|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22235A7862022-08-23023 August 2022
Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, LLW Shipping Investigation Requirements
ML21181A1882021-06-30030 June 2021
E-mail from S. Johnston, Holtec, to A. Snyder and F. Bower, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Readiness Status for ISFSI Only Inspection
ML21175A2092021-06-24024 June 2021
E-mail from A. Sterdis to P. Longmire - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Stating Implementation Intent)
ML21162A3602021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail Response from the State of New Jersey Regarding the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption
ML21168A0172021-06-10010 June 2021
E-mail from HDI: RAI Response
ML21161A2572021-06-0707 June 2021
State Consultation: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Email Response)
ML21175A0712021-06-0202 June 2021
Issuance of Request for Additional Information: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications
ML21148A0562021-05-27027 May 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21132A3182021-05-12012 May 2021
E-Mail from V. Gubbi, DEP to Z. Cruz, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - State of New Jersey Response to the Pending Revision to the Defueled Technical Specifications to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only
ML21132A0312021-05-11011 May 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Physical Security Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21119A1422021-04-28028 April 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021
Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid
ML21099A0382021-04-0808 April 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Request for Additional Information - HDI Request for Approval of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan
ML21085A4872021-03-26026 March 2021
E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Acceptance Review: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications
ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme
ML21064A2392021-03-0202 March 2021
E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Physical Security Plan
ML20345A1462020-12-0909 December 2020
E-mail - Response to Request for Additional Information: HDI Request for One-Time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B FOF Requirements
ML20335A3112020-11-30030 November 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for a one-time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020
Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek
ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020
Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program
ML20279A5082020-10-0505 October 2020
Email to Holtec - Response to Notification of Oyster Creek Onsite Property Insurance Coverage
ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0
ML20134H8742020-05-12012 May 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Temporary Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements
ML20133J9182020-05-11011 May 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from Part 73 Qualification Requirements
ML20120A0252020-04-22022 April 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Oyster Creek Sea Turtle Handling and Conservation Recommendation Obligations
NRC-2019-0073, Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza2019-10-30030 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza
ML19344C8022019-10-20020 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-20-2019 a Dressler
ML19344C8002019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 W Mcmullin
ML19344C7982019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 M Noto
ML19344C7992019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 s Feldman
ML19344C7932019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 C Bischoff
ML19344C7962019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 G Adams
ML19344C7912019-10-0808 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 J Branciforte
ML19344C7902019-10-0808 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 Anonymous
ML19344C7892019-10-0505 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-05-2019 P Dressler
ML19263D1222019-09-20020 September 2019
for Your Action Request for Additional Information Hdi Oyster Creek PSDAR
ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019
NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
ML19182A3422019-07-0101 July 2019
Transaction
ML19178A0702019-06-26026 June 2019
Email to State of New Jersey - Oyster Creek - Request Comments on Proposed Amendment to Remove Reference to the Oyster Creek Cyber Security Plan and Update License Condition 2.C.(4) in the Renewed Facility License
ML19196A3422019-06-20020 June 2019
Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption (Sierra Club)
ML19196A3342019-06-20020 June 2019
Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption
ML19162A2242019-06-11011 June 2019
NRC to NMFS, NRC Responses to NMFS Requests for Additional Information for Oyster Creek ESA Section 7 Consultation
NRC-2018-0237, Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application2019-06-0707 June 2019
Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application
ML19155A1182019-06-0404 June 2019
Incoming E-mail from State of New Jersey on the Oyster Creek Exemption for Reduced Insurances and Use of Decommissioning Trust Fund for Spent Fuel Management and Site Restoration
ML19155A1192019-06-0404 June 2019
State of New Jersey Comments - Oyster Creek Conforming Amendment Associated with the Oyster Creek Generating Station License Transfer Application
ML19154A0582019-05-31031 May 2019
E-mail Response from State of New Jersey Dated May 31, 2019, Notification-and-Request-Oyster Creek License Transfer Application L-2018-LLM-0002
ML19158A2912019-05-30030 May 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS
ML19158A2772019-05-28028 May 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS
ML19148A4392019-05-24024 May 2019
NMFS to NRC, Requests for Additional Information to Support Oyster Creek Reinitiated Section 7 Consultation
2022-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
John Richmond From: Richard Conte ,
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:07 AM To: Michael Modes; Glenn Meyer; John Richmond
Subject:
RE: LR Inspection Plan Public I don't see the need to put the plans in PDR nor give them to the licensee or applicatn in light of our current mode.
Richard J. Conte Chief, Engineering Branch No. 1, DRS, Reg. L (b)(6) ]Off. 610-337-5183
Original Message----
From: Michael Modes Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:56 AM To: Richard Conte; Glenn Meyer; John Richmond
Subject:
RE: LR Inspection Plan Public Here is what I understand:
If the inspection shows up in IP report 21, then it is announced and no further action is required of the lead.
If the inspection does not show up in IP report 21 it is not announced and the lead has to take action:
- 1) Call the applicant contact and verbally announce the inspection or,
- 2) Generate an inspection plan, call the contact and tell him it is coming, send it and put the document into ADAMS as public. Then change the status of the inspection entry in IP to make sure it is marked "announced".
Make sure the DLR PM gets a copy. Make sure PAO RI is made aware of the public pronouncement. Remind the BC to tell the front office about the announcement.
Because Mike Gallagher and Rich Conte discussed the TMI and OC inspections yesterday both inspections have been "announced" regardless of the above.
From: Richard Conte Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:26 AM To: Michael Modes; Glenn Meyer; John Richmond
Subject:
RE: LR Inspection Plan Public all the schedules sent out by DRP did not have the LRI stuff because the activities were marked "unannounced" in RPS.
Mike Gallagher called me yesterday to confirm plan on TMI and we discussed OC a little. LM application was discussed also, see me privately on it - no announcement on LM until Jan 09.
We need to ensure they are all announced even OC under the authority of App. C of 2515.
John do you know how to extend the BV LRI report do a tentative end on 9/5/08, revisit the issue then.
Richard J. Conte (6 O Chief, Engineering Branch No. 1, DRS, Reg. L (b)(6) Off. 610-337-5183 Information Inthis record was deleted I, 1 accaicluice with thhFreedom of I.oumailo AOL Io%- a 7AAJ/-79
Original
Message -----
From: Michael Modes Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:18 AM To: Glenn Meyer; John Richmond Cc: Richard Conte
Subject:
RE: LR Inspection Plan Public Thanks for the input ... things evolve.
The new LR PM for TMI wanted to know if I had sent anything to TMI confirming the inspection. I'll follow recent precedent and give TMI a call.
From: Glenn Meyer Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 8:16 AM To: John Richmond; Michael Modes Cc: Richard Conte
Subject:
RE: LR Inspection Plan Public For Pilgrim, Fitz, IP, and Susquehanna, I have followed roughly the same approach as John mentioned -
communicated inspectors and AMPs but not the plan. To my thinking IP 71002 covers the "what we plan to do" part. Beyond the inspectors and AMPs, much of the plan is just general stuff and coordination.
Original
Message -----
From: John Richmond Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:42 AM To: Michael Modes; Glenn Meyer Cc: Richard Conte
Subject:
RE: LR Inspection Plan Public For BV, I did not share the Inspection Plan with FENOC, and did not make it a Public Document. I provided FENOC a list of AMPs we intended to inspect, with the associated assigned inspector's name.
If you previously told me that we made these inspection plans public, then it must have slipped my mind.
anyway, I didn't.
Original
Message----
From: Michael Modes Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:22 AM To: Glenn Meyer; John Richmond Cc: Richard Conte
Subject:
LR Inspection Plan Public Because License Renewal is a painfully public process I have always sent the applicant the inspection plan two or three weeks prior to arriving on site. It was a decision we all made when implementing Calvert Cliffs inspection. The logic was something like a public exit should be proceeded by a public inspection plan.
Region III was adamantly opposed to this idea and instead wanted to continue sending a formal request for information letter they apparently send to every licensee prior to every inspection.
Region II didn't want to share the inspection plan publicly and, you shouldn't be surprised, wanted to keep the process less formal.
My question: what have you done for the inspections you lead?
2
And what do you suggest I do for TMI?
3
Received: from R1CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov ([148.184.99.7]) by R1 MS01 .nrc.gov
([148.184.99.10]) with mapi; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:06:36 -0400 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Richard Conte <Richard.Conte@nrc.gov>
To: Michael Modes <Michael.Modes@nrc.gov>, Glenn Meyer <Glenn. Meyer@nrc.gov>,
John Richmond <John.Richmond@nrc.gov>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:06:35 -0400
Subject:
RE: LR Inspection Plan Public Thread-Topic: LR Inspection Plan Public Thread-Index:
AQHI97aXxMn41 1Qrik6XtTAzl mCJbl5dgkUQgAAJ4rCAABItGoAAAWBggAAHRM+AAASsAA=
Message-ID: <2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841CB12001 @R1CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
References:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841C9F6ECC@RlCLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841CB11DD5@R 1CLSTRO1. nrc.gov>,<2856BC46 F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841CB11 E47@R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841 C9F6ECE@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>,<2856BC46 F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841CB11 F82@R1CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841 C9F6ED3@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
In-Reply-To: <2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841C9F6ED3@R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72841CB12001 @R1CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0