Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0603807082006-02-0909 February 2006 RAI, Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design-Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0818400612008-06-24024 June 2008 Request for Extension of Corrective Actions Completion Date for NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Request ULNRC-05521, Request for Extension of Corrective Actions Completion Date for NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors.2008-06-24024 June 2008 Request for Extension of Corrective Actions Completion Date for NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors. Project stage: Request ML0818503552008-06-27027 June 2008 Attachment, Summary of Telephone Conference Regarding Request for Extension of Completion of Corrective Actions for NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: Request ML0818503312008-06-27027 June 2008 Email Response from Scott Maglio to Mohan Thadani, Jack Donahew, Leon Whitney Generic Letter - 2004 - 02 Project stage: Other ML0818406062008-07-0303 July 2008 Approval of Second Extension Request for Corrective Actions GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors Project stage: Other ML0920101222008-12-18018 December 2008 Request for Additional Information, Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0920101192008-12-18018 December 2008 Email Re Request for Additional Information, Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ET 08-0053, Corporation Response to Request for Additional Information Response to Generic Letter 2004-02: Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors2008-12-22022 December 2008 Corporation Response to Request for Additional Information Response to Generic Letter 2004-02: Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Response to RAI ML0919704342009-06-22022 June 2009 Draft Request for Additional Information Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: Draft RAI ML0919704232009-06-22022 June 2009 Email Draft Request for Additional Information Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: Draft RAI ML0920306202009-07-31031 July 2009 Notice of Forthcoming Conference Call with Union Electric Company and Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Company Re Draft Requests for Additional Information on Generic Letter 2004-02 for Callaway Plant and Wolf Creek Creek Generating Station Project stage: Draft RAI ML0920306282009-07-31031 July 2009 Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors (Tac No. MC4731) Project stage: RAI ML0922205722009-08-27027 August 2009 Request for Additional Information Related to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage of Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0924607142009-09-28028 September 2009 Summary of Meeting with Union Electric Co., and Wolf Creek, to Discuss Draft Requests for Additional Information on GL 2004-02 for Callaway, Unit 1, and Wolf Creek Project stage: Draft RAI ML0928003162009-10-16016 October 2009 Notice of Meeting with Union Electric Company and Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Company to Discuss NRC Requests for Additional Information on Generic Letter 2004-02 Sent 7/31/0209 and 8/27/2009, Respectively Project stage: RAI ML0929300152009-10-20020 October 2009 Revised Notice of Meeting with Union Electric Company and Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Company to Discuss NRC Requests for Additional Information on Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: RAI ULNRC-05668, Request for Extension of Response Date to NRC Request for Additional Information Re Responses to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at PWRs2009-11-24024 November 2009 Request for Extension of Response Date to NRC Request for Additional Information Re Responses to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at PWRs Project stage: Request ML0932903202009-11-24024 November 2009 Request for Extension of Response Date to NRC Request for Additional Information Re Responses to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at PWRs Project stage: Request ML0933805662009-12-17017 December 2009 Summary of Meeting with Union Electric Company and Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Company to Discuss NRC Requests for Additional Information on Generic Letter 2004-02 Sent 7/31/2009 and 8/27/2009, Respectively Project stage: RAI ULNRC-05989, Path Forward for Resolution of GSI-1912013-05-16016 May 2013 Path Forward for Resolution of GSI-191 Project stage: Request ML13263A1682013-09-23023 September 2013 Request for Additional Information, Closure of Option 2 to Address In-Vessel Mitigative Measures for Potential In-Vessel Blockage; Related to Generic Safety Issue 191 Project stage: RAI ULNRC-06045, Response to Request for Additional Information Closure of Option 2 to Address In-Vessel Mitigative Measures for Potential In-Vessel Blockage2013-10-31031 October 2013 Response to Request for Additional Information Closure of Option 2 to Address In-Vessel Mitigative Measures for Potential In-Vessel Blockage Project stage: Response to RAI 2009-11-24
[Table View] |
Text
Page 1 of 2 Summary of Telephone Conference Regarding Request for Extension of Completion of Corrective Actions for NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 Callaway/AmerenUE
Participants:
Matt Brandes, Brian Holderness, Tom Elwood NRC (NRR)
Participants:
Mike Scott, Mohan Thadani, Leon Whitney Date and Time of Telecon: Wednesday, June 25, 2008, 1430 to 1450 (CDT)
=
Background===
By letter dated June 24, 2008 (ULNRC-05521) AmerenUE submitted a request to the NRC to allow an extension of the time for completing all of the remaining corrective actions identified in response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors. The letter provided the basis for AmerenUEs request which would delay completion of the remaining corrective actions for Callaway Plant until December 15, 2008 (from the current commitment date of June 30, 2008).
Upon receipt of the June 24 letter, the NRC requested a telephone discussion with Callaway representatives to discuss the requested extension. The June 25, 2006 telephone conference was accordingly scheduled and conducted for this purpose.
Summary of Telephone Conference The subject telephone conference between Callaway/AmerenUE and NRC personnel was conducted from 1430 to 1450 on Wednesday, June 25, 2008. After brief introductions and a lead-off by Mohan Thadani (the NRC Project Manager for Callaway), the call was led by Michael Scott of the NRC. Mr. Scott expressed his desire to understand the basis and need for the extension requested for Callaway.
The parts of AmerenUEs June 24 letter describing what testing and actions have been completed, as well as the delay in obtaining the final report for the analyses and evaluations performed by the vendor, were briefly discussed. The similarity to Wolf Creeks request was noted too. In response to a question from Mr. Scott, Matt Brandes noted that all of the actions required for ensuring an Operable ECCS, including a suction strainer head loss that ensures adequate net positive suction head for the ECCS pumps under post-LOCA conditions have been completed.
The remaining actions primarily are for completing proper documentation and revision of Callaway site design documents and procedures based on the vendor-provided analyses and test results. Mr. Brandes noted that there is significant NPSH margin at Callaway, as supported by successful chemical effects and debris bypass testing conducted in January 2008.
Mr. Scott then referred to two of the remaining actions identified in Enclosure 1 of the June 24 letter, i.e., a potential modification to the safety injection system to address downstream effects and the potential removal of the containment spray system cyclone separators based on the results of the downstream effects evaluation. Mr. Brandes noted that based on the results obtained for
Page 2 of 2 the downstream effects testing performed in conjunction with the strainer head loss testing conducted last January, it is very unlikely that these modifications will be needed, as there is a large amount of margin with respect to downstream component wear.
Mr. Brandes then explained the circumstances surrounding the vendors discovery earlier this year in which an error was identified in the design for the sump strainer now installed at Callaway. The error resulted in the size of the holes in the base plate for the strainer being smaller than they should be, thus resulting in a higher pressure drop than intended. Mr. Brandes noted that this condition was evaluated and found to be acceptable, and Tom Elwood noted that an Operability Determination was performed for this condition, which supported continued Operability of the ECCS. Mr. Brandes clarified that this determination was valid under the current licensing basis as well as the new licensing basis developed in response to GL 04-02. It was noted, however, that during the refueling outage to be conducted at Callaway this fall, a modification to replace the existing strainer support with one having the correct hole size will be completed in order to increase head margin to desired levels. It was repeated that the current configuration ensures ECCS operability with respect to the strainer issue addressed by GL 04-02, notwithstanding the modification planned for the fall refueling outage.
With regard to the requested completion date extension to December 15, 2008, Mr. Scott asked why that much time is needed. Mr. Elwood and Mr. Brandes noted that the fall refueling outage is a significant factor with regard to the availability of resources for documenting the final evaluations and completing all of the remaining activities.
Mr. Scott then concluded the call, emphasizing that based on what was described in this call and in AmerenUEs June 24 letter, it is the NRCs expectation that all of the remaining corrective actions will be completed by the completion date identified in AmerenUEs request.