ML100321396
| ML100321396 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point |
| Issue date: | 01/27/1981 |
| From: | O'Toole J Consolidated Edison Co of New York |
| To: | Stello V NRC/OE, NRC/OI |
| Shared Package | |
| ML100321398 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8102260655 | |
| Download: ML100321396 (2) | |
Text
John D.O'To~le C5 Assistant Vice PresidentA R
Consolidated Edison Companytof New, Thr&
4 Irving Place, New York,p 003 Telephone (212) 460-2
- 1.
J 2,aury 7,
9
/. F
- i [
k Janaury 27, 1981 t Indian Point Unit No. 2 FEE,251981 Docket No. 50-247 Mr. Victor Stello, Directo Office of Inspection And Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Stello:
During the meeting in White Plains, N. Y., on November 5, 1980, and at a subsequent meeting in your office on November 19, 1980, we indicated to you that we were studying longer range alternatives to the current containment cooling systems of Indian Point Unit No.
- 2. The principal objective of the study was to determine feasible options to the present direct river water cooled system that would have greater potential for sustained leak tight performance. Attached hereto is the Bechtel Power Corporation report, "Feasibility Study for the Modification of Containment Cooling System for Indian Point Unit 2, Consolidated Edison Co.", dated January 1981, which presents the results of (this effort.
We concur with the recommendation of the study that a "hybrid" closed cooling system, specifically the option employing heat exchangers and pumps, is the preferred alternative. Con Edison plans to develop a detailed design of this system for further evaluation and consideration for installation at Indian Point Unit No. 2. If our further evaluation indicates significant advantages with respect to leak tightness and containment integrity and does not compromise plant safety, as compared to the modified and upgraded system presently being installed, we would at that time proceed with the installation of the new system. We estimate that this evaluation will be complete by approximately January 1982.
We would be pleased to discuss this study in further detail if you so desire.
Ver truly yours, Attach.
"7 9
,C 8 O226o 5p
Attach.
W cc:
Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa 19406 Mr. T. Rebelowski, Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0. Box 38 Buchanan, N. Y. 10511
-VO I
- "?