ML091340543

Commanche Peak - 03-2009 - Public Forms

ML091340543
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	04/03/2009
From:	Ryan Lantz Operations Branch IV
To:	Blevins M Luminant Generation Co
References
50-445/09-301, 50-446/09-301 50-445/09-301, 50-446/09-301
Download: ML091340543 (18)

Text

N OBDl202 - INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING PROCESS EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER I-

Initials I

Task Description a

a. Verify that the outline(s) ffi(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

2 7-

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

~

~~

~

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

a 2

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testM. and that scenarios will not be reoeated on subseauent davs.

4.

G E

N E

R A

L

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and auantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in AoDendix D.

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specrfied on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specmed on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verrfy that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensina examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether piant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that WA importance ratinas (exceDt for olant-soecific orioritiis) are at least 2.5.

1%

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

1 %

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

1%-

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the amropriate iob level (RO or SRO).

1%-

I I

' I 1 12130108 Date I

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-201-2 Rev a

A Facility: CPNPP 1 and 2 Date of Examination: 03/30/09 1

I I

Initials I

Item 1 Task Description

1.

w I

T T

E N

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

R

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with 4

Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems. evolutions, or generic topics.

d. Assess whether the justifcations for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate.

(p, 2,

S and major. transients.

1 6

M

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U

and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A

at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T

from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-3014 and described in Appendix D.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verQ that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, E." Q,

L Q

3.

w I

T

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinalons is within the limits Smd on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modifred tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specmed on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power. emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form

4.

G E

N E

R A

L -

specified on form ES-301-1 crfied on the form a Author b Facility Reviewer (')

c NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d NRC Supervisor Note:

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column 'c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

- Not aDDliWble for NRC-DreDafed examination outlines NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-201-2 Rev Final

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility CPNPP I a 2 Date ofExam.

03/30/09 Exam Level' RO SRO

b. Facility learning o

3.

SRO questbns a*

4 The facility license@

RO or 2 SRO qiUes0 5

Question duplication f indicated below (chec the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or I

I

11.

The exm contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice Items; the total is corrsct and agrees with the value on the c a w sheet.

Author Facility Reviewer (*)

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

NRC Regional Supervisor I

Date

a.

Author

+fz"(p7 b

Facility Reviewer (*)

c NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d.

NRC Regional Supervisor I

I w:

The facility reviewer's initialslsrgnature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations I

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 NRC ES-401-6 Rev Final

I -.

ES-30 1 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility CPNPP 1 and 2 Date of Examination 03/30/09 Operating Test Number Initials

! a I b* 1. l l I.

GENERAL CRITERIA I

a.

The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent 1

1 1

11 with sampling requirements (e g 10 CFR 5545, operational importance, safety function distribution) b There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered I F during this examination

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA l

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

1 initial conditions w

initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for cornpletron) and specific designation if deemed to be time cntical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criterra for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards I!

II

- restricttons on the sequence of steps, if applicable b

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e g, ttem distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinat~ons) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. SIMULATOR CRlTE The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Farm ES-301-4 and a capy is attached p t e d Name I Signature n -L _.

el -

I I

1, -

I NOTE.

if The facrldy signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer iniiial items in Column "c' chief examiner concurrence required NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-3 Rev Final

ES-301-Simulator Scenario Guality Checklist Form ES-301-4

~

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4

4.

Maior transients (1-2) 1 Facility:

CPNPP Date of Exam:

03/30/09 Scenario Numbers:

ID13 Operating Test No.: NRC 11

~

3 2

i QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

5.

6.

EOPs enteredlrequinng substantive achons (1-2)

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)

Initials a

j b

d

1.

2.

3.

The initial conditions are realistic, in fhat some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Each event description consists of 1

1 2

0 1

1 No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible Rrecedina incident such as a seismic event.

the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the syrnptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

c7 IT

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 3 3

~

-~

~~

~~~

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics 2

I

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

.7 7;.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given. 1 2 I @ h 1

The scenarios have been validated Pursuant to 10 CFR 55 46(d). any open simulator performance The simulator modeling is not altered deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelitv IS maintained while runnina the Dlanned scenarios

8.

9 modified scenario. All other

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 2

1 2

1 2

I I

I I

i l

NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-4 Rev Final

Transient and Event Checklist FOm ES-301-5

~

ES-301 Facitity:

CPWPP 1 sod 2 Date of E m :

03i30109 Operating Test No..

NRC 1

(

A L

I C

A H

T I

V E

M T

T Y

P

• Reactr&y and normal evolutions replaced With instrurrient or component malfunctions on a l-for-1 basis NUREG 1021 Revision 9.1 Page 1 of 2 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-5 Rev Final

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 c

Cheek the applicant level and enter the opereting test number and Form ES-Dl eve TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls NUREG 1021 Revision 9.1 Page 2 of 2 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-5 Rev Final

- ES-301 Competencies Checklist Farm ES-301-6 Facility:

CPNPP Date of Examination:

03/31/09 Operating Test No. NRC 1-2 Competencies InterpreVDiag-nose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (I)

Operate Control Boards Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech.

soecs f3)

Applicants SROU-I SROU-2 1

WA ALL -

ALL -

SCENARIO I

SCENARIO 123* 1 6.7 N/A 1 1.2.5,

'IA 6,7

125, 6,7 ALL

NIP, 3,4 NfA SROU-3 SCENARIO ALL 394 NIA i

~-

NIA (1)

(2) Optional for an SRO-U (3) Only appllcable 10 SROs.

tncludes Technical Specification compliance for an RO NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-6 Rev Final

ES-SO1 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301 Competencies Applicants SRUU-4 SCENARIO I

SCENARIO Iiittlz 3#4 2,4 Comply Wtth and U s e Tech Specs. (3)

(4)

(5) 0p:ional for an SRO-U Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO SCENARIO I

NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-6 Rev Final

ES-30 1 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility:

CPNPP Date of Examination:

03/31/09 Operating Test No. PIRC 1-2 Competencies and Conditions Applicants SROI-1 SROI-2 I

SCENARIO I ALL I I

SCENARIO

~ ~ornpty with and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards (2)

Carnmunicate and Interact Demonstrate Ability (3)

Camply With and Use Tech.

%=s.

(3)

Notes (7)

(8) Optional foc an SRO-U Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO 1.2.3.

4.5.6 ALL 1

FIlA 2,4 NIB 2,4 1

I (9) Only apokable to SROs.

SROI-3 SCENARIO NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-6 Rev Final

ES-30 1 dompetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility.

CPNPP Date of Examination:

03/31/09 Operating Test No. NRC 1-2 Applicants RO-1 RO-3 SC ENA R IO Competencies SCENARIO Comply With Procedures { 1) and Use 1.3.5.7 Communicate and r

1 1

Interact I

I Demon m t e 4bility (3)

Supervisory NIA I

I 5 7 I

5.6 1

(10) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO (11) Op!~onaI far an SRQ-U (12) QFdv mplkable lo SROs RO-4 SCENARIO NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-6 Rev Final

ES-301 ComDetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 facility:

CPNPP Date of Examination:

03/31/09 Operating Test No. NRC 1-2 Applicants RQ-5 Cornpeteneies 1; i nterpre# Diag-nos8 Events and Cmditions Comply with and Use Procedures (1 )

1,3.5,7 Operate Control Boards Communicate and Inter act Demonstrate supervisory Ability (3)

Comply with and Use Tech.

specs. (3)

(2) 1,3.4, 5,7 NIA NIA 1,3,4.8 -ti-NIA SCENARKI 1

SCENARIO

--I-I t I'

1 I

Nofee' (13) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO (14) Optional for an SRO-U (1 5) Onty apptic3Me to SROs.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9.1 CPNPP Mar 2009 ES-301-6 Rev Final

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:

Date of Exam:

Exam Item Description

1.

2.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

4.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants

.evei: RO, ~ S R O,

J Initials a

l b

l c

Date ic Printed NameISignature

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. IVRC Supervisor (*)

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Pagelof4 04n3pM09 1016:16 Report 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2008 To 04/30/2009 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 SROl - 3 R O - 8 SROU - 4 R O - 8 SROl - 3 SROU - 4 CI Examlnem ABsIgned h

02/23/2009 Comanche Peak I 05000445 t 2009301 prep FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

HAIRE, MARK S.

TAC #: X02407 HEDGER, SEAN 0.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

02/23/2009 Comanche Peak I05000445 / 2009301 Prep FFF MCKERNON. THOMAS 0.

HEDGER, SEAN 0.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

02/23/2009 Comanche Peak / 05000446 / 2009301 Prep FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

HEDGER, SEAN D.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

02/23/2009 Comanche Peak / 05000446 / 2009301 Prep FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

HEDGER, SEAN D.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

03/30/2009 Comanche Peak / 05000445 I2009301 Admin FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

APGER. GABRIEL W.

TAC #: X02407 TAC #: X02408 TAC #: X02408 TAC #: X02407 HAIRE, MARKS.

13W2009

omanche Peak / 05000445 I2009301

. A P 44. Yn9An7 SROl HEDGER, SEAN D.

i,.

03/30/2009 Comanche Peak I

/ 20139301 TAC #: X02404g y P -1

. I I

HEDGER, SEAN D.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

i MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

HEDGER, SEAN D.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

APGER, GABRIEL W.

HAIRE, MARK S.

HEDGER, SEAN D.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

'1:..

1 Sites: CP Orgs: 4620 Exam Author: FFF

P w 2 o f 4 04/13/2009 Report 21 Region: 4 10:15:16 Phase Code: 5 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2008 To 04/30/2009 02l2009 CP -Comanche Peak RO - 16 SROl - 6 SROU - a LSRO - 0 Total for Comanche Peak: 30 02/2009 RO-16 SROl - 6 SROU - 8 LSRC -

Total for 02/2009: 30 Sites: CP Orgs: 4620 Exam Author: FFF 31

.c I

I Form ES-201-3 ES-201

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized.knowledge.about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled )or the week(s) of H R t ?$?' as'of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not.knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any pepons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be.administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except-as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select theitraining content or provide direct or. indirect' feedback).' Furthermore, I am aware of the phisical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may resultin cancellation of the examinations a!d/or an enforcement action against me or.

the facility licensee. 1 will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any,indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

I

2.

Post-Examination I

1 To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the $C licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of instruct, evaluate, or provide performance-feedback to those.applicants who were administered these licensing examiri'ations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.. '

, From the'date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, i did not PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / TESPONSIBILITY.

\\

I

c r'

r' I

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that 1 have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week($ of,% r' Zm9 as of the date of my signature. 1 agree that I will not knowinglydivulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. 1 will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week@) of instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, 1 did not PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SlGNAlJJgE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE IL.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

I