ML073190360
| ML073190360 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/07/2007 |
| From: | Kimberly Green NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR |
| To: | |
| Green, Kimberly NRR/DLR/RLRB 415-1627 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML073190360 (16) | |
Text
December 7, 2007 LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 13, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., held a telephone conference call on November 13, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staffs draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staffs D-RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the D-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
/RA/
Kimberly Green, Safety Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Participants
- 2. List of Draft Requests for Additional Information cc w/encls: See next page
ML073190360 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR OGC BC:RPB2:DLR NAME YEdmonds KGreen (BPham for) STurk (w/NLO) RFranovich (JCaverly for)
DATE 11/23/07 11/27/07 12/3/07 12/7/07 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS NOVEMBER 13, 2007 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Kim Green U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Stan Gardocki NRC Cliff Marks Information Systems Laboratories, Inc.
Mike Stroud Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Ted Ivy Entergy Don Fronabarger Entergy Leland Loyd Entergy Randy Smith Entergy Alan Cox Entergy Charlie Caputo Entergy ENCLOSURE 1
DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (D-RAIs)
INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION NOVEMBER 13, 2007 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., held a telephone conference call on November 13, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 license renewal application (LRA).
2.2 PLANT LEVEL SCOPING RESULTS D-RAI 2.2A-1 (Unit 2)
License Renewal Application (LRA) Table 2.2-2-IP2, Mechanical Systems Not within the Scope of License Renewal, identifies that the hot penetration cooling system is excluded from the scope of license renewal and references Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR)
Section 5.1.4.2.2 as its basis. UFSAR Section 5.1.4.2.2 provides a local area temperature limit of 250 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF) and states that cooling is provided for hot penetrations through the use of air-to-air heat exchangers.
Cooling of hot containment penetrations minimizes age-related heat-induced degradation of local concrete surrounding the penetration. Therefore, it may have an intended function in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a). Justify the exclusion of the hot penetration cooling system from the scope of license renewal.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.2B-1 (Unit 3)
LRA Table 2.2-2-IP3, Mechanical Systems Not within the Scope of License Renewal identifies that the breathable air system is excluded from the scope of license renewal and references UFSAR Section 9.10 as its basis. UFSAR Section 9.10 states that the breathable air system is a non-category I system, except for the penetration into containment, where breathable air is provided inside containment through a spare penetration line.
Confirm whether the breathable air containment penetration is within scope of license renewal or justify its exclusion.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
ENCLOSURE 2
2.3.0 Scoping and Screening Results: Mechanical Systems D-RAI 2.3.0-1 (Unit 2 and Unit 3)
License renewal drawings LRA-9321-2028 and LRA-9321-20283, for the Unit 2 and Unit 3 emergency diesel generator (EDG) jacket water cooling system, and LRA-9321-2030 and LRA-9321-20303, for the Unit 2 and Unit 3 EDG fuel oil system, identify multiple flexible piping connections as not long-lived components. In addition, LRA Section 2.1.2.1.3, Mechanical System Drawings, states that flexible elastomer hoses/expansion joints are periodically replaced, i.e., not long-lived, and are indicated as such on the drawings.
Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-1800, Rev. 1, Table 2.1-3, Specific Staff Guidance on Screening, identifies short-lived components as consumables. Further, the table states that short-lived components are periodically replaced. For the flexible connections identified above, describe the programs that manage their inspection and replacement.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI (renumbered as RAI 2.3A.3.14-2).
2.3.3.1 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling D-RAI 2.3B.3.1-1 (Unit 3)
The Indian Point 3 UFSAR, page 91, references a backup spent fuel cooling system that operates in parallel with the normal spent fuel pit (SFP) cooling system during refueling activities. The normal SFP cooling system is in scope for 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) with the intended function of providing a pressure boundary for the component cooling system and the safety injection system, and 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) for physical interaction.
Components from the backup spent fuel cooling system are not identified as being within scope of license renewal. Explain why the components from the backup spent fuel cooling system are not in scope, or revise LRA Tables 2.3.3-1-IP3 and 3.3.2-1-IP3 to include these components as types subject to an aging management review (AMR).
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
2.3.3.14 Emergency Diesel Generator System D-RAI 2.3A.3.14-1 (Unit 2)
License renewal drawing LRA-9321-2028 for the Unit 2 jacket water to diesel generators identifies that the jacket water pumps (at locations H-4, E-4, and B-4) for diesel engine no. 21, 22, and 23 respectively, are not subject to AMR in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a) because they are Not a Long Lived Component.
NUREG-1800, Rev. 1, Table 2.3-2, Examples of Mechanical Components Screening and Basis for Disposition, provides examples of passive, long-lived components such as diesel engine jacket water, skid-mounted equipment. Confirm that the jacket water pumps are short-lived components and describe their method for periodic replacement.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3B.3.14-1 (Unit 3)
License renewal drawing LRA-9321-20283 for the Unit 3 jacket water to diesel generators identifies that the jacket water pumps (at locations B-3, B-5, and B-7) for diesel engine no. 31, 32, and 33, respectively, are not subject to aging management review in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a) because they are Not a Long Lived Component.
NUREG-1800, Rev. 1, Table 2.3-2, Examples of Mechanical Components Screening and Basis for Disposition, provides examples of passive, long-lived components such as diesel engine jacket water skid mounted equipment. Confirm that the jacket water pumps are short-lived components and describe their method for periodic replacement.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
2.3.3.17 City Water System D-RAI 2.3A.3.17-1 (Unit 2)
License renewal drawing LRA-227551 shows a small portion of the piping, 2 inch city water (CW) Line #35 (location A-4), color-coded in purple, indicating it is within the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR under the city water system. The piping identified makes no reference to a continuation drawing. The area of the drawing (Detail D) references drawing 9321-F-2510, which was not provided to the staff.
This small section of piping implies a continuation onto another drawing that may contain additional components that should be within the scope of license renewal. Explain why drawing 9321-F-2510 is not listed on page 2.3-142 of the IP LRA under license renewal drawings for the city water system; or, provide this and any other continuation drawings that contain components within the scope of license renewal.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3A.3.17-2 (Unit 2)
License renewal drawing LRA-9321-4006 shows piping on the drawing color-coded in purple, indicating the piping is within the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR for the city water system. At valve FP-1134 (C-1), FP-338 (E-2), FP-880 (H-3), and FP-1264 (H-3), the system designation changes from the city water system to the fire protection system. At valve FP-1227 (D-1), the system designation changes from the city water system to the auxiliary feedwater system.
For these changes in system designations identified above, the color coding remains purple, indicating component subject to AMR under the scope of the city water system. In order to ensure that there are no omissions, explain how the color coding applies to the multiple systems identified above.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3A.3.17-3 (Unit 2)
In the upper left corner on the drawing, LRA-227552 shows pipe lines FP-6077-6 DH-2 and FP-6075-6 DH-2 color-coded in purple, indicating they are within the scope of license renewal and subject to the AMR for the city water system. With the FP designation, they may be construed to be part of the fire protection system.
In order to ensure that there are no omissions, explain why the two Fire Protection lines are shown in purple as being part of the city water system for license renewal instead of green for the fire protection water system.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3A.3.17-4 (Unit 2)
License renewal drawing LRA-227781 at location A-1 shows a short piece of piping on the drawing color-coded in purple, indicating it is within the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR for the city water system. This short piece of city water system piping makes reference to drawings 9321-F-2593 and 9321-F-2696 for upstream continuation piping. Since this short piece of city water system piping is within the scope of license renewal and continues on the upstream drawings 9321-F-2593 and 9321-F-2696, then these drawings should also have city water system piping within the scope of license renewal. These drawing are not listed on page 2.3-142 of the LRA, which are the license renewal drawings for the Unit 2 and Unit 3 city water system.
Explain why drawings 9321-F-2593 and 9321-F-2696 are not listed on page 2.3-142 of the IP LRA under license renewal drawings for the city water system.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3A.3.17-5 (Unit 2)
On page 2.3-140 of the LRA for the city water system, it is stated that the Unit 2 city water system has the intended function for 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3) of providing a supply of water to fire protection system components, including the fire pumps, fire hydrants, hose reel stations inside containment, fire water tank, and various sprinkler and deluge systems. License renewal drawing LRA-9321-2018 at locations C-6 and D-6 shows piping color-coded blue, indicating it is within the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR for the city water system that continues onto additional drawings. One example of this is city water system drawings that refer to drawings 9321-F-2678, 9321-F-2695, and 9321-F-2696 for downstream continuation piping, which are not listed on page 2.3-142. These components would be necessary for the city water system to accomplish its intended function as identified above, (i.e., how the hose reel stations inside containment are supplied water from the Unit 2 city water system). Hence, there may be additional drawings showing city water system components that have not been identified in the LRA.
Provide drawings 9321-F-2678, 9321-F-2695, and 9321-F-2696 and other drawings, as necessary, showing the LRA scope of the Unit 2 city water system.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3A.3.17-6 (Unit 2)
LRA drawing LRA-9321-4006, for the city water system, at locations C-1 and E-2 shows a fire hydrant color-coded in purple, indicating it is within the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR because it supports an intended function in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a). LRA Table 2.3.3-19-7-IP2, for city water system does not include the component type hydrant.
10 CFR 54.21(a)(1) requires the applicant to identify and list those components subject to AMR.
Identify where the hydrants in the Unit 2 city water system are evaluated for aging management.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3B.3.17-1 (Unit 3)
On page 2.3-141, the LRA states that the Unit 3 city water system (also called city water makeup system) has the intended function for 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3) of providing water supply to the fire protection tanks. On license renewal drawing LRA-9321-20343-002, for the city water system, the portion of the city water system piping connecting to fire water storage tanks 1 and 2 beyond the isolation valves 84, PCV-1603, 96, 94, 80, PCV-1602, 93, and PCV-1612 is color-coded in purple, indicating it is within the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR.
Upstream of these isolation valves, the city water system connects to the 16 inch main for the Village of Buchanan, which contains piping required to provide the water supply function.
Explain why all the city water system piping from the 16" main for the Village of Buchanan to the fire water storage tanks is not highlighted in purple, indicating it is within the scope of license renewal for 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3) and subject to AMR.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3B.3.17-2 (Unit 3)
On page 2.3-141, the LRA for the city water system states that the Unit 3 city water system has no intended functions for 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). However, on license renewal drawing LRA-9321-20343-001, for the city water system there is a general note, which states under the heading Class I piping: (1) above ground city water make-up to closed cooling water system -
expansion tank in control room and diesel generator jacket water expansion tank and (2) City water from Unit 1 tie into auxiliary feedwater pumps suction. Also, under the heading Class III piping in the general notes it is stated: (1) above ground city water make-up to closed cooling water system - head tank in turbine building, and (2) above ground city water supply to nuclear services.
In addition, on license renewal drawing LRA-9321-20183-001 for the condensate & boiler feed pump suction system, there is a small portion of the city water system piping shown on the drawing in area H-6. This portion of city water system piping is color-coded in purple indicating it is within the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR. On the drawing, this portion of city water system piping is identified as Class I. By definition, all Class I and Class III piping should have intended functions in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1).
- a. Explain why the Class I and III piping for the city water system on drawings LRA-9321-20343-001 and LRA-9321-20183 do not have a 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) intended function.
- b. Explain why the city water piping up to the closed cooling water system expansion tank, diesel generator jacket water expansion tank, closed cooling water system head tank and nuclear services on license renewal drawing LRA-9321-20343-001 is not color-coded in purple indicating it is in the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR.
- c. Explain why the city water system piping that continues from license renewal drawing LRA-9321-20343-001 onto drawing 9321-H-20283 for supplying the 40-gallon diesel generator jacket water expansion tanks is also not highlighted in purple as within the scope of license renewal and subject to AMR.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
2.3.4.1 Main Steam System D-RAI 2.3A.4.1-1 (Unit 2)
LRA Drawing LRA-9321-2017, showing the Unit 2 main steam system supply to the steam turbine driven auxiliary feed pump turbine, indicates valves PCV-1310A, PCV-1310B (both G-5),
PCV-1139 (H-6), and HCV-1118 (I-6) within the scope of license renewal and subject to aging management review. These valves are air operated valves required for operation of the auxiliary feedwater system, with intended functions in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1).
Explain the exclusion of the valves air operators and their associated solenoid operated valves (SOVs) and tubing from being subject to aging management.
Discussion: The applicant referred the staff to license renewal drawings LRA-251232-0 and LRA-242688-0, and stated that the valves in question are within the scope of license renewal, and that the tubing is subject to an aging management review (AMR) as evidenced by LRA Table 3.3.2-4-IP2. However, the operators are active components, and therefore are not subject to an AMR. Therefore, this question is withdrawn and will not be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3A.4.1-2 (Unit 2)
License renewal Drawings LRA-9321-2017 and LRA-227780, for the Unit 2 main steam system, show the following valves within the scope of license renewal and subject to aging management review: on LRA-9321-2017: PCV-1134 (D-4), PCV-1135 (D-5), PCV-1136 (D-3), PCV-1137 (D-3), MS-1-21 (E-4), MS-1-22 (E-6), MS-1-23 (E-3), MS-1-24 (E-2), and on LRA-9321-227780:
PCV-1120 (C-5), PCV-1121 (C-4), PCV-1122 (A-4), PCV-1123 (A-4), PCV-1124 (F-5),
PCV-1125 (F-5), PCV-1126 (C-4), PCV-1127 (C-4), PCV-1128 (H-5), PCV-1129 (H-4),
PCV-1130 (F-4), PCV-1131 (F-4). This list is intended to be a representation, additional valves about which this RAI applies may exist.
These valves are air operated and have associated air cylinders and air tubing that have been excluded from the scope of license renewal. Explain why the instrument air system, their tubing, and associated SOVs to these valves are not within the scope of license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a).
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI (renumbered as RAI 2.3A.4.1-1).
D-RAI 2.3B.4.1-1 (Unit 3)
License renewal drawing LRA-9321-20173, for the Unit 3 main steam system, shows valves SOV-1310, SOV-1311 (both G-6), SOV-1139-1, SOV-1139-2 (both H-6), and HCV-1118 (H-5) and their connection tubing not subject to aging management in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a).
The valves are required for operation of the auxiliary feedwater system, which has intended functions in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1). Explain the exclusion of these SOVs and their associated piping from being subject to aging management.
Discussion: The applicant referred the staff to license renewal drawings LRA-D-360858-0 and LRA-9321-21543-0. The applicant stated that the first two valves fail safe; and, the remaining valves are within the scope of license renewal, and that the tubing is subject to an AMR.
However, the operators are active components, and therefore are not subject to an AMR.
Therefore, this question is withdrawn and will not be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3B.4.1-2 (Unit 3)
LRA Drawing LRA-9321-20173, for the Unit 3 main steam system, shows the following valves within the scope of license renewal and subject to aging management review: PCV-1120 (G-4), PCV-1121 (G-4), PCV-1122 (E-5), PCV-1123 (E-5), PCV-1124 (G-3), PCV-1125 (F-3),
PCV-1126 (D-4), PCV-1127 (E-4), PCV-1128 (G-1), PCV-1129 (F-1), PCV-1130 (E-3),
PCV-1131 (E-3), PCV-1134 (F-7), PCV-1135 (G-7), PCV-1136 (E-7), PCV-1137 (D-7),
MS-1-31 (F-7), MS-1-32 (G-7), MS-1-33 (E-7), MS-1-34 (D-7). This list is intended to be a representation, additional valves about which this RAI applies may exist.
These valves are air operated and have associated SOVs and air tubing that have been excluded from the scope of license renewal. Explain why the instrument air system to these valves are not within the scope of license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a).
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI (renumbered as RAI 2.3B.4.1-1).
2.3.4.2 Main Feedwater System D-RAI 2.3A.4.2-1 (Unit 2)
License renewal drawing LRA-9321-2019 identifies that valves FCV-417-L, FCV-417, FCV-427-L, FCV-427, FCV-437-L, FCV-437, FCV-447-L, FCV-447, BF2-21, and BF2-22, for the Unit 2 main feedwater system, are within the system evaluation boundary.
Although the aforementioned valves are passive and long-lived, they are not highlighted indicating that they are not subject to aging management in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a).
Explain the valves exclusion from aging management.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 2.3B.4.2-1 (Unit 3)
License renewal Drawing LRA-9321-20193 identifies that valves FCV-417-L, FCV-417, FCV-427-L, FCV-427, FCV-437-L, FCV-437, FCV-447-L, FCV-447, BF2-31, and BF2-32, for the Unit 3 main feedwater system are within the system evaluation boundary.
Although the aforementioned valves are passive and long-lived, they are not highlighted indicating that they are not subject to aging management in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a).
Explain the valves exclusion from aging management.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
2.3.4.5 Water Treatment Plant D-RAI 2.3A.4.5-1 (Unit 2)
In section 2.3.4.5, the LRA states that water treatment plant components are credited for the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump fire event to support safe shutdown in the event of a fire in the Unit 2 AFW pump room. The source of water is the Indian Point Unit 1 (IP1) condensate storage tanks, which makes up to the IP2 hotwell dump and condensate transfer pump. These components have an intended function for 10CFR54.4(a)(3) to support safe shutdown in the event of a fire, and for 10CFR54.4(a)(2) for physical interaction. License renewal drawings do not identify the flow path or the associated components. LRA Section 3.4.2, Results, describes the applicants approach to exclude these components from aging management review based upon the premise that the components in the systems required to supply feedwater to the steam generators during the short duration of the fire event are in service at the time the event occurs or their availability is checked daily. Therefore, integrity of the systems and components required to perform post-fire intended functions for at least one hour is continuously confirmed by normal plant operation.
By concluding that this flow path integrity is continually verified during normal plant operation, the applicant is stating no aging management program is required to assure the post-accident intended function. However, the IP1 condensate storage tanks are only subject to intermittent service; they are not normally in service as a normal flow path. Hence, the approach to exclude the components on this flow path is not consistent with the suggested methodology.
The components in this flow path that are long lived and have an intended function, are required to be within the scope of license renewal and subject to aging management according to 10 CFR 54.21(a)(1). Describe the components in this flow path and how they will be included in the aging management review.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., From K. Green Dated December 7, 2007 DISTRIBUTION:
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 13, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION HARD COPY:
DLR RF E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRpb1 RidsNrrDlrRpb2 RidsNrrDlrRer1 RidsNrrDlrRer2 RidsNrrDlrRerb RidsNrrDlrRpob RidsNrrDciCvib RidsNrrDciCpnb RidsNrrDraAfpb RidsNrrDraAplb RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDssSbwb RidsNrrDssSbpb RidsNrrDssScvb RidsOgcMailCenter RFranovich GMeyer, RI BPham RBarkley, RI KGreen MMcLaughlin, RI JCaverly NMcNamara, RI RAuluck NSheehan, RI OPA KChang DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal JBoska JTsao STurk, OGC LSubin, OGC BMizuno, OGC SBurnell, OPA DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA TMensah, OEDO RConte, RI ECobey, RI MCox, RI PCataldo, RI CHott, RI DJackson, RI BWelling, RI
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 cc:
Mr. Michael R. Kansler Mr. John A. Ventosa President & CEO / CNO GM, Engineering Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
1340 Echelon Parkway 440 Hamilton Avenue Jackson, MS 39213 White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. John T. Herron Mr. John F. McCann Senior Vice President Director, Nuclear Safety & Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
1340 Echelon Parkway 440 Hamilton Avenue Jackson, MS 39213 White Plains, NY 10601 Sr. Vice President Ms. Charlene D. Faison Engineering & Technical Services Manager, Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
1340 Echelon Parkway 440 Hamilton Avenue Jackson, MS 39213 White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Fred R. Dacimo Mr. Ernest J. Harkness Site Vice President Director, Oversight Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Indian Point Energy Center 1340 Echelon Parkway 450 Broadway, GSB Jackson, MS 39213 P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Patric W. Conroy Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance Mr. Anthony Vitale - Acting Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
General Manager, Plant Operations Indian Point Energy Center Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 450 Broadway, GSB Indian Point Energy Center P.O. Box 249 450 Broadway Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. T.R. Jones - Acting Manager, Licensing Mr. Oscar Limpias Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Vice President Engineering Indian Point Energy Center Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 450 Broadway, GSB 1340 Echelon Parkway P.O. Box 249 Jackson, MS 39213 Buchanana, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Joseph P. DeRoy Mr. William C. Dennis Vice President, Operations Support Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
1340 Echelon Parkway 440 Hamilton Avenue Jackson, MS 39213 White Plains, NY 10601
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 cc:
Mr. Paul D. Tonko Mayor, Village of Buchanan President and CEO 236 Tate Avenue New York State Energy Research and Buchanan, NY 10511 Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Mr. Raymond L. Albanese Albany, NY 12203-6399 Four County Coordinator 200 Bradhurst Avenue Mr. John P. Spath Unit 4 Westchester County New York State Energy, Research and Hawthorne, NY 10532 Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Mr. William DiProfio Albany, NY 12203-6399 PWR SRC Consultant 48 Bear Hill Road Mr. Paul Eddy Newton, NH 03858 New York State Department of Public Service Mr. Garry Randolph 3 Empire State Plaza PWR SRC Consultant Albany, NY 12223-1350 1750 Ben Franklin Drive, 7E Sarasota, FL 34236 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. William T. Russell 475 Allendale Road PWR SRC Consultant King of Prussia, PA 19406 400 Plantation Lane Stevensville, MD 21666-3232 Senior Resident Inspectors Office Indian Point 2 Mr. Jim Riccio U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Greenpeace P.O. Box 59 702 H Street, NW Buchanan, NY 10511 Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Senior Resident Inspectors Office Indian Point 3 Mr. Phillip Musegaas U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Riverkeeper, Inc.
P.O. Box 59 828 South Broadway Buchanan, NY 10511 Tarrytown, NY 10591 Mr. Charles Donaldson, Esquire Mr. Mark Jacobs Assistant Attorney General IPSEC New York Department of Law 46 Highland Drive 120 Broadway Garrison, NY 10524 New York, NY 10271
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 cc:
Mr. R. M. Waters Mr. Martin J. ONeill, Esq.
Technical Specialist Licensing Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 450 Broadway 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW P.O. Box 0249 Washington, DC 20004 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 The Honorable Nita Lowey Mr. Sherwood Martinelli 222 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 310 Vice President White Plains, NY 10605 FUSE USA 351 Dyckman Peekskill, NY 10566 Ms. Susan Shapiro, Esq.
President FUSE USA 21 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, NY 10977 John Sipos Assistant Attorney General New York State Department of Law Environmental Protection Bureau The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Robert Snook Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Ms. Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Mr. Paul M. Bessette, Esq.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004