ML091460617
| ML091460617 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 09/30/2008 |
| From: | Modes M NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Richmond J NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2009-0070 | |
| Download: ML091460617 (2) | |
Text
John Richmond From:
Michael Modes Sent:
Tuesday, Septernhber 30, 2008 4:27 PM To:
John Richmond
Subject:
RE: 00 Training IWhat ever you do... don't let Conte know thiis, other wise it will become the one over arching, andd eaningless goal, of the inspection. He will bring it up over-and-over-and-over.
it Wait... it doesn't matter because no one can define a commitment so we can make the number any dam~nI t*
we want.--
From: John Richmond Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:13 PM To: Michael Modes
Subject:
RE: 0C Training Excellent advise, anything for Thursday's sudo bagman trip?
tw - DLR says Wiggins & Boger expect the region's 71003 inspection will verify at least 75% of the 0 o mmitments From: Michael Modes Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:05 PM To: John Richmond
Subject:
RE: OC Training Something I am very concerned about at OC because of the length of time we have been involved in the renewal and the huge volume of paper that has been generated: continuity.
I1 suggest you compare what you look at, with the SER discussion of that subject, and the 71002 inspection report if applicable. Then remember to point the final 71003 team member assigned that subject back to your report remarks for this outage, again if applicable. Continuity of inspection may be difficult to maintain at 00
)however we should try to avoid the trap of contradicting ourselves over time.
From: John Richmond Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:58 PM To: Michael Modes
Subject:
00 Training Michael,s'm going to 00 this Thursday (10/2), for my confined space/mockup training. They're doing the residents, Tim, and myself in a special [probably remedial] class.
Please make your training arrangements as best suits your schedule.
While I'm on-site, I'll look at some of the LR packages they've put together, and get an overview of their Commitments management Process.
Anything else I should look at, ask for, or get?
I
Received: from* R1CLSTR01.nrc.gov ([148.184.99.7]) by R1 MS01.nrc.gov
([148.184.99.10]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:32:01 -0400 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Michael Modes <Michael. Modes@nrc.gov>
To: John Richmond <John.Richmond@nrc.gov>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:27:02 -0400
Subject:
RE: OC Training Thread-Topic: OC Training Thread-Index: AckjJg PMfe6CYI/VT3y/vHuexcMdiAAAEsSwAABTGIAABN KZ7g==
Message-ID: <2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE729697375470@R1CLSTR01.nrc.gov>
References:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72969755CC50@RICLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72969755CC75@R1 CLSTRO1. nrc.goV>,<2856BC46F 6A308418F033D973BBOEE72969755CC9A@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
In-Reply-To: <2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72969755CC9A@R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE729697375470@R1 CLSTR01. nrc.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0