ML070310156

Final - Section a Operating Exam (Folder 3), Appendix C - Perform Daily Containment Leakage Calculation

ML070310156
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point  (DPR-064)
Issue date:	11/01/2006
From:	NRC Region 1
To:	Entergy Nuclear Operations
Sykes, Marvin D.
References
0240010101, ES-C-1
Download: ML070310156 (73)

Text

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point 3 Task No:

0240010101 Task

Title:

Perform Daily Containment Leakage Calculation WA

Reference:

2.2.12 (3.0/3.4)

Job Performance Measure No:

RO-A-1 Examinee:

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance X

Classroom X

Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: The Weld Channel system is aligned for normal operation. Containment Integrity is set with the plant operating at 100% Power. The previous Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation was performed last mid-shift at 0010. Flow integrators were reset to zero. The time is now today at 0025.

Task Standard: 3-SOP-CB-004, Attachment 3 is complete and returned to the CRS.

Calculates total leakage of 8360 scfm and current day leak rate of 5.7 scfm and determines that both average and instantaneous leak rates are less than 10 scfm.

Required Materials: 3-SOP-CB-004 Attachment 3, Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation Panel SLF WCCPPS - Current Integrator Indication handout WCCPP AIR FLOW FR-1126 recorder photo General

References:

3-SOP-CB-004 Weld Channel and Containment Penetration Pressurization System Operation.

Initiating Cue: The CRS had directed you to perform the Daily Weld Channel Leakage Time Critical Task: No Calculation per 3-SOP-CB-004, Attachment 3.

Validation Time: 15 minutes RO-A-1, Rev. 1 1 Of7

Appendix C 2

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step:

Standard:

Record date and time of current reading.

From initial conditions, records todays date and time 0025 Comment:

~

2. Performance Step:

Record time of previous day readings.

Standard:

From initial conditions, records yesterdays date and time 001 0 Comment:

4

3. Performance Step:

Calculate difference in time (minutes).

Standard:

Calculates Delta-T = (24 hrs X 60 min/hr) + 15 minutes = 1455 minutes (Exact)

Com m e nt :

d 4. Performance Step:

Record current WCCPPS integrator readings.

Standard:

From Panel SLF WCCPPS - Current Integrator Indication handout, enters 1440 for Zone I, enters 1960 for Zone II, enters 3120 for Zone Ill, and I840 for Zone IV.

Comment:

RO-A-1, Rev. 1 2 of 7

Appendix C 3

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

5. Performance Step:

Reset integrator counters to zero.

Standard:

Describes pressing integrator reset pushbutton to reset integrators to zero Com m e nt :

d 6. Performance Step: Record previous day integrator readings.

Standard:

Enters 0 in each of the L2 Zone I, II, Ill, and IV positions.

Comment:

~

4 7. Performance Step:

Subtract integrator readings for each zone Standard:

Calculates LZ=L1 -L2 for each of the four zones.

Com ment :

~~

d 8. Performance Step:

Record difference as Zone Leakage Since Previous Day Standard:

Records the following zone leakage values:

Zone1 =I440 ZoneII =I960 Zone Ill = 3120 Zone IV = 1840 Comment:

RO-A-1, Rev. 1 3 of 7

Appendix C 4

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark) 4 9. Performance Step: Add Zone I, Zone II, Zone 111 and Zone IV leakages to obtain the days Total Leakage.

Standard:

Records total leakage of 8360 Comment:

d I O. Performance Step: Divide current day Total Leakage by time interval between readings to obtain current day average leakage rate.

Standard:

Divides 8360 scf by 1455 minutes to get 5.7 sfcm. (5.7 to 5.76)

Comment:

4 11. Performance Step: Record instantaneous recorder leak rate from recorder FR-I 126 WCCPP Air Flow Standard:

Records 7.0 scfm (6.5 to 7.5)

Comment:

RO-A-1, Rev. 1 4 of 7

Appendix C 5

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

12. Performance Step:

Check average daily leakage and recorder reading < 1Oscfm.

Standard:

Notes that both average leak rate and instantaneous leak rate are less than 10 scfm Comment:

13. Performance Step:

Review and sign completed calculation sheet Standard:

Signs and dates RO/BOP line.

Comment:

14. Performance Step:

CUE: CRS has signed completed calculation sheet.

Standard:

Request CRS review and sign completed calculation sheet States that CRS would review and sign completed form Attachment 3.

Comment:

Terminating Cue: 3-SOP-CB-004, Attachment 3 is complete and returned to the CRS.

RO-A-1, Rev. 1 5 of 7

Appendix C 6

Form ES-C-1 VERI F ICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. RO-A-1, Perform Daily Containment Leakage Calculation Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

RO-A-1, Rev. 1 6 o f 7

Initial Conditions Initial Conditions:

o The Weld Channel System is aligned for normal operation.

o Containment Integrity is set with the plant operating at 100%

power.

o The previous Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation was performed last mid-shift at 001 0.

o Flow integrators were reset to zero.

o The time is now today at 0025.

Initiating Cue:

o The CRS had directed you to perform the Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation per 3-SOP-CB-004, Attachment 3.

RETURN THIS TO THE EVALUATOR WHEN THE TASK IS COMPLETE RO-A-1, Rev. 1

No: 3-SOP-CB-004 Rev: 23 Page 42 of 42 CHANNEL AND CONTAINMENT PENETRATION PRESSURlZATfON SYSTEM OPERATION ATTACHMENT 3, DAILY WELD CHANNEL LEAKAGE CALCULATION (Page 2 of 2)

Calculation A Time:

Time of Current Time of Previous A Time in Minutes WCCPP Integrator Readings:

Total Leakage I

IF time period is exactly 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, THEN Total Leakage must be less than 14,400 S.C.F.

Leak Rate = Total Leakage =

st 7:

scfm A Time (min) 600 X Hours (lo nearest tenth) Between Readings = Allowed Leak Rate Instantaneous Recorder teak Rate b o I

scfm (FR-1126)

(leakage Rate and FR-1126 must be less than 10.0 scfm)

LWS Dale

BOTTOM WELD CHANNELS DOME I

I Panel SLF WCCPPS = Current Integrator Indication

~

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-I Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point 3 Task No:

34300401 03 Task

Title:

Determine minimum staffing requirement and determine from Operations schedule which personnel cadcannot be called in WA

Reference:

GKA2.1.5 (2.3/3.4)

Job Performance Measure No:

RO-A-2 Examinee:

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance X

Actual Performance Classroom X

Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: Today is October 23, 2006. Ian McElroy called in sick at 0530. The plant is at 100% power.

Task Standard: All of the ROs on the schedule have been evaluated and a determination made regarding who can be called in without violating requirements.

Required Materials: IP-SMM-OP-103, Overtime Scheduling Guidelines EN-OP-115, Addendum 10.4 Section 2 Shift Manning Ops Schedule handout General

References:

IP-SMM-OP-103, Overtime Scheduling Guidelines EN-OP-115, Conduct of Operations Initiating Cue:

Review the attached schedule and determine who can and who cannot be called in for the oncoming day shift to replace the absent RO without waiving overtime requirements.

Time Critical Task: NO Validation Time: 15 minutes RO-A-2 1 Of5

Initial Conditions 0

Today is October 23,2006.

0 Ian McElroy called in sick at 0530 The plant is at 100% power.

Initiating Cue:

Review the attached schedule and determine who can and who cannot be called in for the oncoming day shift to replace the absent RO without waiving overtime requirements.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED RO-A-2

Appendix C 2

Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE IN FORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step:

Reviews the Ops Schedule and IP-SMM-OP-103 requirements.

Standard:

Schedule and procedure reviewed.

Comment:

.! 2. Performance Step: Determines the following personnel can work the entire shift without any violations:

Standard:

Ray LaFever identified as able to work the entire shift without any violations. Identifies that Chris Cassidy could also work the entire day shift but another RO would need to be scheduled for the night Shift to avoid a violation.

Comment: Possible follow-up question:

If applicant states that Chris Cassidy can work the day shift but fails to mention that he is also scheduled to work the night shift tonight, ask if any further schedule perturbations will occur as a result. Expected response is that Chris Cassidy cannot work both day and night shift, therefore he would have to be replaced on the night shift if called in for day shift.

RO-A-2 2 of 5

Appendix C 3

Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

3. Performance Step:

Determines the following personnel would result in a violation if called in for the entire shift.

Standard:

RT Thomas (not available because he immediately begins violating the 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per 7 day period limit)

Russ Warren (will start violating the 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per 7 day limit immediately and would have 84 hours9.722222e-4 days <br />0.0233 hours <br />1.388889e-4 weeks <br />3.1962e-5 months <br /> at the end of the shift)

Ian is off sick Gary is already on shift Rich and Chris Hron are not available to work the day shift since they are on midnight shift.

NOTE: The reasons are not required.

Comment:

Terminating Cue: Personnel available to call in identified.

RO-A-2 3 of 5

Simulator Setup VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. RO-A-2, Determine minimum staffing requirement and determine from Operations schedule which personnel cankannot be called in Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

RO-A-2 4of5

Initial Conditions Today is October 23,2006.

0 Ian McElroy called in sick at 0530 0

The plant is at 100% power.

Initiating Cue:

Review the attached schedule and determine who can and who cannot be called in for replacing the absent RO without waiving overtime requirements.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED RO-A-2

D - 0700 to 1900 N - 1900 to 0700 (starts previous date at 1900) 4 Oct Oct NAME TITLE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Thomas, R.T.

RO o

o D

D D D D D

o o

N N

N o

Cassidy, Chris RO o

o D

D D D D o

o N

N N

o o

McElroy, Ian RO D

D D o

o o

o D

D D

D D

o o

Duncan, Gary RO N N N o

o o

o D

D D

D D

o o

LaFever, Ray RO o

N N N N N N

o o

o o

o N

N Warren, Russ RO o

o N

N N N N

N o

o o

o N

N Bedka, Rich RO N

o o

D D

o o

N N

N o

o D

D Hron, Chris RO D D o

o o

o N

N N

o o

o D

D Today is 10-23-06 Ian McElroy called in sick RT Thomas not available because he immediately begins violating the 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per 7 day period limit Chris Cassidy could work but he cannot relieve himself at midnight so another RO for 24th midnight would be required Ian is off sick Gary is already on shift Ray can come in with no violations Russ will start violating the 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per 7 day limit immediately and would have 84 hours9.722222e-4 days <br />0.0233 hours <br />1.388889e-4 weeks <br />3.1962e-5 months <br /> at the end of the shifi Rich and Chris Hron are not available to work the day shift since they are on midnight shif&.

RO-A-2 KEY

D - 0700 to 1900

>u NAME Thomas, R.T.

Cassidy, Chris McElroy, Ian Duncan, Gary LaFever, Ray Warren, Russ Bedka, Rich Hron, Chris TITLE RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO Today is 10-23-06 Ian McElroy called in sick N - 1900 to 0700 (starts previous date at 1900)

Oct Oct 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 o

o D

D D

D D

D o

o N

N N

o o

D D

D D

D o

o N

N N

o D

D D

o o

o o

D D

D D

D o

N N

N o

o o

o D

D D

D D

o o

N N

N N

N N

o o

o o

o N

o o

N N

N N

N N

o o

o o

N N

o o

D D

o o

N N

N o

o D

D D

o o

o o

N N

N o

o o

D 28 -

0 0

0 0

N N

D D

RO-A-2 HANDOUT

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point 3 TaskNo:

N/A Task

Title:

Generate A Manual Tag-out KIA

Reference:

GKA 2.2.13 (3.6/3.8)

Job Performance Measure No:

RO-A-3 Examinee:

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance X

Classroom X

Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: The plant is at 100% power. A pump seal failure occurred on 33 CCW Pump. SOMS is not available for protective tagging. Maintenance has requested a tag-out of 33 CCW pump to replace the pump seal. The Field Support Supervisor has prepared.3, Tagout Cover Sheet for 33 CCW Pump Seal Replacement. The FSS has provided you with the following references:

o EN-OP-102, Protective and Caution Tagging o 3-COL-EL-1, 6900 and 480 Volt Ac Distribution o 3-COL-CC-1, Component Cooling System o Drawing 9321-F-27513 Sheet 1, Flow Diagram Aux Coolant Sys RO-A-3 (Rev. I )

1 of6

~

~~

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Task Standard: 33 CCW pump is de-energized, isolated from normal flows and pressures, with a vent or drain path available. The following components are the minimum required:

33 CCW Pump Control Switch 33 CCW Pump 480V Breaker AC-762C 33 CC Pump Disch Isolation AC-760C 33 CC Pump Suction Isolation AC-1858F 33 CC Pump Drain or AC-1858E 33 CC Pump Vent PULLOUT RACKED OUT CLOSED CLOSED OPEN NOTE: Other valves may be acceptable. Candidate may find other components to accomplish the task. The purpose is to determine appropriate TAGOUT points for a simple tagout. The candidate needs to provide isolation from normal flow and pressures, with a drain or vent path available, and de-energize the motor.

Required Materials:

EN-OP-102, Protective and Caution Tagging, Attachment 9.2 Tagout Standards 3-COL-EL-1, 6900 and 480 Volt Ac Distribution 3-COL-CC-I, Component Cooling System Drawing 9321-F-27513 Sheet I, Flow Diagram Aux Coolant Sys General

References:

Same as required Materials, except that the candidate may refer to a complete copy of EN-OP-102 if requested.

Initiating Cue: Using the provided references, specify the type of tag, component numberhames, required positions, and hang sequence necessary to provide a tagout boundary for 33 CCW Pump Seal Replacement.

Time Critical Task: No Validation Time: 20 minutes RO-A-3 (Rev. 1) 2 o f 6

Appendix C 3

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step:

Obtains correct procedure and references.

CUE: FSS provides copies of the required materials:

o Completed Attachment 9.3 o EN-OP-102, Protective and Caution Tagging o 3-COL-EL-1, 6900 and 480 Volt Ac Distribution o 3-COL-CCW-1, Component Cooling Water System o Drawing 9321-F-27513 Sheet 1, Flow Diagram Aux Coolant Sys Standard:

Procedure and references obtained Comment:

.( 2. Performance Step:

Determines tag out points and required positions Standard:

Refers to supplied references and determines that the following points need to be placed in the positions listed:

o 33 CCW Pump Control Switch PULLOUT o 33 CCW Pump 480V Breaker RACKED OUT o AC-762C 33 CC Pump Disch Isolation CLOSED o AC-760C 33 CC Pump Suction Isolation CLOSED o AC-1858F 33 CC Pump Drain OPEN Comment:

RO-A-3 (Rev. 1) 3 o f 6

Appendix C 4

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

~~

~

4 3. Performance Step:

Enter tagout points on the manual tagout tag sheet.

Standard:

Refers to Attachment 9.2, Tagout Standards and lists placement sequences in the following order:

1. 33 CCW Pump Control Switch PULLOUT

2. 33 CCW Pump 480V Breaker RACKED OUT

3. AC-762C 33 CC Pump Disch Isolation CLOSED

4. AC-760C 33 CC Pump Suction Isolation CLOSED

5. AC-1858F 33 CC Pump Drain OPEN NOTE: The critical sequence is control switch, breaker, close isolation valves, open drainslvents. The order of Disch and Suction Isolation is not critical.

NOTE: Candidate may choose additional steps such as removing control power fuses and opening vents. If the candidate does not identify the minimum points listed, additional scrutiny may be required to determine satisfactory completion of the JPM.

Comment:

Terminating Cue:

JPM is complete when isolation points have been recorded, placement configuration determined, and placement sequence specified.

RO-A-3 (Rev. 1) 4of6

Appendix C 5

Form ES-C-1 VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. RO-A-3, Generate A Manual Tag-out Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

RO-A-3 (Rev. 1 )

5 o f 6

Initial Conditions Initial Conditions:

o The plant is at 100% power.

o A pump seal failure occurred on 33 CCW Pump.

o SOMS is not available for protective tagging.

o Maintenance has requested a tag-out of 33 CCW pump to replace the pump seal.

o The Field Support Supervisor has prepared Attachment 9.3, Tagout Cover Sheet for 33 CCW Pump Seal Replacement.

o The FSS has provided you with the following references:

o EN-OP-102, Protective and Caution Tagging o 3-COL-EL-1, 6900 and 480 Volt Ac Distribution o 3-COL-CCW-1, Component Cooling Water System o Drawing 9321-F-27513 Sheet 1, Flow Diagram Aux Coolant Sys Initiating Cue:

o The FSS has asked you to fill out Attachment 9.4, Tagout Tag Sheet to tag out 33 CCW Pump for Seal Replacement.

o Using the provided references, specify the type of tag, component numbednames, required positions, and hang sequence necessary to provide a tagout boundary for 33 CCW Pump Seal Replacement.

RO-A-3 (Rev. 1 )

NUCLEARMANAGEMENT MANUAL I

AITACHN~WT 9.4 l_.i TAGOUT TAGS SHEET WWR&%7tr, EN-OP-102 REV, 3 I

1.

m w A m use PAGE &ofm CMCE:

-hiANUAL TAGOUT:

33 Component Cooling Pump 53' CCR Panel SGF Control Switch 1

Pullout 33 Comp Coollng Water Pump 2

Fuses 480V Bus 6A, 15' Ctrl Bldg Control Power Fuses Removed I

33 Comp Coollng Water Pump 480V Breaker 480V Bus 6A, 15' Ctrl Bldg 3

Racked out AC-760C 33 CC Pump Suchon Isolation 4

Closed 41'PAB AC-762C 33 CC Pump Disch Isolation 5

Closed 41' PAB 1

AC-1858F 6

open 33 CC Pump Drain 41' PAB RO-A-3 Key

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point Unit 3 TaskNo.:

N/A Task

Title:

CALCULATERELEASERATE JPM NO.:

RO-A-4 REV 1

WA

Reference:

2.3.6-KNOWLEDGE OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEWING AND APPROVING RELEASE PERMITS. IMPORTANCE (2.1/3.1)

Examinee:

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testinn:

Simulated Performance:

Actua I Performance :

X Classroom X

Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this Job Performance Measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions:

Task Standard:

Required Materials:

General

References:

Initiating Cue:

Time Critical Task:

Validation Time:

RO-A-4 Rev 1

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

32 Monitor Tank has been on recirculation for 4hrs and the chemistry results have been obtained.

32 Monitor Tank is at 10,500 gallons (88%)

All Circulators are in service at 31 0 rpm Radiation monitor R-18 has been out-of-service (00s) for 7 days Chemistry analysis sample number is 40,000 32 Monitor Tank Boron concentration 197 ppm Allowable diluted concentration per IP-SMM-CY-001 is 1.04 E-7 uci/ml Total gamma activity (C) is 3.26 E-7 uci/ml Next sequential release permit number is 5000 Candidate determines the most restrictive discharge rate is 150 gpm based on pump limitations. Note: Candidate may elect to use the most restrictive of activity and boron of 3.503 E+3 gpm for activity since this is the method used in the Attachment 2 Example. This is also acceptable.

Calculator SOP-WDS-014 SOP-W DS-014 The computer is not available and you are directed to perform a manual liquid release rate calculation IAW 3-SOP-WDS-014, Section 4.1, Steps 4.1.1 through 4.1.13 No 60 Minutes Page 1 of 7

Appendix C Page 2 of 7 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote Critical Steps with an asterisk)

Performance Step: I Standard:

Comment:

Performance Step: 2 Standard:

Comment:

• Performance Step: 3 Standard:

Ensure tank is on recirc per SOP-WDS-006 Tank is verified on recirc per given information Given information Determine that computer generated calculation is not available Candidate refers to step 4.1.3 to perform a manual calculation Computer unavailable per given information Record pertinent data per procedure step 4.1.3.1 and 2 Candidate records the following pertinent information:

0 0

0 0

0 Release ID as 32 Monitor Tank Liquid volume in tank 10,500 gallons Recirc start date and time current values minus 4 hrs Minimum recirc time 4 hrs Earliest sample date and time is current date and time Comment:

Performance Step: 4 Standard:

Candidate records 5000 Record release permit number Comment:

Performance Step: 5 Standard:

Candidate records R-18 Record R-18 in the rad monitor block on permit Comment:

RO-A-4 Rev 1 Page 2 of 7

Appendix C Page 3 of 7 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Performance Step: 6 Standard:

Comment:

• Performance Step: 7 Standard:

Comment:

Performance Step: 8 Standard:

Comment:

• Performance Step: 9 Standard:

Comment:

• Performance Step: 40 Standard:

Comment:

RO-A-4 Rev 1 Determine if R-18 is in service and circle yes/no Candidate circles NO Determine available dilution flow per attachment 7 Candidate determines flow is 6.9 E+5 gpm Cue: No Circs are borrowed from Unit 2 When Monitor Tank has recirculated for 4 hrs, then request chemistry to sample the tanks Determines that the tank has been recirculated and sampled.

Given information When sample results are obtained, then record information in attachment 1 as follows:

0 Radio analysis sample number 0

Sample Date 0

Sample Time 0

Total Gamma Activity (C)

Boron concentration Boron weight Allowable diluted concentration per AP-1 I Information recorded when available. Boron weight calculated per attachment 8 CUE: Inform candidate that the sample has just been taken Request sample gamma activity excluding noble gases from chemistry and verify value is less than 5.0 E-5 uci/ml Candidate recognizes the sample activity of 3.26 E-7 is less than 5.0 E-5 If candidate asks about Noble Gases, inform himlher there are none.

Page 3 of 7

Appendix C Page 4 of 7 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

• Performance Step: 11 Standard:

Comment:

Performance Step: 12 Standard:

Comment:

• Performance Step: 13 Standard:

RO-A-4 Rev I Determine the most restrictive discharge rate (D) using attachment 8 Step 1.O Candidate calculates D ~ 2. 2 0 1 E+5 gpm Step 2.0 Determine pounds of boron in tank are 17 pounds Step 3.0 Candidate calculates Dc=3.503 E+3 gpm Step 4.1 Candidate determines and records Dc as most restrictive value at 3.503 E+3 Step 5.0 Candidate determines the most restrictive discharge rate (D) is 150 gpm per pump limitations The candidate SHOULD determine that D=150 gpm which is the limitation on the pump. However, the candidate may select Dc, since this is the most restrictive of the boron and activity limitations. This is also the way the computer calculates the limit, AND is used in the given example (attachment 2). Should this discrepancy occur, it could be critiqued, but would not constitute failure of this critical step.

Record data from attachment 8 onto attachment 1 Candidate records the following on attachment 1 :

0 Dr-Permissible Radioactive discharge rate 0

Boron Concentration 0

Pounds of Boron 0

0 D-Most Restrictive discharge rate Dc-Maximum Boron (chemistry) discharge rate Candidate skips Step 4.1.12 and performs Step 4.1.13 with R-I 8 is out-of-service

1. Candidate recognizes monitor R-18 00s < 30 days

2. Candidate recognizes second chemistry sample be drawn approximately 15 minutes after the 1 sample

3. Candidate recognizes independent verification of the release calculation is required Page 4 of 7

Appendix C Page 5 of 7 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Comment:

Terminating Cue:

RO-A-4 Rev 1

1. When Candidate indicates monitor 00s for 7 days, CUE the Candidate to record current date and time minus 7 days

2. When Candidate recognizes the need for a second sample within 15 minutes, cue Candidate the sample results are the same as given.

Candidate has completed initial release rate calculation.

Page 5 of 7

Appendix C Page 6 of 7 Form ES-C-1 VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No.:

RO-A-4, Calculate Release Rate Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to Complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result:

SAT UNSAT Examiners Signature:

Date:

RO-A-4 Rev 1 Page 6 of 7

Appendix C Page 7 of 7 Form ES-C-1 JPM CUE SHEET 1 N ITIAL CONDITIONS:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

INITIATING CUE:

32 Monitor Tank has been on recirculation for 4hrs and the chemistry results have been obtained.

32 Monitor Tank is at 10,500 gallons (88%)

All Circulators are in service at 310 rpm Radiation monitor R-I 8 has been out-of-service (00s) for 7 days Chemistry analysis sample number is 40,000 32 Monitor Tank Boron concentration 197 ppm Allowable diluted concentration per IP-SMM-CY-001 is 1.04 E-7 uci/ml Total gamma activity (C) is 3.26 E-7 uci/ml Next sequential release permit number is 5000 The computer is not available and you are directed to perform a manual liquid release rate calculation IAW 3-SOP-WDS-014, Section 4.1, Steps 4.1.1 through 4.1.13 RO-A-4 Rev 1

/'

d

-Y A M

Recirc.

LIQUID WASTE RELEASES I

C Min. Recirc.

Earliest Sample:

CCnTcJt 1

mmc I No: 3-SOP-WDS-014 Rev: 23 I Started-mte:'*

i nm: &,.+,w I Time("):

4 M.

ATTACHMENT 1 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE RELEASE PERMIT FORM (Page 1 of 1) h t a :

c I

Radiation Monitor #: I YES SAT UNSAT I

In Service ( C I g j n e ) : I Rad Monitor source Check:

I

hemistry analysis Sample #: qdpn

&to: w @ v nm: wcu Total Gamma Activity (c): Z r 2c& 6-7 l r

~

Boron ppm: I '3 7 Boronpounds: I/. I 2,

Rad Monitor reading initiated:

oat.:

• IF flow meter is 00s.

Discharge flow meter operable: -

(Circle one)

THEN RECORD estimate approx 1 hr into release and then every 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> (required by IP-SMM-CY-007, Radioactive Effluents Control Program):

1 hr 4 hr 8 hr YES NO*

r Post-Release Release Actual volume Section terminated: Date:

Alert and Alarm setpoints reset per 3-SOP-RM-010:

COMMENTS:

Time:

released:

Lw N/A Performed By: (initials)

YES

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point 3 Task No:

0240010102 Task

Title:

Review Daily Containment Leakage Calculation (Faulted)

WA

Reference:

2.2.1 2 (3.0/3.4)

Job Performance Measure No:

SRO-A-1 Examinee:

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance X

Classroom X

Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: The Weld Channel system is aligned for normal operation. Containment Integrity is set with the plant operating at 100% Power. The previous Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation was performed last mid-shift at 0025. Flow integrators were reset to zero. The time is now today at 001 0.

Task Standard: 3-SOP-CB-004, Attachment 3 is reviewed and errors noted and corrected.

Required Materials: 3-SOP-CB-004 Attachment 3, Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation General

References:

3-SOP-CB-004 Weld Channel and Containment Penetration Pressurization System Operation.

Initiating Cue: The BOP operator has given you for review and approval the Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation per 3-SOP-CB-004, Attachment 3. Note and correct all errors.

Time Critical Task: No Validation Time: 15 minutes SRO-A-1, Rev.1 1 Of7

Appendix C 2

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step:

Standard:

Verify recorded date and time of current reading correct.

From initial conditions, verifies todays date and time 001 0 Comment:

2. Performance Step:

Standard:

Verify time of previous day readings.

From initial conditions, verifies yesterdays date and time 0025 Comment:

4 3. Performance Step:

Verify difference in time (minutes).

Standard:

Calculates Delta-T = (24 hrs X 60 min/hr) -15 minutes = 1425 minutes (exact).

Notes error (handout has 1455 minutes) and calculates correct value.

Comment:

4. Performance Step:

Verify Record current WCCPPS integrator readings.

Standard:

Observes the following entries recorded: 1440 for Zone I, 1960 for Zone II, 3120 for Zone Ill, and 1840 for Zone IV.

Comment:

SRO-A-1, Rev.1

Appendix C 3

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

5. Performance Step:

Standard:

Verify integrator counters reset to zero.

Observes from handout that all integrators were reset to zero Comment:

6. Performance Step:

Standard:

Comment:

Verify Record previous day integrator readings.

Verifies 0 entered in each of the L2 Zone I, II, I l l, and IV positions.

7. Performance Step:

Standard:

Verify subtraction of integrator readings for each zone Calculates LZ=L1 -L2 for each of the four zones.

Comment:

8. Performance Step:

Verify Zone Leakage Since Previous Day calculation Standard:

Checks the following zone leakage values:

Zone 1 = 1440 Zone II = 1960 Zone Ill = 3120 Zone IV = 1840 Comment:

SRO-A-1, Rev. 1 3 0 f 7

Appendix C 4

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

~~

~

4 9. Performance Step: Verify sum of Zone I, Zone II, Zone 111 and Zone IV leakages equals the days Total Leakage.

Standard:

Verifies total leakage. Adds 1440, 1960, 3120 and 1840 and obtains 8360 (exact). Notes that value is different from what is recorded on Att 3 and corrects attachment 3 entry.

Comment:

4 10. Performance Step: Verify calculation divide current day Total Leakage by time interval between readings to obtain current day average leakage rate.

Standard:

Divides 8360 scf by 1425 minutes to get 5.866 sfcm (accept 5.8 to 5.9).

Observes 6.7 recorded on sheet. Notes/corrects error.

Comment:

11. Performance Step:

Verify instantaneous recorder leak rate from recorder FR-1 126 WCCPP Air Flow Standard:

Observes that value recorded by BOP is 5.0 SCFM and notes it is less than 10 SCFM.

Comment:

SRO-A-1, Rev. 1

Appendix C 5

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

12. Performance Step:

Verify average daily leakage and recorder reading < 1 Oscfm.

Standard:

Notes that both average leak rate and instantaneous leak rate are less than 10 scfrm Comment:

13. Performance Step:

Verify BOP operator signed and dated completed calculation sheet Standard:

Notes that BOP did not date the signature block.

Comment:

14. Performance Step:

Sign and date completed calculation sheet Standard:

Signs and dates CRS block on completed form Attachment 3.

Comment:

Terminating Cue 3-SOP-CB-004, Attachment 3 is reviewed and errors noted and corrected.

SRO-A-1, Rev.1

Appendix C 6

Form ES-C-1 VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SRO-A-1, Review Daily Containment Leakage Calculation (Faulted)

Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

SRO-A-1, Rev.1 6 o f 7

Initial Conditions Initial Conditions:

o The Weld Channel System is aligned for normal operation.

o Containment Integrity is set with the plant operating at 100%

power.

o The previous Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation was performed last mid-shift at 0025.

o Flow integrators were reset to zero.

o The time is now today at0010.

Initiating Cue:

o The CRS had directed you to perform the Daily Weld Channel Leakage Calculation per 3-SOP-CB-004, Attachment 3.

o Note and correct all errors.

RETURN THIS TO THE EVALUATOR WHEN THE TASK IS COMPLETE SRO-A-I, Rev. 1

WELD CHANNEL AND CONTAINMENT PENETRATION PRESSURIZATION SYSTEM No: 3-SOP-CB-004 Rev: 23 Calculation A Time:

Day Readings (Tz)

WCCPP Integrator Readings:

OPERATION Page 42 of 42 Previous Day Reading Total Leakage (LZI + LZll + LZlll + LZI")

I' IJ IF time period is exactly 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, -

THEN Total Leakage must be less than 14,400 S.C.F.

Leak Rate = Total Leakaqe =

6 7 scfm A Time (min) 600 X Hours (to nearesl tenth) Between Readings = Allowed Leak Rate Instantaneous Recorder Leak Rate S ' O scfm (FR-1 126)

(Leakage Rate and FR-1126 must be less than 10.0 scfm)

RO/BOP CRS Date Date

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point 3 Task No:

34300401 03 Task

Title:

Determine minimum staffing requirement and determine from Operations schedule which personnel cadcannot be called in WA

Reference:

GKA2.1.5 (2.313.4)

Job Performance Measure No:

SRO-A-2 Examinee:

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance X

Actual Performance Classroom X

Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: Today is October 23, 2006. Ian McElroy called in sick at 0530. The plant is at 100% power.

Task Standard: All of the ROs on the schedule have been evaluated and the correct determination made regarding who can be called in without violating requirements.

Required Materials: IP-SMM-OP-103, Overtime Scheduling Guidelines EN-OP-115, Addendum 10.4 Section 2 Shift Manning Ops Schedule handout General

References:

IP-SMM-OP-103, Overtime Scheduling Guidelines EN-OP-I 15, Conduct of Operations Initiating Cue: Review the attached schedule and determine who can and who cannot be called in for the oncoming day shift to replace the absent RO without waiving overtime requirements:

0 List who can work the entire shift Provide a reason why each of the other operators cannot be called in.

Time Critical Task: NO SRO-A-2 1 of6

Initial Conditions 0

Today is October 23,2006.

0 Ian McElroy called in sick at 0530 0

The plant is at 100% power.

Initiating Cue:

Review the attached schedule and determine who can and who cannot be called in for the oncoming day shift to replace the absent RO without waiving overtime requirements :

List who can work the entire shift Provide a reason why each of the other operators cannot be called in.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED SRO-A-2

Appendix C 2

Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

I.

Performance Step:

Reviews the Ops Schedule and IP-SMM-OP-103 requirements.

Standard:

Schedule and procedure reviewed.

Comment:

4

2. Performance Step: Determines the following personnel can work the entire shift without any violations:

Standard:

Ray LaFever identified as able to work the entire shift without any violations. Identifies that Chris Cassidy could also work the entire day shift but another RO would need to be scheduled for the night Shift to avoid a violation.

Comment:

SRO-A-2

Appendix C 3

Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark) d 3. Performance Step:

Determines the following personnel would result in a violation if called in:

Standard:

RT Thomas (not available because he immediately begins violating the 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per 7 Russ Warren (will start violating the 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per 7 day limit immediately and would have Ian is off sick Gary is already on shift Rich and Chris Hron are not available to work the day shift since they are on midnight shift.

day period limit) 84 hours9.722222e-4 days <br />0.0233 hours <br />1.388889e-4 weeks <br />3.1962e-5 months <br /> at the end of the shift)

Comment:

Terminating Cue: Personnel available to call in identified.

SRO-A-2

Simulator Setup VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SRO-A-2, Determine minimum staffing requirement and determine from Operations schedule which personnel canlcannot be called in Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

SRO-A-2 4 of 5

Initial Conditions 0

Today is October 23, 2006.

Ian McElroy called in sick at 0530 0

The plant is at 100% power.

Initiating Cue:

Review the attached schedule and determine who can and who cannot be called in for replacing the absent RO without waiving overtime requirements:

0 List who can work the entire shift 0

Provide a reason why each of the other operators cannot be called in.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED SRO-A-2

D - 0700 to 1900 NAME Thomas, R.T.

Cassidy, Chris McElroy, Ian Duncan, Gary LaFever, Ray Warren, Russ Bedka, Rich Hron, Chris TITLE RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO Today is 10-23-06 Ian McElroy called in sick 15 -

0 0

D N

0 0

N D

N - 1900 to 0700 (starts previous date at 1900)

Oct Oct 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 o

D D

D D

D D

o o

N N

o D

D D

D D

o o

N N

N D

D o

o o

o D

D D

D D

N N

o o

o o

D D

D D

D N

N N

N N

N 0

0 0

0 0

o N

N N

N N

N o

o o

o o

o D

D o

o N

N N

o o

D o

o o

o N

N N

o o

o 27 N -

28 -

0 0

0 0

N N

D D

SRO-A-2 HANDOUT

D - 0700 to 1900 N - 1900 to 0700 (starts previous date at 1900)

Oct Oct NAME TITLE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Thomas, R.T.

RO o

o D

D D D D D

o o

N N

N o

Cassidy, Chris RO o

o D

D D D

D o

o N

N N

o o

McElroy, Ian RO D D D

o o

o o

D D

D D

D o

o Duncan, Gary RO N N N

o o

o o

D D

D D

D o

o LaFever, Ray RO o

N N N N N

N o

o o

o o

N N

Warren, Russ RO o

o N N N N N N

o o

o o

N N

Bedka, Rich RO N

o o

D D

o o

N N

N o

o D

D Hron, Chris RO D

D o

o o

o N

N N

o o

o D

D Today is 10-23-06 Ian McElroy called in sick RT Thomas not available because he immediately begins violating the 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per 7 day period limit Chris Cassidy could work but he cannot relieve himself at midnight so another RO for 24th midnight would be required Ian is off sick Gary is already on shift Ray can come in with no violations Russ will start violating the 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per 7 day limit immediately and would have 84 hours9.722222e-4 days <br />0.0233 hours <br />1.388889e-4 weeks <br />3.1962e-5 months <br /> at the end of the shift Rich and Chris Hron are not available to work the day shift since they are on midnight shift.

SRO-A-2 KEY

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point 3 TaskNo:

NIA Task

Title:

Review A Manual Tag-out WA

Reference:

GKA 2.2.13 (3.6i3.8)

Job Performance Measure No:

SRO-A3 Examinee :

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance X

Classroom X

Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: A pump seal failure occurred on 33 CCW Pump. SOMS is not available for protective tagging. Maintenance has requested a tag-out of 33 CCW pump to replace the pump seal. The Field Support Supervisor has prepared a manual tagout.

Task Standard: Identifies incorrect placement sequence for AC-1858F 33 CC Pump Drain which should be performed last instead of first. Identifies Incorrect trainhalve for Pump Discharge Valve -should be AC-762C for 33 CC Pump Disch Isolation.

Required Materials:

EN-OP-102, Protective and Caution Tagging 3-COL-EL-1, 6900 and 480 Volt AC Distribution 3-COL-CCW-I, Component Cooling Water System Drawing 9321-F-27513 Sheet 1, Flow Diagram Aux Coolant Sys SRO-A-3 Handout (Tagout tag sheet with proposed isolation points, tag types, placement sequence, and placement con fig u ration. )

General

References:

Same as required Materials Initiating Cue: The FSS has asked you to perform an independent review of the proposed tagout.

Time Critical Task: No Validation Time: 20 minutes SRO-A-3 (Rev. I)

Appendix C 2

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

~

~~~

~~

~

~

~

~

1. Performance Step:

Obtains correct procedure and references.

CUE: FSS provides copies of the required materials:

o Completed Attachment 9.3 o EN-OP-102, Protective and Caution Tagging o 3-COL-EL-1, 6900 and 480 Volt Ac Distribution o 3-COL-CCW-1, Component Cooling Water System o

Drawing 9321-F-27513 Sheet 1, Flow Diagram Aux Coolant Sys Standard:

Procedure and references obtained Comment:

4 2. Performance Step:

Reviews tag out points and required positions Standard:

Refers to supplied references and determines that an incorrect component:

AC-762B 32 CCW Pump Disch lsol is the wrong train. Identifies that AC-762C, 33 CCW Pump Disch Is01 should be specified.

Com ment:

SRO-A3 (Rev. 1) 2 0 f 5

Appendix C 3

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark) 4 3. Performance Step:

Review tagout points on the manual tagout tag sheet Standard:

1. 33 CCW Pump Control Switch PULLOUT

2. 33 Comp Cooling Control Power Fuses Fuses Removed

3. 33 CCW Pump 480V Breaker RACKED OUT

4. AC-762C 33 CC Pump Disch Isolation CLOSED

5. AC-760C 33 CC Pump Suction Isolation CLOSED

6. AC-1858F 33 CC Pump Drain OPEN

7. AC-1858E 33 CC Pump Vent OPEN NOTE: The critical sequence is control switch, breaker, close isolation valve-, ope I drainshents. The order of Disch and Suction Isolation is not critical. The order of vent and drain is not critical provided that they come after Disch and Suction isolation valves.

NOTE: Candidate may choose additional steps such as additional vents. Critical task in this step is to identify incorrect sequence for the pump drain.

Refers to Attachment 9.2, Tagout Standards and determines placement sequence should be in the following order.

Com m e n t :

Terminating Cue:

JPM is complete when the incorrect sequence for drain valve and incorrect component for Discharge Valve have been identified.

SRO-A3 (Rev. 1) 30f5

Appendix C 4

Form ES-C-1 VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SRO-A-3, Review a Manual Tag-out Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

SRO-A-3 (Rev. 1) 4 0 f 5

Initial Conditions Initial Conditions:

o A pump seal failure occurred on 33 CCW Pump.

o SOMS is not available for protective tagging.

o Maintenance has requested a tag-out of 33 CCW pump to replace the pump seal.

o The Field Support Supervisor has prepared a manual tagout o The FSS has provided you with the following references:

o EN-OP-102, Protective and Caution Tagging o 3-COL-EL-I, 6900 and 480 Volt Ac Distribution o 3-COL-CCW-1, Component Cooling Water System o Drawing 9321-F-27513 Sheet 1, Flow Diagram Aux Coolant Sys Initiating Cue:

o The FSS has asked you to perform an independent review of the proposed tagout.

SRO-A-3 (Rev. I )

I I

1 EN-OP-102 1

REV.3 MANUAL ATTACHMENT 9.4 TAGOUT TAGS SHEET CLE.AWGE -MANUAL SRO-A-3 Handout (Sheet 1)

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL CLEAR~CE M A N U A L Qiw-mm-EN-OP-102 REV. 3

&MRuArraa*4e&E PAGE a o f m SRO-A-3 Handout (Sheet 2)

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point 3 Task No:

20001 80102 Task

Title:

Perform Independent Verification of Gaseous Waste Permit K/A

Reference:

2.3.8 Job Performance Measure No:

SRO-A-4 Examinee:

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance X

Classroom X

Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: 33 Large Gas Decay Tank has been pressurized to 87 psig. The Decay tank has been isolated and sampled by Chemistry. A Gaseous Waste Release Permit is being prepared to discharge the decay tank. The data necessary to support the release permit has been collected and recorded on Attachment 1 "Gaseous Waste Release Permit" of SOP-WDS-13, "Gaseous Waste Releases." The CCR personal computer is inoperable, and the software cannot be executed. The PABNC exhaust fans are in service and discharging at 30,000 SCFM. R-27 Channel 4 is reading le-5 ucikc.

Task Standard: Determine that all values are correct except the Release Rate, which is too high by a factor of 10.

Required Materials: SOP-WDS-13, Gaseous Waste Releases, Partially filled-out " Gaseous Waste Release Permit, Calculator General

References:

SOP-WDS-I 3, Gaseous Waste Releases initiating Cue: Using the appropriate section of SOP-WDS-I 3, "Gaseous Waste Releases", perform independent verification of the calculations performed for Attachment 1, "Gaseous Waste Release Permit" for 33 Large Gas Decay Tank.

Time Critical Task: No Validation Time: 17 minutes SRO-A-4 (Rev. 1) 1 of6

Appendix C 2

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step:

Refers to SOP-WDS-013. Reviews P&Ls and section 4.2 Standard:

Procedure obtained and reviewed Comment:

2. Performance Step:

Reviews steps 4.2.1 through 4.2.9 and verifies that required data has been entered on Attachment 1 Standard:

Steps 4.2.1 though 4.2.9 reviewed against the provided copy of Attachment 1, Gaseous Waste Release Permit Form Corn men t :

3. Performance Step:

Verify GDT Curie Content calculation performed correctly.

Standard:

PERFORMS the following calculation and verifies data on Attachment 1, "Gaseous Waste Release Permit" A = (1.93 E+03) * (C) * (V) * (P), where:

C = Concentration of noble gas activity in tank (uCi/cc) (6)

V = unpressurized volume of tank (ft3) (4)

P = initial pressure of tank, in psia (psia = psig + 14.7) (5)

Comment:

4. Performance Step:

Standard:

Check available release rate entered Checks block 12 and block 10. Difference is R-27 Channel 4 reading Comment:

SRO-A-4 (Rev. 1) 2 o f 6

Appendix C 3

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

5. Performance Step:

Check NA recorded in blocks 8a, 13,15, and 16 Standard:

Checks NA in appropriate blocks.

Com m e n t:

6. Performance Step:

Standard:

Comment:

Checks R-27 in block 11 and setpoint in block 12 Block 11 and 12 checked.

7. Performance Step:

Checks Emax calculation Standard:

VERIFIES maximum allowable release rate (Emax), in SCFM for this release using the following equation:

Emax = D / (C

• 472), where:

Emax = Maximum allowable release rate (ft3/min)

D= Available Release Rate (uCi/sec) (10)

C = Concentration of noble gas activity in tank (uCi/cc) (6)

Comment:

8. Performance Step:

Verifies that a conservative actual release rate (E), in SCFM that is less than Emax for this release has been selected.

Per the note, typical conservative value is 1 % of Emax Standard:

Observes that E is 1% of Emax Comment:

SRO-A-4 (Rev. 1 )

3 o f 6

Appendix C 4

Form ES-C-I Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

9. Performance Step:

Check RCV-014 setting against Attachment 12 for 67 SCFM Standard:

Verifies 67 SCFM corresponds to 86% open Comment:

4 I O. Performance Step: Check Calculated Release Rate (R) in uci/sec in block 9 Standard:

DETERMINE Calculated Release Rate, (R) in uCilsec and RECORD on, as follows: (9)

R = E

• C

• 472, where:

R = Calculated Release Rate (uCi/sec)

E = Release rate for RCV 014 position (ftYmin) (30)

C = Concentration of noble gas activity in tank (uCi/cc) (6)

Identifies error in block 9 entry. Should be 30.7, not 307 ucilcc Comment:

Terminating Cue:

Terminate JPM after error in block 9 is identified, or after all calculations complete.

SRO-A4 (Rev. 1 )

4 o f 6

Appendix C 5

Form ES-C-I VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SRO-A-4, Perform Independent Verification of Gaseous Waste Permit Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

SRO-A4 (Rev. 1 )

5 o f 6

Initial Conditions Initial Conditons:

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 33 Large Gas Decay Tank has been pressurized to 87 psig.

The Decay tank has been isolated and sampled by Chemistry A Gaseous Waste Release Permit is being prepared to discharge the decay tank.

The data necessary to support the release permit has been collected and recorded on Attachment 1 "Gaseous Waste Release Permit" of SOP-WDS-13, "Gaseous Waste Releases."

The CCR personal computer is inoperable, and the software cannot be executed.

The PABNC exhaust fans are in service and discharging at 30,000 SCFM.

R-27 Channel 4 is reading 1 e-5 ucikc.

Initiating Cue:

o Using the appropriate section of SOP-WDS-13, "Gaseous Waste Releases", perform independent verification of the calculations performed for Attachment 1, "Gaseous Waste Release Permit" for 33 Large Gas Decay Tank.

SRO-A4 (Rev. I )

i -

NO: 3-SOP-WDS-013 Rev: 22 Page 34 of 53 GASEOUS WASTE RELEASES ATTACHMENT 1, GASEOUS WASTE RELEASE PERMIT FORM (Page 1 of I)

Tank/

Current System (1) 33 L G Q r Date/Time (2) 10 1 a3 b

o boo Permit NO. (3),b

\\ P Date Time Concentration of Volume (4) -$%c ft3 initial Pressure (5) p7 psig Noble Gas (C)(6) 4 ~7 4 ey pCi/cc Grab Sample:(7) Sample # 3b-702 Date 1da.2 / O d Time 0 s 0 OR R-12 Monitor Activity (A)(8) 999 cL pCi NobleGas Iodine 131 Activity (8a) 4 pci/cc VC Purge Only Calculated Release Rate (R)(9) 30

• 7 pCi/sec Available Release Rate (D)( IO) 3 8 0 7 Q + 3 pCi/sec Discharge Monitor (1 1) 17 Actual Alarm Setpoint (12) 3 4

3 pCi/sec Calculated alarm setpoint (13) 4 i4 pCilsec Alert setpoint (14) co

-3 pCilsec R-I 2 Auto Closure/Alarm Setpoints: Calculated (1 5) fA pci/cc Actual ( I 6) 4 pCi/cc IF discharge monitor is OOS, THEN COMPLETE the following:

0 Monitor (17) 4 f A placed out service @

PI /A d i d 0

Vent Sample:(18) Sample #

14 Date d/r4 Time dfh Results (19) J/*

pci/cc 0

Vent flow rate (20) d/n cfm Continuous Release Rate (CR)(21) d f ~

pCi/sec Date Time (Noble Gas)

Release Calculations verified by (22)

Release Path Valve Alignment Verified (23)

CRSlSM Discharge Authorized (24)

Release Start (25)

C RS/SM Date Time Final Pressure (26)

Psig Release Stop (27)

Date Time Calculations Results:

S (28)

&sf Emax (29) 670 5 ft3/min 4'

E(30) 6 3 ft3/min RCV-014 Setting (31)

&?b % open Commenk(32)

SRO-A-4 (Rev. 1) KEY

GASEOUS WASTE RELEASES I No: 3-SOP-WDS-013 Rev: 22 I

ATTACHMENT 1, GASEOUS WASTE RELEASE PERMIT FORM (Page 1 of 1)

Tank/

Current System (I) 3 3 L6DT Date/Time (2) \\ 0 I2 3 / 0 6 0 800 Permit No. (3) 6 I b Date Time Concentration of Volume (4) 5 d ft3 Initial Pressure (5) 7 psig Noble Gas (C)(6) 9 1 7

e pCi/cc Grab Sample:(7) Sample # 3670 2 Date 0 1, '3 foL Time 0s

\\ 0 -

OR R-12 Monitor Activity (A)(8) 449 CjL pCi NobleGas Iodine 131 Activity (8a) 414 pCi/cc VC Purge Only Calculated Release Rate (R)(9) 307 pCi/sec Available Release Rate (D)(10) 3 10-742s $Ci/sec Discharge Monitor (1 1) a - 17 Actual Alarm Setpoint (12) 3 t 0 4 3 pCi/sec Calculated alarm setpoint (13) 4 1 fs pCi/sec Alert setpoint (14) 8 a

4. 5 3 pCilsec R-12 Auto Closure/Alarm Setpoints: Calculated (1 5) 1 pCi/cc Actual (1 6) 4 1 6 pCi/cc IF discharge monitor is OOS, THEN COMPLETE the following:

0 Monitor (1 7) d 14 placed out service @

d /4 r/ 14 Date Time 0

Vent Sample:(18) Sample #

4 / A Date Time Results (19) pci/cc Vent flow rate (20) &A cfm Continuous Release Rate (CR)(21) d/*

pCi/sec (Noble Gas)

Release Calculations verified by (22)

Release Path Valve Alignment Verified (23)

CRS/SM Discharge Authorized (24)

Release Start (25)

CRS/SM Date Time Final Pressure (26)

Psig Release Stop (27)

Date Time Calculations Results:

S (28)

IJ/4 Emax (29) 67 0 h-ft3/min E(30) 67 ft3/m in RCV-014 Setting (31) 86

%open Comments:(32)

SRO-A-4 (Rev. 1) HANDOUT

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility:

Indian Point 3 Task No:

NIA Task

Title:

Event Classification and NYS Part 1 Form K/A

Reference:

2.4.41 (4.1)

Job Performance Measure No:

SRO-A-5 Examinee:

NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator:

Date:

Method of testing:

S i m u I a ted Pe rfo r m a n ce Act ua I Perform an ce X

Classroom Simulator X Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: An event has occurred requiring Emergency classification. The MEANS application is not available.

Task Standard: Classification is correctly made for the event completed Required Materials:

IP-EP-120, Emergency Classification IP-EP-130, Emergency Notifications and Mobilization Event Classification Guide (Wall Chart)

Blank Form EP-1, NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form General

References:

Event Classification Guide IP-EP-AD13, IPEC Emergency Action Level Technical Bases Initiating Cue: Classify the event just completed and provide a completed NYS Radiological Emergency Data Part 1 Form for the CCR Offsite Communicator Time Critical Task: Yes - 15 minutes from start of JPM to EAL declaration. Time for completion of Part 1 form is not part of 15 minute clock.

Validation Time: 15 minutes SRO-A-5 (Rev. 1 )

1 Of5

Appendix C 2

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark) d 1. Performance Step: Classify the event in accordance with the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.

Standard:

Correctly classifies event by selecting the correct EAL within 15 minutes of initiating cue.

For Scenario 1 - EAL 4.2.1, Site Area Emergency Note: EAL 9.1.6 SAE or EAL 3.2.2 SAE, or 4.1.3 SAE are also acceptable For Scenario 2 - EAL 6.1.4, Site Area Emergency Note: EAL 9.1.6 SAE also acceptable For Scenario 3 - EAL 1.1.1, Alert Note: EAL 3.1.2 Alert also acceptable since both events occurred at essentially the same time. EAL 9.1.4 also acceptable.

For Scenario 4 - EAL 1.3.1, Site Area Emergency NOTE: EAL 9.16 also acceptable.

Corn men t:

SRO-A-5 (Rev. I )

2 of 5

Appendix C 3

Form ES-C-1 Performance Information (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

.( 2. Performance Step:

Complete NYS Radiological Emergency Data Part 1 Form Standard:

See attached keys for each event.

The lines with an asterisk are critical:

1. Enters notification # I on top right blank (not critical)

2. Leaves line 1 date and time blank (completed by communicator, later)

3. Selects this is an exercise on line 2

4.

• Facility affected is unit 3 on line 3

5.

• Circles classification on line 4 per key

6.

• Enters and time of declaration on line 5

7.

• Selects appropriate release lsee attached key) on line 6

8.

• Circles A for no need for PARS on line 7

9.

• Enters EAL number and brief event description on line 8 per the IO. Enters Dlant status on line 9 (not critical)

11. Enters date and time of Dlant shutdown on line 10

12.

• Obtains and enters MET data (speed, direction and Stabi1ity)from met data display on rear of flight panel on lines 11, 12, and 13

13. Signs Emergency Director review and approval blank at bottom of page kev CUE: If necessary, ensure candidate selects Exercise - NOT REAL EVENT If necessary, provide cue for dates and times If necessary, cue candidate that unit 2 is operating at 100% power If necessary, cue candidate to obtain MET data from the simulator MET display Comment:

Terminating Cue:

Event classified and a completed Part 1 form is ready for the CCR Offsite Communicator SRO-A-5 (Rev. 1 )

Appendix C 4

Form ES-C-1 VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SRO-A-5, Event Classification and NYS Part I Form Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

, Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

SRO-A-5 (Rev. 1) 4 of 5

Initial Conditions Initial Conditions:

o An event has occurred requiring Emergency classification.

o The MEANS computer application is not available.

Initiating Cue:

o Classify the event just completed and provide a completed NYS Radiological Emergency Data Part 1 Form for the CCR Offsite Communicator o If the EAL escalated during the scenario, classify the highest (most severe) EAL encountered.

o If multiple EAL entry criteria for the same classification occurred during the scenario, classify the event that occurred first.

o Complete the NYS Radiological Emergency Data Part 1 Form after classifying the event.

SRO-A-5 (Rev. 1 )

I New York State Radiological Emergency Data Form Part I - General Information Instructions Notification # __

~-

Indian Point Energy Center

1.

This message being transmitted on:

at:

n-AM

- - VIA: A. RECS

6.

Released A. NoRelease Radioactive Materials due to the Classified Event:

0 To Atmosphere ToWater To Atmosphere 0 To Water B. Release BELOW federally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications)

C.

e1,ease ABOV derally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications)

D. Unmonitored Release - requiring evaluation O E F I

I

7.

Protective Action Recommendations:

A. No need for Protective Actions outside the site boundary.

EVACUATE and implement the-Kl plan for the following ERPAs and SHELTER all remaifling ERPAs.

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 e,

1 Message Received by:

I Message Ended at:

I Q" ffectivell/WO3 Emergency Director Review and Approval: Sk4-(a 6y @ - 9 t t 1 m -

Part I Page 1 of 1 Form EP-1, Rev 2

New York State Radiological Emergency Data Form Notification # 1 Indian Point Energy Center Part I - General Information Instructions Message Received by:

e f

Message Ended at:

1.

This message being transmitted on:

at:

0--AM

- - VIA: A. RECS 0 PM B. Other (Dale)

(Time)

/ F-. x

3.

The Facility Affe

4.

The Emergency B. Alert D. General Emergency I

CdG cu rr-W

5.

This Emergency Classification Declared on: 3&-=i%

at: c r z (Date)

(Time)

6.

Releaseof

@No Release Radioactive Materials due to the Classified Event:

0 ToAtmosphere 0 ToWater 0 ToAtmosphere 0 ToWater B. Release BELOW federally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications)

C. Release ABOVE federally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications)

D. Unmonitored Release - requiring evaluation I

7.

Protective Action Recommendations:

A No need for Protective Actions outside the site boundary.

EVACUATE and implement the-Kl plan for the following ERPAs and SHELTER all remahing ERPAs.

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 6

8.

EAL Number:

q.\\.+ cl\\so w+--L Brief Description,,,,A Event

-chL$ &d&&4.

Ih4C.c' (\\Ow VLO

9.

The Plant status is:

A. Stable m e g r a d i n g E. Cold Stptdo B. Improving D. Hot Shutdown GcdLj&~

5 1 me,ecsG-,

10.

Reactor Shutdown:

A. Not Applicable B.

at:

OPM (Date)

(rime)

11.

Wind Speed: 3 - \\

'Meters/Second at elevation 10 ' meters.

\\

n cct

12.

Wind Direction: (From) ?..a Degrees at elevation 10 meters. 2 b(byh

13.

Stability Class:

A B

D E F G

\\'>-\\.

4

New York State Radiological Emergency Data Form Notification # 1

_-c Indian Point Energy Center Part I - General Information Instructions Pg Message Received by:

I, Message Ended at:

1.

This message being transmitted on:

at:

0-AM

- - VIA A. RECS 0 PM

6. Other (Date)

Crime)

/

2.

This is...

3.

The Facility Affected is:

D. General Emergency

5.

This Emergency Classification Declared on:

722 0 PM t l g c a c a B. Release BELOW federally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications)

C. Release ABOVE federally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications)

D. Unmonitored Release - requiring evaluation (Date)

6.

Release of

@No Release Radioactive Materials due to the Classified Event:

0 To Atmosphere 0 ToWater c] To Atmosphere a ToWater I

7.

Protective Action Recommendations:

No need for Protective Actions outside the site boundary.

EVACUATE and implement the-KI plan for the following ERPAs and SHELTER all remahing ERPAs.

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51

9.

The Plant status is:

0 Stable C. Degrading E. Cold Shutdpwn

6. Improving D. Hotshutdown d >

J Lc Aeccuw

11.

Wind Speed: 2 - \\

MeterdSecond at elevation 10 meters.

12.

Wind Direction: (From) 20° Degrees at elevation 10 meters.

13.

Stability Class: A B @ D E F G Part I Page 1 of 1 Form EP-1, Rev 2

New York State Radiological Emergency Data Form Part I - General Information Instructions Notification # 1 Indian Point Energy Center

-~

Message Received by:

Message Ended at:

1.

This message being transmitted on:

at:

U--AM

- - VIA A. RECS 0 PM

8. Other (Date)

Wme)

3.

The Facility Affected is:

A. Unit 2

8. Unit 3 C. Both

4.

The Emergency A. Unusual Event a-nca Emergency F. Recovery Terminated G. Other B. Alert D. General Emergency a

0 AM 9 2 7 0 PM f w c Y q G c

bb-e-,

5.

This Emergency Classification Declared on:

b%

at:

s t

2 (Date)

Crime)

6.

Releaseof

@No Release Radioactive Materials due to the Classified Event:

ToAtmosphere 0 ToWater 0 ToAtmosphere a ToWater B. Release BELOW federally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications)

C. Release ABOVE federally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications)

D. Unmonitored Release - requiring evaluation I

7.

Protective Action Recommendations:

'@ No need for Protective Actions outside the site boundary.

B. EVACUATE and implement the-Kl plan for the following ERPAs and SHELTER all remahing ERPAs.

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 I

E. C Id Shutdown Hot Shutdown ac -b( !.a cKv)

. 0 ' 5

• me$%

B.

at:

DAM r&t$

C. Degrading Q

9.

The Plant status is:

A. Stable

10.

Reactor Shutdown:

A. Not Applicable

11.

Wind Speed:

3 MetersKecond at elevation 10 meters.

12.

Wind Direction: (From) 7 0.6 Degrees at elevation 10 meters.

13.

Stability Class:

A B a D E F G B. Improving OPM (Dam)

(rim

-*.. fie c /.

U X S L C -.-.

14.

ReportBy at Telephone Number (914) --

(Communicator's Name)

Emergency Director Review and Approval:

Part I Page 1 of 1 Form EP-1, Rev 2