ML091480178

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-mail Petition to Intervene Submitted by David E. Ortman
ML091480178
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/22/2009
From: Ortman D
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY
SECY RAS
References
Download: ML091480178 (1)


Text

From: DAVID E ORTMAN [deortman@msn.com]

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:11 AM To: Hearing Docket Cc: dfstenger@hhlaw.com; jmatthews@morganlewis.com

Subject:

RE: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station -Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications - NRC-2009-0193; Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410 [74 FR 21015 - May 6, 2009]

May 22, 2009 Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Secretary Nuclear Regulatory Commission WA D.C. 20555-0001 RE: NRC-2009-0193; Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410, 74 FR 21015 (May 6, 2005)

Dear NRC:

I have reviewed a copy of the above referenced notice regarding the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Notice of Consideration of Approval of Application Regarding Proposed Corporate Restructuring and of Indirect Transfer of Licenses Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80 and Opportunity for a Hearing, which appeared in the May 6, 2009, Federal Register.

Deficient Public Notice Nowhere in the public notice is the location of these nuclear power plants given. In the future, please provide a location for these nuclear power plants in your public notices so that the public does not have search independently to determine that they are located near Oswego, New York on the shore of Lake Ontario.

Background on Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station According to other sources, Unit 1, a BWR-2 (boiling water reactor), went online in 1969 and is one of the oldest nuclear reactors in service in the United States. Unit 2, a BWR-5, has been in operation since 1988. In 2006, the NRC granted 20-year license extensions to both units. Unit 1 is now licensed to operate until 2029 and Unit 2 is licensed until 2046.

Because of the old age of these reactors, particularly Unit 1, it is virtually certain that accidents and plant failures will occur. It is of deep concern that the newer Unit 2 was the subject of a "site area emergency" (a classification only one level down from the "general emergency" that occurred at Three Mile Island) on August 13, 1991, shortly after its 1988 licensing.

Corporate Shells According to the public notice, the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses, Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 are currently held by:

  • Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, as owner and licensed operator.
  • Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, is currently owned by Constellation Nuclear Power Plants, Inc.
  • Constellation Nuclear Power Plants, Inc. is owned by Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC (CENG).
  • CENG is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Constellation Energy Group, Inc. (CEG).

Thus, there are four listed entities with some type of operating licensing/ownership responsibility for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station.

Proposed Corporate Shell Expansion According to the public notice, the Applicants, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, and EDF Development, Inc. (EDF Development), propose the following corporate restructuring:

  • EDF Development would acquire 49.99% ownership interest in GENG. The Public Notice does not disclose why or what advantage EDF Development would gain by acquiring a minority ownership in GENG, rather than CEG. EDF Development is a U.S. corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.
  • EDF Development is a wholly-owned subsidiary of E.D.F. International S.A., a public limited company organized under the laws of France.
  • E.D.F. International S.A. is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of [Eacute]lectricit[eacute] de France S.A., a French limited company.

Approval of this restructuring would add three more corporate entities to the licensing/ownership responsibility for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, including two foreign corporations.

Comment and Request In summary, no further consideration of the proposed corporate restructuring and indirect transfer of licenses should be undertaken until the NRC has reviewed its facility operation license requirements and determines whether licenses involving multiple levels of wholly-owned subsidiaries provides adequate institutional and corporate control, responsibility, accountability and liability for aging nuclear power plants.

Sincerely, l signature David E. Ortman Attorney-at-Law 7043 22nd Ave N.W.

Seattle, WA 98117

deortman@msn.com cc: The Honorable Charles Schumer The Honorable Henry Waxman E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (COL102-W38D5B2F4BCCE8EB430FF85CF560)

Subject:

RE: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station -Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications -

NRC-2009-0193; Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410 [74 FR 21015 - May 6, 2009]

Sent Date: 5/22/2009 12:11:17 AM Received Date: 5/22/2009 12:11:17 AM From: DAVID E ORTMAN Created By: deortman@msn.com Recipients:

Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov (Hearing Docket)

Tracking Status: None dfstenger@hhlaw.com (dfstenger@hhlaw.com)

Tracking Status: None jmatthews@morganlewis.com (jmatthews@morganlewis.com)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

phx.gbl Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 20830 5/22/2009 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: