ML091980543

E-mail from J. Richmond of NRC to M. Modes of NRC, Regarding Part 54 Question

ML091980543
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	10/23/2008
From:	Richmond J Division of Reactor Safety I
To:	Modes M Division of Reactor Safety I
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0070
Download: ML091980543 (3)

Text

ý 11 1 Sarah Rich From: John Richmond, Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:50 AM To: Michael Modes

Subject:

RE: Part 54 Question I think I'll revise the one portion of the insp plan that addresses part 54.21 (or 54.37), just to say check with licensee or verify whether they have any "newly identified" SSCs or performed any modifications since the last LRA update (July 2007).

From: Michael Modes Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:28 PM To: John Richmond

Subject:

RE: Part 54 Question From: John Richmond Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:38 PM To: Michael Modes

Subject:

RE: Part 54 Question Thanks. (b)(5)

(b)(5)

From: Michael Modes Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:27 PM To: John Richmond

Subject:

RE: Part 54 Question July'07 was the last update, We're checking with DLR managment to make sure that is the "official" position.

From: John Richmond Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 12:23 PM

To: Michael Modes

Subject:

Part 54 Question Section 54.21 Contents of application--technical information 54.21(b) CLB changes during NRC review of the application. Each year following submittal of the license renewal application and at least 3 months before scheduled completion of the NRC review, an amendment to the renewal application must be submitted that identifies any change to the CLB of the facility that materially affects the contents of the license renewal application, including the FSAR supplement.

In the above context, it says "Each year following submittal ... and at least 3 months before scheduled completion of the NRC review..." For OC, NRR, ACRS, and ASLB have all reviewed the LRA and recommended approval. Does that mean that the "NRC has completed its review," and hence, AmerGen does not have to submit either an annual update, or an update "at least 3 months" ??

2

Received: from RICLSTRO1 .nrc.gov ([148.184.99.7]) by R1 MS01 .nrc.gov

([148.184.99.10]) with mapi; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:50:02 -0400 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: John Richmond <John.Richmond@nrc.gov>

To: Michael Modes <Michael. Modes@nrc.gov>

Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:50:01 -0400

Subject:

RE: Part 54 Question Thread-Topic: Part 54 Question Thread-Index: AckOYnVsVUfBE6h8R3yz/OIJ2c6BjwAJIWIsAAGEu9AABkcSjgAVIM2A Message-ID:

<2856BC46 F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA2A445180@R1 CLSTR01. nrc.gov>

References:

<2856BC46F6A308418FO33D973BBOEE72AA2A4DCDD8@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>

<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA2A1 BBAOA@R1 CLSTR01.nrc.gov>,<285 6BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA2A5B9FC6@R1 CLSTR01 .n rc.gov>

<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973B B0EE72AA2A1 BBAOB@R1 CLSTRO1. nrc.gov>

In-Reply-To:

<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA2A1 BBAOB@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>

Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:

X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:

<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA2A445180@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>

MIME-Version: 1.0