ML071560029

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
10/2005 - Public Forms
ML071560029
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/29/2005
From: Gody A
Operations Branch IV
To: Edington R
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
References
50-298/05-302, ES-201, ES-201-2 50-298/05-302
Download: ML071560029 (9)


Text

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 9, ES Forms 201-1 and 501-1 ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Item

~

Task Description k-fTL Initials

1. 3. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

w R

I T

T E

N 2 a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required numbei of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S and major transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain@) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test@)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E

N E

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

R A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

L RIA,

- f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

/ I Date a Author 9- g-eei-b Facility Reviewer (*)

c NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201, Page 25 of 27

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Date of Exam: / 8 Exam Level: ROlSRC Initial I

+

Printed Namg / Signgure 1 Date

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:
  • The facility reviewer's initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:

1.

P/N 5 Item Description Date of Exam:

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

/8 I /;bh, xam Level: RO/SRO Initials

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NamejSignature Date
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

~

" 0 w

-I W

9 0

I i

I a

K 3

H w w

-1 W

-1 W

d P0 P0 3

-I l i v)

">- ">: W Y

Z-W H

r5 I

a I

a P W-K 3

H K

3 H

5 in3 0

LL LL LL

.-c E 0 0

Cl p!

2 n a d

0 - m o o o d ; ;

o m o o m m w ( D ( D ( O 0 0 0 m 0 o m 0

..omo N - N

. 7 .

o N r N - N

. - . 7 \

o

0 0

.. m

.. F t

P 0

0 L

a, P

8 0

2 0 0 0

0 L L L L L L P

-m P

e e e c

m P

c m

P c

m SI-"

P m

c P

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

K B 2 I? I? I?

-m 0 3

0 3

F

.-s 3 3 3 CI B0 B 0 K BW v B)

E v) v) 8..

u)

Q U 0 0 0 s

b b Q

fn 0

0 iY v) 2 2 v) v)

.c u) a p.

r-

??

f tR L Q

R L

Q Q

0 80 0 0 0

-I a

v) lo u) W (D (D (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x

0 0 2 e c c 2 8 e r r d 0 0 c

m 0

0

Q) 0" a

'LI 8

I t

I I

II I

II I

I I

II I

I I

II I

I I

II IiI I

I I I I I i I/I I/

//

I I 1 I I I I I S

.-a Y

Q

.-e E

s n

c T-