ML093521476
| ML093521476 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello |
| Issue date: | 01/29/2010 |
| From: | Tam P Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | O'Connor T Northern States Power Co |
| Tam P | |
| References | |
| TAC ME2523 | |
| Download: ML093521476 (6) | |
Text
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 29,2010 Mr. Timothy J. O'Connor Site Vice President Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company - Minnesota 2807 West County Road 75 Monticello, MN 55362-9637 SUB..IECT:
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT (MNGP) - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT RELATED TO THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION TO 10 CFR 73.55 (TAC NO. ME2523)
Dear Mr. O'Connor:
Enclosed is a copy of the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact related to your request dated November 3, 2009, for an exemption to the scheduler requirement of 10 CFR 73.55 for MNGP. The proposed exemption would permit Northern States Power Company to complete certain requirements imposed by 10 CFR 73.55, "Requirements for physical protection of licensed activities in nuclear power reactors against radiological sabotage," by June 30, 2011, instead of March 31,2010.
The enclosed EA is being forwarded to the Office of the Federal Register for publication.
~~~
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-263
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ
7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY OF MINNESOTA DOCKET NO. 50-263 MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an Exemption, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 73.5, "Specific exemptions," from the implementation date of certain new requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, "Physical protection of plants and materials," for Facility Operating License No. DPR 22, issued to Northern States Power Company of Minnesota (NSPM) for operation of Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) located in Wright County, Minnesota. In accordance with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC prepared an environmental assessment documenting its finding. The NRC concluded that the proposed actions will have no significant environmental impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of the Proposed Action:
The proposed action would exempt MNGP from the required implementation date of March 31, 2010, for two new requirements of 10 CFR Part 73. Specifically, MNGP would be granted an exemption from being in full compliance with certain new requirements contained in 10 CFR 73.55 by the March 31, 2010, deadline. NSPM has proposed an alternate full compliance implementation date of June 30, 2011, approximately 15 months beyond the date required by 10 CFR Part 73. The proposed action, an extension of the schedule for completion of certain actions required by the revised 10 CFR Part 73, does not involve any physical
- 2 changes to the reactor, fuel, plant structures, support structures, water, or land at the MNGP site.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's application dated November 3, 2009.
The Need for the Proposed Action:
The proposed action is needed to provide the licensee with additional time to perform the required upgrades to the MNGP security system due to impediments to construction such as planned refueling outages and winter weather conditions.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action:
The NRC has completed its environmental assessment of the proposed exemption. The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed action to extend the implementation deadline would not significantly affect plant safety and would not have a significant adverse effect on the probability of an accident occurring.
The proposed action would not result in an increased radiological hazard beyond those previously analyzed in the environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact made by the Commission in promulgating its revisions to 10 CFR Part 73 as discussed in a Federal Register notice dated March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13967). There will be no change to radioactive effluents that affect radiation exposures to plant workers and members of the public. Therefore, no changes or different types of radiological impacts are expected as a result of the proposed exemption.
The proposed action does not result in changes to land use or water use, or result in changes to the quality or quantity of non-radiological effluents. No changes to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit are needed. 1\\10 effects on the aquatic or terrestrial habitat in the vicinity of the plant, or to threatened, endangered, or protected species under the Endangered Species Act, or impacts to essential fish habitat covered by the
- 3 Magnuson-Steven's Act are expected. There are no impacts to the air or ambient air quality.
There are no impacts to historical and cultural resources. There would be no impact to socioeconomic resources. Therefore, no changes to or different types of non-radiological environmental impacts are expected as a result of the proposed exemption.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. In addition, in promulgating its revisions to 10 CFR Part 73, the Commission prepared an environmental assessment and published a finding of no significant impact [Part 73, Power Reactor Security Requirements, 74 FR 13926, 13967 (March 27, 2009)].
The NRC staff's safety evaluation will be provided in the exemption, if granted.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action:
As an alternative to the proposed actions, the NRC staff considered denial of the proposed actions (Le., the "no-action" alternative). Denial of the exemption request would result in no change in current environmental impacts. If the proposed action were denied, the licensee would have to comply with the March 31,2010, implementation deadline. The environmental impacts of the proposed exemption and the "no action" alternative are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources:
The action does not involve the use of any different resources than those considered in the Final Environmental Statement for MNGP in November 1972, as updated by Environmental Impact Statement, Supplement 26, dated August 2006 (NUREG-1437, Supplement 26, associated with renewing the operating license for MNGP for an additional 20 years).
Agencies and Persons Consulted:
In accordance with its stated policy, on December 17, 2009, the NRC staff consulted with the Minnesota State official regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action.
The State official had no comments.
- 4 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the redacted version of the licensee's letter dated November 3, 2009; the unredacted version contains safeguards information and, accordingly, is not available to the public. The redacted version, dated December 15, 2009 (Accession No. ML100190133) may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area 0-1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Website:
http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or send an e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.qov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of January, 2010.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOI\\I
-: rl- ;;Y
~.jC(,A'\\.',
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
January 29, 2010 Mr. Timothy J. O'Connor Site Vice President Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company - Minnesota 2807 West County Road 75 Monticello, MN 55362-9637
SUBJECT:
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT (MNGP) - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT RELATED TO THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION TO 10 CFR 73.55 (TAC NO. ME2523)
Dear Mr. O'Connor:
Enclosed is a copy of the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact related to your request dated November 3, 2009, for an exemption to the scheduler requirement of 10 CFR 73.55 for MNGP. The proposed exemption would permit Northern States Power Company to complete certain requirements imposed by 10 CFR 73.55, "Requirements for physical protection of licensed activities in nuclear power reactors against radiological sabotage," by June 30, 2011, instead of March 31, 2010.
The enclosed EA is being forwarded to the Office of the Federal Register for publication.
Sincerely, IRAJ Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-263
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC LPL3-1 r/f RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource RidsNrrPMMonticelio Resource RidsNrrLATHarris Resource RidsOGCRp Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource Letter Accession No' ML093521476 EA Accession No' ML093520544 OFFICE LPL3-1/PM LPL3-1/LA RERB/BC OGC LPL3-1/BC LPL3-1/PM NAME KFeintuch for PTam THarris Almboden MSpencer TBeitz for RPascarelli PTam DATE 1/4/10 12/29/09 1/5/10 1/26/10 1/29/10 1/29/10 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY