ML101170122
| ML101170122 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/20/2010 |
| From: | Syrell T Constellation Energy Group, EDF Group |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML101170122 (4) | |
Text
P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093 CENG a joint venture of 0Constellation
- geDF Energy D
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION April 20, 2010 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTENTION:
SUBJECT:
Document Control Desk Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Unit No. 2; Docket No. 50-410 2009 Annual Environmental Operating Report In accordance with Appendix B of the Renewed Operating License NPF-69 (Environmental Protection Plan) for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2, attached is the Annual Environmental Operating Report for the period of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009.
There are no new regulatory commitments in this letter.
Should you have questions regarding the information in this submittal, please contact me at (315) 349-5219.
Terry F. Syrell Director - Licensing TFS/JJH
Enclosure:
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, 2009 Annual Environmental Operating Report cc:
S.J. Collins, NRC Region 1 Administrator R.V. Guzman, NRC Senior Project Manager Senior NRC Resident Inspector
ENCLOSURE NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 2009 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009 Renewed Facility Operating License NPF-69 Docket No. 50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC April 20, 2010
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 2009 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009 Subsection 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP), as contained in Appendix B of the Renewed Operating License for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2, requires that an Annual Environmental Operating Report be submitted to the Commission prior to May 1 of each year. The following addresses the requirements found in Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP for the submittal of the Annual Environmental Operating Report:
- 1. Provide summaries and analyses of the results of the environmental protection activities required by Subsection 4.2 (if any) of the EPPfor the report period, including a comparison with related preoperational studies, operational controls (as appropriate), and previous non-radiological environmental monitoring reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. If harmful effects or evidence of trends towards irreversible damage to the environment are observed, a detailed analysis of the data and a proposed course of mitigating action shall be provided.
Subsection 4.2 of the EPP denotes three areas of environmental monitoring:
Subsection 4.2.1 (Aquatic Monitoring) has no specific monitoring requirements although it is noted that the Commission will rely on the decisions made by the State of New York under the authority of the Clean Water Act for any requirements. Aquatic monitoring is specified in the station's State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (SPDES Permit) which is a site permit applicable to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1 and Unit 2. The SPDES Permit requires a limited Aquatic Monitoring Program (referred to in the permit as Biological Monitoring Requirements) which, at the present time, is only applicable to Unit 1. Unit 2 is in compliance.
Therefore, no Aquatic Monitoring Program is presently required for Unit 2.
Subsection 4.2.2 (Terrestrial Monitoring) does not contain any monitoring requirements.
Subsection 4.2.3 (Noise Monitoring) does not contain any monitoring requirements.
- 2. Provide a list of EPP non-compliances and corrective actions.
A review of the EPP requirements and plant records showed that there were no non-compliances with the EPP requirements during 2009.
- 3. Provide a list of all changes in station design or operation, tests, and experiments made in accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 which involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question (non-radiological).
A review of plant records, including environmental evaluations, showed that there were no changes during 2009 in station design/operation, tests, or experiments that could have involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question (non-radiological).
Page 1 of 2
I I
- 4. List all nonroutine reports submitted during 2009 in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP.
During 2009, there were no nonroutine reports submitted to the Commission in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP.
Page 2 of 2