ML080710149

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
G20080124/EDATS: EDO-2008-0152 - Edward Nelson Ltr. E-mail of 2.206 Petition Regarding Indian River Plant
ML080710149
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/20/2008
From: Ho Nieh
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DPR
To: Nelson E
- No Known Affiliation
Shared Package
ML080710138 List:
References
2.206, EDATS: OEDO-2008-0152, EDO-2008-0152, G20080124
Download: ML080710149 (31)


Text

March 20, 2008 Mr. Edward Nelson Via email

Dear Mr. Nelson:

This letter is in response to your email addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), dated February 24, 2008, in which you stated I am filing a 2.206 regarding the Indian River Plant. Your email was referred to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) for consideration pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206.

NRR has found that your request does not meet the criteria for consideration under 10 CFR 2.206, because it does not contain a request for enforcement-related action against a licensee of the NRC. In all proceedings, the NRC does strive to be fair and impartial to both licensees and other stakeholders. This is reflected in the values stated in our strategic plan: The safe use of radioactive materials and nuclear fuels for beneficial civilian purposes is enabled by the agencys adherence to the principles of good regulation - independence, openness, efficiency, clarity, and reliability.

Thank you for your interest in these matters.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Ho K. Nieh, Deputy Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

March 20, 2008 Mr. Edward Nelson Via email

Dear Mr. Nelson:

This letter is in response to your email addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), dated February 24, 2008, in which you stated I am filing a 2.206 regarding the Indian River Plant. Your email was referred to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) for consideration pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206.

NRR has found that your request does not meet the criteria for consideration under 10 CFR 2.206, because it does not contain a request for enforcement-related action against a licensee of the NRC. In all proceedings, the NRC does strive to be fair and impartial to both licensees and other stakeholders. This is reflected in the values stated in our strategic plan: The safe use of radioactive materials and nuclear fuels for beneficial civilian purposes is enabled by the agencys adherence to the principles of good regulation - independence, openness, efficiency, clarity, and reliability.

Thank you for your interest in these matters.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Ho K. Nieh, Deputy Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION: G20080124 PUBLIC LPL1-1 Reading File RidsNrrDorl RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 RidsNrrPMJBoska RidsNrrLASLittle RidsNrrWpcMail GLongo, OGC HCruz MKowal HNieh RidsOGCMailCenter RidsEDOMailCenter RidsOpaMail RidsRgn1MailCenter RidsAcrsAcnw&mMailCenter Incoming: ML080580325 Response: ML080710149 Package: ML080710138 OFFICE LPL1-1/PM LPL1-1/LA LPL1-1/BC DD/DPR NAME JBoska SLittle MKowal H. Nieh DATE 3/19/08 3/18/08 3/19/08 3/20/08 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY