ML102950182
| ML102950182 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 04/27/2010 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2010-0334 | |
| Download: ML102950182 (5) | |
Text
INJ Outside of Scope BRANCH3 DAILY STATUS 4/27/10 B
II Highlighted items were discussed at DRP/DRS Coordination meeting A
Outside of Scope JSALEM O'NE Weekend Coverage:
- ALI=Mx>0.07 AL2(2of3)>0.11 A3=(lX1).3i.
Outside of Scope
- iiV, ILh AFWmodifications
- plete; pressure testing c6o6mletel and 'satisfactor y;the AFW header:is restored to'arn.operable status..Nio startup~issues or concer(nswerendsntifid.
AFW issues - Pre Startup Verifications Verify hydro/pressure test is code compliant - O'Hara, determined approach was acceptable, received test records still needs to verify test results. PSEG will also provide the leak check procedure 4/27 am.
Evaluate the 50.59 for AFW modifications - O'Hara, PSEG to provide document 4127 am Verify the ANI reviews and accepts repairs including testing - O'Hara, complete/no issues or concerns Smart samples o
Verify repairs to the control air system elbow that was replacedc(how will PSEG certify the repair) - O'Hara, PSEG adding more detail to description of document, to provide by 4/27 PM o
Verify control air extent of condition - O'Hara o
Backfill procedure reviews to verify coating and backfill cure times - O'Hara, PSEG to provide by 4/27 pm o
Verify control air clamping material - O'Hara, PSEG to provide supporting document 4/27 am o
AFW pipe weld records - O'Hara, PSEG to assess status of documents by 4/27 pm Long Term Concerns AFW coating cure time acceptability PSEG determining the design life of the new coating Design records for as installed piping on Unit 1 & 2 (found some records but have not found sign-off sheetsD
II m
f I navinnflfi Tlt ma rnm~iflCAIr flfh3Dli Outside of Scope Unit 2 AFW Testing -PSEG determined that they did not perform ASME code required pressure drop test for the buried sections of the 22 and 24 headers.
" Confirm the PSEG risk assessment to delay AFW testing for 1 year is reasonable - Cahill, to receive a call 4/27 am for follow-up from PSEG on pipe failure assumptions and how external events were considered.
Evaluate if performing a risk assessment to meet Technical Specification 4.0.5 is appropriate if a test was never performed verses missed - ContelEnnis, follow-up with T/S branch regarding TIA and precedent Operability - Initial assessment Unit 2 was that it is in better condition based on newer piping; 1994 inspection that identified intact coating; and ISI code gives more allowance to an operating unit (can take credit for up to 90% of the yield stress).
Evaluate the Unit 2 AFW extent of condition operability assessment - Schroeder/O'Hara waiting for the final operability determination (PSEG to provide by around 1300)
Confirm the finite element analysis for the Unit 1 as found condition is acceptable including the use of appropriate methods and assumptions - Gray and O'Hara reviewed and did not identify any concerns; HQ review in progress r
Outside of Scope
Outside of Scope Additional Items r
tts-Board Items:
Salem 1, AFW buried piping - modifications and testing I -
l=m ID DICItIITV% _ T/Q raiRL aee~ecm~nf fr AI:tJ t*(cfinr" nn~r'*h~iltf
,t~frm ln~trnn Outside of Scope
JOutside of SCOpo
Outside of Scope