Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance
- Supplement
|
MONTHYEARML0919705092009-07-0606 July 2009
Response to Request to Docket Information Related to the Environmental Site Audit, Enclosures D, Appendix a
Project stage: Request
ML0919705152009-07-0606 July 2009
Response to Request to Docket Information Related to the Environmental Site Audit, Enclosure D, Hydrology Through
Project stage: Request
ML0919705122009-07-0606 July 2009
Response to Request to Docket Information Related to the Environmental Site Audit, Cover Letter and Attachments 1 and 2
Project stage: Request
ML0919705292009-07-0606 July 2009
Response to Request to Docket Information Related to the Environmental Site Audit, Enclosure E, Non-Radiological Waste
Project stage: Request
ML0919601042009-07-15015 July 2009
KPS-LR-Tornado Occurrences, Kewaunee County, Wi 1950-2009
Project stage: Request
ML1001100612009-12-28028 December 2009
Response to Request for Additional Information for the Review of the License Renewal Application
Project stage: Response to RAI
Press Release-10-022, NRC Seeks Public Input on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Kewaunee Nuclear Plant License Renewal; Meetings Scheduled2010-02-0101 February 2010
Press Release-10-022: NRC Seeks Public Input on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Kewaunee Nuclear Plant License Renewal; Meetings Scheduled
Project stage: Request
ML0934800772010-02-19019 February 2010
03/24/2010 Notice of Meeting to Discuss the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Kewaunee Power Station
ML1008500572010-02-25025 February 2010
License Renewal
Project stage: Other
ML1002400022010-02-28028 February 2010
NUREG-1437 Supplement 40 Dfc Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding Kewaunee Power Station Draft Report for Comment
Project stage: Draft Other
ML1011205972010-04-0606 April 2010
Comment (5) of Kenneth W. Westlake, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 40 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Kewaunee Power Station,
ML1010605152010-04-13013 April 2010
Comment (2) of Ginger L. Melton, on Behalf of Dominion Energy Kewaunee, on Draft Supplement 40 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants
ML1011100562010-04-18018 April 2010
Comment (3) of Steve Brooks on Kewaunee EIS License Renewal NUREG-1437, Supplement 40
Project stage: Supplement
ML1011205992010-04-20020 April 2010
Comment (6) of Susan Michetti, Opposing NUREG-1437 Supplement 40, It Is Unsafe to Renew License of Kewaunee Nuclear Plant
Project stage: Request
ML1011205952010-04-20020 April 2010
Comment (4) of Duncan Tam Opposing the Re-license of Kewaunee Nuclear Plant
Project stage: Request
ML1011302552010-04-21021 April 2010
Comment (7) of Diane D'Arrigo, on Behalf of Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Opposing the License Renewal of Kewaunee Nuclear Power Station for Safety, Security, Environmental, Public and Worker Health and Safety Reasons
Project stage: Other
ML1011302562010-04-21021 April 2010
Comment (8) of John Laforge, on Behalf of Nukewatch Co., Opposing License Renewal Application for Kewaunee Power Station
Project stage: Request
ML1011707982010-04-23023 April 2010
Comment (9) of Alfred Meyer, on Behalf of Himself, Opposing License Renewal Application for Kewaunee Power Station
Project stage: Request
ML1012700712010-05-0606 May 2010
Email Between Jeremy Susco and Paul Aitken Regarding Kewaunee LRA Environmental Report
Project stage: Request
ML1013101672010-05-10010 May 2010
Email Regarding Kewaunee Cultural Resources Protection Plan
Project stage: Request
ML1015503542010-06-0303 June 2010
E-Mail Re NRC Follow-Up Request for Tax Info on Kewaunee License Renewal
Project stage: Request
ML1018906762010-07-0707 July 2010
Updated Permit Info Re Kewaunee LRA FSEIS
Project stage: Request
ML1021503302010-08-19019 August 2010
FRN: Notice of Availability of the Final Plant-Specific Supplement 40 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Kewaunee Power Station
Project stage: Other
ML1021501062010-08-19019 August 2010
Notice of Availability of the Final Plant-Specific Supplement 40 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Kewaunee Power Station
Project stage: Acceptance Review
2010-04-18
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML1028711372010-10-0606 October 2010
Comment (1) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Behalf of United States Environmental Protection Agency, on License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 40 Regarding Kewaunee Power Station, Kewaunee County, Wisconsin, NUREG-1437, Ceq # 20100350
ML1011707982010-04-23023 April 2010
Comment (9) of Alfred Meyer, on Behalf of Himself, Opposing License Renewal Application for Kewaunee Power Station
ML1011302552010-04-21021 April 2010
Comment (7) of Diane D'Arrigo, on Behalf of Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Opposing the License Renewal of Kewaunee Nuclear Power Station for Safety, Security, Environmental, Public and Worker Health and Safety Reasons
ML1011302562010-04-21021 April 2010
Comment (8) of John Laforge, on Behalf of Nukewatch Co., Opposing License Renewal Application for Kewaunee Power Station
ML1011205992010-04-20020 April 2010
Comment (6) of Susan Michetti, Opposing NUREG-1437 Supplement 40, It Is Unsafe to Renew License of Kewaunee Nuclear Plant
ML1011205952010-04-20020 April 2010
Comment (4) of Duncan Tam Opposing the Re-license of Kewaunee Nuclear Plant
ML1011100562010-04-18018 April 2010
Comment (3) of Steve Brooks on Kewaunee EIS License Renewal NUREG-1437, Supplement 40
ML1010605152010-04-13013 April 2010
Comment (2) of Ginger L. Melton, on Behalf of Dominion Energy Kewaunee, on Draft Supplement 40 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants
ML1011205972010-04-0606 April 2010
Comment (5) of Kenneth W. Westlake, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 40 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Kewaunee Power Station,
ML0831005862008-10-22022 October 2008
Comment (1) of Bob Ziegelbauer on Behalf of the State of Wi, Supporting Dominion Energy Kewaunee'S Application for License Renewal
ML0430100892004-10-12012 October 2004
Comment (8) of Lynda L. Dorr Comments on NUREG-1577, Rev. 1, Draft Supplement to Standard Review Plan, Decommissioning Funding Insurance for Power Reactors
ML0426100262004-09-0202 September 2004
Comment (2) of Lars Bengtsson Supporting the Sale of the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant
ML0400902562003-12-30030 December 2003
Comment (6) of Edward J. Weinkam, NMC, Regarding Draft Revision 9 of NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors.
2010-04-06
[Table view] |
Text
Mendiola, Doris From: Alfred Meyer [alfred.c.meyer@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:53 PM To: KewauneeEIS Resource
Subject:
PUBLIC COMMENT: NUREG-1437, 13 Supplement 40, draft KewauneeElS.Resource@nrc.gov 3l-0
,(9//"' &&'&K) .,..-N)
Date: April 23, 2010 T77 RE: NUREG-1437, 13 Supplement 40, draft; li1 W' Pertaining to license renewal for Kewaunee Nuclear Power Station, Wisconsin.
In reviewing NUREG-1437, 13 Supplement 40, draft, I find there to be five significant operational site conditions which are not addressed. Due to the real and present danger each issue presents, before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission can renew the license of the Kewaunee reactor, each of these five issues needs to be satisfactorily resolved, including a process for ongoing public input in this process.
Thus I request that the NRC hold License Renewal in abeyance until there is satisfaction of these public health and safety issues:
- 1) There must be an age related management plan for of buried pipes with radiological materials to protect the public health, safety and groundwater
- a. Tritium leaks documented in 2006 at Kewaunee
- b. Similar tritium leaks at many other U.S. reactors
- c. There are no current age related management plan for buried pipes
- d. The inherent problem is that the buried pipe systems cannot be easily and regularly inspected
- e. The "leak first, fix later" scenario is insufficient to protect public health and safety.
- f. Tritium contamination is moving offsite towards Lake Michigan, leading to a much more pervasive problem for public safety, health and protection of the environment.
5o.OSJ
/)
- g. Therefore there is no plan for safety, health and environmental impacts of license renewal
- h. This issue must be included in the scope and determinations of the EIS before license renewal is adjudicated
- 2) No age related analysis of submerged electrical circuits
- a. There must be a proactive inspection and maintenance program for all .buried electrical circuits to ensure their good operating condition and dependability before license renewal can proceed.
- 3) Tritium contamination of the Kewaunee site is not included in the current scope of the Decommissioning Plans - adequate funding levels must be determined before license renewal is adjudicated
- a. As an example, the estimated costs of decommissioning (without acknowledging actual Tritium contamination, which is currently being recognized as a significantly more than admitted by the reactor operator Entergy, who is being sued by the state of Vermont) are $1 Billion, whereas there are only $500 Million in the current Vermont Yankee decommissioning fund. A thorough analysis must be provided for Kewaunee prior to license renewal.
- 4) With the likely demise of the Yucca Mountain Project, and in any case, no projected date for availability of a permanent geologic repository, the confidence aspect of the Waste Confidence Act is undermined. The EIS must now address the environmental, health and safety impacts of de facto permanent on site storage of the high level nuclear waste contained in the spent nuclear fuel before license renewal.
- a. The current standard of 60 years for SafeStore post license term must be reevaluated in light of the lack of any plan for disposition of HLNW.
- b. Since current dry cask storage technology is based on an expected 60-year lifetime, the health, safety and public health issues implicit in the use of such limited term technology for an indeterminate time must be addressed by the EIS before license renewal is adjudicated.
- c. Public health, safety and decommissioning funding implications of extended on site dry cask storage, during and after license periods, must be included in the EIS, in particular, the need for and environmental impacts of maintaining existing cooling pool facilities and/or building new cooling pool structures that will be needed to handle any unplanned, emergency or planned transfers of spent fuel from initial dry cask storage units to new storage and/or transport units due to premature failure of said casks, extension of storage time beyond the planned lifetime of said casks, and/or implementation of different storage and/or transport containers. Current estimates for new cooling pool facility construction is approximately $300 Million.
- 5) Public health and safety concerns of barge shipment on Lake Michigan should there be shipment of HLNW from the Kewaunee site to a yet-to-be-determined geologic repository 2
- a. There is no road or rail transport capacity to move HLNW from the Kewaunee site at present.
- b. Thus, barge shipment on Lake Michigan to a suitable port, such as the city of Milwaukee, as per DOE plans, must be addressed by the EIS.
I hereby request that no license renewal be awarded to the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Station until the above noted conditions have been resolved to the satisfaction of the general public.
Sincerely, Alfred C. Meyer 312 - 11th Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20002 alfred.c.mevereLmail.com 3
