Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0629904292006-10-17017 October 2006
License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification - Onsite Spent Fuel Storage Expansion
Project stage: Request
ML0700303222007-01-0909 January 2007
Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Storage Capacity
Project stage: RAI
ML0635407392007-01-12012 January 2007
Individual Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License and Opportunity for a Hearing in Conjunction with the Expansion of Spent Fuel Pool Storage Capacity
Project stage: Other
ML0635407342007-01-12012 January 2007
Letter to License Individual Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License and Opportunity for a Hearing in Conjunction with the Expansion of Spent Fuel Pool Storage Capacity
Project stage: Other
NLS2007007, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Onsite Spent Fuel Storage Expansion2007-02-0707 February 2007
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Onsite Spent Fuel Storage Expansion
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0704502422007-02-27027 February 2007
Withholding from Public Disclosure, Table 4-1 of Hi (Holtec International)-2043224, MD3349
Project stage: Other
ML0704502372007-02-27027 February 2007
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure - Holtec International
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML0704003662007-02-27027 February 2007
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure - Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas, LLC 1/24/07 Affidavit
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML0705902302007-03-0505 March 2007
Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request Onsite Spent Fuel Storage Expansion
Project stage: RAI
ML0708201972007-03-15015 March 2007
H. Floyd Gilzow, State of Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Letter to C. Lyon, NRC, Cooper Nuclear Station - Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure
Project stage: Withholding Request
NLS2007012, Non-Proprietary Version of Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Onsite Spent Fuel Storage Expansion2007-04-17017 April 2007
Non-Proprietary Version of Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Onsite Spent Fuel Storage Expansion
Project stage: Response to RAI
NLS2007040, Affidavit Requesting Withholding from Public Disclosure Regarding Response to Request for Additional Information to Support NRC Review of License Amendment Request to Increase Capacity of Onsite Spent Fuel Storage at Cooper2007-05-0404 May 2007
Affidavit Requesting Withholding from Public Disclosure Regarding Response to Request for Additional Information to Support NRC Review of License Amendment Request to Increase Capacity of Onsite Spent Fuel Storage at Cooper
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0714903152007-05-23023 May 2007
Response to Informal RAI Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Expansion Amendment Request
Project stage: Other
NLS2007056, Revised Page from Holtec International Non-Proprietary Report2007-07-26026 July 2007
Revised Page from Holtec International Non-Proprietary Report
Project stage: Request
ML0721300052007-08-28028 August 2007
Letter and Federal Register Notice of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Onsite Spent Fuel Storage Expansion
Project stage: Other
ML0721300232007-09-0606 September 2007
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment No. 227 Onsite Spent Fuel Storage Expansion
Project stage: Approval
2007-03-05
[Table View] |
Text
sarl Lyon - Hesponse to intormal HAl Hegarling bpent Fuel Fool Lxpanslon Amendment Hequest Faqe 1 11 From:
"Rogers, Ronald E." <reroger@nppd.com>
To:
"Carl Lyon" <CFL@nrc.gov>
Date:
05/23/2007 2:13:01 PM
Subject:
Response to Informal RAI Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Expansion Amendment Request Fred:
Your e-mail to Dave Van Der Kamp, sent Monday, May 21, 2007, 6:29 PM, stated:
Dave, John Burke (Engineering Mechanics Branch reviewer) requested the following clarification:
Please confirm that
- 1) for the neutron attenuation testing, in lieu of giving an actual % degradation numerical value, the acceptance criteria will be to perform an evaluation of the actual measured values of neutron absoption and confirm Keff remains less than 0.95.
- 2) The response to RAI question #2 applies to the coupons as well as the actual metamic panels.
Based on review by the Corporate project manager and with Reactor Engineering, a response to each of these questions is attached. Please call or e-mail me if any of this is not clear.
Ron Rogers Licensing Engineer Cooper Nuclear Station (402) 825-5304
<<Response to NRC e-mail RAI.doc>>
CC:
"Van Der Kamp, David" <dwvande@nppd.com>, "Swantz, William L."
<wlswant@ nppd.com>, "Parkyn, Christine P." <cpparky@ nppd.com>
'arl Lyon - Hespqq§ý tq NHL; e-mail HAI.CIOC I.-'age 1 il
... ai Lon I-espnseto NU emai HA~do
-a~ge 1 iI Response to NRC RAI (E-mail sent 5/21/07)
Cooper Nuclear Station, Docket No. 50-298, DPR-46
- 1. NRC Request Confirm that for the neutron attenuation testing, in lieu of giving an actual %
degradation numerical value, the acceptance criteria will be to perform an evaluation of the actual measured values of neutron absoption and confirm that Keff remains less than 0.95.
NPPD Response If the neutron attenuation testing revealed degradation, the impact on K-effective would be evaluated. The intent of this evaluation would be to confirm that the value of K-effective for spent fuel storage in the Spent Fuel Pool remains less than 0.95.
- 2. NRC Request Confirm that the response to RAI question # 2 applies to the coupons as well as to the actual Metamic panels.
NPPD Response Each batch of the Metamic panels is tested for neutron attenuation and the chemical certification for the boron carbide as described in the response to RAI question # 2.
The coupons are cut by the manufacturer, Metamic LLC, from the actual manufactured lots of Metamic material that were shipped to the Holtec Assembly Facility. The coupons are nominally 4 by 6 inches in size. The coupons initially remain at Metamic, LLC, and are therefore not subjected to the dimensional and visual inspection that the final panels receive as discussed in the last sentence of the response to RAI question # 2.
