|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARPNP 2015-021, Submits Report of Changes, Tests and Experiments and Summary of Commitment Changes for the Period of April 1, 2013 Through March 31,20152015-04-0101 April 2015 Submits Report of Changes, Tests and Experiments and Summary of Commitment Changes for the Period of April 1, 2013 Through March 31,2015 ML0734603102007-09-10010 September 2007 2007 Report of Decommissioning Lessons Learned in Fsme/Dwmep/Durld ML0715203992007-05-30030 May 2007 Fy 2007 Final Fee Rule Workpapers ML0706007382006-10-27027 October 2006 Attachment 1, Transmittal of Survey Packages in Support of Big Rock Point Phased License Termination, Matrix of FSS Supporting Documentation ML0706007722006-10-27027 October 2006 Attachment 5, Transmittal of Survey Packages in Support of Big Rock Point Phased License Termination, Class 1 Final Status Survey Release Record, 11C11, East Protected Area ML0706007652006-10-27027 October 2006 Attachment 4, Transmittal of Survey Packages in Support of Big Rock Point Phased License Termination, Class 1 Final Status Survey Release Record, 10C11, East Protected Area ML0706007612006-10-27027 October 2006 Attachment 3, Transmittal of Survey Packages in Support of Big Rock Point Phased License Termination, Class 1 Final Status Survey Release Record, 08C11, East Central Protected Area ML0706007512006-10-27027 October 2006 Attachment 2, Transmittal of Survey Packages in Support of Big Rock Point Phased License Termination, Class 1 Final Status Survey Release Record, 07C11, South East Protected Area ML0706006732006-10-24024 October 2006 Transmittal of Survey Packages in Support of Big Rock Point Phased License Termination ML0627201262006-09-25025 September 2006 Final - Confirmatory Survey Results for the Turbine and Containment Building Excavations, the Backfill Soil Pile, and Portions of Backfilled Survey Units and Class 3 Impacted Areas at Big Rock Point ML0622002992006-08-0404 August 2006 Analytical Results for Six Soil Samples, Batches One and Two, from Big Rock Point Nuclear Station, Charlevoix, Michigan (Inspection Report No. 050-00155/2006-001)(RFTA No. 06-001) ML0610303072006-04-25025 April 2006 Enclosure 3: Supporting Survey, Excavated Surface Release Record East TBC ML0605306112006-02-16016 February 2006 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML0706403292005-11-10010 November 2005 Consumers Energy Co Letter to EPA R5 Re Inadvertent Torch Cut of Containment Shell Piece at Big Rock Point ML0603300782004-08-0404 August 2004 Outline: Basis for 20. 2002 Alternative Disposal Procedure for Us Ecology Idaho Site, W/Handwritten Notes ML0310506332003-04-0101 April 2003 Proposed License Amendment - License Termination Plan, Chapters 3 -6, Appendix 6-D ML0310506312003-04-0101 April 2003 Proposed License Amendment - License Termination Plan, Attachments 1 - 3, Chapters 1 and 2 ML0310103992003-04-0101 April 2003 Proposed License Amendment - License Termination Plan, Chapters 6 - 8 ML0310103982003-04-0101 April 2003 Proposed License Amendment - License Termination Plan, Chapter 2, Appendix 2-C Through 2-E ML0631303142000-10-0909 October 2000 Attachment 8, Class 1 Area - Final Status Survey, 09Cx31, Excavated Soil from Screenhouse Area ML19196A2411997-09-19019 September 1997 Decommissioning-Related Documents: Post Shut Down Decommissioning Activities, Revision 1, Date: 9/19/1997 (ADAMS Legacy No.: 9709240373), (Dkt Nos. 72-43, 50-155; License No. DPR-6) NRC Generic Letter 1979-451979-09-25025 September 1979 NRC Generic Letter 1979-045: Transmittal of Reports Regarding Foreign Reactor Operation Experiences ML18346A2441978-04-0505 April 1978 Revision of Steam Generator Tube Dent Data 2015-04-01
[Table view] Category:Miscellaneous
MONTHYEARML0734603102007-09-10010 September 2007 2007 Report of Decommissioning Lessons Learned in Fsme/Dwmep/Durld ML0715203992007-05-30030 May 2007 Fy 2007 Final Fee Rule Workpapers ML0622002992006-08-0404 August 2006 Analytical Results for Six Soil Samples, Batches One and Two, from Big Rock Point Nuclear Station, Charlevoix, Michigan (Inspection Report No. 050-00155/2006-001)(RFTA No. 06-001) ML0605306112006-02-16016 February 2006 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML0706403292005-11-10010 November 2005 Consumers Energy Co Letter to EPA R5 Re Inadvertent Torch Cut of Containment Shell Piece at Big Rock Point ML0603300782004-08-0404 August 2004 Outline: Basis for 20. 2002 Alternative Disposal Procedure for Us Ecology Idaho Site, W/Handwritten Notes ML0310506332003-04-0101 April 2003 Proposed License Amendment - License Termination Plan, Chapters 3 -6, Appendix 6-D ML0310506312003-04-0101 April 2003 Proposed License Amendment - License Termination Plan, Attachments 1 - 3, Chapters 1 and 2 ML0310103992003-04-0101 April 2003 Proposed License Amendment - License Termination Plan, Chapters 6 - 8 ML0310103982003-04-0101 April 2003 Proposed License Amendment - License Termination Plan, Chapter 2, Appendix 2-C Through 2-E ML19196A2411997-09-19019 September 1997 Decommissioning-Related Documents: Post Shut Down Decommissioning Activities, Revision 1, Date: 9/19/1997 (ADAMS Legacy No.: 9709240373), (Dkt Nos. 72-43, 50-155; License No. DPR-6) 2007-09-10
[Table view] |
Text
NRC Decommissioning Lessons Learned Search Criteria: Year: 2007 Facility Type: All Facility Types Stage: All Functional Areas Benefit: All Benefits Lesson ID: 2007-01 Facility Type: Reactors, Material Facilities Stage: Decommissioning Planning Benefits: Facilitates Decommissioning Work
Subject:
Best practice in executing the license termination plan for the Big Rock Point (BRP) Facility Discussion: The BRP license termination plan required that almost all plant structures be removed, including the removal of building foundations.
This simplified the final status survey (FSS) program, since only soil surveys were required. This limited the instrumentation required, as well as the training required for technicians and staff. The BRP staff was proficient in the procedures and implementation requirements
References:
Contact Us About Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/decommissioning/contactus.html Lesson ID: 2007-02 Facility Type: Reactors, Material Facilities Stage: Decommissioning Work Benefits: Facilitates Decommissioning Work
Subject:
Lesson learned with In-Situ Gamma Spectroscopy for land surveys at Big Rock Point Discussion: Early BRP experience with In-Situ Gamma Spectroscopy for land surveys demonstrated to the BRP staff that hand-held instrumentation was more sensitive for soil surveys. The BRP staff elected to use proven technology (2x2 sodium iodide detectors, as prescribed in NUREG-1507) for the final status survey program.
References:
Contact Us About Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/decommissioning/contactus.html Monday, September 10, 2007 Page 1 of 3
Search Criteria: Year: 2007 Facility Type: All Facility Types Stage: All Functional Areas Benefit: All Benefits Lesson ID: 2007-03 Facility Type: Reactors, Material Facilities Stage: Decommissioning Planning Benefits: Facilitates Decommissioning Licensing, Facilitates Decommissioning Work
Subject:
Best practice in preparing the procedures for the final status surveys during the decommissioning of the Big Rock Point Facility Discussion: The BRP FSS procedures were written such that they became the FSS Reports. The procedures required specific data recordings that fulfilled DP requirements for the FSSRs. The completed procedures were copied and submitted as the FSSRs. This simplified the submittal of the FSSRs for approval by the NRC staff since the procedures included survey design and final data.
References:
Contact Us About Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/decommissioning/contactus.html Lesson ID: 2007-04 Facility Type: Reactors, Material Facilities Stage: Decommissioning Work Benefits: Facilitates Decommissioning Work
Subject:
Best practice during soil excavation at the Big Rock Point Facility Discussion: Excavated soils removed during building and foundation removal were consolidated and stored on-site. The licensee surveyed the soil in 6-inch depths to ensure the soil was clean (less than the derived concentration guideline levels) prior to placement back in the excavations. This resulted in significant cost savings as the native soil was reused and not disposed of as radioactive waste.
References:
Contact Us About Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/decommissioning/contactus.html Monday, September 10, 2007 Page 2 of 3
Search Criteria: Year: 2007 Facility Type: All Facility Types Stage: All Functional Areas Benefit: All Benefits Lesson ID: 2007-05 Facility Type: Reactors, Material Facilities Stage: Decommissioning Planning Benefits: Facilitates Decommissioning Work
Subject:
Best practice during final status surveys at the Big Rock Point Facility Discussion: The BRP final status survey (FSS) procedures included that independent quality assurance measurements be performed in the field at the conclusion of the FSS. This resulted in not only the verification of results, but also encouraged the survey technicians to perform comprehensive surveys, which appeared to eliminate human factor errors typically encountered with surveys performed with hand-held survey meters and detectors.
References:
Contact Us About Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/decommissioning/contactus.html Monday, September 10, 2007 Page 3 of 3