ML070580439
| ML070580439 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre |
| Issue date: | 02/23/2007 |
| From: | Scherer A Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, NRC/FSME |
| References | |
| Download: ML070580439 (4) | |
Text
ISOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company A. Edward Scherer Manager of Nuclear Regulatory Affairs February 23, 2007 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness for Duty Program Data - 2006 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3
Dear Sir or Madam:
In accordance with 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data for the reporting period of July 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 (Attachment 1).
A Summary of Information and Management Actions Report for the reporting period has also been included (Attachment 2).
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Clay E. Williams at (949) 368-6707.
Sincerely, :10 CFR 26 Performance Data : Summary of Information and Management Actions Report cc:
B. S. Mallett, NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV J. C. Shepherd, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Unit 1 K. Kalyanam, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 C. C. Osterholtz, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92672 949-368-7501 Fax 949-368-7575 A Ca
FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 2 July 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 Southern California Edison Company 6 months ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location C. E. Bauaher. Fitness for Duty Proaram Mar.
(949) 368-2482 PHONE NUMBER CONTACT NAME CUTOFFS: SCREEN/CONFIRMATION (NG/ML)
MARIJUANA COCAINE OPIATES AMPHETAMINES METHAMPHETAMINE AMPHETAMINE 50/10 300/150 300/300 1000/500 1000/500
/200 BARBITURATES BENZODIAZEPINE METHADONE PROPOXYPHENE PHENCYCLIDINE ALCOHOL (%BAC) 300/200 300/300 300/200 300/200 25/25
.04 TESTING RESULTS Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel (SHORT TERM ONLY)
AVERAGE NUMBER W/UNESCORTED 2237 939 ACCESS Categories
- REFERRED TO TESTED POSITIVE MANDATORY ACCESS TESTED POSITIVE ACCESS TREATMENT RESTORED RESTORED Pre-Access 244 1
0 0
1372 5
0 For Cause 7
0 0
0 0
0 0
Post Accident 5
0 0
0 9
0 0
Random 577 1
1 0
162 2
0 Follow-Up 19 0
0 0
14 0
0 Other 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
Total 853 2
1 0
1558 7
0 Random Testing during this period = 23%
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 2 Table 1. RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS Individuals 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Tested
- Failed 4
3 4
0 2
2 4
2 4
3
- Tested 799 470 577 721 746 911 834 639 1025 739
% Failed
.5%
.6%
.7%
.0%
.3%
.2%
.5%
.3%
.4%
.4%
Table 2. BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS Marijuana 100/15a 150/1Ob Cocaine Methamp hetamine Alcohol Licensee 1
1 0
0 1
Employees Contract 3
4 1
2 0
Workers Totals 4
5 1
2 1
Onsite Presumptive 5
1
- Certified Lab 5
1_1 Confirmation Ratio 100%
1_100%
a - NRC levels b - SCE levels
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 1 Summary of Information and Management Actions Report (Reporting Period: July 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006)
- 1. There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positive tests for marijuana or cocaine.
- 2. One (1) employee and five (5) contract workers were denied unescorted protected area access following pre-access chemical test failures. The employee was a new hire with less than 6 months in service and was terminated in accordance with Company policy and denied access. The contract workers were provided detailed information regarding the right to appeal management actions resulting in access denial.
- 3. One (1) employee and two (2) contract workers were denied unescorted protected area access following random chemical test failures. The employee was subject to a mandatory treatment program in order to be eligible for reinstatement of access. There were no reinstatements of access during the reporting period.
- 4. There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from San Onofre site) as a result of failed chemical tests.
- 5. The MRO reviewed two (2) employees' and seven (7) contract workers' appeal test results.
The original test results were confirmed. All individuals were provided with detailed:
instructions regarding the right to appeal management actions resulting in access denial.
- 6. Three (3) contract workers were declared uncooperative after they refused to submit acceptable specimens. The workers were permanently denied site access. The workers were provided detailed information regarding the right to appeal management actions resulting in access denial. One (1) contract worker appealed the access denial and the denial was subsequently upheld.
- 7. There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness for Duty program.
- 8. During this period, there were no identified items reported to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 26.73.