ML091060460
| ML091060460 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/2009 |
| From: | David M Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Simpson P Exelon Corp, Exelon Generation Co |
| marshall david 415-1547 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME1038, TAC ME1039 | |
| Download: ML091060460 (1) | |
Text
From:
Marshall David Sent:
Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:27 PM To:
patrick.simpson@exeloncorp.com Cc:
Lisa.Schofield@exeloncorp.com; Matthew Mitchell
Subject:
Application Accepted - Braidwood Relief Request I2R-50 re. ISI Examination Coverage (ME1038-39)
- Pat, By letter dated March 31, 2009, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a relief request for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 (ADAMS Accession Number ML090960468).
The March 31, 2009 letter requested approval to use a proposed alternative to the existing American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," on the basis that compliance with the specified requirements is impractical due to plant design. The purpose of this message is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review was also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and has concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
In accordance with our process as described in LIC-109, "ACCEPTANCE REVIEW PROCEDURES," I am placing a copy of this email in ADAMS as a publicly-available, official agency record.
Sincerely, Marshall David Senior Project Manager (301) 415-1547 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (01BD2A1885C88F45A12CB413DEF03410968D32B011)
Subject:
Application Accepted - Braidwood Relief Request I2R-50 re. ISI Examination
Coverage (ME1038-39)
Sent Date: 4/15/2009 12:27:12 PM Received Date: 4/15/2009 12:27:12 PM From: Marshall David Created By: Marshall.David@nrc.gov Recipients:
patrick.simpson@exeloncorp.com (patrick.simpson@exeloncorp.com)
Tracking Status: None Lisa.Schofield@exeloncorp.com (Lisa.Schofield@exeloncorp.com)
Tracking Status: None Matthew.Mitchell@nrc.gov (Matthew Mitchell)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 15704 4/15/2009 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: