ML102950182

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML102950182
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/27/2010
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0334
Download: ML102950182 (5)


Text

Outside of Scope BRANCH3 DAILY 4/27/10 STATUS B II _______________________________

Highlighted items were discussed at DRP/DRS Coordination meeting A

Outside of Scope INJ JSALEM O'NE Weekend Coverage: :ALI=Mx>0.07 - AL2(2of3)>0.11 " A3=(lX1).3i.

Outside of Scope AFWmodifications* plete; pressure testing c6o6mletel and 'satisfactor y;the AFW header:is restored to'arn.operable status..Nio startup~issues or concer(nswerendsntifid.

AFW issues - Pre Startup Verifications

  • Verify hydro/pressure test is code compliant - O'Hara, determined approach was acceptable, received test records still needs to verify test results. PSEG will also provide the leak check procedure 4/27 am.
  • Evaluate the 50.59 for AFW modifications - O'Hara, PSEG to provide document 4127 am
  • Verify the ANI reviews and accepts repairs including testing - O'Hara, complete/no issues or concerns
  • Smart samples o Verify repairs to the control air system elbow that was replacedc(how will PSEG certify the repair) - O'Hara, PSEG adding more detail to description of document, to provide by 4/27 PM o Verify control air extent of condition - O'Hara iiV, o Backfill procedure reviews to verify coating and backfill cure times - O'Hara, PSEG to provide by 4/27 pm o Verify control air clamping material - O'Hara, PSEG to provide supporting document 4/27 am o AFW pipe weld records - O'Hara, PSEG to assess status of documents by 4/27 pm ILh Long Term Concerns

" AFW coating cure time acceptability

  • PSEG determining the design life of the new coating

" Design records for as installed piping on Unit 1 & 2 (found some records but have not found sign-off sheetsD

II .... ; .... . m f I navinnflfi Tlt ma rnm~iflCAIr flfh3Dli Outside of Scope Unit 2 AFW Testing -PSEG determined that they did not perform ASME code required pressure drop test for the buried sections of the 22 and 24 headers.

" Confirm the PSEG risk assessment to delay AFW testing for 1 year is reasonable - Cahill, to receive a call 4/27 am for follow-up from PSEG on pipe failure assumptions and how external events were considered.

" Evaluate if performing a risk assessment to meet Technical Specification 4.0.5 is appropriate if a test was never performed verses missed - ContelEnnis, follow-up with T/S branch regarding TIA and precedent Operability - Initial assessment Unit 2 was that it is in better condition based on newer piping; 1994 inspection that identified intact coating; and ISI code gives more allowance to an operating unit (can take credit for up to 90% of the yield stress).

" Evaluate the Unit 2 AFW extent of condition operability assessment - Schroeder/O'Hara waiting for the final operability determination (PSEG to provide by around 1300)

  • Confirm the finite element analysis for the Unit 1 as found condition is acceptable including the use of appropriate methods and assumptions - Gray and O'Hara reviewed and did not identify any concerns; HQ review in progress r ;

Outside of Scope

Outside of Scope Additional Items r tts- Board Items:

. Salem 1, AFW buried piping - modifications and testing AI:tJt*(cfinr" nn~r'*h~iltf ,t~frm ln~trnn I - l=m ID DICItIITV% _ T/Q raiRL aee~ecm~nf fr Outside of Scope

JOutside of SCOpo Outside of Scope