ML063250368

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
11-2006-Public-Forms
ML063250368
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 04/18/2006
From: Gody A
Operations Branch IV
To: Kelly Clayton
Operations Branch IV
References
50-361/06-301, 50-362/06-301 50-361/06-301, 50-362/06-301
Download: ML063250368 (17)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Outiine Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

=acility: SONGS Units 2 & 3 Date of Examination: I nitial:

Item Task Description 1.

W R

I T

T E appropriate.

N 2.

S I

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected U number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromisingexam integrity; and ensure that each applicant L can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no A scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and scenarios will not be T repeated on subsequent days.

0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and R wantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I

T (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form, (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s) nate path, low-power, emergency and RCA tasks meet the (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified aodicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:
  1. IndependentNRC reviewer initial items in Column c, chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

\

I 4

0 ru P

3 co

h)

TI -0 zz 8

';c

-i rn rn U E

$ z.a z

rn B

a rn 0)

N a,

s N

4

3 0

-I rn ll v,

0 2

2; c

7J rn h

h) v

?

r; rn

//I/// z n s 0 rn llllll

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: SONGS Date of Examination: 10/23/06 Operating Test Number: I Initials 4 . GENERAL CRITERIA a

1 a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent 1 with sampling requirements (e.g. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. a The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section 1 c' D.1.a). i3 d Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. 3
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
  • initial conditions
  • initiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
  • operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

4

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1and 2)have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

4

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4and a copy is attached. ;z Date Author /

Facility Reviewer (*)

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

NRC Supervisor NOTE:

  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021. Revision 9

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-4 1 Facility: SONGS Date of Exam: 1012312006 Scenario Numbers: 112314 Operatin Test No.: NRC

'~ QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a I b* 1 c#

I' II The initial condrtions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events I2 The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of 0 the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated 0 the malfunction(s)that are entered to initiate the event 0 the symptoms1cues that will be visible to the crew 0 the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

IO. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

/I r

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes Actual Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) (Scenario) 2 3 4 Total malfunctions(5-8) 6 6 Malfunctions after EOP entw (1-2) 2 1 1 1 2 I 3. Abnormal events (2-4) I 2 1 3 1 2 1 3 I 4.

5.

Major transients (1-2)

EOPs enteredhequiringsubstantive actions (1-2) 1 2

2 1

1 2

1 1.

1

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 0 1
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 4 3 3 NUREG-1021. Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: SONGS 2 and 3 Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Operating Test No.: NRC E

A Scenarios V

P E P 1 2 3 4 5 T N

L O MINIMUM T

I Crew Crew Crew Crew Crew T C Position Position Position Position Position A T

A L Y S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B N P R T O R T O R T O R T O R T O R I U T E O C P O C P O C P O C P O C P RX 0 1 1 0 NOR - 4 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,4, 1,2,3 7 4 4 2 SROU-1 5

MAJOR 6 5,7 3 2 2 1 TS 2,3 1,3 4 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 NOR - 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,4, 2,3,4 7 4 4 2 SROU-2 5

MAJOR 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS 2,3 2,4 4 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 NOR - 4 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,4, 1,2,3 7 4 4 2 SROU-3 5

MAJOR 6 5,7 3 2 2 1 TS 2,3 1,3 4 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 1,2,3 2,3,4 6 4 4 2 SROU-4 MAJOR 5,7 5 3 2 2 1 TS 1,3 2,4 4 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR - 4 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,4, 1,2,6 2,4 9 4 4 2 SROI-1 5

MAJOR 6 5,7 5 4 2 2 1 TS 2,3 - - 2 0 2 2 RX - 0 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,4 1,2,3 3,6 8 4 4 2 SROI-2 MAJOR 6 5,7 5 4 2 2 1 TS - 1,3 - 2 0 2 2 NUREG 1021 Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: SONGS 2 and 3 Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Operating Test No.: NRC E

A Scenarios V

P E P 1 2 3 4 5 T N

L O MINIMUM T

I Crew Crew Crew Crew Crew T C Position Position Position Position Position A T

A L Y S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B N P R T O R T O R T O R T O R T O R I U T E O C P O C P O C P O C P O C P RX 4 1 1 1 0 NOR - 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 5,7,8 2,3 2,3,4 8 4 4 2 SROI-3 MAJOR 6 5,7 5 4 2 2 1 TS - - 2,4 2 0 2 2 RX - 0 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,4 1,2,6 6 4 4 2 RO-1 MAJOR 6 5,7 3 2 2 1 TS - - 0 0 2 2 RX - 0 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,4 3,6 5 4 4 2 RO-2 MAJOR 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS - - 0 0 2 2 RX - 0 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,4 1,2,6 6 4 4 2 RO-3 MAJOR 6 5,7 3 2 2 1 TS - - 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 1 1 1 I/C 1,2,6 2,4 5 4 4 2 RO-4 MAJOR 5,7 5 3 2 2 1 TS - - 0 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 NOR - 0 1 1 1 I/C 5,7,8 2,3 5 4 4 2 RO-5 MAJOR 6 5,7 3 2 2 1 TS - - 0 0 2 2 NUREG 1021 Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: SONGS 2 and 3 Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Operating Test No.: NRC E

A Scenarios V

P E P 1 2 3 4 5 T N

L O MINIMUM T

I Crew Crew Crew Crew Crew T C Position Position Position Position Position A T

A L Y S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B N P R T O R T O R T O R T O R T O R I U T E O C P O C P O C P O C P O C P RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR - 0 1 1 1 I/C 5,7,8 2,4 5 4 4 2 RO-6 MAJOR 6 5 2 2 2 1 TS - - 0 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 NOR - 0 1 1 1 I/C 5,7,8 2,3 5 4 4 2 RO-7 MAJOR 6 5,7 3 2 2 1 TS - - 0 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3 3,6 4 4 4 2 RO-8 MAJOR 5,7 5 3 2 2 1 TS - - 0 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must service in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

NUREG 1021 Revision 9

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: SONGS Date of Examination: 10/23/2006 Operating Test No. NRC 1-4 SRO RO (ATC) BOP competencies IL SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 2 3 4 3 4 InterpreUDiag- 2,3, 12, 12, 23, nose Events 4,5, 3,5, 3,5, 4,5, 7 6 6 and Conditions Comply With 2,3, and Use ALL ALL ALL ALL 4&

7 Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards NIA NIA NIA NIA (2) --

Communicate and ALL ALL ALL ALL Interact Demonstrate Supervisory ALL ALL NIA NIA Ability (3) ___ ___

Comply With and Use Tech. 1,3 2,4 NIA N/A Specs. (3) - -

~

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Insfrucfions:

Circle the applicanfs license type and enter one or more evenf numbers fhat will allow fhe examiners to evaluate every applicable compefency for every applicant.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6

'acility: San Onofre 2 and 3 Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Exam ROlSRO Level:

I Initial I

Item Description a

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility. 'J-as
2. a. NRC WAS referenced for all questions.
b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available.

sG.6

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordancewith Section D.2.d of ES-401 $4
4. The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than 4 RO and 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL w Program Office)
5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or the examinations were developed independently,or XX the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or

8. Referenceslhandoutsprovided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

IO. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet.

Printed Name l Signaturp , Date Author 10/5/2006 Facility Reviewer (*)

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

NRC Regional Supervisor I

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developedexaminations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: R O B SROCZ]

I Initials I

Printed Name/Signature Date

d. NRC Supervisor (*) t

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: R O O S R O B I

I Initials Item Description

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 YO overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NameISignature Date
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*) 1\ / / m A .

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two indeDendent NRC reviews are reauired.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

xs s A A A 2 2 eN 0

0 x

0 0

Is 0

0 m m m

-403 -4cn -4cn

$2 $2 $2 9 ?Fg ?Fg xo_

Is;;;

0.

$3 w.

3%

N Z w.

%g 0

Kg 0

%g0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w w N

0 N

0 m

N N

0 2

N 0

m N

N 0

N 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m W 0 0 0 w 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 mn cnn cnn 011 cnn cnn no no go go go go Z& Z& C m C m CCU n P P c P m P P W W W W W W n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n x x F

r E

i P P P O P

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML063250368&oldid=2581285"