ML072630032
| ML072630032 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 03/29/2007 |
| From: | Gabbert L Duke Energy Corp |
| To: | NRC/RGN-II |
| References | |
| 50-369/07-301, 50-370/07-301 2007-301 | |
| Download: ML072630032 (64) | |
Text
Administrative Documents (Yellow Paper) 1.
Exam Preparation Checklist ES-201-1 2.
Exam Outline Quality Checklist ES-201-21 3.
Exam Security Agreement(s)
ES-201-3~
4.
Administr 5.
Control (Final)..
6.
Operatin 7.
Simulat Topics Outline (Final)
ES-301-1J ms &Facility Walk-through Test Outline I
ES-301-2/
......... ES-301-4 8.
Transient and Event Checklist ES-301-5 9.
Competencies Checklist ES-301-6 10.
Written Exam Quality Check Sheet ES-401-6 11.
Written Exam Review Worksheet ES-401-9~
12.
Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist ES-403-1 13.
Post-Exam Check Sheet......................
Facility Submittal Letter
[
y
ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility:
McGuire 2007-301 Dates of Examination:
3/19-22 and 29/2007 Examination Prepared By:
Facility NRC Written I Operating Test Written / Operating Test Target Chief Date*
Task Description (Reference)
Examiner's Initials
-180 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 8/2006
-120 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 10/26/2007
-120 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 10/26/2007
-120 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 10/26/2007
[-90]
[5.
Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]
01/15/2007
{-75}
6.
Integrated examinationoutline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, 12/14/2006 ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
{-70}
{7.
Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 12/19/2006 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
{-45}
8.
Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms 01/15/2007 ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; 02/15/2007 ES-202)
-14
-14 11.
Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 03/05/2007 (C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14
- 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) 03/05/2007
-7
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor 03/15/2007 (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7
- 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm 03/12/2007 qualifications 1eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
-7 15.
Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed 03/02/2007 with facility licensee (C.3.k)
-7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions 03/19/2007 distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201, Rev. 9 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Date of Examination:
c.
4.
a.
G b.
E N
c.
E d.
R A
e.
L f.
Initials Task Description Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the a ro riate exam sections.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of a Iicants and ensure that no items are du Iicated on subse uent da s.
b.
a.
d.
c.
a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and maior transients.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the a licants' audit test s, and that scenarios will not be re eated on subse uent da s.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified 3
no more than one task is re eated from the last two NRC licensin examinations 3.
2.
S I
M U
L A
T o
R 1.
W R
I T
T E
N W
/
T Item Printed Name/Signature
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor Date Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c": chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge; I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of j~~::,,,o71=rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27
1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these QVl::lmiinl::llrinrlc:'.
been authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if individual training content or provide direct or indirect feedback. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and reouirements documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this canceuanon the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security have compromised.
the best of my knowledge, I did notJdiYr'ge to uthorized persons any information concerning NRC licensing administered during the week(s) of 3~I'tJ)2- ~
he date that I entered into this security agreement until administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were !:Irlrn;ni~to,rQrl examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
NOTE DATE
- 021, 9
SIGNATURE (2) c;~~
go RID
- s,Re>/STIJ-s NOTES:
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY
- 1. J"OSEM A/(SGtJfJrJc(_~~....:....:IL--
~mGlt-~.J~ _~~~'""-"-
U-~"'-'~~~~'i-Y-
~:~~:';;L~~~===:::::==:=======
L44J16-.1Ce V;60"'b1-_----'=-=--'--J.:.-::::...'-----__.
ES*601 1.
Pre-Examfnation Examination Security Agreement Form ES-601-1 I ackn.owledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC requaliflcation examinations scheduled for the week(s) of-f-/1 '07 -
as of the date or my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those operators scheduled to be administered these examinaticns from this date until ccmpletion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authortzed by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to Iacility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2..
Post-Examination To the best of myknowledge, I did not diVUlge t,Q..~nYAUJautllOrized persons any information concerning the NRC requallficatlon exarninaftons administered during the week(s) of3#'!h1-'1.t J="rdfrlt1ie date that I entered into this security agreement untillhe completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evalulte, or provide performance feedback to those operators who were administered these examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
ES-601, Page 27 of 36
- 1. ~<.LU-'----;:::C=-='-FT;-- ---=::e.:.-::....L-:..=.1'-'='-=
~~~~C-..=:~==__J_T_'=r'----
- 2. -';?"""-"'~,.....""~~~
2L.!...!::::..--'-~~.t::.=::.L--------~-L.:.--...I..~s:::::;;~~~_,
- 3. ~t-:~'7ii~f:'~-
....-LLUL-L---""!::'-tJ:.J-t."""-!...J..<....olC>
-o..,p~~",;.
- 4. +-l'-:'O---'''"'~:-:----;--...~~--"~-5lO!!J~T_---- -T7I1~~f---4~
- 5..L!:-~~.....!....!:~-""-'.u.L.u.=- --L.;!.\\,U..u.u:..L...J~~.u.!l~-!..----- -~~~..f....lI;H....1-P~~~l!::..- --'-..........I-.---"-d
- 6. (J".,o"If.'1 Go tu>...... M
- 7. Sc..~ g,.o.c1tt.....J e.'yo. '¥ RJ....J,..,..c
- 9. /tlco1. iVl'lO'VI 10::SL:> T t+A SH-t<.tJf'Yl AR.,.,
11.]L.L lVI.~Ss~y 12.&bed: R OeD.v".,..
13, GAbt.y L. G'RAttAh-.
14.
NOTES:
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination
..,./,...£n..,/.
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~l.b.1s()~f the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. [understand that I am notto Instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be adrnlnlstered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.q., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, 1am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will Immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my kno~~<jge, ~dJ.qn!V divulge to any unauthorlzed persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) o~m the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not Instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
JOB TITLE! RESPONSIBILITY ES-201, Page 26 of 27 PRINTED NAME
- 1. 6Mv ~~/("->.
- 2. m,. z. ere,...
- 3. 6'£1 )r~",(OP
- 4. 72e0...S' Cdt¢e
- 5. r;/eA~
M. J;.:J<'Jo,..)
- 6. $*" -r ArJrtk.C>
i~
10*Amk.. totMr 11.~ c-~~
- 12. IJ}; Jl k 0 (.[ Lf*
13.5'@Jl? CO:c1'G1f..
14..
1 NOTES:
Form ES-201-3 t
\\
ES-201 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge thatI have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weeks(s) of 3~9/Q2 -
as of the dateof my signature. I agree thatI will not knowingly divulgeany information aboutthese examinations to-any-persons W 0have not been authorized by the NRC(e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable ifthe individual doesnot selectthe training content or provide direct or indirect feedback. Furthermore, I am awareof the physical security measures andrequirements (as documented in thefacility licensee'sprocedures) and understand thatviolation of the conditions of this agreementmay resultin cancellation of the examinations and/oran enforcement actionagainstme or the facility licensee. I will immediatelyreportto facility management or the NRC chief examiner anyindications or suggestions that examination security mayhave been compromised.
u, 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not diVtlge tO~J"}l/!1l..quthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 311" 02 <. ~rcrrfl~ date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provideperformance feedback to those applicants whowere administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically notedbelowand authorized by the NRC, NOTE NUREG-1 021, Revision 9
~--_._--------
la~~'~
~----
NOTES:
PRINTED NAME JOBTITLE I RESPONSIBILITY
~IG U E (1)
- 1. JOSEPH ARs£/'Jfr.Jc(
1rtJTf}O!..
2.
(L 3.
4.
5, 6.
7.
8.
9.
10.------
11.------
12,------
13, 14.------
15, flla In
erard Laska -
arm 301-1 HLP C Admin JPM's ES*301, Rev. 9 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES*301*1 Facility:
McGuire Date of Examination: March 19 2007 Examination Level:
RO Operating Test Number:
HLP*23 NRC Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note)
Code*
A*1a JPM: Calculate QPTR with a Inoperable Power Conduct of Operations M,R Range Instrument.
KIA: 2.1.25 Ability to obtain and interpret station reference manuals.
A*1b JPM: Thermal Margin Calculation in Mode 5 Conduct of Operations M,R KIA: 2.1.3 Knowledge of Shift Turnover Practices A*2 JPM: SLC Determination of Operable EFA Zone Equipment Control D,R KIA: 2.2.25 Knowledge of bases in tech specs for limiting conditions of operations and safety limits.
A*3 JPM: Evaluate LWR Paperwork Radiation Control M,R KIA: 2.3.11 Ability to Control Radiation Releases.
A-4 JPM: Declare an Emergency Classification and Emergency Plan D,R complete the ENS notification form.
KIA: 2.4.41: Knowledge of the emergency action level threshold and classifications.
NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (::;; 3 for ROs; ::;; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (~ 1)
(P)revious 2 exams (::;; 1; randomly selected)
erard Laska -
orm 301-1 HLP Admin JPM's ES*301! Rev. 9 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES*301*1 Facility:
McGuire Date of Examination: March 192007
- R()
T",c:t 1-11 P.?':l NPt' Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note)
Code*
A*1a JPM: Perform a Manual AFD Calculation Conduct of Operations M,R KIA:
2.1.25 Ability to obtain and interpret station reference manuals.
A*1b JPM: Monitor Critical Safety Function Status Trees Conduct of Operations N,S KIA:
2.1.19 Ability to use plant computer to obtain and evaluate parametric information on system or component status.
A*2 JPM: Perform a Manual NC Leakage Detection PT Equipment Control M,R KIA:
2.2.12 Knowledge of surveillance procedures.
A*3 JPM: Perform Unit Vent Flow Calculation of Radiation Control M,R Containment Air Release.
KIA:
2.3.11 Abilitv to control Radiation Releases Emergency Plan NOTE:
All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (:0; 3 for ROs; :0; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (~ 1)
(P)revious 2 exams (:0; 1; randomly selected)
ES*301, Rev. 9 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:
McGuire Date of Examination:
March 19,2007 Exam Level: RO SRO-I SRO-U Operating Test No.:
HLP-23 NRC Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)
System I JPM Title Type Code*
Safety Function a.
0061 Increase Level in Cold Leg Accumulator 1A (CLA-68)
D,S SF-2 b.
0021 Calculate Boric Acid Potentiometer Setting and Begin Manual A,D,P,S SF-1 Makeup to the VCT (NV-207A) (SROU) c.
0061 Transfer to Hot Leg Recirc (NC-115A)
(SROU)
A,D,E,S SF-3 d.
0051 Respond to Leak on NO While at Midloop (ND-258A)
(SROU)
N, A, L, S SF-4P e.
0641 Manually Sequence Loads after a Blackout (DG-13)
D,S SF-6 f.
1031 Manually Align Phase A Isolation Components Following a LOCA N,A,S SF-5 (ISE-259A) g.
0731 Respond to 1EMF-35 Hi Rad Alarm (EMF-257)
N,S SF-7 h.
0451 Perform Main Turbine Overspeed Trip Test (EHC-154A)
A,D,S SF-4S In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.
0281 Start the Hydrogen Recombiner (VX-20) (SROU)
D,E SF-5 j.
0611 Start and Stop 2TD CAP (CA-256)
(SROU)
N,R SF-4S
!k."
0621 Restore Normal Power to 1ETA and Shutdown DIG 1A (DG-175) 0 SF-6 All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
- Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-II SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6/4-6/2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 5:.915:.815:.4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant
~1/~1/~1 (L)ow-Power 1Shutdown
~1/~1/~1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A)
~2/~2/~1 (P)revious 2 exams
.5:. 3 1.5:. 3 15:. 2 (randomly selected)
(R)CA
~1/~1/~1 (S)imulator
ES-301, Rev. 9 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilit: fVl c Gv ; ft.
Date of Examination: '3.1 '1.07 0 eratin Test Number:
Initials
- 1. General Criteria a
b*
a.
b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination.
c.
The 0 eratin test shall not du Iicate items from the a Iicants' audit test s. see Section D.1.a.
d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.
e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a
licants at the desi nated license level.
- 2. Walk-Throu h Criteria
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co is attached.
b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a licable a.
a.
Author b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d.
NRC Supervisor Date 3-12_-07
~/}..- 0'7 NOTE:
The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: rn c (,u; rc, Date of Exam: 3-\\'1.07 Scenario Numbers: I / 1.. / SPA A.I!
Operating Test No.:
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials 5.
The events are valid with re 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are iven.
3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination oint if a licable 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible recedin incident such as a seismic event.
1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the 0 erators into ex ected events.
2.
The scenarios consist mostl of related events.
6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain com lete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario obiectives.
9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelit is maintained while runnin the Ianned scenarios.
8.
The simulator modelin is not altered.
10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.
11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated. as verified using Form ES-301-6 submit the form alon with the simulator scenarios.
12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events s ecified on Form ES-301-5 submit the form with the simulator scenarios.
13.
The osition.
Tar et Quantitative Attributes Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d Actual Attributes 1.
5
/ b / :5 2.
z:
/.2. / 2 3.
Abnormal events 2-4 4
/Lt Y
4.
/
I
/
2 5.
EOPs entered/re uirin substantive actions 1-2 2
/ :l. /
6.
0-2
/0 /
Z.
7.
Critical tasks (2-3)
- 1.
/ '3 / 2.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5
~
Date of Exam: March, 19, 2007 Op A
E Scenarios P
V 1
2 3
4 T
M P
E L
N CREW CREW CREW CREW 0
I I
T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T
N C
A I
A T
S A
B S
A B
S A
B S
A B
L M
N Y
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
U T
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P M(*)
E R
I U
RX 6
1 1
1 0
R01 NOR 3
1 1
1 1
SRO-I I/C 1,5 3,4 4
4 4
2 MAJ 7
2 2
2 1
SRO-U TS 0
0 2
2 RX 2
1 1
1 0
IROz NOR fi 1
1 1
1 SRO-I I/C 5
4 4
2 4
SRO-U MAJ T
7 2
2 2
1 TS 0
0 2
2 I RX 2
1 ;if RO NOR 3
1 SRO-I I/C 4
4 2
5,6 SRO-U1 MAJ 7
1 2
2-t TS 3
0 2
2 0
RX 6
1 1
1 0
RO NOR 5
1 1
1 1
SRO-I I/C 4
4 4
2 3,4
~1=?C'l*l.J3 MAJ T
1 2
2 1
TS 1,4 2
0 2
2 Instructions:
1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"
positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a t-tor-t basis.
3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
Author:
r))~
NRC ReViewer:~tvr/\\cVlc!
(~
~J t
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Date of Exam: March, 19, 2007 Operating Test No.: HLP-23 A
E Scenarios P
V 1
2 3
4 T
M P
E L
N CREW CREW CREW CREW 0
I I
T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T
N A
I C
S A
B S
A B
S A
B S
A B
L M
A T
N Y
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
U T
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P M(*)
E R
I U
RX +/-=f 6
1 1
1 0
R():r NORa 1
1 1
1 SRO-I I/Cl,5 3,4 4
4 4
2 MAJ i
7 2
2 2
1 SRO-U TS 0
0 2
2 RX 2
1 1
1 0
RO,[
NOR s
1 1
1 1
SRO-I IIC s
4 4
2 A
SRO-U MAJ T
7 2
2 2
1 TS 0
0 2
2 RX 2
1 1
1 0
RO NOR 3
1 1
1 1
SRO-I I/C 4
4 4
2
$,6 SBO-U2 MAJ T
1 2
2 1
TS 3
0 2
2 6
RX 6
1 1
1 0
RO NOR 5
1 1
~
SRO-I I/C I
I 4
4
- 3,4
~"Qif)..
MAJ 1
2 tlliJl I
TS 1,4 2
0 Instructions:
1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"
positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
~
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Author:
- Guire Date of Examination: March 19,2007 Operating Test No.:
RO 1/SRO-1 RO 2/SRO-1 RO/SRO-I RO/SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U1 SRO-U3 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Crew A ATC BOP BOP ATC 1
2 1
2 1
2 Interpret/Diagnose 1,5,7 3,4,7 4,6,7 1,2,4, 1-7 1-7 Events 7
and Conditions Comply With and 1
1-7 Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control 1-7 Boards (2)
Communicate t-7 and Interact Demonstrate t-7 1-7 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and 2,4, 1,4 Use Tech. Specs. (3) 6 Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competeocy applicant.
VI
/
NRC Reviewer:
ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6
~ uire Date of Examination: March 19, 2007 Operating Test No.:
RO 3/SRO-1 RO 4SRO-1 RO/SRO-I RO/SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U2 SRO-U4 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Crew B BOP BOP ATC 1
2 1
2 1
2 Interpret/Diagnose 1,2,4, 1*7 1-7 Events 7
and Conditions Comply With and 1-7 Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate 1-7 1-7 1-7 and Interact Demonstrate 1-7 1-7 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and 1,4 Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1 )
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate evel)f applicable competency Author:
NRC Reviewer:
SRO uestions are appropriate in accordance with Section 0.2.d of ES-401 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than 4 RO and 2 SRO questions were from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL ram Office) to Date of Exam:
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or the examinations were developed independently, or XX the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or other (explain)
Item nA':;:l'rilntil1n a.
NRC KlAs referenced for all questions.
b.
referenced as available.
Questions and answers accurate and 5.
4.
3.
1.
2.
Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
Date 3/3/2007 New 37/19 CIA 43/16 5/2 Modified 32/9 33/4 Bank Memory Printe The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c": chief examiner concurrence required.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only uestion distribution s at ri ht.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the question on the RO exam are written at the comprehensionl analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO uestion distribution s at ri ht References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are iustified.
Facility Reviewer (*)
Author The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet.
8.
10.
9.
11.
7.
a.
6.
b.
c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#:)
d.
NRC Regional Supervisor
ES-401, Rev. 9 McGuire 3/30/2007 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only 7.
Explanation 6.
- 5. Other
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1.
2.
Q#
LOK LOD t---r--,...--r--..,---1--..,.-----r--,---t--,---1 (F/H)
(1-5)
Instructions
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
1.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
2.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
3.
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (I.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (I.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
5.
Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6.
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
7.
At a minimum, explain any "U" ratinqs e.q., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not beinq met).
1 H
2 S
003A4.05 Appears to match KIA. The question states that "1A NC Pump Seal Leakoff Hi"... Is this the way the indicator is labeled on the MCB?
Otherwise SAT.
NEW. (lAW Procedure)
Discussed that this is a recorder will verify prior to administration. 2/20/2007 Verified Correct 3/112007.
2 F
1 x
U 003K1.01 Appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B are not credible. (Especially with the statement "describes an Interlock" in the stem) Need to develop better distractors. Low discriminatory value as written. NEW Changed interlock to condition. SAT 2/20/2007
ES-401, Rev. 9 2
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws ~Job Content Fl.",
- 5. Other 6.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Part Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO utE/S Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 3
F 2
X U
Form ES-401-9 7.
Explanation 004K2.02 Does not appear to match the KIA. CVCS-Knowledge of bus power supplies to the following:
Make up pumps. K2.01 asks for the knowledge of bus power supplies to the Boric acid transfer pumps.
I believe this KIA refers to reactor water makeup pumps or the equivalent. UNSAT; NEW Changed to ask Which ONE of the following describes where the circuit breaker for Boric Acid transfer pump A on Unit 1 is located. Changed distractor A to 1ELXA. SAT 2/20/2007.
4 H
2 X
E 005A1.01 Question appears to match KIA.
Assuming that the HX bypass valves are manual and not automatic this is the way it should operate.
Distractor D is not plausible, if total system flow increases, why would cooldown rate go down? Need to strengthen distractor. Enhancement needed BANK.
Changed Band D distractors to have the cooldown rate remains the same changed stem to Total ND system flow, and NCS cooldown rate. SAT 2/20/2007
7.
Explanation 6.
- 5. Other
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1.
2.
Q#
LOK LOD I--r----r--r---r---+--..----.--..---.J---r-~
(F/H)
(1-5) 6 F
2 S
006K1.10 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW 7
H 2
X U
007A1.02 Appears to match KIA. lAW Procedure. As this question is written all responses are correct. All of these methods would reduce PRT Pressure. This could be appealed by an applicant. The Question needs to be bounded by a procedure. UNSATI NEW.
Changed to 100 % power, and added procedure.
SAT 2/2012007 8
F 2
S 007K3.01 Kind of matches KIA. Very simple.
SAT BANK 9
F 2
X E
008K1.01 Appears to match KIA, but very simple.
One can determine the correct supplies and answer by observing that YM is listed twice as the normal, so it must be the normal and that RN must be the back up because it is listed twice as the back up.
Does the plant have a demineralized water system?
Enhancement Needed. Did not have any other sources that could be used. Will leave question as is. SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Onl 10 F
2 E
7.
Explanation 010K2.01 Appears to match KIA. Is bank 0 the only bank that is powered from the SSF. If so the applicant need not know the power supplies, just have the knowledge that one of bank 0 heaters is supplied from the SSF (Only one answer has an SSF power source). Enhancement Needed. NEW Changed first column A to LXG and B to SMXG to B. SAT 2/20/2007.
12 H
2 x
U 013G2.1.33 Appears to match KIA. Distractors A and C are not credible. (What would make the applicant think that the NV pump being out of service would have and effect on TRN B NS operability? Also the applicant is not determining if entry to a tech spec is required, but when. UNSAT/NEW Many changes made to question look at again and decide if it is okay.
2/20/2007 Changed times, appears to be okay 3/1/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO UfE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 13 H
2 X
E 013K3.02 Appears to match KIA. Stem should read If a Large LOCA occurs at this time which One of the following would occur. Enhancement Needed NEW Many changes with stem.
SAT 2/20/2007.
14 H
2 S
022K4.05 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK 15 H
2 S
025K1.02 Appears to match KIA. SAT MODIFIED 16 H
2 X
U 026K3.02 Appears to match KIA. Distractors C and D do not appear to be credible. Are there any other interlocks that effect two different systems? Need to work on distractors C and D. UNSAT Removed when required. Appears to be some connection between systems.
NEW SAT 2/20/2007 "7
H 2
S 039A2.01 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK (cooling down at max attainable rate is somewhat of a stretch.)
2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
Q#
LOK LaD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Focus Link units ward KIA ani 18 H
2 E
7.
Explanation 059A1.07 Appears to match KIA (Not a B&W plant so no need for ICS). Need to add "Assume No Operator Action". Does the transmitter number need to be used? Enhancement Needed.
Bank Changed as requested. SAT 2/20/2007 20 F
2 S
061G2.1.32 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW Added lAW ADD PROCEDURE 2/20/2007 21 H
2 S*
061K6.02 Appears to match KIA Kind of simple. *WiII the DIG start and tie on to the ETA bus? Otherwise SAT NEW 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA OnIv 22 H
2 E
062K2.01 Appears to match KIA. Three of the distractors/answers have NCP B continues to run, why would anyone pick NCP B Trips? Need to find a balance for distractors. Enhancement needed.
BANK Completely re-wrote question.
SAT 2/20/2007 Distractor analysis to be fixed.
23 F
2 S
063A3.01 Appears to match KIA. SAT.
NEW 24 H
2 S
064G2.4.4 Appears to match KIA. Question appears to be SAT. Not a new question. This question is in many banks.
BANK Changed B distractor to have procedure begin the response. SAT 2/20/2007 25 F
2 S
073A4.03 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW SAT 2/20/2007
7.
Explanation 6.
- 5. Other
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1.
2.
Q#
LOK LOD I---Y--.,--r---y---+-.,---r---,r--+--r--;
(F/H)
(1-5)
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO utEIS Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 28 H
2 X
E 103A3.01 Appears to match KIA. Distractor B is not credible, can you receive a MSLI without a phase A?
Why two bullets on conditions? Enhancement needed.
BANK Changed all distractors and S/G pressure rcs pressure, and temp. Check to ensure plausible.
SAT 2/20/2007 29 H
2 S
002K6.07 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK.
SAT 2/20/2007 30 F
2 S
015K5.07 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW added and why.
SAT 2/20/2007 31 F
2 X
X X
U 027K1.01 Appears to match KIA. Teaching in stem.
Distractors Band C are not credible injection phase flow does not come from the sump, and recirc phase does not come from the FWST. UNSAT.
BANK Continue to work on Some changes made more needed. 2/20/2007 SAT 3/1/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
Q#
LOK LOD 1--'--~--,----,----+--r--.....,....-r--+-~--1 (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Onl 7.
Explanation 32 H
33 H
2 2
x x
E 028A1.01 Appears to match KIA. Distractor Delta uses backwards logic (not). Change distractor to say Maintain hydrogen igniters in service, obtain a recommendation from... Change the H2 level in stem to greater than 4%. (4.1 or 4.2 etc.) This will add credibility to distractor D and C. Enhancement needed.
MOD. Need original question to verify modification.
Changed concentration of H2, and distractor Band SAT 2120/2007.
S 035K5.01 Appears to match KIA. Kind of simple SAT BANK SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Onlv 35 H
2 X
X U
055K3.01 Appears to match KIA. Stem states that Tave remains constant but the distractor analysis states that Tave will rise. Distractor B ( correct answer) needs to have the malfunction described like the other distractors. (Leakage/dilution/insertion)
It sticks out like a sore thumb. UNSAT.
BANK Changed tave to remain constant, and distractor B to have a malfunction.
SAT 2/20/2007 36 F
2 S
071K4.05 Appears to match KIA. SAT.
MOD SAT2/20/2007 37 F
2 X
X E
079A2.01 Appears to match KIA. Stem should state lAW AP-22. A Should read Check 1VI-820 closed. C distractor should read Check 1 VI-820 open. This is very simple. Low discriminatory value. This is a system question. Some reference to the procedure may improve the distractors. lAW enclosure 5 of...
Enhancement needed.
NEW SAT 2/20/2007
1.
Q#
LOK (F/H)
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Explanation 39 F
2 X
E 007EK1.04 Appears to match KIA. Stem should read...source range instruments to energize, and which of he following could cause the source range instrument to remain de-energized. Or something positive. Do not believe that this is a new question.
Enhancement needed.
BANK Made changes to conditions 2 in stem "prevent from energizing automatically".
SAT 2/20/2007 40 H
1 X
U 008G2.2.22 Appears to match KIA. Distractors C and D are not credible. With RCS pressure dropping how would an applicant ever believe that NC System pressure safety limit could be exceeded. Very simple question, this becomes a question of whether or not pressure effect ot delta t or op delta t. UNSAT NEW Make a table for OtdT and T,le. 2/20/2007 changed format SAT 3/112007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Explanation Focus Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Onl 41 H
2 X
U 009EK2.03 Appears to match KIA. Distractors C and 0 are not credible. Very simple. Need to see original to ensure that the question is modified.
UNSAT MOD Changed the whole question SAT 2/20/2007.
F 2
S 011EA2.13 Appears to match KIA. SAT.
NEW 43 F
2 S*
015AA1.05 Appears to match KIA. Very similar to
- 29. Need to discuss. Otherwise SAT NEW.
SAT 2/20/2007 45 F
2 S
026AK3.01 Appears to match KIA. Very Simple.
SAT NEW 2/20/2007
7.
Explanation 6.
- 5. Other
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1.
2.
Q#
LOK LaD 1--.--,----,--,--+--,---,--....--+-.----1 (F/H)
(1-5)
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 49 F
2 S
055EK3.02 Appears to match KIA. Distractors should be balanced. Two initiates and two establishes.
Otherwise SAT.
BANK. Changed all distractors and reworded SAT 2120/2007.
50 H
2 S
056AA1.04 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK SAT 2/20/2007 51 H
2 S
057AA2.06 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW SAT 2/20/2007 52 H
2 S
058G2.4.50 Appears to match KIA. Distractor analysis states that A is the correct and incorrect answer. Need to clarify. Question is marked as modified, but there is no bank question present.
Supply band question Otherwise SAT MOD?
Validated voltage new. Otherwise SAT 2/20/2007
7.
Explanation 6.
- 5. Other
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1.
2.
Q#
LOK LOD I---..---.---r---r---!--,...---r--,...--+----..--!
(F/H)
(1-5) 54 F
2 S
065AK3.08 Appears to match KIA. Kind of simple.
SAT.
NEW SAT 2/20/2007 55 F
2 S
WE04EK3.3 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK SAT 2/20/2007 56 H
2 E
WE12EA1.2 Appears to match KIA. Teaching in stem and this could lead applicant to select an incorrect answer. Remove as SG pressures decrease. Use what actions will be required to mitigate the event or something similar.
Enhancement Needed BANK SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F
. I Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Focus Link units ward KIA Onl 57 H
2 X
X X
U 7.
Explanation 003AK3.07 Appears to match KIA. The way the distractors are developed, an applicant does not need to know if the limit was exceeded, only the reason to narrow the answer to a or b. need to move the reasons around to develop a question to test the reason, setpoint and action. The LCO bases states: If the parameters that are outside the limit cannot be restored, the plant must be brought to a mode in which the LCO does not apply. How long is allowed to bring the parameter back into compliance?
Are you assuming in this case that the temperature cannot be restored? Question needs some work. UNSAT NEW SAT 2/20/2007 Changed C and 0 first part to Has not been exceeded.
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Only 59 H
2 S
032AA1.01 Appears to match KIA. Need to ensure that none of these status lights could be on after maintenance. SAT NEW Think About!! Leave question as is. SAT 3/1/2007 60 F
2 E
036AK1.03 Appears to match KIA. Distractor C is not credible (Radiation levels). What procedure is used to determine this. The Stem should state lAW....
Enhancement Needed.
NEW Changed radiation levels to intermediate range and need to verify procedure to back up correct answer.
SAT 2/20/2007 61 F
1 X
U 059AK2.01 Appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B do not appear to be credible. If two pumps are required and three are running how could the loss of one pump secure the release? How long has it been since the change to remove WM-46 as a release path. This may not be credible either. UNSAT BANK Rewrote distractors A, B, and C.
SAT 2/20/2007 62 F
2 E
060AK3.03 Kind of matches KIA. Good Attempt. Use of the word preferred in the stem is not desirable.
Use something like: Which ONE of the following methods would cause the least amount of contamination in mitigating the event? Use procedures, lAW ES-3.1 etc. Otherwise Okay.
Enhancement Needed.
BANK Changed as requested.
SAT 2/20/2007
7.
Explanation 6.
- 5. Other
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1.
2.
Q#
LOK LaD 1--.--,----,--,--+--,---,--....--+-.----1 (F/H)
(1-5)
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 49 F
2 S
055EK3.02 Appears to match KIA. Distractors should be balanced. Two initiates and two establishes.
Otherwise SAT.
BANK. Changed all distractors and reworded SAT 2120/2007.
50 H
2 S
056AA1.04 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK SAT 2/20/2007 51 H
2 S
057AA2.06 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW SAT 2/20/2007 52 H
2 S
058G2.4.50 Appears to match KIA. Distractor analysis states that A is the correct and incorrect answer. Need to clarify. Question is marked as modified, but there is no bank question present.
Supply band question Otherwise SAT MOD?
Validated voltage new. Otherwise SAT 2/20/2007
7.
Explanation 6.
- 5. Other
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1.
2.
Q#
LOK LOD I---..---.---r---r---!--,...---r--,...--+----..--!
(F/H)
(1-5) 54 F
2 S
065AK3.08 Appears to match KIA. Kind of simple.
SAT.
NEW SAT 2/20/2007 55 F
2 S
WE04EK3.3 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK SAT 2/20/2007 56 H
2 E
WE12EA1.2 Appears to match KIA. Teaching in stem and this could lead applicant to select an incorrect answer. Remove as SG pressures decrease. Use what actions will be required to mitigate the event or something similar.
Enhancement Needed BANK SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F
. I Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Focus Link units ward KIA Onl 57 H
2 X
X X
U 7.
Explanation 003AK3.07 Appears to match KIA. The way the distractors are developed, an applicant does not need to know if the limit was exceeded, only the reason to narrow the answer to a or b. need to move the reasons around to develop a question to test the reason, setpoint and action. The LCO bases states: If the parameters that are outside the limit cannot be restored, the plant must be brought to a mode in which the LCO does not apply. How long is allowed to bring the parameter back into compliance?
Are you assuming in this case that the temperature cannot be restored? Question needs some work. UNSAT NEW SAT 2/20/2007 Changed C and 0 first part to Has not been exceeded.
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Only 59 H
2 S
032AA1.01 Appears to match KIA. Need to ensure that none of these status lights could be on after maintenance. SAT NEW Think About!! Leave question as is. SAT 3/1/2007 60 F
2 E
036AK1.03 Appears to match KIA. Distractor C is not credible (Radiation levels). What procedure is used to determine this. The Stem should state lAW....
Enhancement Needed.
NEW Changed radiation levels to intermediate range and need to verify procedure to back up correct answer.
SAT 2/20/2007 61 F
1 X
U 059AK2.01 Appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B do not appear to be credible. If two pumps are required and three are running how could the loss of one pump secure the release? How long has it been since the change to remove WM-46 as a release path. This may not be credible either. UNSAT BANK Rewrote distractors A, B, and C.
SAT 2/20/2007 62 F
2 E
060AK3.03 Kind of matches KIA. Good Attempt. Use of the word preferred in the stem is not desirable.
Use something like: Which ONE of the following methods would cause the least amount of contamination in mitigating the event? Use procedures, lAW ES-3.1 etc. Otherwise Okay.
Enhancement Needed.
BANK Changed as requested.
SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO utE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Onlv 63 H
2 8
067G2.1.23 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW Changed several distractors.
SAT 2/20/2007 H
2 E
WE08G2.1.27 Kind of meets the function portion of KIA (function of P.1) Good attempt. Distractor Cis not credible. Think of something else that would cause a cooldown or raise pressure. For instance, start another 81 pump to increase subcooling, etc.
Enhancement Needed.
BANK Changed all distractors except A. Verify C is incorrect.
SAT 2/20/2007 65 F
2 X
X U
WE10EK2.2 Appears to match KIA. Distractors C and D are subsets of A so if either one was wrong A would also be wrong. As written the applicant need only know the reason for the PRZ level requirement to get the answer correct. This question needs some work. UNSAT BANK Changed two distractors at 90% and 25-35%. And only two reasons.
SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO utE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Onlv 63 H
2 8
067G2.1.23 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW Changed several distractors.
SAT 2/20/2007 H
2 E
WE08G2.1.27 Kind of meets the function portion of KIA (function of P.1) Good attempt. Distractor Cis not credible. Think of something else that would cause a cooldown or raise pressure. For instance, start another 81 pump to increase subcooling, etc.
Enhancement Needed.
BANK Changed all distractors except A. Verify C is incorrect.
SAT 2/20/2007 65 F
2 X
X U
WE10EK2.2 Appears to match KIA. Distractors C and D are subsets of A so if either one was wrong A would also be wrong. As written the applicant need only know the reason for the PRZ level requirement to get the answer correct. This question needs some work. UNSAT BANK Changed two distractors at 90% and 25-35%. And only two reasons.
SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LaD rv.
I"'RO (F/H)
(1-5) I;~~: Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back UlE/S Explanation Dis!.
Link units war nlv 66 F
1 X
U G2.1.10 Does not totally meet the KIA. The limitation is met but not the conditions. The conditions for this TIS is less than one hour, so include the action required for example:
A. 2735 psig; reduce pressure to less than the setpoint within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
B. 2735 psig ;reduce pressure to less than the setpoint within 5 minutes.
C. 2765 psig; reduce pressure to less than the setpoint within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
02765 psig; reduce pressure to less than the setpoint within 5 minutes.
Question as written has very little discriminatory value. UNSAT BANK.
Will make changes as requested SAT 2/20/2007 67 F
2 X
E G2.1.8 Appears to match KIA. Distractor A could be argued correct. If IAE could locally cause a SM isolation signal it would be the same as C. The Stem of the question needs to have in accordance with AP-17. Enhancement Needed BANK Made changes as required SAT 2/20/2007 F
2 S
G2.2.30 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK changed distractor B add to the core.
SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Onlv 69 H
2 8
G2.2.2 Appears to match KIA. For Distractors C add until the Control Rod Bank Lo Limit is clear, and on D add...ensure the Control Rod Bank Lo alarm clears as Xenon... Need original question to verify that question is modified. otherwise SAT.
MOD Check procedure and ensure all distractors are incorrect except for the correct answer.
SAT 2/20/2007 70 F
2 8
G2.2.3 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK 2003 McGuire NRC EXAM.
SAT 2/20/2007 71 F
2 X
E G2.3.10 Appears to Match KIA. Distractor A is not credible. Enhancement needed.
BANK Changed A distractor to cation bed. Check ARP actions.
SAT 2/20/2007 72 F
2 8
G2.3.4 Kind of matches KIA. Better match would have been a P8E. 8till Acceptable.
SAT (I don't believe that this is new) BANK SAT 2/20/2007 73 H
2 8
G2.4.24 Appears to match KIA. SAT BANK SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
Q#
LOK LaD 1---~-r----r--r---+----,.----r---r---1--~--1 (F/H)
(1-5) 75 6.
~
Explanation S
G2.4.18 Appears to match KIA. One of the reasons for leaving the NC pump running should be to provide two phased forced or reflux cooling. This would make a better distractor. Otherwise SAT.
BANK SAT 2/20/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 76 F
2 X
X N
U 007G2.1.33 Does not meet KIA. A SLC is not the same as a Technical Specification. I am also not familiar with a plant that uses DRPI to verify shutdown margin. Not mentioned in the DRPI lesson material. Needs Work.
UNSAT NEW Changed distractors to include technical specification distractors to determine if TIS is not required and actions are required by the SLC.
SAT 2/21/2007 77 H
2 X
N U
009EA2.23 List as KIA. Question supplied was written to 009EA2.07 as directed upon initial review of ES 401-6.
Question still does not meet 009EA2.07 in that the applicant is informed that the surge tank isolation valve indicates closed. The question should test whether the applicant understands whether the valve should have closed for the indications listed. Then as an SRO what TIS was involved or what actions needed to be performed to mitigate the event.
This question can be salvaged.
UNSAT NEW Changed, removed valve position from stem and changed distractors.
SAT 2/21/2007 78 H
2 Y
S 026M2.03 Appears to match KIA. SAT MOD Changed A distractor, and placed procedures in front of the distractor. Added at 100% power.
SAT 2/21/2007
7.
Explanation
- 5. Other 6.
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1.
2.
Q#
LOK LaD I--,..---r-....,--....,---+--or----.--or---+---r--!
(F/H)
(1-5) 81 H
2 Y
S 055G2.1.20 Appears to match KIA. SAT NEW SAT 2/21/2007 82 H
2 M
E 005G2.4.4 Appears to match KIA. As written the question is very simple and not really SRO only. It could be enhanced to make some of the other distractors more attractive. 1. Put QPTR at 1.023, and 2 Rod M-12 at 194 steps.
Needs Enhancement.
NEW Changed distractor Band QPTR as requested.
SAT 2/21/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Onlv 83 H
2 M
E 051AA2.02 Appears to match KIA. Distractor D is not plausible. Needs work. Borderline SRO.
Enhancement needed.
BANK Run, and check on simulator. Changed distractor A, and reduced power to 45%.
Otherwise SAT 2/21/2007 84 F
2 X
X Y
U 060AA2.05 Appears to match KIA.
The stem states that the Refueling SRO reports that the alarm was received when withdrawing a spent fuel assembly from the core, this implies that it was heard in containment so C and D distractors would not be credible. Question needs some work. UNSAT NEW Changed several items including No other EMFs in alarm, and other Items in stem.
SAT 2/21/2007 85 F
2 X
X y.
U 069G2.1.14 Appears to match KIA. Teaching in stem, an SRO should know which procedure to enter. (You mentioned referred to) Is there more than one procedure to deal with fuel handling problems in containment. If So the distractors should have this in them so that the SRO could also select the procedure ans well as the action.
Question needs some work. UNSAT NEW Made changes as requested SAT 2/21/2007
1.
- 2. jg. Psychometric FI_
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Dist.
Link units ward KI 86 H
2 X
Y 010A2.03 Appears to match KIA. Unless the value in the COLR is less than 2185 psig distractor C would also be correct. Does the value for pressurizer pressure change, (with the exception of # of transmitters operable) if not the applicant should know the value. With two correct answers the question is UNSAT BANK Changed all distractors to contain> COLR SAT 2/21/2007 87 H
3 y
S 025A2.04 Good Attempt at a tough KIA. Appears to match. SAT NEW SAT 2/21/2007 88 F
2 y
S 061G2.1.2 Appears to match KIA. Conditions in the stem are really not credible. I understand the need to have all three CA pumps Inoperable. Isthere another way that we could word this to be more credible. (With a fire that damaged both MDCA pumps the reactor may have been tripped using the procedure to fight the fire. Otherwise SAT.
BANK Changed the problem with the TDAFW to Bearing replacement. SAT 2/21/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO utE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 89 H
2 X
Y E
073G2.4.4 Appears to match KIA. Need to state that the plant is aligned for cold leg recirc and that E-1 is in progress. Stating the procedure flow paths as listed is teaching. With this enhancement the question will be SAT.
NEW Made enhancements SAT 2/21/2007 90 H
2 X
U 076A2.02 Does not match the KIA. The question should be written to have the applicant respond to lowering RN pressure. This is really a question of which procedure to enter based on plant conditions not affiliated with a loss of RN. Yes RN may be lost is this case but that is not the intent of the KIA. The applicant should enter the AP for a loss of RN and understand actions to take based on RN pressure.
UNSAT.
NEW Continue to work.
Add B trn in service. Otherwise SAT. 3/2/2007 91 H
3 x
U 017A2.01 Does not match KIA. There is no mention of how open or short circuits affect the ITM. This is TIS question and does not match the KIA. Replace.
UNSAT NEW Continue to work. New Question written SAT 3/2/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO utE/S Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Onl 92 F
2 X
?
y E
7.
Explanation 034G2.2.22 Question may not meet KIA. Will contact HQ's and get clarification on SLCs remedial actions substituting for TIS LCOs. In the past this was not acceptable. With three items in the distractor the applicant need know only any two to select the correct answer. For instance, if I know that the action was to be taken immediately I would discount A and D. Then I would need to only know if the weight was 2000 or 3000, or the correct reason. Question needs some enhancements.
NEW Took all the actions out, and have the weight limit and the basis for 10 CFR100 safety limit.
This is a tough KIA. I allowed this because they not longer have any TIS associated with Fuel it was all moved to the SLC.
SAT2/21/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
Q#
LOK LaD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO UlE/S Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA ani 94 F
1?
?
E 7.
Explanation G2.1.4 Appears to match KIA. Not sure this is SRO only knowledge. Your procedure states that you may be less than the minimum for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> provided immediate action is taken to restore the shift to minimum requirements. Will discuss SRO Only portion.. Very simple question. Enhancement may be needed. I don't believe that this is new.
BANK SAT 2/21/2007 96 F
2 Y
S G2.2.11 Question appears to match KIA. SAT NEW.
SAT 2/21/2007 97 H
2 Y
S G2.3.3 Question appears to match KIA. SAT MOD SAT 2/21/2007
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 99 F
2 G2.4.27 Question appears to match KIA Appears to S
be very simple. Why would anyone pick distractors A and C.? Will Discuss. Not a CIA question.
NEW SAT 2/2112007 100 H
2 X
G2.4.45 Kind of Matches KIA. Not sure it is SRO only. With the OPDT reactor trip annunciator in everyone should know that the reactor should be tripped. UNSAT.
NEW Needs to be made SRO Only rewrote distractors to include procedure selection SAT 2/21/2007
I ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403*1 Facilit : McGuire Date of Exam: 3-29-07 Exam Level: RO&
Initials 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations 2.
Answer key changes and question deletionsjustified and documented 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are lustlfied c
b a
Item Descri tion Clean answer sheets copied before grading 1.
4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Si nature Date
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired.
ES-403, Rev. 9 Facility: McGuire Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam: 3-29-07 Form ES-403-1 Initials Item Descri tion 1.
2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations) 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a
licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl ) reviewed in detail 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature b
Date c
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-501, Rev. 9 Post-Examination Check Sheet Form ES-501-1 Post-Examination Check Sheet Facility:
McGuire 2007-301 Date of Examination: March 19-22, and 29, 2007 Task Description Date Complete 1.
Facility written exam comments or graded exams received and verified complete 4/05/2007 2.
Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed, if necessary 4/09/2007 3.
Operating tests graded by NRC examiners 4/17/2007 4.
NRC chief examiner review of operating test and written exam 4/17/2007 grading completed 5.
Responsible supervisor review completed 4/19/2007 6.
Management (licensing official) review completed 4/19/2007 7.
License and denial letters mailed 4/20/2007 8.
Facility notified of results 4/19/2007 9.
Examination report issued (refer to NRC MC 0612) 4/25/2007
- 10. Reference material returned after final resolution of any appeals N/A
Duke Energy December 13, 2006 Mr. W. D. Travers Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-3415 GARYR. PETERSON Vice President McGuire Nuclear Station Duke Energy Corporation MG01VP /12700 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078 704875 4809 fax grpeters@duke-energy.com
Subject:
McGuire Nuclear Station Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator Examinations 50-36912007-301 and 37012007-301 The enclosed information is provided in response to your request of October 26, 2006. This information is the outline for the McGuire licensed operator examinations scheduled in March 2007.
Specific items provided in response to this request:
ES 201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist ES 201-3, Examination Security Agreement ES 301-1, Administrative Topics Outline ES 301-2, Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline ES 301-5, Transient and Event Checklist ES 401-2, PWR Examination Outline ES 401-3, Generic Knowledge and Abilities ES 401-4, Record of Rejected K/As D-1, Scenario Outlines (4)
Questions or comments should be directed to Charles Sawyer at (704) 875-5248 or Kay Crane at (704) 875-4306.
G. R. Peterson
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission December 13, 2006 Page 2 Mr. James H. Moorman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303 Mr. Gerry Laska U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303
Duke Enel'gy January 15, 2007 Mr. William D. Travers Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-3415 GARY R. PETERSON Vice President McGuire Nuciear Station Duke Energy Corporation MG01VP /12700 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, nc 28078 704 875 4809 fax grpeters@duke-energy.com
Subject:
McGuire Nuclear Station Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator Initial Examinations 50-369/2007-301 and 370/2007-301 The enclosed information is provided in response to your request of October 26, 2006. This information supports the McGuire licensed operator examinations scheduled during the month of March 2007.
Specific items provided in response to the request:
Simulator Scenarios - (ES-D-l, Scenario Outline Forms in the book)
Administrative Topics - (ES 301-1, Administrative Topics Outline Forms in the book)
Job Performance Measures - (ES 301-2, Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Test Outline Forms in the book)
Examination Quality Assurance Checklist Form, ES 201-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form, ES 301-3 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form, ES 301-4 Transient and Event Checklist Form, ES 301-5 Competencies Checklist Form, ES 301-6 Written Examination Quality Checklist, ES 401-6 Reactor Operator and Senior Reactor Operator Written Questions Reference Materials The McGuire Operations Facility Representative has reviewed and approved the proposed examination material per NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Section 201. The completion of this action is documented III the attached letter January 11, 2007.
e directed to Kay Crane at (704) 875-4306 or Charles Sawyer at
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission January 15,2007 Page 2 Mr. James H. Moorman U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303 Mr. Gerry Laska U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303
January 11, 2007 To:
Gary Peterson From: Fred Kirk As the McGuire facility representative I have reviewed and approved the proposed examination material for the NRC examination to be administered in March 2007.
I have determined this material is accurate, operationally valid, and ready for NRC review. This review and approval was completed per NUREG 1021, Revision 9, Section 201.
Fred Kirk McGuire Operations
McGuire 2007*301 Answer Key RO EXAM Question 1
D 26 B
51 B
2 C
27 A
52 D
3 B
28 D
53 A
4 A
29 D
54 A
5 C
30 B
55 B
6 A
31 D
56 B
7 C
32 A
57 A
8 B
33 D
58 A
9 C
34 B
59 C
10 C
35 B
60 B
11 A
36 A
61 D
12 B
37 A
62 B
13 C
38 D
63 A
14 B
39 C
64 A
15 D
40 A
65 B
16 B
41 A
66 B
17 D
42 C
67 C
18 C
43 B
68 B
19 D
44 A
69 D
20 D
45 C
70 C
21 B
46 C
71 B
22 A
47 A
72 D
23 A
48 A
73 B
24 D
49 A
74 B
25 B
50 C
75 A
Question 76 A
77 B
78 D
79 C
80 B
81 D
82 C
83 C
84 A
85 C
86 D
87 B
88 A
89 D
90 A
91 Deleted 92 B
93 A
94 C
95 C
96 D
97 B
98 A
99 B
100 C
McGuire 2007-301 Answer Key SRO EXAM