ML070730309

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Request for Additional Information Regarding the Revision of Existing Exemptions from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Appendix R Requirements
ML070730309
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/15/2007
From: Boska J
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLI-1
To: Kansler M
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Boska J, NRR/DORL, 415-2901
References
TAC MD2671
Download: ML070730309 (6)


Text

March 15, 2007 Mr. Michael R. Kansler President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

SUBJECT:

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE REVISION OF EXISTING EXEMPTIONS FROM TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 50, APPENDIX R REQUIREMENTS (TAC NO. MD2671)

Dear Mr. Kansler:

By letter dated July 24, 2006, Request for Revision of Existing Exemptions from [Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations] (10 CFR Part 50), Appendix R: One-Hour Hemyc Electrical Raceway Fire Barrier System, Fire Areas ETN-4 and PAB-2, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

(Entergy) requested a revision to existing exemptions for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 (IP3), from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1, 1979, for Fire Areas ETN-4 and PAB-2.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). The Entergy staff indicated that a response to the RAI would be provided within 45 days.

Please contact me at (301) 415-2901 if you have any questions on this issue.

Sincerely,

/RA/

John P. Boska, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-286

Enclosure:

RAI cc w/encl: See next page

ML070730309

  • See memo dated February 2, 2007 OFFICE LPL1-1/PM LPL1-1/LA AFPB/BC LPL1-1/BC(A)

NAME JBoska SLittle SWeerakkody*

DPickett DATE 3/15/07 3/15/07 2/2/07 3/15/07

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 cc:

Mr. Gary J. Taylor Chief Executive Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.

1340 Echelon Parkway Jackson, MS 39213 Mr. John T. Herron Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Fred R. Dacimo Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Paul Rubin General Manager, Plant Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Oscar Limpias Vice President Engineering Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Christopher Schwarz Vice President, Operations Support Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. John F. McCann Director, Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Ms. Charlene D. Faison Manager, Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Michael J. Columb Director of Oversight Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. James Comiotes Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Patric Conroy Manager, Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P. O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Peter R. Smith, President New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. Paul Eddy New York State Department of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 cc:

Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Senior Resident Inspectors Office Indian Point 3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59 Buchanan, NY 10511 Mr. Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Mayor, Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511 Mr. Raymond L. Albanese Four County Coordinator 200 Bradhurst Avenue Unit 4 Westchester County Hawthorne, NY 10532 Mr. William DiProfio PWR SRC Consultant 139 Depot Road East Kingston, NH 03827 Mr. Garry Randolph PWR SRC Consultant 1750 Ben Franklin Drive, 7E Sarasota, FL 34236 Mr. William T. Russell PWR SRC Consultant 400 Plantation Lane Stevensville, MD 21666-3232 Mr. Jim Riccio Greenpeace 702 H Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Mr. Phillip Musegaas Riverkeeper, Inc.

828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 Mr. Mark Jacobs IPSEC 46 Highland Drive Garrison, NY 10524

Enclosure REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE REVISION OF EXISTING EXEMPTIONS FROM TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 50, APPENDIX R REQUIREMENTS ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 DOCKET NO. 50-286 By letter dated July 24, 2006, Request for Revision of Existing Exemptions from [Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations] (10 CFR Part 50), Appendix R: One-Hour Hemyc Electrical Raceway Fire Barrier System, Fire Areas ETN-4 and PAB-2, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

(Entergy or the licensee) requested a revision to existing exemptions for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 (IP3), from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1, 1979, for Fire Areas ETN-4 and PAB-2. Specifically, the licensee requests that the existing exemptions for Fire Zones 7A, 60A, and 73A in the above fire areas be revised to credit a 30-minute fire resistance rating for the installed Hemyc electrical raceway fire barrier system (ERFBS) in lieu of the previously credited 1-hour rating.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is reviewing the submittal in order to determine if the reduced Hemyc ERFBS fire resistance rating will continue to meet the intent of the fire protection program in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, Section 48 (10 CFR 50.48),

Fire protection, and NUREG-0800, SRP 9.5.1, Fire Protection Program," and has the following questions:

1.

Which specific NRC-tested configurations were the IP3 modified Hemyc ERFBS configurations compared to? Are the modified configurations comparable to the industry-sponsored Hemyc test configurations? Do the results of the industry-sponsored Hemyc tests also support the licensees conclusion on the 30-minute rating of the modified Hemyc ERFBS at IP3?

2.

The licensee indicated that administrative control measures are in place to limit transient combustibles in Fire Areas ETN-4 and PAB-2 to moderate quantities. Clarify exactly how much of which type of transient combustibles are allowed? Also, are there any specific locations in the above fire areas where transient combustibles are not allowed?

3.

What type, how much, and how close in proximity are fixed combustibles located in the area of the credited Hemyc ERFBS in Fire Areas ETN-4 and PAB-2?

4.

What fire scenarios are being considered for Fire Zone 1? What is the post-fire safe-shutdown strategy for Fire Zone 1; specifically under what circumstances must the credited Hemyc ERFBS survive the postulated fire?

5.

Are there drains or dikes provided in the areas of the component cooling water (CCW) pumps? If not, can the partial height Appendix R wall contain a spill of combustible fluid from entering or leaving the CCW Pump 33 area? How high is the partial-height wall?

6.

Is there a potential for combustible fluids to drip from the 55 elevation into the CCW pump areas? Or a potential for a fire in the 15 elevation directly below the CCW pump areas that could impact both trains of CCW pumps?