ML091130644
| ML091130644 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 11/04/2008 |
| From: | Conte R NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Ronald Bellamy, Marjorie Mclaughlin, Richmond J, Diane Screnci, Neil Sheehan NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2009-0070 | |
| Download: ML091130644 (3) | |
Text
I )ýý A
Sarah Rich From:
Richard Conte Sent:
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:41 AM To:
Diane Screnci; John Richmond; Marjorie McLaughlin; Neil Sheehan; Ronald Bellamy Cc:
Robert Summers; Darrell Roberts
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight Bob I have been anxious to talk with you about commitments in the CLB this is another twist to the commitments issue; if the NRC pressured by the state feels a commitment is inadequate.
Richard J. Conte Chief, Engineering Branch No. 1, DRS, Reg. I L
(b)(6)
I Off. 610-337-5183
[ The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written consent from the sender. This e-mail may also contain confidential or privileged information so consult with the sender before disclosing. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.]
From: Diane Screnci Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:48 AM To: John Richmond; Richard Conte; Marjorie McLaughlin; Neil Sheehan; Ronald Bellamy
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight Guess I wouldn't mind a little tutorial on the same information.
DIANE SCRENCI SR. PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER USNRC, RI 610/337-5330 From: John Richmond Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:22 AM To: Richard Conte; Marjorie McLaughlin; Diane Screnci; Neil Sheehan; Ronald Bellamy
Subject:
OC and NJ DEP Insight An insight as to where the State of NJ may be headed, regarding the current OC drywell coating issue.
Yesterday, during the day, Rich Pinney asked about how the NRC would change a "commitment" if Exelon
,needed to do more than a current commitment required. We talked, in general, about commitment management, SERs, enforceability, and what might constitute a violation of a requirement.
Rich didn't really have much to say, but he seemed to believe the NRC could "enforce" commitments, and could [or should be able to] change commitments and require a licensee to implement a new commitment.
During the 4 pm telecom with Exelon, near the end, Rich showed me a note that he'd written. "Increase sand bed inspections to every 2 years." The current commitment is to inspect the drywell shell, in the sand bed bays, every other outage [every 4 years].
amiodmnce with the Freedom of kdondon Act FOINPA,
"Oog-00-70
I'll update if more comes to light.
John R.
2
Received: from R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov ([148.184.99.7]) by R1 MS01.nrc.gov
([148.184.99.10]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 08:41:07 -0500 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Richard Conte <Richard.Conte@nrc.gov>
To: Diane Screnci <Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov>, John Richmond
<John.Richmond@nrc.gov>, Marjorie McLaughlin
<Marjorie.McLaughlin@nrc.gov>,
Neil Sheehan <Neil.Sheehan@nrc.gov>, Ronald Bellamy
<Ronald. Bellamy@nrc.gov>
CC: Robert Summers <Robert.Summers@nrc.gov>, Darrell Roberts
<Darrell. Roberts@nrc.gov>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 08:41:05 -0500
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight Thread-Topic: OC and NJ DEP Insight Thread-Index: Ack+d97zQQT87FF7TEG+vZ3A6P+xjwAA5b4wAAHS5JA=
'Message-ID:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA4387C282@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
References:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA436328DB@R1 CLSTR01.nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA4387C 1 F7@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
In-Reply-To:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA4387C1 F7@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNE F-Correlator:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA4387C282@R1 CLSTRO1. nrc.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0