JoE ~ tit I~ 8 ~CI) Yo Go u:- a:_ IL_ ~w oe-Yo _ ZD: i ~~ ~l ~ a.:CI) ~~ '0 (.)1&1 ~ 11.1_ Z 0% ... 8:: ~ ~~ /D-ID- ~8 Yo 9; w W ~S2 u.! (,) ~~ ~~ oe

1

~ m-aw 0(J z'"

u.

0:1: W ID ~ -cD: ~u Gt oe BT4 7.00 163 8780 1352.87 46H19 1358.61 1402 1332 1262 NO YES BT6 7.50 163 8784 1364.35 8T 4 675 160 8780 1269.04 46H20 1298.13 1467 1394 1321 YES NO BT6 7.25 163 8784 1327.22 BT4 5.75 163 8780 1315.98 46H22 1311.48 1488 1412 1337 YES NO BT6 6.38 163 8784 1306.98 BT 4 6.00 161 8780 1336.10 46H23 132997 1425 1354 1283 YES NO BT6 5.75 163 8784 1323.85 8T4 6.75 183 8780 1419.92 46H24 1425.65 1472 1398 1325 NO YES BT6 7.50 183 87&4 1431.78 ~- II u: u; il II z ~:5. ~ II I u:- A:_ A._ g Ii ... ~ li! ~i "(/) >0 CI):J: I >'A. iliA. W I~ ~ m2 ~g ~ ~ m- '$.- = c l ~:J: ID Gt 8T 2 650 163 8780 1366.28 62H29 1369.63 1421 1350 1279 NO YES BT6 6.38 163 9501 1372.98 8T2 6.25 183 8780 1269.04 62H31 1269.04 1475 1401 1328 YES NO BTS' 6.00 163 NlA NlA 812 700 163 8780 1332.75 62H32 1332.75 1455 1362 1310 YES NO BT 6* 650 163 NlA NlA BT2 619 163 8780 1242.22 62H33 1313.39 1461 1388 1315 YES NO BT6 650 162 8784 1384.56 BT 2 7.00 163 8760 139310 62H34 1378.71 1432 1360 1289 NO YES BT6 6.75 162 8784 136432

  • TENDON NOT ACCES$ABLE AT BUTTRESS 6.

I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 5 of 5 I I .I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-Nt002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 40 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'm YEAR TENDON.SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 AS-FOUND LIFTOFF RESTORATION I z azkl U. %6I 2: 9D P: ml I-U I I I I I U i i i I I I I BT 1 8784 1350,83 8784 1479.00 13H34 1368.61 1508.13 1475

  • 2.2%

YES BT 3 8780 1388.39 8780 1537.27 BT 1 8784 1249.64 8784 1411.54 13H35 1244.25 1417.40 1373 +3.2% YES BT 3 8780 1238.87 8780 1423.27 BT 1 8784 1344.08 8784 1546.46 13H36 1385.23 1555.27 1484 8% YES BT 3 8780 1426.63 8780 1564,09 BT 1 8784 1367.69 8784 1394.68 13H37 1289.87 1415.68 1368

  • 3.5%

YES BT 3 8780 1212.05 8780 1436.69 BT 4 8780 1269.04 8780 1488.98 46H20 1298.13 1494.79 1467 -1.9% YES ST 6 8784 1327.22 8784 1502.61 BT 4 8780 1319.34 8780 1503.74 46H21 1330.02 1501.49 1441 .4.2% YES ST 6 84 1340.71 8784 1499.24 BT4 8780 1315.98 8780 1567.45 46H22 1311.48 1538.40 1485 +3.5% YES BT 6 8784 1306.98 8784 1509.35 BT 4 8780 1336.10 8780 1486.98 46H23 1329.97 1481.30 1425 +4.0% YES BT 6 8784 1323.85 8784 1475.62 BT 2 8784 1249.64 0780 1443.39 62H30 1290.84 1467.71 1413 +3.9% YES BT 6 9501 1332.05 9501 1492.04 BT 2 8780 1269.04 8780 1488.98 62H31 1269.04 1486.98 1475 40.8% YES BT 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A BT72 8780 1332.75 8780 1497.04 62H32 1332.75 1497.04 1455

  • 2.9%

YES BT 6" N/A N/A N/A N/A 5T 2 8780 1242.22 8780 14.88.98 62H33 1313.39 1494.79 1461 +2.3% YES 87U4 1384.56 8784 1502.61

  • TENDON NOT ACCESSABLE AT BUTTRESS 6 - RESTORATION ONE END ONLY.

I FM 6.1 Exhibit 3g Survey 8 page 5 of 5 I 30 1M YEAR TENDON SURVEilLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 DOCUMENT NUMBER: ""C""R:...,;-N..;.,I;.::0;::02:..-.:.;5004:.:.... ___________ REVISION: 0 PAGE: 40 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'H YEAR CONTAINMENT IWlINSPECTION DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: I I I I AS-FOUND LIFTOFF RESTORA nON ~~ r-W Z &L-1=>: ID 8 0

  • en

~m z I&.

u.

0:1: z ~ ~.. ~1 ~ ~- ~~ 0=111 W ~ 0 ~! 0 . ~ ....1 m- ~~ 0.. c: ~~ c( t:!. ~~ 0 .,t~ 0 c: BT 1 8784 1350.83 8784 1479.00 13H34 1368.61 1508.13 1475 +2.2% YES I BT 3 8780 1386.39 8780 1537.27 BT 1 8784 1249.64 8784 1411.504 13H35 1244.25 1417.40 1373 +3.2% YES BT 3 8780 1238.87 8780 1423.27 I BT 1 8784 1344.08 8764 1548.46 13H36 1385.23 1555.27 1464 +4.8% YES BT 3 8780 1426.63 8760 1564.09 I BT 1 6784 1387.69 8784 1394.68 13H37 1289.87 1415.68 1368 +3.5% YES BT 3 8780 1212.05 8780 1436.69 I BT4 8780 126904 8780 1486.98 46H20 1296.13 1494.79 1467 +1.9% YES BT6 8764 1327.22 8764 150261 BT4 8780 1319.34 8780 1503.74 I 46H21 1330.02 1501.49 1441 +4.2% YES BT6 ,6764 1340.71 8784 1499.24 BT4 8760 1315.98 8780 1567.45 I 46H22 1311.48 1538.40 1486 +3.5% YES BT6 8784 1306.98 8784 1509.35 BT4 8780 1338.10 8780 1468.98 46H23 1329.97 1481.30 1425 +4.0% YES I BT6 6784 1323.85 8784 1475.62 BT 2 8784 1249.64 8780 1443.39 62H30 1290.84 1467.71 1413 +3.9% YES BT 6 9501 1332.05 9501 149204 I BT 2 6780 126904 6780 1486.98 62H31 1269.04 1486.98 1475 +0.8% YES BT6' NlA NlA NlA N/A I BT 2 6780 133275 8780 1497.04 62H32 1332.75 1497.04 1455. +2.9% YES BT 6' NlA NlA NlA NlA I BT 2 8780 1242.22 8780 1486.98 62H33 1313.39 1494.79 1461 +2.3% YES 8764 1384.56 8764 1502.61

  • TENDON NOT ACCESSABLE AT BunRESS 6 - RESTORATION ONE END ONL Y.

I I I

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 1 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 8) 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 I T T T F T V F 1 F 1 F V I M Shop (kips) 0 Field (kips) Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red) FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 1 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 8) 1800...,.----------------------------- 1600 +---------------------------- 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 o

  • Shop (kips)
  • Field (kips)

Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red)

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 2 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry (Survey 8) Lý 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 I 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 180 160 140 120 100 80 1\\, 60 40 20 o page 2 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry (Survey 8) 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% \\ I 1\\ 6.0% 1\\ 4.0% 2.0% \\ J \\ '" / \\ J r )L --L- )~ ~IJ::jl V 0.0% Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 AL 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 page 3 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 7) T T T T T T T ~ T T T T T T 7 T T 46H2146H2946H3046H3146H3246H3346H3446H3546H3646H3746H3846H3953H1662HO262H09 D126 D212 D339 0 shop U field Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red) FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 3 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 7) 1800 -.----------------------------- 1600 +------------------------------- 1400 -!----,------=-----=-- 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 o 46H2146H2946H3046H3146H3246H3346H3446H3546H3646H3746H3846H3953H1662H0262H090126 0212 0339

  • shop
  • field Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red)

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 4 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry (Survey 7) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 U U i I U 20.0% 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends ..-----------------------------------------------~~~~- FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 page 4 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry (Survey 7) 20.0% 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 5 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 6) '1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 U Shop (kips) 0 Field (kips) Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red) FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 5 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 6) 1800.,------------------------------- 1600 -f-------------------- 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 o

  • Shop (kips)
  • Field (kips)

Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red)

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 6 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Delta (kips) (left scale) -*-Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 6 of 12 Tendon Lift-off F,orce Asymmetry 300 (Survey 6) 25.0% 250 20.0% I 200 15.0% 150 \\ ~ II /11\\ ~ I I, I, I Il ~ ~ V 1\\ I V l M 5.0% 10.0% 100 50 o 0.0%

      1. P##~##~~##~###~#~~~#~

www¥¥wwww¥¥~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 7 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 5) 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 I i ri i i i i i -"n 35H1 42H1 46H21 46H28 46H29 46H30 46H47 62H8 D215 D224 D231 N Shop (kips) 0 Field (kips) Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red) FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 7 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 5) 1800 -,------------------------- 1600 +--- 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 o 35H1 42H1 46H21 46H28 46H29 46H30 46H47 62H8 0215 0224 0231

  • Shop (kips)
  • Field (kips)

Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red)

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 8 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry (Survey 5) 20.0% 18.0% 250 I 200 150 100 50 0 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 35H1 42H1 46H21 46H28 46H29 46H30 46H47 62H8 D215 D224 D231 I Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 8 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry Surve 5 250 r--__________

l~

____l~ ____L_ _____ __r 20.0% 18.0% 200 f-------------- >---------------+ 16.0% 14.0% 150 -\\-------------+ 12.0% 10.0% 100

t-8.0%

6.0% 50 ---'l~----t-4.0% 2.0% o --'---"---'- 0.0% 35H1 42H1 46H21 46H28 46H29 46H30 46H47 62H8 0215 0224 0231 Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 9 of 12 STendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 4) AL ~1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 64H19 13H20 51H26 13H40 51H41 D105 D212 D328 N Shop (kips) 0 Field (kips) Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red) FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 9 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 4 ) 1800..,-------------------------- 1600 -t------------------------ 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 o 64H19 13H20 51H26 13H40 51H4l 0105 0212 0328

  • Shop (kips)
  • Field (kips)

Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red)

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 10 of 12 Lý Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry (Survev 4) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 64H19 13H20 51H26 13H40 51H41 D105 Delta (kips) (left scale) --*-Delta (%) (right scale) D212 D328 Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 10 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry Surve 4 200 r---------------"~------'----L------____r 14.0% 180 12.0% 160 140 1-------- 10.0% 120 1---------1 8.0% 100 6.0% 80 60 I------~- 4.0% 40 2.0% 20 o 0.0% 64H19 13H20 51H26 13H40 51H41 0105 0212 0328 Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 11 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 2) I I 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 1 r~ r-" Ir n 200 0 13H22 13H32 13H13 51H10 51H23 51H37 53H24 53H28 53H44 64H42 D331 D323 D208 D140 D122 0 Shop (kips) 0 Field (kips) Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red) FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 11 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Forces (Survey 2) 1800..,----------------------------- 1600 +---= 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 o 13H22 13H32 13H13 51H10 51H23 51H37 53H24 53H28 53H44 64H42 0331 0323 0208 0140 0122

  • Shop (kips)
  • Field (kips)

Lift-off forces measured at the Shop end (blue) and at the Field end (red)

FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 12 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry (Survey 2) 7' 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% i- ý...I.II.I I I 13H22 13H32 13H13 51H10 51H23 51H37 53H24 53H28 53H44 64H42 D331 D323 D208 D140 D122 Delta (kips) (left scale) --*-Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends FM 6.1 Exhibit 4 page 12 of 12 Tendon Lift-off Force Asymmetry (Survey 2) 160,..------------------------------,- 9.0% 140 1------------------1~Itr_------------j 8.0% 7.0% 120 1----------'lP---------1~ 6.0% 100 1---------1 5.0% 80 4.0% 60 3.0% 40 2.0% 20 1.0% o 0.0% 13H22 13H32 13H13 51H10 51H23 51H37 53H24 53H28 53H44 64H42 D331 D323 D208 D140 D122 Delta (kips) (left scale) Delta (%) (right scale) Delta = Difference between lift-off forces at Shop and Field ends

FM 6.1 Exhibit 5 page 1 of 1 Force Along Hoop Tendon Hoop Tendon Force (kips) assuming tensioning is performed equally from both tendon ends CL 0 0 M 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 I I I - - -7 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Angular Position from left buttress (deg) Distance from left buttress (ft) FM 6.1 Exhibit 5 III Q, ~ CII u ~ 0 - c: 0 ~ c: CII I-Force Along Hoop Tendon Hoop Tendon Force (kips) assuming tensioning is performed equally from both tendon ends 1800 ~--------~,.---------.---------~---------.--------.-,.---------, 1600 !~~--=~.~--~-~-~--j~r--~-~-~--~-~--~-~-;--~-+: ~--~-~--~-~-~--~-~--~-j-~l-~-~--~-~-~--~-~--~-~-~~ -~-~--~-~-~--~-~--~-J~r--~-~--~-~-~~-~'l--

~-------- -----t----

~----

---,--------------~-------------- 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0

4--------------~--------------~---------- ---~--------------r--~-----------

I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I t _____________ J ______________ L ______________ L _____________ J ______________ L _____________ _ I I I I i 1 .1 I I I I i

,--------------T--------------!-------------,--------------r--------------

1 I I I I 1 I I I I I i _____________ ~ ______________ + ______________ ~ __________ ___ ~ __________ ~ __ ~h _____________ _ I ' J I

~--------------+--------------~-------------~--------------~--------------

I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I

,--------------~--------------r-------------1--------------r--------------

20 40 60 80 Angular Position from left buttress (deg) Distance from left buttress (ft) 100 120 page 1 of 1

FM 6.1 Exhibit 6a Survey 4 page 1 of 1 GREASE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT TABLE 4 Crystal River Unit 3 TENDON END GREASE GREASE NET DIFFERENCE : NUMBER DESIGNATION REMOVED REPLACED (gals.) (gals.) 12VI Field + Shop 29.9 34.0 4.1 Gallons 34V4 Filed + Shop 12.9 17.9 5.0 56V2 Field + Shop 89.9 92.9 3.0 Dios Field + Shop 11.0 34.0 23.0 D212 Field + Shop 4.0 16.0 12.0 D328 Field + Shop 8.0 16.0 8.0 13H20 Field + Shop 2.0 21.1 19.1 13H40 Field + Shop 4.0 24.5 20.5 -H26 Field + Shop 2.0 21.1 19.1 51H27* Field + Shop 1.0 5.0 4.0 51H41 Field + Shop 2.0 25.6 23.6 64H19 Field + Shop 2.0 16.8 14.8 Unsealed in error. TP420Ads FM 6.1 Exhibit 6a ~ Crystal River Unit 3 TENDON END NUMBER DESIGNATION l2Vl Field + Shop 34V4 Filed + Shop 56V2 Field + Shop 0105 Field + Shop 0212 Field + Shop 0328 Field + Shop 13820 Field + Shop l3H40

  • Field + Shop

.....,.826 Field + Shop 51H27 ~ Field + Shop

  • slH41 Field + Shop 64H19 Field + Shop Unsealed in error.

TP420Ads Sl:Irvey 4 GREASE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT TABLE 4 GREASE . GREASE NET REMOVED REPLACED

  • (qals.)

(qa1s.1 29.9 34.0 4.1 12.9 17.9 5.0 89.9 92.9 3.0 11.0 34.0 23.0 4.0 16.0 28.0 8.0 16.0 8.0 2.0 21.1 19.1 4.0 24.5 20.5 2.0 21.1 19.1 1.0 5.0 4.0 2.0 25.6 23.6 2.0 16.8 14.8 page 1 of 1 DIFFERENCE.. Gallons

FM 6.1 Exhibit 6b Survey 5 page 1 of 1 Crystal"River Unit 3 Post-Tensionin9 System: 5th In-Service Tendon Surveillance Test Report: Revision 0 TABLE 51

SUMMARY

OF GREASE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED NET (GALLONS) (GALLONS) DIFFERENCE

  • 34V6 56V15 61V14 D215 D224 D231 35H1 42H1 46H21 46H28 46H29 46H30 46H47 62H8 30 96 64 19 38 40 02 02 04 3.5 07 04 04 02 71.5 116 82 51 51 51 22 22 19 19 22 17 24 22 41.5 20 18 32 13 11 20 20 15 15.5 15 13 20 20 a

a a

  • Acceptance Criteria:

Net difference shall not exceed 4 gallons. Please refer to the applicable NCR where it is noted that final evaluation and disposition of acceptance criteria is deferred to Gilbert Commonwealth (to be addressed in their engineering report). 17 FM 6.1 Exhibit 6b S.urve:y 5 page 1 of 1 Crystal'River Unit, 3 Post-Tensioning System: 5th In-Service Tendon Surveillance Test Report: Revision 0 TABLE 5;

SUMMARY

OF GREASE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED NET (~ALLONS) (GALLONS) DIFFERENCE

  • 34V6 30 71.5 41.5 56V15 96 116 20 61V14 64 82 18 D215 19 51 32 D224 38 51 13 D231 40 51 11 35Hl 02 22 20 42H1 02 22 20 46H21 04 19 15 46H28 3.5 19 15.5 46H29 07 22 15 46H30 04 17 13 46H47 04 24 20 62H8 02 22 20
  • Acceptance Criteria:

Net difference shall not exceed 4 gallons. Please refer to the applicable NCR where it is noted that final evaluation and disposition of acceptance criteria is deferred to Gilbert Commonwealth (to be add~essed in their engineering report). 17

FM 6.1 Exhibit 6c Survey 6 page 1 of 2 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE _j CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE XII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 12.1 GREASE LOSS Vs GREASE REPLACEMENT Florida Power CORPORATION 2, b TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED DIFF. NET SHOP FIELD TOTAL SHOP FIELD TOTAL (GAL.) VOLUME (GAL.) (GAL.) 12VI 2.00 36.75 38.75 40.75 0.75 41.50 +2.75 143.46 1.91 23V2 0.75 9.75 10.50 11.50 0.00 11.50 +1.00 142.52 0.70 61 V21 0.75 88.50 89.25 20.25 72.50 92.75 +3.50 144.03 2.43 43V04 0.50 0.00 0.50 7.50 0.00 7.50 +7.00 N/A N/A D113 4.50 4.00 8.50 6.20 3.50 9.70 +1.20 115.11 1.04 -D-115 4.50 4.50 9.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 +2.00 117.17 1.71 D212 6.50 4.00 10.50 20.00 4.50 24.50 +14.00 115.55 12.12, D304 12.00 7.25 19.25 38.20 0.00 38.20 +18.95 103.68 18.30' D311 24.00 4.00 28.00 46.50 3.50 50.00 +22.00 115.12 19.10'

  • SEE NCR No.FrN604-018, 019, 020 45 FM 6.1 Exhibit 6c v

Survey 6 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE XII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 12.1 GREASE LOSS Vs GREASE REPLACEMENT TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED page 1 of 2 _Florida litl Power ~ CORPORATION DIFF. NET SHOP FIELD TOTAL SHOP FIELD TOTAL (GAL.) VOLUME (GAL.) 12VI 2.00 36.75 38.75 23V2 0.75 9.75 10.50 61V21 0.75 88.50 89.25 43V04 0.50 0.00 0.50 D113 4.50 4.00 8.50 -0115 4.50 4.50 9.00 . D212 6.50 4.00 10.50 D304 12.00 7.25 19.25 D311 24.00 4.00 28.00

  • SEE NCR No. FN604-018, 019, 020 I

.V 40.75 11.50 20.25 7.50 6.20 7.00 20.00 38.20 46.50 (GAL.) 0.75 41.50 +2.75 143.46 1.91 0.00 11.50 +1.00 142.52 0.70 72.50 92.75 +3.50 144.03 2.43 0.00 7.50 +7.00 N/A N/A 3.50 9.70 +1.20 115.11 1.04 4.00 11.00 +2.00 117.17 1.71 4.50 24.50 +14.00 115.55 12.12. 0.00 38.20 +18.95 103.68 18.30. 3.50 50.00 +22.00 115.12 19.10. 45

FM 6.1 Exhibit 6c Survey 6 page 2 of 2 20Tll YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE XII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ12.1 GREASE LOSS Vs GREASE REPLACEMENT Florida Power CORPORATION '1 TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED DIFF. NET SHOP FIELD TOTAL SHOP FIELD TOTAL (GAL.) VOLUME _ (GAL.) (GAL.) 42H18 3.75 2.00 5.75 5.25 5.25 10.50 +4.75 121.40 3.91 42H29 3.50 3.25 6.75 5.25 6.25 11.50 +4.75 121.48 3.91 42H30 3.00 3.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 14.00 +8.00 121.59 6.58. 42H31 2.50 3.00 5.50 5.25 5.75 1 1.00 +5.50 121.84 4.51 42H32 3.75 2.50 6.25 6.25 4.75 11.00 +4.75 121.36 3.90 42H33 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.25 4.75 11.00 +5.00 120.38 4.15 42H34 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.50 6.25 12.75 +6.75 121.99 5.53

  • 42H35 3.25 4.50 7.75 4.90 5.30 10.20

+2.45 121.27 2.02 "-42H36 4.00 4.00 8.00 4.00 5.75 9.75 +1.75 121.62 1.44 42H37 4.50 4.50 9.00 6.20 5.00 11.20 +2.20 120.44 1.83 42H44 4.75 3.50 8.25 5.30 4.90 10.20 +1.95 121.08 1.61 51H25 3.50 3.50 7.00 8.00 4.50 12.50 +5.50 120.73 4.56 51H25

  • 3.00 4.00 7.00 4.50 4.00 8.50

+1.50 120.73 1.24 511126 4.50 3.75 8.25 5.25 4.50 9.75 +1.50 121.43 1.24 51H27 3.50 3.25 6.75 5.30 5.70 11.00 +4.25 121.60 3.50 51H28

  • 3.50 4.00 7.50 4.50 4.75 9.25

+1.75 120.46 1.45 51H28

  • 4.00 4.00 8.00 4.50 4.00 8.50

+0.50 120.46 0.42 53H2 4.50 4.00 8.50 5.75 6.25 12.00 +3.50 121.32 2.88 53H46 3.25 3.50 6.75 6.00 5.25 11.25 +5.25 121.60 4.32 62H41 4.00 4.00 8.00 7.10 5.30 12.40 +4.40 .121.37 3.63 62H46 3.50 4.50 8.00 6.25 6.50 12.75 +4.75 121.11 3.92 51 H41 N/A 3.50 3.50 NIA 4.00 4.00 +0.50 N/A N/A I ,1 I GREASED 11/18/97 GREASED 12/18/97

  • SEE NCR No. FN604-021 46 FM 6.1 Exhibit6c Survey 6 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST. TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE XII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ12.1 .1 GREASE LOSS Vs GREASE REPLACEMENT TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED page 2 of 2 Florida ~J) CORPORATION li4IJ Power DIFF. NET SHOP FIELD TOTAL SHOP FIELD TOTAL (GAL.) VOLUME I I J, . 1 42H18 42H29 42H30. 42H31 42H32 42H33 42H34 42H35 -42H36 42H37 42H44 51H25

  • 51H25**

51H26 51H27 51H28

  • 5IH28**

53H2 53H46 62H41 62H46 51H41 3.75 3.50. 3.0.0. 2.50.

  • 3.75 3.0.0.

3.0.0. 3.25 4.0.0. 4.50. 4.75 3.50. 3.0.0. 4.50. 3.50. 3.50. 4.0.0. 4.50. 3.25 4.0.0. 3.50. N/A \\. / GREASED 1111 8197

~. GREASED 12118197 (GAL.)

2.0.0. 5.75 3.25 6.75 3.0.0. 6.0.0. 3.0.0. 5.50. 2.50. 6.25 3.0.0. 6.0.0. 3.0.0. 6.0.0. 4.50. 7.75 4.0.0. 8.0.0. 4.50. 9.0.0. 3.50. 8.25 3.50. 7.0.0. 4.0.0. 7.00 3.75 8.25 3.25 6.75 4.0.0. 7.50. 4.0.0. 8.0.0. 4.0.0. 8.50. 3.50. 6.75 4.0.0. 8.0.0. 4.50. 8.0.0. 3.50. 3.50. (GAL.) 5.25 5.25 10..50. +4.75 121.40. 3.91 5.25 6.25 11.50. +4.75 121.48 3.91 7.0.0. 7.0.0. 14.0.0. +8.0.0. 121.59 6.58

  • 5.25 5.75 11.0.0.

+5.50. 121.84 4.51 6.25 4.75 ) 1.0.0. +4.75 121.36 3.90. 6.25 4.75 11.0.0. +5.0.0. 120..38 4.15 6.50. 6.25 12.75 +6.75 121.99 5.53

  • 4.90.

5.30. 10.20 +2.45 121.27 2.0.2 4.0.0. 5.75 9.75 +1.75 121.62 1.44 6.20. 5.0.0. 11.20. +2.20. 120..44 1.83 5.30. 4.90. 10..20. +1.95 121.0.8 1.61 8.0.0. 4.50. 12.50. +5.50. 120..73 4.56 4.50. 4.0.0. 8.50. +1.50. 120..73 1.24 5.25 4.50. 9.75 +1.50. 121.43 1.24 5.30. 5.70. 11.0.0. +4.25 121.60. 3.50. 4.50. 4.75 9.25 +1.75 120..46 1.45 4.50. 4.0.0. 8.50. +0..50. 120..46 0..42 5.75 6.25 12.0.0. +3.50. 121.32 2.88 6.0.0. 5.25 11.25 +5.25 121.60. 4.32 7.10. 5.30. 12.40. +4.40.

  • 121.37 3.63 6.25 6.50.

12.75 +4.75 121.11 3.92 N/A 4.0.0. 4.0.0. +0..50. N/A N/A

  • SEE NCR No. FN604-021 46

FM 6.1 Exhibit 6d Survey 7 page 1 of 1 25T I YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SSTE AT TEPower CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT Aroress E ompn UNIT 3 A Progress Energy Company TABLE XI:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SIIEETS SQ 12.1 GREASE LOSS Vs GREASE REPLACEMENT TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED DIFF. NET SHOP FIELD TOTAL SHOP FIELD TOTAL (GAL.) VOLUME (GAL.) (GAL.) 12V01 2.25 105.75 108.00 0.00 115.00 115.00 7.00 139.43 +5.02 12V02 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.50 0.00 3.50 0.50 139.78 40.36 23V02 2.75 0.00 2.75, 4.75 0.00 4.75 2.00 139.85 +1.43 45VI4 7.00 102.50 109.50 0.00 118.50 118.50 9.00 140.34 +6.41 61V08 7.00 102.75 109.75 0.00 112.50 112.50 2.75 139.78 +1.97 461121 3.25 3.25 6.50 3.50 4.00 7.50 1.00 119.96 +0.83 461129 1.75 1.75 3.50 3.50 2.50 6.00 2.50 119.73 +2.09 461130 1.75 1.50 3.25 4.50 2.25 6.75 3.50 119.73 +2.92 y 461131 1.75 1.75 3.50 3.25 4.50 7.25 3.75 119.73 +3.13 461132 1.75 1.75 3.50 2.25 3.50 5.75 2.25 119.73 +1.88 46H33 1.75 1.75 3.50 4.50 3.50 8.00 4.50 119.73 +3.76 461134 1.75 1.75 3.50 2.50 3.50 6.00 2.50 119.73 +2.09 461135 1.75 1.75 3.50 3.50 2.50 6.00 2.50 119.09 +2.10 461136 2.25 1.00 3.25 2.50 4.50 7.00 3.75 119.25 +3.14 46H37 1.75 1.00 2.75 3.50 4.00 7.50 4.75 119.93 +3196 461138 1.50 1.50 3.00 2.50 4.00 6.50 3.50 119.73 +2.92 461-139 1.75 3.50 5.25 3.00 3.50 6.50 1.25 119.73 +1.04 561116 2.50 2.00 4.50 3.00 3.50 6.50 2.00 119.53 +1.67 621-102 2.25 2.50 4.75 4.50 5.25 9.75 5.00 119.33 +4.19 621109 3.00 2.00 5.00 3.50 5.25 8.75 3.75 119.73 +3.13 621113 2.50 1.50 4.00 4.75 4.50 9.25 5.25 120.59 +4.53 D126 14.50 25.75 40.25 0.00 42.75 42.75 2.50 115.97 +2.16 D212 24.75 22.00 46.75 0.00 62.25 62.25 15.50 113.86 +13.73* D339 40.00 15.00 55.00 73.75 0.00 73.75 18.75 100.18 +18.72 *

  • ADDRESSED IN.FN 750-007
  • ADDRESSED IN FN 750-006 40 FM 6.1 Exhibit 6d Survey 7 page 1 of 1 v

25TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TilE ('"~ POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TilE ~ 1,' Florida Power CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT ~ APE Co UNIT 3 rogress nergy mpany TABLE XI:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 12.1 GREASE LOSS Vs GREASE REPLACEMENT TENDON GREASE REMOVED SHOP FIELD 12VOI 2.25 105.75 12V02 3.00 0.00 23V02 2.75 0.00 45VI4 7.00 102.50 61V08 . 7.00 102.75 461121 3.25 3.25 46.. 29 J.75 1.75 461130 1.75 l.50 \\. J 461131 1.75 l.75 461132 1.75 1.75 46H33 1.75 1.75 46H34 1.75 1.75 461-135 1.75 1.75 461-136 2.25 1.00 46H37 1.75 1.00 461-138 1.50 l.50 46H39 1.75 3.50 56HI6 2.50 2.00 62H02 2.25 2.50 62H09 3.00 2.00 62Hl3 2.50 1.50 0126 14.50 25.75 0212 24.75 22.00 0339 40.00 15.00

  • ADDRESSED JNFN 750-007

\\........

    • ADDRESSED IN FN 750-006 TOTAL (GAL.)

108:00 3.00 2.75 109.50 109.75 6.50 3.50 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.25 2.75 3.00 S.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 4.00 40.25 46.75 55.00 GREASE REPLACED DlFF. NET SHOP FIELD TOTAL (GAL.) VOLUME (GAL.) 0.00 115.00 115.00 7.00 139.43 +5.02 3.50 0.00 3.50 0.50 139.78 +0.36 4.75 0.00 4.75 2.00 139.85. +1.43 0.00 118.50 118.50 9.00 140.34 +6.41 0.00 112.50 112.50 2.75 139.78 +1.97 3.50 4.00 7.50 1.00 119.96. +0.83 3.50 2.50 6.00 2.50 119.73 +2.09 4.50 2.25 6.75 3.50 119.73 +2.92 .3.25 4.50 7.25 3.75 119.73 +3.13 2.25 3.50 5.75 2.25 119.73 +1.88 4.50 3.50 8.00 4.50 119.73 +3.76 2.50 3.50 6.00 2.50 119.73 +2.09 3.50 2.50 6.00 2.50 119.09 +2.10 2.50 4.50 7.00 3.75 119.25 +3.14 3.50 4.00 7.50 4.75 119.93 +3.96 2.50 4.00 6.50 3.50 119.73 +2.92 3.00 3.50 6.50 1.25 119.73 +I.O~ 3.00 3.50 6.50 2.00 119.53 +1.67 4.50 5.25 9.75 5.00 119.33 +4.19 3.50 5.25 8.75 3.75 119.73 +3.13 4.75 4.50 9.25 5.25 120.59 +4.53 0.00 42.75 42.75 2.50 115.97 +2.16 0.00 62.25 62.25 15.50 113.86 +13.73

  • 73.7S 0.00 73.75 18.75 100.18

+18.72 ** 40

I I I I I U FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 1 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 45 DOCUMENT TITLE FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30*" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 10.2 TENDON CAP RESEALING AND GREASING U I I I I I I I I I I I 10.2.1 After completion of all inspections, the anchorage components were hand coated with cold grease to ensure complete coverage. The caps were reinstalled with new gaskets and the results of the grease cap replacement were recorded on Data Sheet SQ 12.0 and are summarized in Tables 50 thru 55. 10.2.2 Upon acceptable cap replacement, the necessary amount of sheathing filler (grease) was added. All of the inspected tendons were refilled within the acceptable limits as stated in the PSC Procedure SQ12.1. The results of the grease replacement were recorded on Data Sheet SO 12.1 and are summarized in Tables 56 thru 60. 10.2.2.1 The absolute difference between the amount of grease removed/lost and the amount of grease replaced in the subject tendon shall not exceed 10% of the net duct volume per PSC Procedure S0 12.1. No tendon accepted above 10% of the net duct volume more than was lost, and all refills were acceptable. 45 Ul ° o .W C-1ya 1*W 0 W-01 W.Jor 0 0 MU =.o"0 Ita0 = 0: 0. 0 0 J 0 7e. Wo a 49 D 3 1 _j3 C E Zo<w, Z W 3 o I-0 it /~I Z 0= 0 = UJ I I% 0 0 TOP YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 12VOI BOT YES YES YES YES YES NO YES TOP YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 45V20 IOT YES YES YES YES YES NO YES TOP YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 61V08 BOT YES YES YES YES YES NO YES TOP YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 61V17 BOT YES YES YES YES YES NO YES Z 114 IQ O.K IL .1 IX a'I I0(0 r.._ 0I I Z I.=1I* 2' .9 1 111iR U< I.. le 0:, l -K 1-g 040 2900ml I,. t -w

0) 0 BT5 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 5 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 0212 BT3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES D238 IBT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 1 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER ...::C~R~.N.!.!1~OO!!!2:....:.504= ___________ REVISION: 0 PAGE ~ DOCUMENT TITLE PROJECT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWlINSPECTION 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 10.2 TENDON CAP RESEALING AND GREASING 10.2.1 After completion of all inspections. the anchorage components were hand coated with cold grease to ensure complete coverage. The caps were reinstalled with new gaskets and the results of the grease cap replacement were recorded on Data Sheet sa 12.0 and are summarized in Tables 50 thru 55. 10.2.2 Upon acceptable cap replacement. the necessary amount of sheathing filler (grease) was added. All of the inspected tendons were refilled within the acceptable limits as stated in the PSC Procedure SO 12.1. The results of the grease replacement were recorded on Data Sheet SO 12.1 and are summarized in Tables 56 thru 60. 10.2.2.1 The absolute difference between the amount of grease removedllost and the amount of grease replaced in the subject tendon shall not exceed 10% of the net duct volume per PSC Procedure SO 12.1. No tendon accepted above 10% of the net duct volume more than was lost, and all refills were acceptable. ~tlii$l ~':!4\\l foj, ~~A~*~E4.50;~vE*FrnC'ALS'*-"~Q12.0 i- *GREA'~*~f~.l(I?~~"EP.!!A<%~~~N~tlc'~'."~~~lti wZ... w! z -c Cl)1Ii: ... w

a.

~ t-~CD au -0 0a. !:)z... o u..-cj c...... > t-u.. Z-c Z~wlU OU 0 au Z

S... C "0=

~Q... 8u IU ~~ a.:

  • a. loll 0

Q a.ut

u~

1~~2i "S~IU !:)~"!J: ID Q Z "ww O>g; CI)~-cjW

i:c~!:)

~ z W: 3 uU z.... " je flQ c::>>~ CI) i 0111: o~a:a A. w a: co ~Ii II. .c;~ ",,11.... :; >oa. !:)OCLII !AI ",!l.C ~! ~III: ... z:' OIll:WIII: u w!a c... ~cnu. oz",O u CI) cC z~ ~o z~ (,) "'c lD -c CD(I)~ CI) uo~

ria':

-c "'w 0 TOP YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 12VD1 BOT YES YES YES YES YES NO YES TOP YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 45V20 BOT YES YES YES YES YES NO YES TOP YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 61V08 BOT YES YES YES YES YES NO YES TOP YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 61V17 BOT YES YES YES yes YES NO YES I!!ZW !A2 ~A. Q. ~ c'" u."'j

swlD 00 0

w Z ... ~ hd; A. _Q. w 8 Q a.oQ.

>>WC!)1a':

ID Z "WW ,lII: z - Z zu(,) zc-:>> w u!tG:a G. w -c(') °lu.~1 w G:II.C

>>ai:jw

(,) ~a:Q Iw (l)C) 0a:1II1II: (,) ID!:)Z C (I)..: ID 3

r:

BT 3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 0129 8T 5 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 1 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 0212 BT 3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES ST.. YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 0238 8T6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 2 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 46 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE-W124108 z 02SI 4c.. tow K P1 I-Wj W3 0 004M BT YES YES YES YES YS NO YES 13H36 6T3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 42H14 BT4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 8T4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H2t BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT I YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 513H3 ST5 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H430 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 2 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR*N1002*504 REVISION: _0_ PAGE: 46 DOCUMENT TITlE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30 TH YEAR CONTAINMENT IWlINSPECTION PROJECT TinE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE-01124/08 r." I -:( '\\'T:ABl.tE '52: *H00P.S !.IS'ci1'2!O -..!(GRE~sErcJKpJREp.L~GE'~~ENT"'"oi ~ ~ -, -; . 'I~ !2! ~A. ~~m t! i0c i~... Q Q. C'- I&.Cj we.. c~.. 0(') Q til

5~~

til&. !e I!!ww z 00 cn ... cc.>i III ~cn ~ _0...... i 0 Q.(,)Q. go..: lWei) ~Q... _c.> ..,:Z:CI)CI) w"'l: ! z ",,,,1&1 )oW eI)- CI)~.~w."c w

I:~a;:;)

zu u z.... a:: jt-UlQ c=>1 en <<1= "a:: w I&. uJG::(J Q. W ~~~ ~I; I&o~~~ ~~i~

)Q~w Ilol t-i
ja:o "CDI&. II ~I OG::ma:

u e=t (')Z-C:u '-c u m:;)z cc! ~! c eI)-c: ~ U0(1) lID I

z:<<

0 z BT 1 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 13H36 BT 3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 42H46 8T4 YES yes YES YES YES NO YES BT4 YES YES YES YES . YES NO YES 46H21 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 1 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 51H34 BT 5 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 8T2 YES YES yes YES yes NO YES 62H30 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES I!!~; Go "'1iI ~~ I z ~~~ ~= Uli i 0~1ti 3:! i: UO t! S~~ is a~ CD!; ~u C Z BT 1 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 13H33 BT 3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 1 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 13H34 BT3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 1 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 13H35 BT 3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 1 YES yes YES YES YES NO YES 13H37 BT3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 1 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 13H38 BT 3 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES

I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 3 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: DOCUMENT TITLEý PROJECT TITLE: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 47 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30TH YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION 30TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 'oil L1117 .,Owv ftw-m Emy U I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I 1ý ý wIz MI a:I Ow& wrw ul us zwý >A IX 16

0. 0 IL 0

co w0< si i I 1,. 0 WT us z -c z4( a.0 N w -I I-0. U'UU 8T4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H19 BT 6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 4YSY20 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H22 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H23 BT 6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H24 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES =I, = I& 4.~ jN5 BT!2 YES YES YES NO YES BT 6 YES YES YSES YES NO YES BT 2 YES YES YES YES YSNO YES 621131 BT 6 YES YES YES YES YSNO YES BT 2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H32 BT 6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H33 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H34 BT 6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES T - -E S YE-E ESNE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 3 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: -=C::..:R....:..N:..:.1.=.:OO:.::2....,,.504"'-.:.... __________ REVISION: ° PAGE: 47 DOCUMENT TITLE: FiNAl REPORT FOR THE 30tH YEAR CONTAINMENT IWLINSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 .. ~..... ;"4"'J'I(BI!IE~54: ~46fi21 r~*[!);1~~ENfr~<::!*S*Q~2.0~*G*RE*AS~O'Aip..(REP.~~~EMENT"I~' I!!!III i! iIi~ (1)0: 1,... 0 Q.. ('. -0 OQ.. ... C~ I&I~W ~-'-'> "'11. ~C Ou 0 W ~ ~...t:! °O(/) Wl!!~~ ~.Q. W ...t Q

auQ, iu~

W~u~ ~:a... _u O:t(/)fh w,,~ 4D (!)WUI i4l)!!2o 3~iji iS~~ ~z C z %>1 u~i5 t-w ~u(,)

5e~i Q.

w ~C(,) ~Ii ~..... >o~ 8Q~'" cl!C II. cc ~ "z CJ o(UI Q,cn'" 1-u Z ", ~1IIg: (,) w~i (1) c~~ fh z~ (,) t-< C IIIfh", ~ (,)O(/) II ~

t~
  • w 0

BT4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H19 BT 6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46 H20 8T6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 8T 4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H22 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 8T.. YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H23 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT 4 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 46H24 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES wz ; I'" t-C I

5~i!

UI ...t Q,UI; III ~~g ~ III Q-... ~II.C U 11111 u 0( BT 2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H29 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H31 BT6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H32 BT 6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES BT2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H33 8T6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 8T 2 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES 62H34 BT 6 YES YES YES YES YES NO YES

I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 4 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION 0 PAGE: 48 DOCUMENT TITLE FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'ý YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE. 01124(08 P WS GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED DUCT TENDON END (GALLONS) (GALLONS) DIFFV %DU END TOTAL END TOTAL (GAL) (GAL.) DIFF. 12V TOP 2785 0 82.19 369 143.97 2.56 YES BOT 76 82.19 45V20 TOP 3 880 91.04 3.04 1d447 2.10 YES BOT 85 91.04 TOP 2.5 708 61V08 BOT 52.5 55 4956 5664 1.64 144,12 1.13 YES TOP 25 1 61V17 98.5 107.2 8.7 144.74 601 YES BOT 98 106.2 Depending on the amount of grease loss during the inspection, grease can t>e replaced by pouring it back into the grease cap. RETAINED IN HARD COPY 1kr-W -*3 iO({ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 4 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: ~C::..:R...:.;*N:..:.;I00=2-~~04=-__________ REVISION' _0_ PAGE: 48 DOCUMENT TITLE PROJECT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 3Or~ YEAR CONTAINMENT IWlINSPECTION 30:~ YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIIIER DATE: 01124(08 DUCT OfFF. TENDON END (GAL) VOLUME DIFF. ACCEPT 12V01 45V20 SiV08 61V17 . / TOP BOT TOP BOT TOP BOT TOP BOT .~. .f-;

  • .. J. _,

END TOTAL 2.5 785 76 3 88 85 2.5 55 52.5 25 98.5 96 RETAINED IN HARD COpy 12JY;--#=-393 'Oll~ END TOTAL (GAL.) 0 82.19 369 143.97 2.56 82.19 0 91.04 3.04 1~*H 2.10 91.04 708 56.64 1.64 144.12 1.13 49.56 107.2 8.7 144.7" 6.01 1062 Depending on the amount of grease loss during the inspection. 1--....... ----4 grease can be replaced by pouring '~ ,~ it back into the grease cap. YES YES YES YES

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 "Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 5 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: CR-N,002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 49 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'T YEAR CONTAINMENT,WL INSPECTION 3 0 r' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 PI EmS IGALLONSI (GALLONSi TENDON END I ~ END TOTAL END TOTAL DIFF.* (GAL.) DUCT VOLUME (GAL.) DIFF. ACCEPT BT 1 2.5 354 13H36 5 708 2.08 121.67 1.70 YES BT 3 2.5 3.54 6T 2 2 5 309* 42H46 55 5,74 024 122.57 0.19 YES ST 4 3,0 2.65 BT 4 2.5 3.54 46H21 5 7.08 2.08 12206 1.70 YES BT 6 25 3-54 BT 1 2.5 2.65 511H34 5 619 1.19 120.88 0.98 YES BT 5 2.5 3.54 BT 2 2.5 3.54 62H30

5.

7.08 2.08 121.75 1.70 YES BT 6 2.5 3.54 GREASE REMOVED REASE LACEDD TENDON END (GALLNS) (a) VOLUME ACCEPT END TOTAL END TOTAL (GAL.) 8T 3 13,5 0 D129 36.5 39.71 3.21 116.41 2-75 YES BT 5 23 39-71 ST 1 2.5 0 D212 20 23.78 3.78 115.99 325 YES BT 3 17.5 23,78 BT 4 62.5 73,34 D238 69.5 73.34 3-84 102.59 3.74 YES ST 6 7 0

I I I I I I I I I I I U U I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 6 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 50 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30TH YEAR CONTAINMENT,W. INSPECTION L 30'm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 Prpu GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED DUCT TENDON END (GALLONS) (GALLONS) DIFF DUCT END TOTAL END TOTAL (GAL) (GAL.) DIFF. ST 1 2 2265 13H33 4 5.3 1.3 121.57 1.06 YES BT 3 2 2.65 BT 1 2 2.65 13H34 4 5.3 1.3 121.25 1.07 YES BT 3 2 265 BT 1 2 265 13H35 4 53 1.3 121.77 1.06 YES ST 3 2 2,65 BTI 2 2.65 13H37 4 5.3 1.3 122.15 1.06 YES BT 3 2 2.65 BT 1 2 2.65 13H38 4 5.3 1.3 121.53 1.06 YES BT 3 2 2.65 8T4 2 2.21 46H19 4 4.86 0.86 121,25 0.70 YES BT6 2 2.65 BT 4 2 265 46H20 4 5.3 1.3 12137 1.07 YES BT 6 2 2.65 BT4 2 2.65 4IH22 4 5.74 1.74 122.43 1.42 YES BT 2 3.09 BT4 2 265 46H23 4 5.3 1.3 122,63 1.06 YES BT 6 2 265 BT 4 2 2.65 4"H24 4 5.74 1.74 121.57 1.43 YES BT 6 2 3.09 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 6 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER: ..::C::..:R:..:.*N.!..:I~OO==2:....:*504=_--.:... _________ REVISION: 0 PAGE: 50 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 3O'H YEAR CONTAINMENT IWI.. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'H YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 _.~::lI~_IHret~. I:l. 1::a:.!~1lI ~l!H"'*'(2

,t.C~e

~R~AS~ DJ:DI "'~J:n Ir..... * ~;~YCU - ',G";' ':O"Ns,---

DJFF, DUCT "

ACCEPT TENDON END (GAL) VOLUME DlFF. END TOTAL END TOTAL (GAL.) BT 1 2 2.65 13H33 4 5.3 1.3 121.57 1.06 YES BT 3 2 2.65 8T 1 2 2.65 13H34 4 5.3 1.3 121.25 1.07 YES BT3 2 2.65 BT 1 2 2.65 13H35 4 5.3 1.3 121.77 1.06 YES 8T 3 2 2.65 8T 1 2 2.65 13H37 4 5.3 1.3 122.18 1.06 YES 8T3 2 2.65 8T 1 2 2.65 13H38 4 5.3 1.3 121.53 1.06 YES 8T3 2 2.65 8T4 2 2.21 46H19 4 4.86 0.86 121.25 0.70 YES BT6 2 2.65 8T 4 2 2.65 46H20 4 5.3 1.3 121.37 1.07 YES 8T6 2 2.65 BT4 2 2.65 46H22 4 5.74 1.74 122.43 1.42 YES 8T 2 3.09 8T4 2 265 46H23 4 53 1.3 122.63 1.06 YES 8T6 2 265 8T4 2 2.65 46H24 4 5.74 1.74 121.57 1.43 YES 8T6 2 3.09

I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 7 of 7 IU U I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: CR-N1002-50,4 REVISION: 0 PAGE:. 51 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION 30'm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/20~08 Pf S E GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED TENDON END (GALLONS) (GALLONS) DIFF. VOLUME ACCEPT (GAL) VOUEDIFF ACP END TOTAL END TOTAL (GAL.) ST 2 2 2.65 62H29 4 5,3 1.3 121.93 106 YES BT 6 2 2.65 BT 2 2 2.65 62H31 2 2.65 065 122.13 0.53 YES BT6 0 0 BT 2 2 2.65 62H32 2 2.65 0.65 121.45 0,53 YES BT6 0 0 BT 2 2 2.65 62H33 B45 5.3 0 80 122.07 0.65 YES BT 6 25 2.65 BT 2 2 2.65 62H34 4 53 13 121.47 1,07 YES BT 6 2 2,65 I I I I I I I I I I S"/If a large amount of grease is lost during the inspection, then grease must be replaced by pressure pumping it back into the tendon duct. REIAINLU IN HAKMU i.tur ze, ~ecyjcc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FM 6.1 Exhibit 6e Survey 8 page 7 of 7 DOCUMENT NUMBER..::C~Rc..:..N::...:l~OD=2c..::*5~04::...-__________ REVISION: 0 PAGE: 51 DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITlE: TENDON END 9T :2 62H29 9T6 BT 2 62H31 BT6 BT 2 62H32 BT6 BT 2 62H33 BT6 BT 2 62H34 BT6 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWlINSPECTION 3O'H YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124(08 END TOTAL END 2 2.65 4 2 2.65 2 2.65 2 0 0 2 2.S!'> 2 0 0 2 2.65 '.5 2.5 2.65 2 2.65 4 2 . 2.65 DIFF. DUCT (GAL.) VOLUME DIFF. TOTAL (GAL.) 5.3 1.3 121.93 106 2.65 0.65 122.13 0.53 265 0.65 121.45 0.53 5.3 080 122.07 0.65 5.3 1.3 121.47 1.07 If a large amount of grease is lost during the inspection. then grease must be replaced by pressure pumping it back into the tendon duct. ACCEPT YES YES YES YES YES

FM 6.1 Exhibit 7 Aý page 1 of 1 N> Grease losses from tendon sleeves 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 -1 surv 4 surv 5 surv 6 surv 7 surv 8 Grease Losses (gal) (left axis) --U-Std Dev (right axis) Average and standard deviation of grease losses for each surveillance 2/21/2010 1 FM 6.1 Exhibit 7 page 1 of 1 Grease losses from tendon sleeves 25.00.,----------------------,- 25.00 20.00 +--------------------+ 20.00 15.00 +-----

+ 15.00 10.00

+ 10.00 5.00

---;;;;;;;;0;;;;::=::;;-=:=------+ 5.00 0.00 0.00 surv 4 surv 5 surv 6 surv 7 surv 8 Grease Losses (gal) (left axis) ..... Std Dev (right axis) Average and standard deviation of grease losses for each surveillance 2/21/2010

FM 6.1 Exhibit 8 page 1 of 4 Weight of tendons A. Horizontal tendon 163 wires x pi/4 (7/25.4)A2 in2 = 9.72 in2 9.72 in2 x 13Oft x 12 in/ft x 0.283 lb/in3 = 4,291 lbs B. Vertical tendon 9.72 in2 x 192 ft x 12 in/ft x 0.283 lb/in3 = 6,337 lbs C. Conclusion Hoop tendon = 4,300 lbs Vertical tendon = 6,400 lbs FM 6.1 Exhibit 8 Weight of tendons A. Horizontal tendon 163 wires x pi/4 (7/25.4)1\\2 in2 = 9.72 in2 9.72 in2 x 130ft x 12 in/ft x 0.283 Ib/in3 = 4,2911bs B. Vertical tendon 9.72 in2 x 192 ft x 12 in/ft x 0.283 Ib/in3 = 6,337 Ibs C. Conclusion Hoop tendon = 4,300 Ibs Vertical tendon = 6,400 Ibs page 1 of 4

FM 6.1 Exhibit 8 page 2 of 4 From: Brian Giometti To: Portmann. Rick; Christooher Cox

Subject:

RE: CR3 Root Cause Team Questions Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:24:18 AM Rick-I would estimate the maximum force the vertical coiler can pull around 16,000 lb. The horizontals are less. This is based upon our testing at the shop as well as the fact that the 1st vertical tendon was not able to be broken free from the grease with the coiler. When the crane was used, the operator's computer read 17,000 lb. Let me know if you need any further clarification. Brian From: Portmann, Rick [1] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 6:24 AM To: Christopher Cox; Brian Giometti

Subject:

CR3 Root Cause Team Questions Christopher / Brian - There were a few more questions that came up last night from the root cause team. I'm not sure where this one question comes up in the scheme of things, but your assistance is appreciated. See below. Thanks, Rick Outage Cell: 352-464-7846 What is the maximum force of the tendon coiler used at CR3? FM 6.1 Exhibit 8 From: To:

Subject:

Date: Rick-Brian Giometti Portmann. Rick; Christopher Cox RE: CR3 Root Cause Team Questions Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:24:18 AM page 2 of 4 I would estimate the maximum force the vertical coiler can pull around 16,000 lb. The horizontals are less. This is based upon our testing at the shop as well as the fact that the 1 st vertical tendon was not able to be broken free from the grease with the coiler. When the crane was used, the operator's computer read 17,000 lb. Let me know if you need any further clarification. Brian From: Portmann, Rick [2] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 6:24 AM To: Christopher Cox; Brian Giometti

Subject:

CR3 Root cause Team Questions Christopher / Brian - There were a few more questions that came up last night from the root cause team. I'm not sure where this one question comes up in the scheme of things, but your assistance is appreciated. See below. Thanks, Rick Outage Cell: 352-464-7846 What is the maximum force of the tendon coiler used at CR3?

FW: RCA question about PSC coiler Monday, January 4, 2010 8:12 AM From: "HollidayF

    • 6'~l*.*lj~t(gnmnail.corn>pae3o4 From:

~page 3 of 4 To: 'patrickberbon@yahoo.com'" <patrickberbon@yahoo.com> From: Paul Smith [ma Ito:PSmith@psctendon.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:26 AM To: Holliday, John

Subject:

RE: RCA question about PSC coiler

John, Please find below a response to the questions:
1.

Hoop tendon length is approximately 155 feet so weight should be approximately 45001bs.

2.

Vertical weight is about right.

3.

Max pulling force is 16,0001b when you start pulling but quickly drops.

4.

Coiler is designed and built by PSC for PSC and has no operation manual.

5.

Estimated coiling rate is more like 30 ft per minute during continuous operation. Coiler stops to allow banding each revolution. Paul From: Holliday, John y@pgnmail.com Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 9:25 AM To: Paul Smith

Subject:

FW: RCA question about PSC coiler

Paul, Could you please review and provide responses to the questions below that I received from the Root Cause Team. Thanks.
Regards, John Holliday From: Patrick Berbon [mailto: patrickberbon@ya hoo.com]

FW: RCA question about PSC coiler From: "Holliday.p~6-::~~~llrelt~gnmail.com> To: '"patrickberbon@yahoo.com <patrickberbon@yahoo.com> From: Paul Smith [3] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:26 AM To: Holliday, John

Subject:

RE: RCA question about PSC coiler

John, Please find below a response to the questions:

Monday, January 4, 2010 8:12 AM page 3 of 4

1.

Hoop tendon length is approximately 155 feet so weight should be Paul approximately 45001bs.

2.

Vertical weight is about right.

3.

Max pulling force is 16,OOOlb when you start pulling but quickly drops.

4.

Goiler is designed and built by PSG for PSG and has no operation manual.

5.

Estimated coiling rate is more like 30 ft per minute during continuous operation. Goiler stops to allow banding each revolution. From: Holliday, John [mailto)~hDJI.<?JJj9?!Y@P9D!':I?!H,~()IJ1J Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 9:25 AM To: Paul Smith

Subject:

FW: RCA question about PSC coiler

Paul, Could you please review and provide responses to the questions below that I received from the Root Cause Team. Thanks.
Regards, John Holliday From: Patrick Berbon [4]

Cc: Portmann, Rick; Williams, Charles R.; Dave Brevig

Subject:

RCA qF*ti6nlaLy 8oiler page 4 of 4 Hi John, We have some more questions on the PSC tendon coiler used at CR3. - Can you confirm the approximate weight of a hoop tendon is: 9.72 in2 x 130 ft x 0.28 lb/in3 = 4,250 Ibs? - Can you confirm the approximate weight of a vertical tendon is: 9.72 in2 x 192 ft x 0.28 lb/in3 = 6,270 Ibs? - We have an email from Brian Giometti at PSC indicating the maximum pulling force for the coiler is around 16,000 lbs. Can you confirm that? - Do you have an operation's manual for the coiler? Can we get a copy? - What is an estimate of the coiling rate? Does 1ft/min make sense? I appreciate your time. Patrick Berbon, PH1 Team Cc: Portmann, Rick; Williams, Charles R.; Dave Brevig

Subject:

RCA qpWie~~~~~ sailer Hi John, page 4 of 4 We have some more questions on the PSC tendon coiler used at CR3. - Can you confirm the approximate weight of a hoop tendon is: 9.72 in2 x 130 ft x 0.28 Ib/in3 = 4,250 Ibs? - Can you confirm the approximate weight of a vertical tendon is: 9.72 in2 x 192 ft x 0.28 Iblin3 = 6,270 Ibs? - We have an email from Brian Giometti at PSC indicating the maximum pulling force for the coiler is around 16,000 Ibs. Can you confirm that? - Do you have an operation's manual for the coiler? Can we get a copy? - What is an estimate of the coiling rate? Does 1 ft/min make sense? I appreciate your time. Patrick Berbon, PII Team

FM 6.1 Exhibit 9 8th Surveillance (2007) Tendon Shim Information page 1 of 1 8th Surv. End #1 Lift-Off Shim Stack End #2 Lift-Off Shim Stack I Lift-Off Re-Tensioning Notes End #1 Lift-Off Shim Stack End #2 Lift-Off Shim Stack Lift-Off Tendon KIPS Height Make-Up KIPS IHeightI Make-Up Ave. KIPS Height Make-Up KIPS Height Make-Up Ave. 128 6 164"

1,1Buftl. 5 129F12 6"..~

3,3 1 1289.641 I I II I I II D12 1259763/8" 3,3,3/8 Butt. 3 129 6 1/2" 1 1277.81 D238 Butt. 4 1 7527.21 3,3,3/8 1Butt. 61 495.8 3,3,1 1511.53 Re-Tensioned due to Wire Removal Detension. Butt. 4 1613.8 7" 3, 0.4, 0.5,3.1 Butt. 6 1519.47 7 1/4" 3, 3, 1, 1/4 1566.6 12V01 Top 1559.9g5 14 3/4" 3,3,3,1,112,1/2,1/2,1/4 Bot. N/A 4 31 4[ 11 3,1 1-N/A 45V20 Top 14568 12" 3,3,3,3 Bot N/A 4" 311 N/A 61V08 Top 150598 13I 33331 t Bot N/A 4" 3,1 N/A 1 Bot. N 13/ 61V17 Top 1580.18 12" 33,33 Bot N/A 4 3,1 N/A Re-Tensioned due to Wire Removal De31 N/A 13H33 Butt. 1 1310.35 7" 3,1,3 Butt. 3 1302.57 6 3/4" 3,3,3/8, 3/8 1306.46 13H34 Butt. 1 1350.83 7" 3,1,1,1,1 Butt. 3 1386.39 7" 3,1,1,1,1 1368.61 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 1 1479 7 1/2" 3,1,1,1,1, 1/2 Butt. 3 1537.27 7 1/2" 3,1,1,1,1, 1/2 1508.1 13H35 Butt. 1 1249.64 6 9/16" 3,3,3/8,3/16 Butt. 3 1238.87 6 3/8" 3,3,3/8 1244.25 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 1 1411.5 7 1/4" (Not listed) Butt. 3 1423 1/4 7" (Not listed) 1417.4 13H36 Butt. 1 1344.08 6 1/2" 3,1,1,1, 1/4,1/4 Butt. 3 1426.63 7 1/4" 1,1,1,1,1, 1/4 1385.23 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 1 1546.5 7 1/4" (Not listed) Butt. 3 1564.09 7 3/4" (Not listed) 1555.3 13H37 Butt. 1 1367.69 6 7/8" 3.3, 3/8, 1/4, 1/4 Butt. 3 1212.0, 5 3/4" 1,1, 3/8, 3/8 1289.87 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 1 1394.7 7 1/8" 3,3,3/8,1/4,1/4,1/4 Butt. 3 1436.69 61/2" 3,1,1,3/8,3/8,1/2,1/4 1415.7 13H38 Butt. 1 1411.54 6 1/2" 3,1,1,1,1/4,1/4 Butt. 3 1378.57 7" 3,1,1,1,1 1395.05 42H46 Buff. 2 1546.46 5 3/4" 3,3/8,3/8,1,1 Butt. 4 1570.8 6" 3,3 1558.63 1 1 46H19 Butt. 4 1352.87 7" 3,1,1,1,1 Butt. 6 1364.35 7 1/2" 3,3,1,1/4,1/4 1358.61 1 1 1 46H20 Butt. 4 1269.04 6 3/4" 3,3,1/4,1/2 Butt. 6 1327.2 7 1/4" 3,3,1,1/4 1298.13 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <90% Butt. 4 1487 7 1/4" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1502.61 7 5/8" (Not listed) 1494.8 46H21 Butt. 4 1319.34 5 3/4" 3,1,1/2,1/4,1 Butt. 6 1340-71 6" 3,1,1,1/2,1/2 1330.02 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 4 1503.7 6 1/8" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1499.24 6 3/8" (Not listed) 1501.5 46H22 Butt. 4 1315.98 5 1/2" 3,11,1/2 Butt. 6 1306.98 6 3/8" 3,3,3/8 1311.48 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <90% Butt. 4 1567.5 6" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1509.35 63/4" (Not listed) 1538.4 46H23 Butt. 4 1336.1 6" 3,1,1,1 Butt. 6 1325.85 5 3/4" 0,1,1,1/2, 1/4 1329.97 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 4 1487 6 1/2" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1475.62 71/8" (Not listed) 1481.3 46H24 Butt. 4 1419.92 6 3/4" 3,3, 1/2, 1/4 Butt. 6 1431.7 7 1/2" ,3,1, 1/4, 1/4 1425.85 51H34 Butt. 1 1532.96 8" 3,3,1, 1/2, 1/2 Butt. 5 1396.45 7" 3,1,1,1,1 1464.7 Re-Tensioned due to Wire Removal Detension. Butt. 1 1585.8 8 1/2" 3.1,1.25,1.05,3.1, Butt. 5 1530.56 7 1/2" 3,1,1,1,1, 1/2 1558.2 62H29 Butt. 2 1366.28 6 1/2" 3,1/2,3 Butt. 6 1372.78 6 3/8" 3, 3/8, 1,1,1 1369.63 62H30. Butt. 2 1249.64 6 3/4" 3,3/8,3/8, 3 Butt. 6 1332.05 6 3/4" 3,3,1/2, 1/4-1290.84 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 2 1443.4 7 9/16" (Not listed) Butt.6 1492.04 7 1/8" (Not listed) 1467.7 62H31 Butt. 2 1269.04 6 1/4" 3, 1/4, 3 Butt. 6 InAcc 6 3,1,1,1 N/A Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <90% Butt. 2 1487 7" (Not listed) Butt. 6 InAcc " N/A (Not Changed) N/A 62132 Butt. 2 1332.75 7" 3,1,3 Butt. 6 InAcc 6 1/2" 3,3, 3/8, 1/8 N/A, Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt._2 1497 73/8" (Not listed) Butt. 6 InAcc N/A (Not Changed) N/A 62H33 Butt. 2 1242.22 6 3/16" 3,3/16,3 Butt. 6 1384.5E 6 1/2" 1/4, 1/4, 1,1, 1313.39 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt.2 1487 6 9/16" (Not listed) Butt. 6 4502.61 6 7/8" (Not listed) 1494.8 62H34 Butt. 2 1393.1 7" 3,3,1 Butt. 6 1364.32 6 3/4" 3,3, 3/8, 3/8 1378.71 1 1 FM 6,1 Exhibit 9 8th Surveillance (2007) Tendon Shim Information page 1 of 1 8th Surv. End #t Lift-Off I Shim Stack End #2 Lift-Off Ill shim Stack Lift-Off Re-Tensioning Notes End #1 Lift-Off Shim Stack End #2 Lift-Off Shim Stack Lift-Off Tendon KIPS Height Make-Up KIPS Height Make-Up Ave. KIPS Height Make-Up KIPS Height Make-Up Ave. ID129 Butt. 3 1289.16 1 61/4" I 3,1,1,1,1/4 Butt. 51 1290.1 6" I 3,3 I 1289.64 1 I I I I I I I I I ID212 Butt. 1 1259.76 I 63/8" I 3,3,3/8 Butt. 31 1295.8 61/2" I 3,1,1,1,1/2 1277.81 I I ID238 Butt. 4 1527.21 1 63/8" I 3,3,3/8 I Butt. 61 1495.8E I 7"1 3,3,1 I 1511.53 IRe-Tensioned due to Wire Removal Detension*1 Butt. 41 1613.8 I 7" I 3, 0.4, 0.5, 3.1 I Butt. 61 1519.47 I 71/4" 3,3,1,1/4 11566.6 12VOI Top 1559.95 143/4" ,3,3,3,1,112,112,112,1/4 Bot. N/A 4" 3,1 N/A 45V20 Top 1456.8 12" 3,3;3,3 Bot. N/A 4" 3,1 N/A 61V08 Top 1505.98 13" 3,3,3,3,1 Bot. N/A 4" 3,1 N/A 61V17 Top 1580.18 12" 3,3,3,3 Bot. N/A 4" 3,1 N/A Re-Tensioned due to Wire Removal Detension. Top 1597.1 121/2" 3,3,3,3, 1/2 Bot. N/A 4" 3,1 N/A 13H33 Butt. 1 1310.35 7" 3,1,3 Butt. 3 1302.5 63/4" 3,3,3/8, 3/8 1306.46 13H34 Butt. 1 1350.83 7" 3,1,1,1,1 Butt. 3 1386.3 7" 3,1,1,1,1 1368.61 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 1 1479 71/2" 3,1,1,1,1,1/2 Butt. 3 1537.27 71/2" 3,1,1,1,1,1/2 1508.1 13H35 Bult.l 1249.64 69/16" 3,3,3/8,3/16 Butt. 3 1238.8 63/8" 3,3,3/8 1244.25 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 1 1411.5 71/4" (Not listed) BUIt.3 1423114 7" (Not listed) 1417.4 13H36 Bult.l 1344.08 61/2" 3,1,1,1,114,114 Butt. 3 1426.6 7114" ,1,1,1,1, 114 1385.23 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 1 1546.5 71/4" (Not listed) Butt. 3 1564.09 73/4" (Not listed) 1555.3 13H37 Bult.l 1367.69 67/8" 3,3,3/8, 114, 1/4 Butt. 3 1212.0, 53/4" ,1,1,3/8,3/8 1289.87 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% BUIt.l 1394.7 71/8" 3,3,3/8,114,114,114 Butt. 3 1436.69 6112" 3,1,1,3/8,3/8,1/2,114 1415.7 13H38 Bult.l 1411.54 61/2" 3,1,1,1,1/4,1/4 Butt. 3 1378.5 7" 3,1,1,1,1 1395.05 42H46 BUIt.2 1546.46 53/4" 3,3/8,3/8,1,1 Butt. 4 1570.8 6" 3,3 1558.63 46H19 Bult.4 1352.87 7" 3,1,1,1,1 Butt. 6 1364.3, 7112" 3,3,1,1/4,1/4 1358.61 46H20 BUIt.4 1269.04 63/4" 3,3,1/4,112 Butt. 6 1327.2 7114" 3,3,1,114 1298.13 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <90% Butt. 4 1487 71/4" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1502.61 75/8" (Not listed) 1494.8 46H21 BUIt.4 1319.34 53/4" 3,1,1/2,1/4,1 Bult.6 1340.71 6" 3,1,1,112,112 1330.02 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 4 1503.7 61/8" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1499.24 63/8" (Not listed) 1501.5 46H22 Bult.4 1315.98 5112" 3,1,1,1/2 Butt. 6 1306.91 63/8" 3,3,3/8 1311.48 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <90% Butt. 4 1567.5 6" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1509.35 63/4" (Not listed) 1538.4 46H23 Butt. 4 1336.1 6" 3,1,1,1 Butt. 6 1325.8, 53/4" 3,1,1,1/2,114 1329.97 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 4 1487 6112" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1475.62 71/8" (Not listed) 1481.3 46H24 Bult.4 1419.92 63/4" 3,3,1/2,1/4 Butt. 6 1431.71 71/2" ,3,1,1/4,1/4 1425.85 51H34 Bult.l 1532.96 8" 3,3,1,1/2,1/2 Butt. 5 1396.4! 7" 3,1,1,1,1 1464.7 Re-Tensioned due to Wire Removal Detension. Butt. 1 1585.8 8 112" 3.1,1.25,1.05,3.1, Butt. 5 1530.56 71/2" 3,1,1,1,1,1/2 1558.2 62H29 Butt. 2 1366.28 61/2" 3,112,3 Butt. 6 1372.7 63/8" 3,3/8,1,1,1 1369.63 62H30. Butt. 2 1249.64 63/4" 3, 3/8, 3/8, 3 Butt. 6 1332.0 63/4" 3,3,.1/2, 114. 1290.84 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 2 1443.4 79/16" (Not listed) Butt. 6 1492.04 71/8" (Not listed) 1467.7 62H31 Butt. 2 1269.04 61/4" 3,1/4,3 Butt. 6 InAcc 6" 3,1,1,1 N/A Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <90% Butt. 2 1487 7" (Not listed) Butt. 6 InAce N/A (Not Changed) N/A 62H32 Butt. 2 1332.75 7" 3,1,3 Butt. 6 InAcc 6112" 3,3, 3/8, 1/8 N/A Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Bult.2 1497 73/8" (Not listed) Butt. 6 InAcc N/A (Not Changed) N/A 62H33 Bult.2 1242.2 63/16" 3,3/16,3 Butt. 6 1384.5< 6112" 1/4,1/4,1,1, 1313.39 Re-Tensioned due to low-lift-off <95% Butt. 2 1487 69/16" (Not listed) Butt. 6 4502.61 67/8" (Not listed) 1494.8 62H34 Bult.2 1393.1 7" 3,3,1 Butt. 6 1364.3 63/4" 3,3, 3/8, 3/8 1378.71

%tkr c p M^0° C GILBERT WES, INC. _iro., ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS

  • 0. CP.

READING. PXNNA. f,., WOK onoI sz OAWINov. C.'.I ITa Ao,4, lEV. CM. APP. DAT9 I I I 71 14-Ak 4tk a-t 6~& tShP A~ tA&& 0"%- tQ-t- &Oj,%. CL 1

  • tit~k VU
LCA, ocVol

'401 Zý 112 O;L -1 116 t'd40AAS

  • 1 S

Kt 'Iftb tAAb Z3 G$3 1 9~IZ~ 3

  • 8 I'

s-4. L >'-I IT. iro<~illS ('= IVS-o'v.l,,.* -.is~,,.,16) I-- ioL9 s = 161". -)q cl e,' \\,.,/ a..:"':::"0.:..J-~lSD!!.~ GILBERT ~ES. INC. CMIt'D. ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS READINe. ""itA. T. 10 I I Tl ~'A\\ ~\\ ~ bo..~cl ~ ~ t-~ ~ ~ ,-~ 4. Til ~ ~t- -t.....J~, ~cl ~ a.f1-~tt.. +L-cL.~. S.Q.c.~, ~. ~ \\t~~t-< T~~S' ~ ~A~ erv- ~y-I~~ ~ ~~ 14\\

  • 11

-r U~. Qkt::.U.,. (i) \\)e.-.=tCA.-\\ ~ oc~o,:. b'-\\l~l = ~"l~ ~ ~"S'~ ~.~" & I"d~~ I...o l =. L2~ e.tc

. ll I-bn'~~' ~~ ~ ~ 0 \\ : oc. ~ '\\ \\ o* 12.J.

~ 2 Tr ~., S '2. '3 l-Cl.d. I'lS "T\\ K:.*~~ :. Q,:. (, + K"L.+"'",") :. ('+ I't*1~,aool ~"7!Cfx'lb) ~ 1*1\\\\ S tA o:."b cr> ~ ~ \\ 'i.:: 'S Z:3b - ~ 'X. ~ IB"l1 ~,., '>90 ~t:L:4..\\.. ~ ( U>rL L,,_ ~ I~'SI (SGq,(e..d. h. ~5:~ ~C1.l'~ ~) (+~~ ~~~ kA-~ k~\\L 12~~ ~(,"-..o. ~ ~\\ ~L~"'-4\\ \\.. -;"es -', 4-PPt"a~.~.t,,,- j~-l"'~\\,J) . " Q'\\.. =- (I +- K L -rfAoe-) -:. (\\ t-I ~'S}C.,CS'OQ~-t- * \\S,\\)c'.01 b) ~. l. 01..q S ',\\1./I'I\\\\~ Tl.- :. 111'~OL.'\\~ I~ = 16J-r,. HlS --',\\- ':. 1S'0Yj, 1\\ IS

. 12., 7~ ~~

':: IE;')., '\\ t.,,: ~ - ISO." b ~~",' -: I~S.SI ~Sl ~~,8.f'S ~ ~ I*CiQ*\\1

-""o GILBERT Asfl'S, INC. CiK*0. 76 ENGINEERS Aft CONSULTANTS SQ. CO. .AWEG0. FINN&. WOK,on M RUS. "RAW1N k""". Rev. C". Apr. calla '.a.--* .-- 4Z 1-4 o

q. Z3'

/-01 t-- L I - D aDo 0 týl-- t* i-L/ ~ =--_ 2.507-L 1 n Q~~&- (14 wLt.Mb) 000 (I 4I*u~~- 2 Sat~i* T*. -- o', S. 4-1S 3 T4 1+4

1. o4-5 Av&P-Z. ISO."9 No % Is %Q I -s q.c~

armitoe-bc-Pý a k ý- ýf-114 111 i g2-01. -z- -I 0 ~ roCk .', 0) k "Z'1 (I+ -084.o - W6,1o.*.1-481tl,lo") "$Ž*~(3 L.I1C~-~~ 2 ~ ~ I**7e J, o44 i'F: Is$-6.>ogz*=

v.

)) ... 0_. ~~=---t GILBERT ~~t!S. INC. CMIt'O. ENGIN£lRS AtID CONSULTANTS IftAIN.G. POJIAo

  • l~'~~L$

ttI.2l ' }1a.n2.t-~\\ ~~ ~ ~I ~ b(k),l: q.'2, ~ X 'l... -:.. I'! Ga 1 ~<A . '1 (' ~.. ~, ~ (l t-lC("+~) 0;. (l + q*1.1X*()O'03+ -S061 X.,6) -= I. OSl"1 CY t;)(..... I "l.. ~

  • S 2.1 C:t -

2..)(.,~ ~"")

. 2.50'l.

~ ct (1~4' lt~ L I 1.. ':. II

    • I Q"L ~ (i ~ teL ott-' v..) ~ (I t 11)t* aaD'!a t-. 2 ~ct. 't. Ib) = I* 04-S )

.. 1"'\\ -:. \\'\\1../1. O!.~,, T'\\. -;. l;"~ 1.0 4!. t l:' J~~9', *081; . T4 ~ '~'/*0931 ,,'1'1; JbQ*CS1 ,~~. 4-"1 l+4*1\\ T~cr-- S) \\4 - I 0 (J) v~\\ ~tw-t ~O\\ ~ ~n:: I 1~ l~\\ Lf)\\.:'L"l) ":. '1.08,' .~~:. p:.~ L. 100.7'8 tcJi~ ~~~ j ~

.,so.~9

~1.~\\~~ bc-~o\\ ~ ~~" -- j~oe, I~~ x '2. -:..., 1,q..S ~ c.l ... C) l ~ (I + q. oS)C.. oce'l +. 4't 8 h. " b') It oS 2.4 (j) tJ( ~ 1'- ':

  • S t 1~ - L,...\\ 'lct-S

'2. ;'1 0 t,L~ LI1.... ': I,' . '. G"l.. "; (, t Ir~*CN'Ql or '"l.~ ')C.Olb) ~ ~q VI

  • o'at'\\-

\\'i*~8~'- \\ \\, ':.. 1 '1'*~'1 '0 04~' -:.. I, 'I. G I ~'-.1 '1... ~ "... I~q.61/I.091tt ~ \\s(;. i 0 ~\\.. ~ - ISb"Yl" 08 2.q 144. i, IC-S ~ l 4-:'

Av,& G S. 61 I11 LQe-t -S o( 14T' I=. icqLA-oc , OG 161.1yi 0 C., 111. 04-116' C A\\ý#- : 4-4 -1,,,. co 3 J; H-, Z4,,Al 4_ C ~ (I + a o -*Cal 0 &-. ,I1b6 S - 4 48' I, 6O(At--c 3O6(.Z-a T4 - .4-(/'O-4t ?s J.:".::"O~. ~~~ GILBERT j)~~T£S. INC. C_N"_*D

  • ..-.,........~1IL..jI. ENGINEERS AIIO CONSULTANTS INO.

R!IV. eM. API>. DAT. T.A--~ _1~ H -q ~ ~ \\G-...c:l~ 4'2.. ~ -8 ~ 51 H ~ S ~ ........-=- S =- 4 *48' 0> V,.;t ~ ~VOl :. OC V"l3 ~ I I; (,~ ~~ LOl -:. 1..., J -_ 4 I 4-8 I ~ ~ b(~D\\: ~"h.) ~ ~'4' 1-1. :.

  • 06(:A. Ml.-c1 11<:.

.'.Q, ':- (,t-4'4-8~'0"003 +-'~lX.'bj :. "O'l-O'l- ~ I, ::.- T"l. ~ Tl ': \\4 ':-

  • ~"t"1C:. - "2 )(
  • o~(:)4 ~ -1~08

~J... \\1,il L\\~ ":; Zr ~ ~ (I + 2.6)(

  • cool t -1'\\08 )(1/(,)

I* DI63

l't1./ I: 04CYL 184* Ss

~\\.. '1 ~g.'2. S I S+'~8/1 *0101 - 11'2.,. 4b ~~ 1 ~ --- \\ (,~. rt I/l'4-~/1 *D4O't -:=. 1£'<;'.7'1 ~l. i6~* iQjl.{)4OL ~ ! 5~ *19 ~\\\\.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML102990362&oldid=5289926"