|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22278A2962022-10-0505 October 2022 FAQ 22-02- Diablo Canyon Scram - Final Approved ML22276A2402022-10-0303 October 2022 1) FAQ Response Provided by NEI ML22179A0302022-06-22022 June 2022 Plants 1 and 2 - Response to Public Questions Regarding Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Neutron Embrittlement Coupon Testing - June 28, 2022 ML22166A4442022-06-15015 June 2022 Plants 1 and 2 - Response to Public Questions Regarding Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Neutron Embrittlement Coupon Testing - June 15, 2022 ML22144A1442022-05-23023 May 2022 FAQ 22-02 - Diablo Canyon Scram ML22206A2602022-05-23023 May 2022 FAQ 22-02- Diablo Canyon Scram - Proposed ML21270A2192021-09-27027 September 2021 LTR-21-0264-Ticket David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists, Letter Study Regarding Spent Fuel in Dry Storage at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ML21060B1842021-03-0101 March 2021 Enclosure 1 - 1-26-21 Diablo Canyon Renewal pre-app Meeting Attendee List ML21008A5172021-01-0808 January 2021 NRC-2021-000055 - Resp 1 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed ML20254A0652020-08-24024 August 2020 NRC-2019-000301 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed, Part 1 of 3 ML20254A0662020-08-24024 August 2020 NRC-2019-000301 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed, Part 2 of 3 ML20254A0682020-08-24024 August 2020 NRC-2019-000301 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed, Part 3 of 3 ML20141L7182020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Released Set of New OE Docs (for NRC-2019-000279 Item 2) ML20141L7172020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2015-0071, Part 2 of 2) ML20141L7162020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2015-0071, Part 1 of 2) ML20141L7152020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488, Parts 1 and 2) ML20141L7142020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 5, Part 2 of 2) ML20141L7132020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 5, Part 1 of 2) ML20141L7122020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 4, Part 2 of 2) ML20141L7112020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 4, Part 1 of 2) ML20141L7102020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 3, Part 2 of 2) ML20141L7092020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 3, Part 1 of 2) ML20262G9682020-03-19019 March 2020 Health Order 3.19.2020 ML20073M8812020-03-0909 March 2020 NRC-2020-000152 - Resp 1 - Final. Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed ML20073M0462020-03-0505 March 2020 NRC-2019-000301 - Resp 1 - Interim. Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed ML20042D3642020-02-0606 February 2020 NRC-2020-000134 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to Request Enclosed, Part 1 of 2 ML20042D3652020-02-0606 February 2020 NRC-2020-000134 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to Request Enclosed, Part 2 of 2 ML20034E1832019-12-19019 December 2019 Mesa Survey Picture Collection ML20034E1842019-12-19019 December 2019 Survey Divider Sheets ML20034E1872019-12-19019 December 2019 U23 Laydown Area North ML19261A1112019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2018 San Onofre Unit 3 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A0962019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (Decommissioning Funding Status Reports & Related Information) ML19261A0992019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis 2010 San Onofre Unit 1) ML19261A1002019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis 2011 San Onofre Unit 1) ML19261A1022019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis 2012 SONGS Unit 1 Analysis) ML19261A1032019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2013 SONGS Unit 1 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1042019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2014 SONGS Unit 1 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1052019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2015 San Onofre Unit 1 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1062019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2017 San Onofre Unit 1 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1072019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2017 San Onofre Unit 2 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1092019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2018 San Onofre Unit 1 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1102019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2018 San Onofre Unit 2 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1122019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (All Spreadsheets - San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1132019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (Spreadsheet for San Onofre Unit 2 2015 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1142019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (Spreadsheet for San Onofre Unit 3 2015 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A1172019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (Spot Check SONGS 2 and 3 - 2008) ML19261A1082019-09-12012 September 2019 NRC-2019-000288 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed (2017 San Onofre Unit 3 Decommissioning Funding Assurance Analysis) ML19261A0892019-09-0909 September 2019 NRC-2019-000239 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed ML19235A0852019-08-0909 August 2019 NRC-2019-000034 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed ML19189A1912019-07-0101 July 2019 NRC-2019-000343 - Resp 1 - Final. Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed 2022-06-22
[Table view] |
Text
On July 16, 2007, a magnitude-6.6 quake occurred near the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant site.
The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant site in Japan-the world's largest, with seven reactors producing 8,2120 MW. The site consist of 5 BWRs and 2 ABWRs. The epicenter of the quake was about 8-10 km from the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant site. Units 3, 4, and 7 were in operation at time of the event, Units 1, 5, and 6 were shutdown and Unit 2 was in startup. As a result of the quake Units 2, 3, 4, and 7 received automatic Scrams, the auxiliary transformer outside Unit 3 was on fire, drums of low-level radioactive waste fell over, water from the spent fuel pool was on the refueling floors due to sloshing from the spent fuel pool, minor transformer and generator oil leaks and seven workers suffered minor injuries. It is estimated that 1200 liters of radioactive water was discharged to the sea with a total activity of about 2432 nanocuries and 8.1 E6 nanocuries of radioactive iodine and other radioactive particulate matter was released from the Unit 7 main ventilation stack with no other radioactivity found in the other stacks (estimated dose to the public less than I millionth of annual limit).
Japan is located in a very active seismic settirg that is significantly higher than California. Only two US plants have active faults nearby. The US facility located closest to a potentially active fault, the Diablo Canyon plant in California, is built to withstand a seismic event exceeding the magnitude of the quake that occurred in Japan. The Diablo Canyon plant is located -5 km from the nearest fault, and has been evaluated for a magnitude 7.5 earthquake. The other US plant located in California is San Onofre, which is located -8 km from the nearest potential fault, and is designed for a magnitude 7.0 earthquake. These California plants are designed to withstand an earthquake greater than the one that occurred in Japan. The Diablo Canyon and San Onofre plants also have an auto-trip mechanism for earthquake initiated plant shut-down. Both plants have automatic shutdown during a seismic event above a specified level. Other plants in the US are located in areas of much lower seismicity than that of California. Is should be noted that the seismicity at various NPP sites varies depending on the location of any particular power plant. At the power plant site in Japan, the estimated seismicity is substantially higher than that for any US NPP east of the Rocky Mountains. US Nuclear Power Plants are designed to meet the criterion in 10 CFR 100, Appendix A, which requires the ground motion be determined by the maximum historical earthquake.
Japanese officials had been under the assumption that the nearby fault that shifted last week is a strike-slip fault, in which the two sides of the fault move horizontally against each other.
However, the fault mechanism after the quake indicated that the earthquake was generated by a thrust fault (usually a dipping fault. plane, and the upper block moves upwards relative to the downside block), which usually causes more damage to the structures located on its upper block. Because Diablo Canyon is also located near a fault, Hosgri fault, which is considered mostly as a strike-slip fault but with a small potion of thrust component (about 2/3 strike slip and 1/3 reverse). It could be concluded that the Hosgri fault can also behave like the earthquake fault in Japan, thought to be a strike-slip fault but generating thrusting events.
Based on extensive search on seismic background related documents by Yong Li of the NRC staff, the NRC staff has not found anything indicating that the earthquake fault for the Niigata earthquake was thought to be a strike-slip fault. In fact, many faults in the region were considered as reverse faults because of its compressional basin background. The earthquake fault mechanism confirmed that reverse faults dominating in the geologic history are still in control. Fault mechanism from the earthquakes occurred along the Hosgri fault is strike-slip type. Therefore, there is no analogy between the Hosgri fault and the Niigata earthquake fault 7/15/2007) in terms of their fault types.