|
---|
Category:Legal-Motion
MONTHYEARML18330A2932018-11-26026 November 2018 Notices of Appearance of Jay E. Silberg, Timothy J. V. Walsh, Anne R. Leidich, and Erin E. Connolly ML0922402872009-08-11011 August 2009 New Jersey Environmental Federation V. USNRC, No. 09-2567 - Motion by Petitioners for Extension of Time to File Brief and Appendix and Compel Respondent'S to Provide a Complete Record on Review and for Other Appropriate Relief ML0906303452009-03-0202 March 2009 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Petition to Require Supplementation of the Safety Evaluation Report ML0905706962009-02-23023 February 2009 Exelon'S Answer to Citizens' Motion for Leave to File a Reply ML0905606502009-02-19019 February 2009 Motion for Leave to File a Reply to the NRC Staff'S Opposition to Citizens' Motion to Reopen ML0902805342009-01-28028 January 2009 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response to Recent Letters and Notification to the Commission ML0904005382009-01-26026 January 2009 2009/01/26-License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML0904005392009-01-23023 January 2009 Commission Notification Regarding Findings of NRC Staff During an Inspection Carried Out in October & November 2008 ML0832500282008-11-19019 November 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Answer in Opposition to Citizens' November 10, 2008 Motion for Clarification ML0832404282008-11-10010 November 2008 Citizens' Motion for Clarification of Certain Findings of Fact and Other Appropriate Relief ML0830104842008-10-27027 October 2008 Oyster Creek, NRC Staff'S Motion for Leave to Reply to Citizens' October 14, 2008 Letter and Comments to the Chairman ML0826904432008-09-16016 September 2008 Citizens' Emergency Motion to Amend Reply Pleading and for Other Appropriate Relief ML0817006732008-06-18018 June 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Reply in Response to Citizens' Response to Commission Order Dated May 28, 2008 ML0816900642008-06-16016 June 2008 Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff'S Response to Joint Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff Opposition to Supplemental Petition for Additional Investigation and Correction of Deficiencies in Licence Renewal.. ML0816900782008-06-16016 June 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Answer to Citizens' Motion to Strike NRC Staff Response to the May 21 Board Order ML0815706182008-06-0505 June 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Answer to Citizens' Motion to Supplement the Basis of Their Contention ML0816500692008-06-0505 June 2008 Citizens' Motion to Strike and for Other Appropriate Relief Preliminary Statement ML0817105252008-06-0404 June 2008 2008/06/04-Motion by Collective Petitioners for Leave to Reply to Nrc'S Oppositions to Supplemental Petition for Additional Investigation & Correction of Deficiencies License Renewal Reviews for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, & Vermon ML0818304022008-06-0404 June 2008 Motion by New England Coalition, Inc. Et Al. for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Oppositions to Supplemental Petition for Additional Investigation and Correction of Deficiencies Licensing Renewal Reviews for Vermont Yankee Et Al ML0814902152008-05-27027 May 2008 2008/05/27-Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff'S Answer to Supplemental Petition for Additional Investigation and Correction of Deficiencies in License Renewal Reviews ML0814901822008-05-27027 May 2008 NRC Staff'S Explanatory Pleading and Affidavit ML0813604722008-05-15015 May 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Motion for Leave to File Reply to NRC Staff'S Opposition to Citizens' Motion to Reopen ML0813602822008-05-14014 May 2008 Oyster Creek - Notice of Withdrawal of Kimberly Sexton ML0818407082008-05-0606 May 2008 Motion for Leave to File a Reply to the NRC Staff'S Opposition to Citizens' Motion to Reopen ML0812000412008-04-28028 April 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Motion to Reopen the Record and for Leave to File and Add a New Contention ML0811600902008-04-21021 April 2008 Amergen 'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Motion to Stay Proceeding ML0811300532008-04-21021 April 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Motion to Stay ML0811508002008-04-18018 April 2008 Motion by Nuclear Information and Research Service, Et Al., to Reopen the Record and for Leave to File a New Contention, and Petition to Add a New Contention ML0810902382008-04-11011 April 2008 2008/04/11-Motion by Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Et Al., to Stay License Renewal Proceedings for Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant Pending Resolution of the Significant New Issue Notified by Staff ML0806701082008-03-0404 March 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Motion for Clarification ML0807202722008-02-27027 February 2008 Citizens' Motion for Clarification ML0808104582008-02-0808 February 2008 Nj Department of Environmental Protection V. USNRC, No. 07-2271 - Consent Motion by Petitioner for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ML0803506812008-02-0404 February 2008 NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Motion for Leave to Reply ML0803805812008-02-0404 February 2008 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Motion for Leave to Reply ML0808104592008-01-30030 January 2008 Nj Department of Environmental Protection V. USNRC, No. 07-2271 - Consented Motion by Respondent, NRC for Leave to File a Supplemental Appendix ML0808104612008-01-29029 January 2008 Nj Department of Environmental Protection, Petitioner V. USNRC, Respondents, No. 07-2271 - Motion of the Nuclear Energy Institute on Consent for Leave to File a Brief Amicus Curiae Support of the Respondents and Affirmance ML0803104042008-01-25025 January 2008 2008/01/25-Motion by Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Et Al., for Leave to Reply to Oppositions to Petition to Suspend License Renewal Reviews for Oyster Creek...Pending Investigation of NRC Review...With Accompanying Reply ML0804303232008-01-17017 January 2008 Nj Department of Environmental Protection V. USNRC, No. 07-2271; Federal Respondents' Consented Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Appendix ML0800906122008-01-0707 January 2008 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Emergency Motion for Additional Pages to Appeal the Board'S Final Decision ML0801403582008-01-0404 January 2008 Citizens' Emergency Motion for Additional Pages to Appeal the Board'S Final Decision ML0735114452007-12-17017 December 2007 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Answer to Citizens' Motion for an Extension of Time to File Any Appeal ML0735506802007-12-17017 December 2007 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Motion for Extension of Time to File Any Appeal ML0735308922007-12-10010 December 2007 Citizens' Motion for an Extension of Time to File Any Appeal ML0731805082007-11-0909 November 2007 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' November 1, 2007 Motion to Strike ML0731201162007-11-0505 November 2007 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' October 26, 2007 Motion to Strike ML0731000292007-11-0505 November 2007 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Answer to Citizens' Motion to Strike Erroneous Testimony ML0731104272007-11-0101 November 2007 Citizens' Answer to Amergen Motion to Strike ML0730405612007-10-31031 October 2007 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Answer to Amergen'S Motion to Strike Portions of Citizens' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Notice of Withdrawal of Mitzi A. Young and Notice of Appearance of Kimberly A. Sexton ML0731000972007-10-26026 October 2007 Motion to Strike Erroneous Testimony ML0730504632007-10-22022 October 2007 Citizens' Motion for Transcript Corrections 2018-11-26
[Table view] |
Text
DOCKETED USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION January 19, 2007 (4:04pm)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF In the Matter of: ) January 19, 2007 AmerGen Energy Company, Inc.'
Docket No. 50-219-LR (License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station)
)
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION'S NOTICE OF PERTINENT NEW CASE LAW AFFECTING APPEAL AND REQUEST FOR ITS CONSIDERATION Honorable Commissioners:
On January 12, 2007, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for a writ of certiorari in the case of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 449 F.3d 1016 (2006), thereby refusing to entertain an appeal from that decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit ruled that the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ("NEPA"),
42 U.S.C. 4321-4337, requires that the question of the vulnerability of a proposed nuclear storage facility to terrorist attack must be included within the NEPA environmental impacts analysis required for licensure of such facility. The decision states that "it is unreasonable for the NRC to categorically IeP(escy 3 Cb V- ~-
dismiss the possibility of terrorist attack" and rejects prior decisions of the Commission on this point. Mothers for Peace is the only decision of a Circuit Court of Appeals on the issue since the tragic events of September 11, 2001.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
("NJDEP") raised essentially the same contention to support its attempt to become an intervenor in the Oyster Creek relicensure proceeding. The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) rejected this contention as speculative. In September 2006, the Commission postponed its decision regarding NJDEP's appeal based on this contention because of the Ninth Circuit decision in Mothers for Peace and the later petition by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for certiorari in that case.
Since the Supreme Court has denied the petition for certiorari in Mothers for Peace, supra, letting the Ninth Circuit's decision stand, NJDEP requests that the Commission acknowledge that decision to be controlling precedent on NJDEP's NEPA contention and correspondingly reverse the Board's decision and grant NJDEP's petition for intervention in this proceeding.
Respectfully submitted, STUART RABNER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY By:
Valerie Anne Gr"Ky/
Deputy Attorney Gen*jrl cc: Service List Certificate of Service Attached
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of:
January 19, 2007 AmerGen Energy Company, LLC (License Renewal for Oyster Creek Docket No. 50-219-LR Nuclear Generating Station) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION'S NOTICE OF PERTINENT NEW CASE LAW AFFECTING APPEAL AND REQUEST FOR ITS CONSIDERATION were served this day upon the persons listed below, by E-mail and first class mail, unless otherwise noted.
Secretary of the Commission*
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Att: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 (E-mail: HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov)
Administative Judge Paul B. Abramson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (E-mail: pba@nrc.gov)
Administrative Judge E. Roy Hawkens, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (E-mail: erh@nrc.gov)
Administrative Judge Anthony J. Baratta Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (E-mail: aib5@nrc.gov)
Suzanne Leta NJPIRG 11 N. Willow Street Trenton, NJ 08608 (E-mail:sleta@njpirg.org)
Mitzi A. Young Steven C. Hamrick Office of the General Counsel, 0-15D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 (E-mail:may@nrc.gov)
(E-mail:schl@nrc.qov)
Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication**
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Richard Webster Rutgers Environmental Law Clinic 123 Washington Street Newark, NJ 07102-5695 (E-mail:rwebster@kinoy.rutgers.edu)
Paul Gunter Nuclear Information and Resource Service 1424 1 6 th Street, NW Suite 404 Washington, DC 20036 (E-mail:pgunter@nirs.org)
Debra A. Wolf Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (E-mail:dawl@nrc.gov)
/,/ Maureen Popp
// /ý/d I