ML071510037
| ML071510037 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 05/30/2007 |
| From: | King D NRC/ADM/DC |
| To: | Naassan K ARES Corp |
| References | |
| DR-03-06-046, GL-04-002, GSI-191, Job Code J-3304, NRC-03-06-046-T3, TAC MC4707 | |
| Download: ML071510037 (6) | |
Text
f ORDER FOR SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PAGE OF PAGES IMPORTANT: Mark all packages and papers with contract and/or order numbers. BPA NO. DR-03-06-046 1 / 6 1.DATE OF ORDER 2. CONTRACT NO. (If any) 6. SHIP TO:
MAY i I GS23FO*13L_
- a. NAME OF CONSIGNEE
- 3. ORDER NO. MODIFICATION NO. 4. REQUISITIONIREFERENCE NO.
NRC-03-06-046-T3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'1005 b.STREET ADDRESS
- 5. ISSUING OFFICE (Address correspondence to) Attn: Sally Adams, 301-415-0209 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M/S: 05-H4 Div of Contracts Two White Flint North - MS T-7-I-2 c Ce. ZIPCODE Attn: Jennifer A. DeFino, (301) 415-6714 c.WCITY d.nSTATE eZ20CE Washington, DC 20555 Washington DC 20555
- 7. TO: f. SHIP VIA a.NAME OF CONTRACTOR ARES CORPORATION 8. TYPE OF ORDER ARES GOVERNMENT SEVICES b COMPANY NAME a.PURCHASE Exl b. DELIVERY REFERENCE YOUR Except for billing instructions on the reverse, this Please furnish the following on the terms and delivery order is subject to instructions
- c. STREET ADDRESS conditions specified on both sides of this order contained on this side only of this form and is 1440 CHAPIN AVE STE 390 and on the attached sheet, if any, including issued subject to the terms and conditions delivery as indicated. of the above-numbered contract.
- d. CITY e. STATE f. ZIP CODE BURLINGAME CA 940104058
- 9. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA 10. REQUISITIONING OFFICE NRR B&R: 720-15-111-104 Job Code: J-3304 BOC: 252A Alprn. No. 31X0200.720 Obligate: $41,263.20 Contractor DUNS No. 807721980
- 11. BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION (Check appropriate box(es)) 12. F.O.B. POINT EL a. SMALL I b. OTHER THAN SMALL --c. DISADVANTAGED [] g. SERVICE- N/A DISABLED
- d. WOMEN-OWNED e HUBZone f. EMERGING SMALBUSINESS VETERAN-dU OWNED
- 13. PLACE OF 14. GOVERNMENT B/L NO. 15. DELIVER TO F.O.B. POINT 11E.DISCOUNT TERMS auINSPECTION b. ACCEPTANCE OR BEFORE (Date) NA/ON
- 17. SCHEDULE (See reverse for Rejections)
QUANTITY UNIT QUANTITY ITEM NO. SUPPLIES OR SERVICES ORDERED UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ACCEPTED
.(a) .. ............. (b) . ............. (c). (d) -.(e) (fM -. (g)
ISSUANCE OF TASK ORDER NO. 005 TITLE: EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL ADEQUACY OF NEW SUMP TESTING PROGRAM RESULTING FROM AUDIT OF THE PRAIRIE ISLAND RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER (GL) 2004-02" TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: 841,263.20 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 04/26/2007 - 12/26/2007 CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON PAGE 2 OF 2
- 18. SHIPPING POINT 19. GROSS SHIPPING WEIGHT 20. INVOICE NO.
$41, 263.20
- 21. MAILINVOICE TO: 17(h)
TOTAL
- a. NAME (Coot.
SEE BILLING U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission INSTRUCTIONS Division of Contracts pages)
ON REVERSE b. STREET ADDRESS (or P.O. Box)
Mail Stop: T-7-I-2 17(i).
ATTN: DR-03-06-046 TO5 GRAND
- c. CITY d. STATE a. ZIP CODE Washington DC 20555 $41,263.20
- 22. UNITED STATESOF AMERICA 123. NAME(Typed)
BY (Signature) O-Donald A. King Contracting Officer
- TITLE; CONTRACTING/ORDERING OFFICER OP AUTL PREVI I AR"M' TUSABLE WWI REIEW I MAY 3 0 PR
&V. 4/2006)
AR& 48 CFR 53.213(f)
GS23rFOI13L TO35F DR-03-06-046 Task Order No. nn.;;
Paqe 2 of 6 In accordance with Section A. 10, Task Order Procedures, of blanket purchase agreement number DR-03 046, this definitizes verbal authorization given on April 26, 2007 for Task Order No. 005. The effort shall be performed in accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work.
Task Order No. 005 shall be in effect from April 26, 2007 through December 26, 2007, with a cost ceiling of
$41,263.20.
The following individual is considered to be essential to the successful performance for work hereunder:4.
- r. The Contractor agrees that such personnel shall not be removed from the effort under the task order without compliance with Contract Clause A.8, Key Personnel.
The issuance of this task order does not amend any terms or conditions of the subject contract.
Your contacts during the course of this task order are:
Technical Matters: Sally Adams. Contractual Matters: Jennifer DeFino Project Officer Contract Specialist (301) 415-0209 (301) 415-6714 Acceptance of Task Order No. 005 should be made by having an official, authorized to bind your organization,
-execute--th.ree copies.-of-this-document-in-the-:space-provided and -return-two-copi.es-to-the-_ContraclS~peiaist.:--
You should retain the third copy for your records.
ACCEPTED: Task Order No. 005 NAME i(gTH,-vkJ&5sjAJ ViaA-.
TITLE DATE
Statement of Work for Task Order 5 under JCN J-3304
Title:
Evaluation of the Technical Adequacy of New Sump Testing Program Resulting From the Audit of the Prairie Island Response to Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02 Technical Monitor: Shanlai Lu, office: 301/415-2869; E-mail: SXL2(anrc.gov TAC Number: MC4707 BACKGROUND In June, 2003, the NRC identified Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191, involving the potential for clogging of recirculation sump screens in pressurized water reactors (PWRs). Based on the findings of the study of GSI-191 "Assessment of Debris Accumulation on PWR Sump Performance" conducted by the NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research on ECCS suction/containment sump clogging in PWRs, the NRC staff issued a Safety Evaluation (SE) and a Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02 pertaining to the PWR sump design guideline report developed by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) in conjunction with the PWR Owners group.
Through this GL and using the guidance approved by the SE, licensees are requested to proceed to resolve the GSI-191 issue for each PWR plant. The NRC staff, through audit of licensees' responses to GL-2004-02, is reviewing implementation of the GL, specifically of the new sump designs in accordance with NRC requirements.
-NRC-ftiff audite-d-thb-Pirie ladNU1-G-e-neatingPlai-t, units 1and 2-in-Odctob-er,20_06_. -
Contractor support was provided under Task Order No. 2 to assist the staff in determining the technical adequacy of the GSI-191 Sump Clogging Issue analysis of the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant. During the audit, the staff identified many issues related to the PCI strainer head loss testing program and the scaling methodology which was one of the criteria reviewed under Task Order No. 2. In response to staff's concerns, the strainer vendor supporting Prairie Island decided to refine the testing protocol and the scaling method. The staff has been informed that the strainer vendor will meet with staff to discuss the new testing methodology and perform testing accordingly in May 2007, which will provide a technical basis of the new strainer performance.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this task order is to obtain engineering expertise from ARES Corporation to assist the staff in reviewing the technical adequacy of the additional information provided by the vendor on its new scaling methodology and testing protocol as part of the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant GSI-191 audit follow up activity initiated under Task Order No. 2.
TECHNICAL AND OTHER SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED One senior level mechanical engineer with an extensive experience on PWR LOCA analyses and containment analysis. This includes areas such as LOCA break selection, debris generation, debris characteristics, debris transport (including the emerging area of sump and containment pool "near-field effect"), recirculation water hold-up volumes, strainer design and performance, strainer head-loss and vortexing, and ECCS and containment spray pump net-positive suction head (NPSH).
I
WORK REQUIREMENTS Tasks Completion Schedule
- 1. Review of Additional Licensee Information. Four weeks after receipt of the vendor's test Based on the standard scaling methodology plan report.
and the large hydraulic facility scaling practice, review PCI's new testing protocol which is intended to be used to resolve testing issues raised during the Prairie Island audit. Specifically, evaluate the following aspects:
" Geometry scaling;
" CFD analysis protocol to define the upstream flow condition;
" Strainer module scaling;
" Surrogate material selection and transportability;
" Temperature extrapolation scheme; and,
" Global effect of entire strainer train comparing with the testing module.
Draft report (evaluation of above elements)
- 2. Compare PCI's new scaling methodology Two weeks after receipt of the other strainer and testing protocol with other strainer vendor's testing plan.
vendor's methodology. Identify the differences and the justifications supporting these differences. Develop recommendations regarding the scaling methodology and develop appropriate review criteria.
Draft report (comparison and recommendations)
- 3. Prepare for and travel to strainer vendor's testing site to observe the strainer head loss testing following the vendor's proposed methodology.
Evaluate the consistency of the actual testing practice and prepare a technical letter report.
- a. Draft (consolidated report) Two weeks after the trip.
- b. Final (Incorporate NRC comments) One week after receipt of NRC comments.
2
LEVEL OF EFFORT The estimated level of effort is 232 professional staff hours for the completion of all tasks under this Task Order.
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The period of performance is April 26, 2007 through December 26, 2007.
DELIVERABLES Technical Reportinq Requirements NOTE: All reports are to be submitted electronically using WordPerfect X3 or Microsoft Word (Font Arial regular 11 point) or compatible software program to the Technical Monitor with a copy provided to the Project Officer. In all correspondence, include the following information: JCN No., Task Order No., the applicant, the facility, TAC No.,
and NRC/NRR Branch: Safety Issue Resolution Branch (SSIB)
Task 1 At the completion of Task 1, submit a technical letter report that contains a summary of the work performed and the results of the evaluation of all aspects of PCI's new testing protocol as
-ideintified irfTask-1-. ... ...
Task 2 At the completion of Task 2, submit a technical letter report that contains the results of the comparative analysis performed and the supporting justification for the differences identified and a recommended methodology for evaluating the consistency of the testing and associated review criteria.
Task 3 At the completion of Task 3, submit a technical letter report, draft and final as appropriate, that contains a summary of the results of the testing observed and revised methodology and review criteria developed in Task 2, based on those findings.
MEETINGS AND TRAVEL One one-person, two-day trip to vendor's testing site in Worcester, MA.
NRC-FURNISHED MATERIALS The strainer vendor's submittal will be made available to the ARES Principal Investigator at award of the task order.
The NRC Safety Evaluation Report, "GSI-191 SE, Revision 0, "Pressurized Water Reactor Containment Sump Evaluation Methodology" dated December 6, 2004, and GL-2004-02, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors," dated September 13, 2004, can be found at the following web site:
3
httiD://www.nrc.aov/reactors/oDeratina/oDs-exDerience/nwr-sumr)-Derformance.html NOTE: These documents contain licensee information which is provided for audit purposes, may be proprietary, and they must be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure. After completion of work, the document(s) should either be destroyed or returned to NRC. if they are destroyed, please confirm this in an E-mail to the Technical Monitor with a copy to the Project Officer and include the date and manner in which the document(s) was destroyed.
OTHER APPLICABLE INFORMATION License Fee Recovery The work to be performed under this task order is not licensee fee recoverable.
Assumptions and Understandings The level of effort assumption for Task 3 is based the NRC judgment of what it should take to perform a thorough review of the available documentation.
4