ML093030389

Correction to Summary of September 29, 2009, Meeting with Representatives of STP Nuclear Operating Company, to Discuss Experience with Implementation of Risk-Managed Technical Specification Pilot Amendment (Initiative 4b) and Other Initiati

ML093030389
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	11/02/2009
From:	Thadani M Plant Licensing Branch IV
To:	South Texas
Thadani, M C, NRR/DORL/LP4, 415-1476
References
Download: ML093030389 (6)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 2, 2009 LICENSEE: STP Nuclear Operating Company FACILITY: South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2

SUBJECT:

CORRECTION TO

SUMMARY

OF SEPTEMBER 29, 2009, MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF STP NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, LICENSEE FOR SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT, UNITS 1 AND 2, REGARDING LICENSEE'S RISK-INFORMED PERFORMANCE-BASED PROGRAMS On October 29, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML093020098), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a meeting summary of the September 29, 2009, meeting with representatives of STP Nuclear Operating Company, licensee for South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2.

Due to an administrative error, pages 22 to 24 of the licensee handouts were missing from the electronic copy issued on October 29, 2009. The omission does not change the content of the meeting summary. Enclosed is a copy of pages 22 to 24; please add them to your copy of the licensee handouts.

Ifthere are any questions or comments; please contact me by telephone at 301-415-1476 or by electronic mail at Mohan.Thadani@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Mohan C. Thadani, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv

ENCLOSURE LICENSEE HANDOUTS PAGES 22 TO 24 FOR SOUTH TEXAS PRO~IECT, UNITS 1 AND 2 MEETING

SUMMARY

ISSUED OCTOBER 29,2009

--1 m co x w co

~3-5

-c co :....!.

l 0 C ,I  ::l

_. co ....,

l;tJ-h W .Q ~

--.., c_.

rY\""'OO

)C-co-o i':>3 co co

l 0_.

W en

--'1

COMPONENT RISK SIGNIFICANCE-MAINTENANCE APPLICATION BREAKDOWN As of 09/24/09 (See Note 1)

Component Risk Significance Breakdown FUskSignificance  % of Safety Related SSC's High ~, VJ,rJ..:u'\kllJyt ~

MedlulU Low Exempt ~

NRS Non- Total sse Bre~kdown Total Evaluated SSC Population 104 Systems

~76000 TPNS

- Safety Related ....

SSCs 74%

I High Low NRS

- (1%)

r-.ledllllll-( :\lI n )

- (16%)

- (77%)

% of Non-Safety Related SSC's NRS 88 %

Low 10 0;0 2° 0 ofNon-Safeh Related Medium I U n }-- sse s requiring e\"aluatiol1 High IUD ,-I for addItional controls --J 23

Exemption from Special Treatment Requirements Lessons Learned

• Dedicated individual to facilitate categorization process is very desirable.

• Document system categorization bases and in database to enable retrieval and to produce "Risk Significance Basis Documents".

• Specific categorization process training required for IWG and Expert Panel members

• Develop appropriate interface with station equipment databases (MEDMaster)

• Information and insights from the categorization process used across many station organizations and in many station processes 24

ML093030389 OFFICE DORULPL4/PM DORLlLPL4/LA DORULPL4/BC DORULPL4/PM NAME MThadani .IBurkhardt MMarkley MThadani DATE 11/02/09 10/30/09 11/02/09 11/02/09