ML102650433

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML102650433
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 09/07/2010
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML100560049 List:
References
TAC U01821
Download: ML102650433 (21)
v • d • e


Text

~W-supl-final-forms-ms doc

irxamination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: J)i k/ t,.- V!1 L L  ! r 1 Date of Examination:  !/I~~i! /Z.:

(

Developed by: Written - Facility f:lI NRC 1/ Operating - Facility KJ NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)  ;;;?

-f)/

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) (1./

4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) tV

[5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)J

(

[-90]

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5. ES-D-1's. ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) tv'

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} (t/

{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6. and any Form fl./'

ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

~

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) ("

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) r-

-14 I 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) r

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) ;V

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.1; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) rv

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

/y

-7 Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) f

.. Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Examination: Weeks of 8116 & 8123 2010 Initials Item Task Description a b* C#

1.

w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. AJ~( 0M- /

V2j~~ r

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section 0.1 of R ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

I

~~~ 1 T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

T E

N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

f?Yj ~ ~

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal 2.

evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications and major transients. /fJ(j Qwt r S b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of I applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising

~;j ~

M exam integrity; and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s} with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. ~ ~~ tV'
a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

3.

'v-~

(1) the outline(s) contain(s} the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the W

~

safety functions as specified on the form.

I T (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums speCified on the form. I""

(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

~

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified. f)8 r (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. 1J~ ~ V
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate
4. exam section. 18~ ~ r G

E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. ~:9 (~ t'"

tV'

~

N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R

A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. r L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

tfJ/3 ~ (1

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). .1;:;- ~ ~

Printed Name I Signature Date

a. Author /?ruhA-v-d l'. 13ro.lcs / ~ tJbLIO
b. Facility Reviewer (*) 1:J&I/\O W 1-\ ~Lf\ / (,j (..\~ I/V IW CO/'/'O
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

\].9 q Ifrff I 7lrV?' ~

d. NRC Supervisor S-"'~ 1~(A~~~I( ,j ~ ~(,13olto Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines NUREG-1021 , Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENOC Facsimile

ES-201 Examination Security. . eement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons. who have nol been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these. licensing examinations. except as specifically noted below and authorized. by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. I'

~ hI\"J :1, £3.-w1::"S PleL.T t3.'fI"Vl LeA-!) 1{;:lIO 2 . .DP5Vi- %LO ~rlfAc.:1I TJ R~;,t~~

3. ~(\ 'lndo a h '§a'..r:::t&W(~

,'L~"O

4. 'tAu/,... E'~NMANN ~'KA""'. O£:Vl!.I.OP~
5. \f'J\I..I..\t\II'\ ,J": K~~\.pIt.:r; . 'S ....... ('I\". C),r><,.. ThV!-\,..,,,,,

6.1fi:t1tf!/( 4' ~fl5? 'r ~veh.,1.e

7. \}.)\\\,~VV"'- h~~o~ R'g(),S",,'\<... o£le<<.~{L.

8.ll..l~.!l}fIL) c W(!]1..J1 ~ I2..c4c:fDI"l (;,otyf.<1"1lJJ1..

9.11nW;Rl11\Clen~ IrYt(Ml.4.~fL(t./01(f~01 10.. M2.4.,..4rn ~~ d~ 5"()~ .ii8.ID

11. bv~he: S?:>C!..JJ')J.r ~1">1S$t. ~'i'fQj':\ ~\tio 12~~~ . LooH S HlPI' mf'j",~ J-:;8-1 (j
13. ~ Ttd.1y~ UI.v1 5u~ vtS c::rr=

,5'" ~-iO ------

............. I

14. _ _ _ _ __
15. _ _ _ _ __

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Beaver Valley Facsimile

ES-201 Examination Securir reement Form ES-201

1. Pre-Examination ~'::> 1.

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 8/16 & 8J23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week{s) of 8/16 & 8J23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licenSing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. ~ it hl\rJ ~,Bvwl::-<; PleLT c. 'f1l1lVl L~A-~ 1{j3//CJ
2. .D PJV£* 'tELO ~ J1fAc.:i11h Rt,; I tHti£ "'3/10 3'E'" 'iUclclh 4.. 4,\1;" EI~NJl/\ArlN

~~

£')Cfl . .., Q,VI!.I.OPE.)1.

5. ,,\1 \\"\...11'\1"'\ ,J": K"'~l..PtI ~ 1) '--C'i:". () 1'-'. 'TIt11"" ....,..,

6.1&54!/( e .GNc;,1! $;y ~ueb~.e 7.~\\\,,*,,,,,,,,, Ofi..I.:J()'(..,,'S> fuC!.c.:"'\<- o{>e<<.~~~

8A'~AM C WON"'.. 1!.E4<1DTl #inA,noT' S-"/'7-/0 9.1)- 1 ~ni1 f'  ;

IrYt<<Vll4.JuK.IOu,W

.L I ~

10. !..(Au-'Arn ~ hI'l~ 5'ti~ s:i81()

'R,..,~\".c: 2.c o.>JJ<r 1'l..... l ,~'" <;; -Pfcd §=\'&jO 12'il£ 11.

13...

ilcG- L~,"[ 5 H.!. l' r mprff' 1/£"-

~IId..k)t2::('2). U~f"\ 5V~Vv'IS af

)"--1 &-10 _ _ _ _ _ __

S--I £SOLD _ _ _ _ _ __

14. ,Reb o;:t IAJ. til'. s-r".., & ~ '1" S~::t I I hlj!J~
15. Geo-f.f.y s ~~ t.ht.i:'l- 5:.tDIII":J>>>1I

L 1"1'0 NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Beaver Valley Facsimile

ES-201 Examination Securit\ aement Form ES-201

1. Pre-Examination ~;2 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. M~~\'&w""'i. F-NOS. u""'\."\. s.'-~~u\.'l:.QIC:.. f. /lr..{ 1Lt::>
2. ANbQJiy..) :r .l>oB~~ RtaA-c."{b f2., Oft: ~p.., t,/tv/to
3. ________________
4. ________________
5. _____________
6. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
7. _____________
8. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
9. ______________
10. ________________
11. ___________
12. ___________
13. ___________
14. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
15. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Seaver Valley Facsimile

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination ~':> 1...

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1.~I'hl\l'a\  :),/?:¥wb; fleeT Cf-I"1Il LeA-I)

2. .D p<v£.- \\E,LO 5;.rifAGil ,+~ K~; It~~~
3. ~l' JUdQ,A.?> ~1::bu.(~
4. ~,,;.. G'!*I'IMANN £xp..AI1 D'"l!..I.."ti't~

5 . .,,\J,LL'AM .:r t("'\':)C!'...VtI.l'. "'S ..... {> r. or.... \1t!A-\.-"~,,

6.-;i&fell e 6/0/;;;/1 $1' v'e~de4.{.

R~(l L'" \<.... 0 Z>e. <<.. ~"-'{:....

12.. t4 c. fi)rt 1i;>1!t<. -t 1lJ J2. _ <;,--/7-/tJ

9. wn U4J1A~n *' rt1lt~4.7!7iffW.t( IliJ ~
10. tvlu.-,;;'m ~~ d~~ s-j~ s:i8/v , . 4)
11. ~~Sw::- ~\'vJ'\4': ~l'.>>tll: ~~Pfot'j ~-z.'i '\0
12. Z*Gltt&- LeTO}! jJ-fJFj m"'r}~Cr(J0 /0 1l:-C ~ J'-Jv-)O UI.1;~\ 5v.o.JllJ vt~ c:rr >5"'1£S~£D ~~ 8~~l() _ _

~ £n q, ~' S;;~~::--;= '1 I 6bIJo  :='-A::ii j ~/&J/JtJ

15. tieo-f-"y $ ~ l)~;+ !W(¥--;,.... #0 *7 ~~ -zruj"O NOTES:6) viA- 1\

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Beaver Valley Facsimile

ES-201 Examination Security aement Form ES-201

1. Pre-Examination ~~

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 8116 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE

1. M~:£'t~ww "'S. e.~ \..I..,\."1; s.,-"E:.e.u~~Qiii!.. 41t/ro
r.1>ora ti>>' O",~g..A=Telp., 8"30~IO
2. At..t'Da..Ev-.)
3. MaY-1al{ VauJ RiaA.-c.\!) I?"

Inler~fz a/at lTflLAA//Vk ,~,r- fJii!JJ O

4. ;-<< 1'- (J uw;t= Af; rt <-TO .t. () I e:Il.ItTQfk '8,6,,0' __

5.1J9viei :r,.JJtJ i<{14C- /:lJp Oaer"tt{)t- __ ~ ~,- &,,;.5'10 _ _

6. POy 'prl c:. e. L t ~ 'f.. " c :h i ~'f.r:

7.lli<;;,c;rdca \tl~\f8~t'S\\~ Sveeerr 'Wru'M.Cl ~~JA:.... . 24

8. Ow~'" M~£ fI ~o-tt SY'. IJ..,<:.* St\"':\.;..h\\. _ u (<~.7-IO i/':44/IO
9. 111\0....4--$ AG,,;~ ~05 \l'- oS'...:> Ps.e !t. V\ S C Jl. SI2.l-(I,o
10. WA>/,Je.., /k..v,,"I{c;L ,3-t-A{f' At'..Idc 4! :f:;:j::;li~..b- ,.;><-..~' l~/ Pk1lt(.1
11. l"h.1~\ K\ ''4s",;~ ,S-h.~ N ~ l:,,'1.~ ............ "ij; "/10 ¢t?D
12. k/v,utJ()]) IIVdtff
13. ~lt'NlO I }

C'CM/n:ujoy ~C;'Mk5'h. ._

lPy W C'fr-TLt;l/~ ~itV",- :J.M7

~ ell<l fl'J4.ct"'l

&'I~h I

~16-IO

{Q¢o

? .-'l,Y'- /0

14. ~!(fi. i/;.z;~.1l t:RNT/bfC¢ A/r({'t.e7tL!. k~ ~)~ £~;.:;;;7t 0("/10 e/z4/0

'(;~ ;).'-( to i

15. G£O{\~ Ct\RISTof'tff SttJioR t\l~'<- oV" Vv<;T Og'CbID NOTES:

lb S~ t~ 16"/()

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Beaver Valley Facsimile

ES-201 Examination Security AQreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination f~

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weekes) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Vallev Unit 2 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. RAt*-(~a *1 +;r "

~ 4f i f)(~"1 LtVln~!) iifgJ!,)

1r;r-~ Y-[7 -Iv (f) (lj 6)
2. C:/df2lJ. i+ttvt?-S, llZAIN i,\j G NMAG-r..a. t-le-iO C)~ "5-2'1-)0
3. C"'d... lc-J jV\ C('=-e..q.h" Op.'l> I"'\('",,,~ ,.. ~11'g/Jo *-.i/'~. '6'/2""i 11c:J
4. "1£.AsE "B.kR7ku SKIPT MPwy",.q.E)t a-MHo .4IY~ fl"YP'A 9-/-10
5. _ _ _ _ __
6. _ _ _ _ __
7. _ _ _ _ __
8. _ _ _ _ __
9. _ _ _ _ __
10. _ _ _ _ __
11. _ _ _ _ __
12. _ _ _ _ __
13. _ _ _ _ __
14. _ _ _ _ __
15. _ _ _ _ __

NOTES: (f)see "I-IIAGLt&{ d>A:C:I\.tL $~jt1.~"t"1\ PA,e.3 Col'/. ~~ 1/7/10 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Beaver Valley Facsimile

E5-201 ExaminatiClI1 Security Agreement Fonn ES-201-3 o

o 1, Pre-Examination f~  :}

o I acknowledge that I have acquire<! specialize<! knowledge about the NRC I icensing examinations schedu led for the week(s) of 8116 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2 o

I§I as of the date of my signature. I agree Ihat I will not knowingly divulge any infonnation about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand fhat I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback 10 these applicants scheduled to be administered these l!censing examinations from this date until completion of examination adminfstration. except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g.* acting as a simulator booth operator Of" communicatOf" is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore. I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility lic:ensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an entorcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immed!ately report to facility management or1he NRC chief exam mer any indications or suggestions that examin anon security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 8116 & 8/23 2010 at Beaver Valley Unit 2
  • From'the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion <If examination administration, I did not instruct. evaluate, or prov:ide performance feedback to those applicants who were adminislered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted be10w and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE

1. flAt -z.;,...<  : Z1flJ /g+. 1Av;,~ / 1i1-~ Yj 7 -f V ..::.(./-4--H-....."..~~.....;:. £ -2.4 -/D
2. COO> }tr~s. Trl4\N~~ (). t*u\J;~ - ' : J "A  !"~" - (-IB=i O_.L...-_
3. C~c'.. t£... M c.fe...h'l OAnl!""'C'1.L> ,.. Sflflla
4. '1l..Ase ~7)f:Q 5Mf~ er*~-IO 5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

x 12 .

u-N 13.

0 0') 14.

0 0

15.

~ NOTES:

~

N co

<<-:-~:2 t. RevWon 9 Supplemenl 1 Beaver Valley Facsimile

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Exam Weeks of 8/16 & 8/232010 Operating Test No.: NRC 2LOT7

1. GENERAL CRITERIA
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit testes) (see Section D.1.a).
d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. ROUGH CRITERIA
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
  • initial conditions
  • initiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and speCific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
  • speCific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) speCified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name I Signature Date

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:
  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column *c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG*1 021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENOC Facsimile Rev.O

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Beaver Vii!lIe~ Uni12 Date of Exam Weeks of §/1 Ii I! 8/2~ 2Ql Q Operating Test No.: 2LOT7 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# II

~~ r

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ~{!1
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. lJJ) iQ~ t'
3. Each event description consists of -
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event 1J'fJ

~~

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
t/

the event termination point (if applicable) f2J~ ~uJt

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. !fj::J I~ f"
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. /IJ{!} IG~\ tv'
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

/11 I

~ ri~ ,

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. 1J1J W-,VJ\~ ~
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open tgt'IJ ~w~

simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. t

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or Significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

~r~

~J\ rv

~ ~ r

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES 301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

11'~~ r

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER ~~."., ....."': SEE ;::tI:\,IIVrf D.S.d) Actual Attributes

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 7 7 8
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3 3 3 4 11;1) ~~ r'
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 3 4 2 l#1d !QW' .IL
4. Major transients (1-2) 1 1 2 1 /VJ> ~w~  !
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 2 3 3 1rcJ tJ~' ('"

~~ ~w\\ It

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions 0 0 1 1 (0-2)
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 3 3 3 3 11/'J ~W~ ~

NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENOC Facsimile Rev.O

ES-3~O~1=====================T~r~a~ns~i~e~nt~a~n~d~E~ve~n~t~C~h~e~c~k~li~st~============~Fo~r~m~E~S~-3~O~1~-5~

Unit 2 Date of Exam Weeks of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 Operating Test No.: 2LOT7 M

I CREW POSITION CREW POSITION N I

T M Y S A B S B S A B U P R T o R o R T o M(.)

E o C P o P o C P SROI-1 NOR 3

[8]

lIe 1,2,4 5,7,8 MAJ 6 TS 1,4 RX 3 SROI-2 NOR

[8]

lIe 1,4,5 2,3,4 7 5,7,8 MAJ 6 6 TS 2,3,4 RX SROI-3 NOR 3

[8]

lIe 2,4,8 2,3,4 5

6 6 TS 1,3 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. (.) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1021 , Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 1 of 3 FENoe Facsimile Rev. 0

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 acility: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Exam Weeks of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 Operating Test No.: 2L0T7 A E P V M P E I L N T CREW POSITION CREW POSITION N I I C T M A y S A B S A B S A B U N P R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(.)

T E 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P RX SROI-4 NOR

[8]

3 SROI-5

[8]

MAJ TS 2,3,4 RX SROI-6 NOR 2

[8]

I/C 2,4,8 2,3,4 1,3,6 5 7 MAJ 6 6 4,5 1,3 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. (.) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 2 of 3 FENOC Facsimile Rev. 0

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Beaver Vallell Uni12 Date of Exam Weeks of 8/16 & 8/23 2111g Operating Test No.: 2LOT7 A E P V M P E I L N T CREW POSITION CREW POSITION N I I C T M A y S A B S A B S A B U N p R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(.)

T E 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P RX 2 SROI-7 1 1

[R]

1,3 4 2 4,5 2 2 0 2 2 1 0 SROI-8 2 1

[R]

TS 2,3,4 1,3 RX RO -1 NOR 3

[R]

I/C 2,4,8 2,3,4 5

MAJ 6 6 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. (.) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 3 of3 FENoe Facsimile Rev. 0

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 APPLICANTS ATC iii BOP SRO-I Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3

, 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,2 1,2 1,2 InterpretlDiag nosis 4,5 3,4 3,4 4,6 4,5 4,5 3,4 3,4 3,4 6,7 5,6 5 7,8 6,7 6,7 5,6 5,6 5,6 Events and Conditions 9 7,8 7,8 7 1,2 Comply With and 3,4 5,6 Use Procedures (1) 7 1,3 1,2 1,2 1,2 2,3 1,2 1,2 Operate Control 4,5 3,4 3,4 5,6 4,6 4,6 4,5 6,7 5,6 5 8,9 8 7,8 6,7 Boards (2) 1,2 1,2 2,3 1,2 1,2 Communicate and 3,4 5,6 4,6 4,6 4,5 5 8,9 8 7,8 6,7 Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) 2,3 1,3 Comply With and 4 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENoe Facsimile Rev.O

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Exam Weeks of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 Operating Test No.: 2LOT7 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 M P E I

L N T CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION N I I C T M A Y S A B S A B S A B U N p R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(.)

T E 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P u

o SROI-1 NOR 3

[8]

lie 1,2,4 2,4,7 1,3 4 4 2 5,7,8 8 MAJ 6 6 4,5 2 2 1 TS 1,4 RX 3 SROI-2 NOR 2 1

[8]

lIe 1,4,5 2,3,4 4 4 2i 7 5,7,8 MAJ 6 6 4,5 2 2 TS 2,3,4 0 2 2 RX 1 0 SROI-3 NOR 3 2 1 1

[8]

lie 2,4,8 2,3,4 1,3,6 4 4 2 !

5 7 MAJ 6 6 4.5 4 2 2 TS 1,3 2 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-ot-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATe positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. (.) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements speCified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 1 of3 FENoe Facsimile Rev. 0

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Beavgr Vallell Unit 2 Date of Exam Weeks of 811§ & 812;12010 Operating Test No.: 2LOT7 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 M P E T I N

L CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 N T

I T I C T A M A y S A B S A B S A B L U N p R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(.)

T E 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R ul RX 2 1 o.

SROI-4 NOR 3 1 1 1

[RJ lIe 1,2,4 2,4,7 1,3 4 2.

5,7,8 8 MAJ 6 6 2 2 TS 1,4 2 0 2 2*

RX 3 1 1 1 0 SROI-5 NOR 2 2 1 1 1

[RJ lIe 1,4,5 2,3,4 13 4 4 2 7 5,7,8 MAJ 6 6 2 2 1 TS 2,3,4 0 2 2 RX 0 SROI-6 NOR 3 2 1 1

[RJ lIe 2,4,8 2,3,4 1,3,6 4 2 5 7 MAJ 6 6 4,5 2 2 1 TS 1,3 0 2 2 1 1 0 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. (0) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1021 , Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 2 of 3 FENoe Facsimile Rev. 0

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Unit 2 Date of Exam Weeks gf 8/16 & 8/23 2010 Operating Test No.: 2LOT7 Scenarios 1 2 3 M I

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION N I

T M Y S A B S A B S A B U P R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(.)

E 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R U RX 2 1 1 0 SROI-7 NOR 3 1 1

[R]

lIe 1,2,4 2,4,7 1,3 4 4 2 5,7,8 8 MAJ 6 6 4,5 2 2 TS 1,4 0 2 2 RX 3 0 SROI-8 NOR 2 1 1

[R]

lIe 1,4,5 2,3,4 1,3,6 4 2 7 5,7,8 7 MAJ 6 6 4,5 TS 2,3,4 1,3 2 2 RX 1 0 RO -1 NOR 3 2 1 1 *

[R] I lIe 2,4,8 2,3,4 4 4 2 5

MAJ 6 6 4,5 4 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 0

Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-O-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-ot-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. (.) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right hand columns.

NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 Page 3 of3 FENoe Facsimile Rev. 0

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 APPLICANTS ATC It( BOP SRO-I Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1,3 1,2 1,2 1,2 2,3 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,2 1,2 1,2 Interpret/Diagnosis 4,5 3,4 3,4 5,6 4,6 4,6 4,5 4,5 3,4 3,4 3,4 6,7 5,6 5 8,9 8 7,8 6,7 6,7 5,6 5,6 5,6 Events and Conditions 9 7,8 7,8 7 1,3 1,2 1,2 1,2 2,3 1,2 1,2 Comply With and 4,5 3,4 3,4 5,6 4,6 4,6 4,5 6,7 5,6 5 8,9 8 7,8 6,7 Use Procedures (1) 1,3 1,2 1,2 1,2 Operate Control 4,5 3,4 3,4 5,6 6,7 5,6 5 8,9 Boards (2)

Communicate and Interact 1,2 1,2 Demonstrate 3,4 3,4 5,6 5,6 Supervisory Ability (3) 7,8 7 2,3 1,3 Comply With and 4 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

NUREG-1021 , Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENoe Facsimile Rev,O

ES-401 Written Examination Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Beaver Valley Unit 2 Date of Exam Weeks of 8/16 & 8/23 2010 Exam Level: RO 1m SRO 1m Item

1. Questions and answers t .. rhmr",lhl accurate and aOl:lltcablle to faci!
2. a. NRC KlAs referenced for all questions
b. Faci! referenced as available
3. SRO questions are Section D.2.d of ES-401
4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions are repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office.)
5. Question duplication from the license exam was controlled as indicated below (c)1eck the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

L the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or L the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

/ the examinations were developed independently; or 7 the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO- 23/3 16/6 36/16 distri
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on CIA the RO exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent If the randomly selected KlAs 34/7 41/18 support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual (45.3%)/(28%) (54.7%)/(72%)

RO / SRO question distribution{s} at right.

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are
10. Question n!,:'Jr.h,nrru:~tr*ir. and format meet the nrl",lin,,., in ES Appendix B.
11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and with value on cover sheet
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
d. NRC Supervisor Note:
  • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "CO; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Supplement 1 FENoe Facsimile Rev. 0

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist il Facili~:

I Date of Exam: Exam Level: Ro=J SROD I Initials I

Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading fib

... O~ ()

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified N/If ~A' and documented f I
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 11iJ3 Q;;'Id 1? II
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail II' ~ut ~ I

\5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 141' (WIU rr fP ~~ r

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity ofJiuestions missed bv half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader R~~J:8""'14 8P"JJD
b. Facility Reviewer(*) t)AUl- t+~L{J )w~ lUi 6)~lJo
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) /Jj, c)f1...,f / J. j)'1;/1""",:,,""b '1Ll /I~

I

'L

d. NRC Supervisor (*)  ::5'0\. !1s '-!..e.l L.~sJi~ 1 a;p J 10

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC;

\ two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML102650433&oldid=2555458"