ML100260006
| ML100260006 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point, 05000248  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/2010 |
| From: | Tom Gurdziel - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Richard Guzman Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
| Guzman R, NRR/DORL, 415-1030 | |
| References | |
| 2.206, EDATS: OEDO-2010-0010, G20100014, IR-06-002, TAC ME3062, TAC ME3063 | |
| Download: ML100260006 (2) | |
Text
From:
Tom Gurdziel [tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com]
Sent:
Thursday, January 14, 2010 7:39 PM To:
Guzman, Richard
Subject:
RE: 10 CFR 2.206 Petition dated 2 January 2010 re: Entergy/Indian Point Siren System Hello Rich, I do not wish to address the board either in person or by telephone because, in this case, I believe the facts are very clear: a Confirmatory Order was issued on January 31, 2006 (according to Inspection Report 05000286/2006002) and now, four years later, there is still no accepted siren system to protect the people living nearby. There is, however, continuing permission to operate both Indian Point power plants at 100% power.
The basic problem that I see is that NRC action to this point has been insufficient.
I am requesting that sufficient action be taken now.
Thank you, Tom From: Guzman, Richard [1]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 3:11 PM To: 'tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com'
Subject:
10 CFR 2.206 Petition dated 2 January 2010 re: Entergy/Indian Point Siren System Mr. Gurdziel, Your petition dated January 2, 2010, was assigned to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) for review. My name is Rich Guzman, a project manager in NRR, and I've been assigned as a petition manager for your subject letter.
The 10 CFR 2.206 process is a public process, in which your petition and the NRC documentation related to your petition will be made public, including your identity. If you do not wish your petition to be made public, please advise us of that immediately and we can suggest other NRC processes to you, such as our allegation process. A copy of Management Directive 8.11 describing the 2.206 process in detail is attached for your information.
The NRC will convene a Petition Review Board (PRB) to discuss your 2.206 petition request.
During this meeting, the PRB will discuss the request to reach a reasoned decision whether the petition meets the criteria for under 10 CFR 2.206 process. After that meeting, you will be informed on the PRB's initial recommendation.
In accordance with the 10 CFR 2.206 process, the PRB is offering you an opportunity to address the PRB in person or by teleconference, before the PRB reviews the petition and makes an initial recommendation. This meeting or teleconference, if held, is an opportunity for you to provide any relevant additional explanation and support for your request in advance of the PRB's initial evaluation. Please let me know if you wish to address the PRB as soon as possible, but no later than January 22, 2010. Otherwise, as indicated above, you will be
informed following the PRB's evaluation as to whether or not the petition has met the 2.206 criteria for review.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
- Thanks, Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (8B.C5.17903.E39BF4B4)
Subject:
RE: 10 CFR 2.206 Petition dated 2 January 2010 re: Entergy/Indian Point Siren System Sent Date: 1/17/2010 2:31:40 PM Received Date: 1/14/2010 7:39:27 PM From: Tom Gurdziel Created By: tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com Recipients:
Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov (Guzman, Richard)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 13384 1/17/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: